Rugby jersies in Parliament

June 7th, 2011 at 3:30 pm by David Farrar

Stuff reports:

Labour MP has been kicked out of for wearing a Highlanders Super Rugby jersey.

Curran appeared at Parliamentary questions this afternoon wearing the team’s old blue, gold and maroon kit in protest at the new lime green colour.

Speaker declared the jersey violated Parliament’s strict dress codes and ordered Curran to leave.

Labour colleague Trevor Mallard protested the decision.

I would have thought a rugby jersey was a pretty obvious “no” in terms of meeting the House dress code.

Personally I think the dress code should be relaxed so men do not have to have a tie and jacket, but even I would hestitate to suggest that rugby jersies should be acceptable in the House.

Her ejection from Parliament highlighted the lack of rules around what women should wear in the House, she said.

“I certainly never expected to be thrown out of the House for being a woman wearing a football shirt. I think it was an over reaction.”

She said she was surprised and would consider whether she would change and return to Parliament this afternoon.

Green Party co-leader left the House with Curran.

Turei later tweeted saying it was an example of in Parliament continuing. “Has Ross Robertson ever been scolded for his sports team scarves let alone kicked out? No”

I hate it when people cry sexism mindlessly.  And this is mindless.

I have absolutely no doubt that a male MP would be kicked out by Lockwood for wearing a rugby jersey in the House.

If anything, the rules are sexist against men. The dress code for men is far more proscriptive than for women MPs.

Tags: , , , ,

81 Responses to “Rugby jersies in Parliament”

  1. Elaycee (4,410 comments) says:

    Probably the only time that Curran will ever be seen wearing the “right” [political] colours!

    But isn’t there a tinge of hypocrisy somewhere – didn’t Jackie Blue wear an All Whites shirt (with pearls) in the House during the Football World Cup?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. SHG (319 comments) says:

    I think the problem is that the dress code calls for females to wear “business attire”. As anyone who has watched the Highlanders lately will attest, they’re more of a charity than a business.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Roflcopter (465 comments) says:

    If Clare had sought permission to wear it first, from the Speaker, then she may have been allowed to. She did not do this.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Trevor Mallard (248 comments) says:

    Elaycee yes. My view is that constituents can tell MPs they don’t like their attire every three years. Doesn’t need the speaker to rule.

    [DPF: So get a majority of MPs to vote to change the rules]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Nick C (336 comments) says:

    “I hate it when people cry sexism mindlessly. And this is mindless.

    I have absolutely no doubt that a male MP would be kicked out by Lockwood for wearing a rugby jersey in the House.

    If anything, the rules are sexist against men. The dress code for men is far more proscriptive than for women MPs.”

    +1

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Nicola Wood (8 comments) says:

    National MP Jackie Blue wore an All Whites jersey in the House last year and there was no trouble: http://nzmad.blogspot.com/2010/06/special-mention.html

    [DPF: Possibly the Speaker did not notice it under the pearls. Good photo of it by the way]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. Jade (146 comments) says:

    Yep, Clare simply forgot the number 1 rule to any good outfit: accessorise. The old Highlanders shirt is a tad difficult. Pearls just wouldn’t work. Sapphires perhaps? The new green shirt would be easy as could go for pounamu.

    There’s also an issue of the material the shirt is made from. Traditionally the football (as in soccer) shirts have a lovely sheen, lighter weight and a little more flattering by showing the curve of the body. Sadly, most rugby shirts don’t have the same qualities so aren’t quite dressy enough for an occasion such as Question Time.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Elaycee (4,410 comments) says:

    Trevor Mallard (225) Says: June 7th, 2011 at 3:41 pm: “Trevor Mallard (225) Says: “Elaycee yes. My view is that constituents can tell MPs they don’t like their attire every three years. Doesn’t need the speaker to rule”.

    So,Trevor, you are advocating that it would be OK for someone to turn up to the house with a Tee Shirt that screamed something highly inappropriate on the front of it? Because if the constituents didn’t like it they would vote them out in three years time? Nah.

    And how would that work with list MPs? You know, the MPs who get dumped by their electorate but still make it back into the House because the Party committee picks them on their List?

    Nah – it wouldn’t work either.

    In fact, you’re not doing too good in the ideas department at the moment – are you?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Manolo (14,066 comments) says:

    This poor socialist woman is an imbecile and deserves to be treated like one.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Elaycee (4,410 comments) says:

    @ Nicola Wood – thanks for that.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. mikenmild (11,742 comments) says:

    Poor Clare Curran. Perhaps it was okay to wear an All Whites shirt because they had a bit of success.
    I understand the Highlanders changed the jersey to move away from a strip that had seen no success. Look forward to many more jersey changes from them in the future.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. david (2,563 comments) says:

    oh dear, do the left all have their “good taste” centres lobotomised at birth or something? chalk and cheese I’m afraid.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. The only red for me is that of Manchester United (62 comments) says:

    There was never enough maroon in the Highlanders jersey anyway. It was always an Otago jersey with a passing acknowledgment to Southland. The jersey will be green for a season or half a season and then go back to the blue.

    No, men should always wear a tie in parliament. It looks professional. If New Zealand becomes anymore casual and relaxed we may as well roll over and lie in the sun all day. I’ve never seen John Key in a red tie. Anyone else notice that?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. Ender (105 comments) says:

    Metiria Turei is fucked in the head

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. 103PapPap (131 comments) says:

    What was the point Clare was trying to make?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. Michaels (1,318 comments) says:

    She was not kicked out.
    She was asked to leave the chamber, change and return.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. Murray (8,847 comments) says:

    I think the Highlanders should wear pearls and high heels.

    If they’re going to play like princesses…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. Auberon (873 comments) says:

    What, were all Clare’s pirate shirts in the wash?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. Murray (8,847 comments) says:

    Chris Carter had them.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. toad (3,674 comments) says:

    I have to say I rather like the new Highlanders jersey colour (although it is not quite the Green green – should be C:95 M:0 Y:100 K:27).

    At least it symbolises a move from blue to Green. Let’s hope that trend occurs politically too.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. dime (10,113 comments) says:

    toad – do you agree with your leader walking out?

    im over these childish politicians.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  22. pseudonymous (74 comments) says:

    Yeah Trev, you got up on a point of order and Lockie cleaned your clock again.
    I give you credit though for fessing up to not knowing what speakers ruling he was using.
    You know, the one that came after Ruth Richardson.
    “Shadow leader of the House”- more swat needed, less grandstanding.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  23. SHG (319 comments) says:

    All jokes aside, I don’t understand Clare Curran’s gesture. It’s just a Super Rugby jersey. It doesn’t represent a club, a community, history, anything. Super Rugby is a totally-commercial 100%-manufactured marketing product and the Highlanders have only existed since 1996.

    A Super Rugby jersey is just another piece of corporate branding. Jesus, the jerseys for EVERY TEAM change EVERY YEAR so suckers^H^H^H fans will go out and buy the new ones.

    Fucked if I know what point she was trying to make.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  24. Murray (8,847 comments) says:

    Well elts make every team wear green taod! Once again its about a myopic agenda and has no place in the real world for you people.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  25. jaba (2,146 comments) says:

    it was a silly thing to do .. I know Mallard/Pistol Pete and a few others have turned the place into a kindy BUT I wouldn’t lose too much sleep over the jersey thing .. except when Dipshit Turei joined in .. what a total moron. The Greens want 10% at this years election and she will be their No1 MP .. fk me.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  26. lofty (1,317 comments) says:

    @jaba 5.20 ..fk me..

    Sorry pal not while there are puss infected dead dogs on the side of the street.

    Thanks for the offer though ;-)

    Thats presuming you are a male…. if Female my number is 0410E

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  27. toad (3,674 comments) says:

    FFS – the depth of the vitriol! I thought this was a fun thread, and responded at 5:01pm accordingly.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  28. KevinH (1,236 comments) says:

    Actually Trev had a point, Clare looked quite fetching in a Highlanders jersey, and perhaps it is time to relax parliamentary dress code to better reflect our Kiwi heritage.
    For instance , jandals and black shorts for the men, and t shirts for the ladies would be better in summer and for debates.
    Also strict gender rules could be relaxed, if a member felt like wearing clothing of traditionally the opposite sex, then they would be free to do so. This could get interesting.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  29. Mark (1,491 comments) says:

    The rules are clear. She should be well aware of them by now and being asked to change was not surprising. This was nothing more than a publicity stunt by the Mp and should be treated as such

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  30. TripeWryter (716 comments) says:

    I’m with Lockwood.

    I’m also with Curran re the new Highlanders jersey.

    Just not in Parliament, thanks, Clare.

    You know better.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  31. toad (3,674 comments) says:

    @Mark 5:36 pm

    The rules are clear. She should be well aware of them by now…

    Fuck, I hate this authoritarian bullshit. The whole point is that we should challenge rules that are unfair (in this case, sexist), rather than obediently and subserviently comply.

    As Metiria tweeted:

    Has Ross Robertson ever been scolded for his sports team scarves let alone kicked out?

    Recall Shane Ardern and his tractor on the steps of Parliament. Legitimate protest, even though he was completely wrong on his substantive issue of the contribution of agricultural emissions to climate change.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  32. Rodders (1,755 comments) says:

    Quite a difference between wearing a football scarf and a football jersey, surely.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  33. toad (3,674 comments) says:

    Good post at Frogblog by Sue Kedgley on this:

    So what I have deduced from the Speaker’s ruling is it is okay for women MPs to wear anything as long as we look like men. And, presumably, behave like them as well. This ruling is indicative of the fact that Parliament is still the male citadel that it was when I entered it 12 years ago – based on male rules, male culture and male values.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  34. Rodders (1,755 comments) says:

    So Sue Kedgley admits that her dozen years in parliament have been a complete waste of time?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  35. projectman (228 comments) says:

    Does anyone take seriously anything that Sue Kedgley says?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  36. Viking2 (11,569 comments) says:

    From Twitter. Ha

    crumblecromwell profile

    crumblecromwell RT @edmuzik: @clarecurranmp banned for wearing a Highlanders jersey, even though @JohnKeyPM has been dressed as a wolf in sheep’s clothing for 3 years

    crumblecromwell profile

    crumblecromwell RT @edmuzik: @clarecurranmp banned for wearing a Highlanders jersey, even though @JohnKeyPM has been dressed as a wolf in sheep’s clothing for 3 years

    bustedblonde @clarecurranmp shud have taken her shirt off in house Woman lacks fortitude of a true feminist or doesn’t have a decent set of norks.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  37. jaba (2,146 comments) says:

    yes lofty, I am a bloke and a mighty fine looking one at that

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  38. Viking2 (11,569 comments) says:

    Copyright law ‘will not change’
    Last updated 17:28 07/06/2011

    The Government will not revisit a controversial law that allows internet providers to disconnect users for alleged copyright infringements, despite a UN report that said internet access was a human right.

    In a recent report on internet freedoms, UN special rapporteur Frank La Rue said he was “alarmed by proposals to disconnect users from internet access if they violate intellectual property rights”.

    So the Govt. does everything else the UN wants but chooses to ignore this.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  39. IHStewart (388 comments) says:

    It was a stunt and good on Clare for doing it. SHG whilst I love my exile in Auckland I have always backed the Highlanders and Otago despite the less than awe inspiring results they have achieved over recent seasons. Clare’s stunt should bring it home to the Highlanders board what a bunch of bloody halfwits they are, you never piss off your customers in business and you are right this is business. With regard to Lockwood… all credit to him… ( cringe ) and hopefully…. rugby will be a winner at the end of the day ( X2 cringe ).

    Metiria would have been far more sensible to have said she was supporting Clare and the Highlanders fans although maybe Sue Bradfords well thought-out blog at Pundit http://pundit.co.nz/content/greens-step-to-the-right had freaked her out, after a step to the right you need a stumble to the left and a knock on. I am looking forward to IV 2’s take on this.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  40. nasska (11,808 comments) says:

    toad @ 5.54pm

    Fred Dagg covered it quite well back when he said “the women are like blokes & the blokes are all queer”.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  41. Rodders (1,755 comments) says:

    That brings back memories, nasska (although Fred would’ve used the term “sheilas”) ;)

    http://folksong.org.nz/howlucky/index.html

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  42. Viking2 (11,569 comments) says:

    So the Highlanders are goin’ Green eh. That’s ok for them. Who wants to play them anyway. They can stay home and practice all they like. No airplanes no carbon.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  43. Lee C (4,516 comments) says:

    These episodes just read more and more like Clare Curran’s desire to feature in the news, not for political reasons, but for twee little ‘pop-spot’ ones, like the Trademe thing, popping up on Whaleoil, and now this rather inane stunt – and kiwiblog appears hellbent on stoking her egotistical craving for media attention by repeatedly handing her free publicity on a plate.

    Honestly – I really feel I could have got through the day without knowing this bit of ephemera, but now I’m lumbered with the mental image of a drunken Clare Curren, fag in mouth, trying to step into a jock-strap, (if she thought it might get her on the 6.00 o’clock news, that is).

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  44. TripeWryter (716 comments) says:

    How about some perspective.

    Labour is an Opposition party desperately trying to get some traction against an overwhelmingly popular prime minister and party in government.

    Thousands – perhaps hundreds of thousands – of people are looking to Labour to be a credible Opposition and a credible alternative to an overwhelmingly popular prime minister and party in government.

    Clare Curran should have her nose to the grindstone worrying about that than engaging in a pointless exercise.

    I agree with her that the new Highlanders jersey is a dog. She can wear the ‘old’ Highlanders jersey whenever else she likes. But not in ‘my’ time, when I expect her to be working towards being a credible Opposition and a credible government alternative.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  45. KH (695 comments) says:

    I realised that I was accidently watching TV3 and that the 1st story, covered extensively, was a rugby jersey.
    Thank goodness for Al Jazeera on Stratos.
    I reached for the remote control.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  46. davidp (3,588 comments) says:

    >Curran appeared at Parliamentary questions this afternoon wearing the team’s old blue, gold and maroon kit in protest at the new lime green colour.

    Labour’s election campaign:

    1. A new Minister and Ministry of Children to joint CYPS, the Family Commission, the Minister of Youth Affairs, the Children’s Commissioner and other existing child related government agencies.

    2. Archives and the National Library not to report to DIA.

    3. Don’t paint historic buildings.

    4. Replace our simple GST system with one that will involve the government and business in court pretty much continuously arguing about product rules.

    5. Mallard to race Whaleoil on a bicycle.

    and now

    6. Oppose corporate re-branding.

    How can they lose!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  47. ben (2,384 comments) says:

    And the search for relevance by Labour continues. Today’s score: Labour 0, Relevance 1.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  48. IHStewart (388 comments) says:

    Sorry fucking fail Lee C, Tripe, You fucking don’t get it. I grew up in Clare’s electorate you guys have never been to the front bar at the Cook, argued with Pete Hodgikinson over a jug of beer. We are tribal when it comes to rugby. Clare has my total support. She is saying we the people own the Brand Team what ever and she is right.

    I think Clare should be on the board of the Highlanders.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  49. ben (2,384 comments) says:

    I noticed Curran also played the “I’m a woman card” on the Trademe forums about their silly game. She backpeddled pretty fast, too, when the relevance of her gender to interest in computer games was questioned.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  50. KH (695 comments) says:

    to IH Stewart @ 7.10
    Yes. I have been to the front bar of the Cook.
    No. I don’t give toss about the Highlanders and what they wear.
    They are a commercial outfit, and all of the fever is manufactured artificial tripe.
    your rugged political man self image was manufactured at the marketing agency sucker.

    (oh. And of course you believe the Speight’s beer adverts)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  51. adze (2,129 comments) says:

    So the Greens are upset because a woman MP wearing a sports team jersey was asked to leave, while on another occasion… another woman MP managed to get away with it.

    …yep sounds like sexism to me. /sarc

    Kedgley’s attempt to gain traction by suggesting that women are expected to dress the same as men doesn’t wash either, as “business attire” is not nearly as proscriptive as the requirement for men to wear business jacket and tie. That leaves a lot of scope for women but I doubt even the NZRFU would recognise a Super 14 jersey as business attire.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  52. TripeWryter (716 comments) says:

    To IH Stewart:

    I have been to the front bar at the Cook. More than once.

    If you had read what I said more carefully you would have seen that I agreed that the new jersey was a lemon.

    Clare Curran can even wear the old one as a protest, if she likes. But not in Parliament and making it an issue when her job is to represent your fellow Dunedinites on the things that matter.

    I know you are tribal. And good for you.

    Clare Curran can be on the Highlanders’ board, too, as long as she can also fit in the required hours of the day to do her job as an MP.

    By the way, I can remember when Speight’s was a distinctive beer with taste and strength. Nothing like the watery, over-hyped, over-faux Southern ‘Man’ piss it has been for the last 20 years.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  53. dion (95 comments) says:

    I don’t think it does us any harm to maintain some standards – especially given that we’re paying these guys^H^H^H^Hpeople $130+k / year.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  54. SHG (319 comments) says:

    @IHStewart “We are tribal when it comes to rugby.”

    No you’re not. You’re a consumer of marketing, that’s all. Go on, tell me about how your father followed the Highlanders like his father did before him. Tell me about how great it was back in the good old days when the Highlanders hammered the Springboks when they were on tour.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  55. rosscalverley (83 comments) says:

    “Labour MP Clare Curran has been kicked out of Parliament for wearing a Highlanders Super Rugby jersey.”

    A) Please say that this is permanent.
    B) Good on her for protesting against the Shirt change.
    C) I wonder what Michael Woodhouse thinks of this, he’s pro-blue, yellow and maroon.
    D) Gosh she’s a muppet sometimes.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  56. Grendel (1,004 comments) says:

    notice how the greens have to, have to label things. they cannot just agree with Curran, this has to be sexist.

    So Toad, explain how:

    Men are required to wear jacket and tie in the chamber – a specific descriptive restriction on choice.

    Women are required to wear ‘business attire’ – a much looser description allowing plenty of scope for personal choice for women.

    A rugby jersey is only business attire when you are a professional rugby player, otherwise its clearly casual attire.

    which part of this is sexist? other than towards men?

    or is this just another lame attempt by the greens at creditbility? do they think that they more they try to pathetically label the government with their petty little labels the more their votes will increase?

    pathetic, and in this case, clearly wrong and clearly pointless dogwhistle politics from an MP and a party (both from the left funnily)who are proving to be increasingly pointless in this world.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  57. alex Masterley (1,523 comments) says:

    The front bar of the Cook?
    Nah, the back bar was the place.
    A pie and a jug or four or five made a friday afternoon.
    The Highlanders weren’t even a marketers wet dream back then. And the Otago team of the time struggled to get crowds along to Carisbrook. The more things change the more things stay the same.
    And as for wearing an old Highlanders jersey well it achieves sod all.
    Trypewriter, so do I. The taste of old speights that is.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  58. scrubone (3,105 comments) says:

    So a policy that allows women heaps of leeway (but men basically none) is sexist, because a woman actually managed to breach it’s wide bounds.

    Oh boy…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  59. AlphaKiwi (683 comments) says:

    Women should not be forced to wear high heels as part of any dress code.
    Men shouldn’t be forced to wear ties as part of any dress code.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  60. F E Smith (3,307 comments) says:

    “Women should not be forced to wear high heels as part of any dress code.”

    The requirement of business attire does not mean that women are required to wear high heels. It has always rankled though that the definition of business attire seems to allow women to wear pretty much anything and get away with it. That should be stopped and the women should be held to the same standard as the men.

    “Men shouldn’t be forced to wear ties as part of any dress code.”

    Much as I dislike wearing a tie, I have to disagree. When it comes to wearing a modern business suit, not wearing a tie with it makes the suit itself pointless, unless you are finished business for the day.

    Of course, I reckon we should go back to morning suits for the men. Let’s have some real formality!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  61. Jade (146 comments) says:

    Remember that it was the Greens of old that also attempted to have the dress code in the house changed for men as well – away from jacket and tie.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  62. toad (3,674 comments) says:

    @Jade 8:44 pm

    Remember that it was the Greens of old that also attempted to have the dress code in the house changed for men as well – away from jacket and tie.

    It was indeed. And if an MP of whatever gender wants to turn up in shorts and a T-shirt, why is that a problem?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  63. Rodders (1,755 comments) says:

    Clare just doesn’t know when to give it a rest. Any more salt for your wound?

    http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2011/06/07/sent-to-the-sin-bin/

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  64. Rodders (1,755 comments) says:

    ” if an MP of whatever gender wants to turn up in shorts and a T-shirt, why is that a problem?”

    Is there any parliament in the world where that would be acceptable attire? I doubt it.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  65. Gerrit (107 comments) says:

    Knee high boots and tights plus a rugby jersey, it looked like the MP was getting ready for a night shift on the streets at Hunters Corner.

    Guess it was “business” attire. Just depends on what “business” I guess.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  66. nasska (11,808 comments) says:

    Better that they all dress in clown suits…..it would be appropriate to the childish circus that is parliament.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  67. bhudson (4,740 comments) says:

    Labour is an Opposition party desperately trying to get some traction against an overwhelmingly popular prime minister and party in government.

    And their attempt at this is a rugby jersey in the House???

    I suspect they would get more traction in an oil-covered latex bodysuit

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  68. kowtow (8,776 comments) says:

    It’s election year so you will witness antics such as this to gain attention.
    No doubt front page of the ODT tomorrow am. You could call it a cunning Curran stunt……She needn’t worry though,South Dunedin is serious “client territory” so I don’t know what she’s playing at.

    Lockwood was great though,sent Curran reelling ,she looked like a possum in headlights,stunned,nothing to say (for once)and then the co head greenie on her feet ,swatted away by Lockwood “I’m on my feet”. Brilliant.

    And those well paid buggers in parliament should always wear jacket and tie in the House. Too many low standards in this country.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  69. GazzaW (30 comments) says:

    I didnt think that the rugby jersey was that bad when compared to Dalziel’s black leather outfit of a couple of weeks ago.

    She looked a right slapper.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  70. Peter (1,723 comments) says:

    Every MP should be made to wear a very silly hat, and a ludicrous pair of pantaloons.

    At least then, we taxpayers would get some value out of parliament…..

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  71. Longknives (4,882 comments) says:

    Toad- “And if an MP of whatever gender wants to turn up in shorts and a T-shirt, why is that a problem?”

    Toad do you have any idea of the concept of ‘Professionalism’ or ‘Work Ethic’ in the workplace?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  72. Peter (1,723 comments) says:

    Clare did look rather saucy.

    Should be encouraged….

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  73. RightNow (6,995 comments) says:

    It certainly won’t hurt Clare’s vote.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  74. Rich Prick (1,727 comments) says:

    Never mind the shirt, her hair! Does she sleep in bus shelters? She has done nothing to dispel the rumour that pinko’s look and smell funny.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  75. IHStewart (388 comments) says:

    SHG, I am fuckinging tribal, Otago has a Springbok head. Not many provinces have one. ( You get one for beating a Springbok team at a provincial level ) Our jersey matters to me and Clare did the job for us today. I am proud of her.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  76. SPC (5,775 comments) says:

    The most successful corporates of recent decades don’t do the suit at their workplaces – Apple, Google etc.

    Bankers do – but …

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  77. markm (114 comments) says:

    A cynical ploy by a desperate woman to ingratiate herself with the perceived legions of disgruntled Highlander fans in election year.
    Ms Curran has no genuine love of , or support for the game of rugby Im sure.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  78. cabbage (457 comments) says:

    SPC: Agree. However they are all hip IT firms, Not the Government of a country. Dosent matter how hard you try, your not going to make Government cool.

    Also, Especially for Clare and IHStewart:
    http://img.skysports.com/11/06/800×600/Highlanders-fans-show-off-their-sign_2605357.jpg

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  79. SHG (319 comments) says:

    @IHStewart who’s talking about Otago? The Otago union aren’t changing their colours are they? No.

    That you are transferring your tribalism regarding Otago rugby and its proud history to a shiny new commercial venture called the Highlanders just shows how successfully you have been marketed to.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  80. Pete George (23,685 comments) says:

    Curran is right, it is an issue that has concerned quite a few down here, but it has got nothing to with parliament.

    She would score more votes if she came up with a plan get the Highlanders playing again, the first half of the season revival was very refreshing but they seem to have run out of will.

    Personally I don’t care about the colour change – I’m a keen follower but it’s results I think are important – and it isn’t Otago.

    One thing I’ll be pleased to hear the end of is the “house of pain” name, it made going to Carisbrook sound like going to the dentist.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  81. laworder (292 comments) says:

    Meh

    I dont care what they wear.

    All I want is for them to carry out the policies that the public want and ask for

    I will vote for any politician from any party that will do that. And I dont care if they wear tight dayglo pink hotpants and a gold mesh top with sparkly high heels while they are doing it.

    Even if its a bloke :-)

    Regards
    Peter J
    see http://www.sensiblesentencing.org.nz

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote