Blame the Jews
October 28th, 2011 at 12:35 pm by David FarrarNBR reports:
A small group of ‘occupy’ protestors crowded the doors of the Citbank building in the Auckland CBD this morning. The tower houses the US consulate, and a Postshop with a Kiwibank. …
NBR asked a spokesman for the group if it had any specific demand for the NZ or US government. The spokesman replied the protest was a show of solidarity with the Wall Street occupation.
So that is no demands then.
One protestor expressed concern about what he called a “Zionist conspiracy” and the influence of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
Oh yes. Damn Jewish bankers.It’s all their fault. Personally I blame the 1% who don’t pay their fair share of taxes, such as the UNITE union!
Talking of blaming Jews though, I did piss myself laughing at this line from William Shatner during the Comedy Central Roast of Charlie Sheen:
“I know another famous guy who was nice to whores and kept 12 losers around, and he also got crucified by Jews! And people worship that guy!
Mike Tyson almost fell out of his seat at that one.
No tag for this post.
October 28th, 2011 at 1:01 pm
Maybe if some of them had gainful employment their attitudes would change. Not much chance of that happening with perpetual demonstrators though.
cheers
David Prosser
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 1:09 pm
Happened to be walking past at the time. If there was 12 of them it was almost certainly an overcount. All looked like hippies. Their actual sign was some sort of protest about education.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
Would Shatner have made a Mohammed joke? Don’t think so. I presume he likes his head attached to his body.
I’ll bet the anti Zionist was the prick with the PLO scarf….seems to go with the territory.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 1:46 pm
Just more aping of the US OWS protests:
The additional argument that will be made here is I don’t really hate Jews, I just hate international bankers. There’s a variation on that in the rest of that videoed rant of course – the whole jews-as-white-european-colonisers argument that the likes of Luc have frequently put forward on this blog; because they think the whole “anti-Colonialist” structure is a similarly effective cover for traditional Jew hatred.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 1:47 pm
And they say that the OWS idiocy is just like the Tea Party. Sure it is…
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 2:13 pm
Very silly stuff.
The occupy movement means different things to different people.
The extremists who have latched on are having their birthday, christmas and Easter all rolled into one.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 2:20 pm
wreck
…that’s birthday,eid and ramadan all wrapped into one.
The Tea Party are neither idiots nor extreme. Since when was it stupid or extreme to live within your means?
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 2:32 pm
wreck,
the OWS people are the same people who cause untold millions of dollars of damage at G8/20 and other similar conferences around the world. A mix of communist/socialist/(supposedly)anarchist/green losers.
Compare the images coming out of the OWS camps (such as defecating on cop cars, flags, etc) and the Tea Party rallies. They are in no way similar. The Tea Party was/is genuine grass roots. The OWS thing is organised leftism, trying to look grass roots.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 2:34 pm
kowtow – there were a few muslim jokes. “mike tyson, the second most stupid thing youve done.. the first being converting to islam” etc etc there were a few
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Pretty sure it was the Romans who crucified jesus. But I’m sure history’s greatest monster, John Key, ( a JEW) had a hand in it somewhere.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Kowtow…as Shatners Jewish himself I guess he just played what he knew…
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 5:58 pm
So… they don’t know what they stand for, but the important thing is to show show they agree with some other people who don’t know what they stand for. Geniuses…
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 6:13 pm
Why do people think that when the Rothschild’s are critiqued one is at the same time also critiqueing the Jewish race?
It’s a myth.
Yes, Rothschild claims credit for the Balfour declaration and is on the 500 shekel note and paid for the Israeli Supreme Court and many Israeli’s revere them.
But the conspiracy stories about that family, if one bothers to acquaint oneself with them, say that the Rothschilds are doing all of this precisely in order to destroy, not save, Israel. They say, if one bothers to acquaint oneself with them, that the Rothschilds financed both the Axis and the Allies, in WWII. They say, if one bothers to acquaint oneself with them, that they also designed WWII precisely in order to engineer the creation of the State of Israel. They say, if one bothers to acquaint oneself with them, that the Rothschilds are doing all of this, setting it up in order to destroy it, because they are at heart, Satanic and if you were Satan, how would it appear to G-d’s believers on Earth if G-d couldn’t or didn’t save Israel from destruction? And so far, Israel’s trod precisely the path as a country, to set herself up for that fate, almost as if it might just be the reason why her politicians are so very destructive to Israel’s best interests and the instant they become otherwise they’re immediately taken out, such as how Rabin was, and also, they say, if one bothers to acquaint oneself with them, Sharon, because he refused to invade Lebanon, and just look what a success that was when they got an obedient but not too bright sucker to do it instead of Sharon.
So if you want to live in some fantasy land about what you think the Rothschilds may or may not be all about, go ahead, but don’t pretend that’s what the stories actually are, because they’re not. I might add, IMO, it’s mind-bogglingly ignorant to write off a subject like the Rothschilds or indeed anything else, without even investigating what in fact the allegations are. That’s just nuts.
P.S. If anyone thinks I’m saying the Rothschilds are micro-managing all of this, don’t. I’m not. It’s too complicated to explain here. Research it yourself, to find out how it could possibly work. Watch out for all the cognitive dissonance.
Vote:October 28th, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Dictionary definition of occupy:
1. To fill up (time or space)
2. To dwell or reside in.
3. To hold or fill (an office or position).
4. To seize possession of and maintain control over by or as if by conquest.
5. To engage or employ the attention or concentration of
What the “occupy” protestors “achieved”
“Protesters made no attempts to invade the lobby of the Citibank building and five minutes later, the group returned to its Aotea Square base’
Epic fail on occupying.
Vote:October 29th, 2011 at 10:13 am
http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/12/the-solution-to-bad-speech-is
Vote:October 30th, 2011 at 8:00 am
DPF said: “I did piss myself laughing at this line from William Shatner during the Comedy Central Roast of Charlie Sheen: “I know another famous guy who was nice to whores and kept 12 losers around…” “
…while we know one was a loser, if the other 11 were losers also then where does that leave the rest of us?
Vote: