StatsChat on Polls

Andrew Balemi (Auck Uni Stats Dept) at Stats Chat blogs on polls:

But let's go back to the Horizon panel poll mentioned above. It claims that it's to be trusted as it has sampled from a large population of potential panellists who have been recruited and can win prizes for participation. The adjusts for any biases by reweighting the sample so that it's more like the underlying New Zealand adult population – which is good practice in .

However, the trouble is this large sampling frame of potential panellists have been self-selected. So who do they represent?

To illustrate, it's hard to imagine people from more affluent areas feeling the need to get rewards for being on a panel. Also, you enrol via the and clearly this is biased towards IT-savvy people. Here the sampling frame is biased, with little or no known way to adjust for any biases bought about from this self-selection problem. They may be weighted to look like the population but they may be fundamentally different in their political outlook.

Panel polls are being increasingly used by market researchers and polling companies. With online panel polls it's easier to obtain samples, collect information and transfer it, without all the bother involved in traditional polling techniques like CATI.

I believe the industry has been seduced by these features at the expense of representativeness – the bedrock of all inference. Until such time as we can ensure representativeness, I remain sceptical about any claims from panel polls.

I believe the much-maligned telephone (CATI) interviewing, which is by no means perfect, still remains the best of a bad lot.

 

 

Comments (10)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment