Fran O’Sullivan writes:
I’ve really drunk the Kool Aid when it comes to the inspirational blueprint for Christchurch’s new CBD. It is a stunner. Compact. Cutting edge. Green. Sustainable.
It was crunched out in just over 100 days; a brilliant demonstration of that old maxim “pressure makes a diamond”.
It is also a plan that all New Zealanders need to embrace.
I doubt many of us seriously appreciated that the whole of New Zealand is pretty much a seismic zone until the devastating Canterbury earthquakes hit.
Yeah I thought it was just Wellington that was going to get a big one.
But I’ll never forget the look of abject horror on the faces of the hundreds of people who poured out of the Christchurch CBD after the 6.3 magnitude quake that struck on February 22, 2011 … or the grim chat I had with Mayor Bob Parker at the Christchurch Art Gallery shortly afterwards when he told me “there has been serious death”. Nor will I forget the sincerity of former US Secretary of State Richard Armitage, also in Christchurch when the quake struck, who later that afternoon told me the United States had instantly offered assistance from its own military based in Hawaii.
Disasters do bring out the best in people, as we band together. The memory for me is the Australian police officers and others landing in Christchurch to cheery crowds.
Key has now ordered them to get the L-shaped frame of parks which will surround the new CBD in place by the end of 2013. Decisions will be made super fast. Most will bypass the Resource Management Act.
The tempo will be fast.
If anyone doubts just how fast officialdom can work when the whip is cracked just consider the AMI stadium. David McConnell’s Hawkins Construction got that up in 11 weeks.
Which has proved to be excellent.
The brute reality is that before the quakes struck Christchurch was effectively dying. The very compactness of this new city heart will ensure its vibrancy.
Something I have said also.
What if other New Zealand cities – particularly Auckland – were given the tools so they too could follow Christchurch’s example and wipe the barriers that stymie economic growth?
The government has created a major political risk for itself given the sheer brilliance of its new Christchurch plan.
I try to strictly avoid writing here about anything I am working on in my day job but, like everything else that has happened in Christchurch these last 21 months, this is a once-in-a-lifetime exception.
The Christchurch plan is the result of two madcap ideas by sometimes uneasy bedfellows, Christchurch mayor Bob Parker and earthquake czar Gerry Brownlee.
Mr Parker led his council’s “Share an Idea” campaign where the people of Christchurch got to say what they wanted in their new city.
It wasn’t the typically stifling local government “consultation” exercise. Lawyers, formal submissions and correct spelling and grammar were not welcome. People just got to scribble down in their own words what they wanted.
Over 100,000 Cantabrians responded, more than a quarter of Christchurch’s population. The campaign became the first community engagement programme outside Europe to win the international Co-Creation Association’s supreme award and it did so unanimously.
The lawyers and lobbyists who make it their business to get between the public and their elected officials were sidelined.
I wasn’t aware of the award.
The plan is radical and far more clean, green, politically-correct and urban-design-y than would be expected to be signed off by the sometimes gruff and usually conservative Mr Brownlee. There are all sorts of parks and art and culture hubs and so forth. Christchurch will be the most beautiful city in the world.
But the plan is far more commercially astute than might be expected from the urban designers and creative types who prepared it.
It halves the size of the CBD, making land scarce to improve returns per square metre, creating competition among investors and developers for the best spaces. There is going to be a gold rush.
What is interesting is that the Property Council has welcomed the plan. They represent the property owners who have the capital that is essential to making the plan a reality. They were negative on the original plan, but have been supportive of this final one, which is a good and important thing.
Decisions will be made on urban design resource consents within five working days, by a three-person committee representing the government, the city council and Ngai Tahu and they will not then need to be notified under the Resource Management Act.
Proposals will of course need to be pretty, clean and green and fit the plan but the tradeoff is that developers get a final answer in a week.
Mr Parker’s city council has then resolved to make final decisions on all other aspects of building consent applications within a fortnight. …
Do Aucklanders need to wait for Rangitoto to erupt before Len Brown will launch a community engagement programme about its spatial plan as good as Mr Parker’s “Share an Idea”?
Do Dunedites need to suffer some sort of biblical-type flood before their leaders will develop an innovative 100-day plan to deal with some of the same long-term economic challenges that were faced by Christchurch?
Do Wellingtonians need to suffer their major earthquake before they get access to 24-hour investment services, five-day resource consent decisions and two-week building consents?
Does the Waikato need to be devastated by mad cow disease before delays at the OIO and Immigration Service are sorted out?
For that matter, why on earth doesn’t the government roll out its bold, visionary Christchurch approach on a nationwide basis and just slash all the barriers to economic growth that still exist everywhere but Canterbury?
A roadmap to growth.Tags: Christchurch, Fran O'Sullivan, Matthew Hooton, RMA