I’ve decided to no longer call myself a hetrosexual – but a natural order sexual!

Well I hope so, they will probably have to look after me and the missus in our old age the way things are going!

Fucking commies white noising my reception!!!

Haven’t watched the peoples channels for years.

Surprised they haven’t sacked that funny looking little knaff Campbell years ago.

How the fuck a major peasants entertainer could employ a bloke with eyes as close together as his always had me fucked!

Keep up the good work. Your sprogs will grow up even smarter than you!!!

Same here- best thing you can ever do for political clarity.

(Listening to downloaded version of the Mark Levin Show through my Bluetooth cordless earbuds on my Galaxy Note.)

TV is just blah.

Do what I did then Johnboy, turn the bastard off.

When the tele signal went digital last month, that was the end of it, no dish = no tv. No more swearing at John Campbell, no more constant background noise, Kids becoming much more creative, reading more and basically a lower stress household.

The internet provides everything anyone needs for news and information.

We are now an MSM free household!

I think that the government should be authorised to video their attempts to do same.

I think the government could sell such footage to “Histories Greatest Fuckups” or similar on the Living Channel.

Lets face it we need something on TV that isn’t bloody boring!

So you use this as a justification for removing the rights of others to the same “freedom of speech and expression “?

You sir, are a bigot.

Payback is not a valid reason to silence your opposition in a free and liberal society.

Pour yourself another glass of Chardonnay and have a think about it.

Anybody who thinks that heterosexual couples should be denied the benefits of modern science to become parents is sick.

Anyone that shuts down debate on the philosophy of how science is used is a fool.

Anybody who thinks that couples of the same sex should be denied the chance to marry is a bigot.

No actually, anyone that writes the way you just did fits the definition of bigotry perfectly.

Anybody who thinks that they have the right to tell the rest of us how to live because of what is written in a book of fiction is mad.

Perhaps, but they do have the right to have their say none the less.

Anybody who thinks that it is more important to protect the corrupt and evil Catholic church than it is to protect kids from pedophiles is pure evil.

Yet people are happy to protect big tobacco on ‘principle’.

Anybody who thinks they have experienced a “demonic attack” should be locked up in a loony bin.

As should anyone that talks to dogs like they’re people, thinks ‘sensing murder’ is real, believes in chem trails, homeopathy, Feng shui, earthquake weather……….people believe all sorts of crap, most people should be locked up by your definition.

The only thing that she deserves is for people to point and laugh at her.

I think that about people that frequent dog shows

Oh for fuck’s sake. Change the fucking record will ya.

Well noted.

It is a real shame that those here that claim to be ‘social liberals’ are in fact usually just ‘arrogant bigots’ with a tendency to scapegoat whole sections of society and join their left wing comrades in the ‘shouting down’ of any and all opposition no matter how civil said opposition actually is.

And why is that all of the advocates of these things seem to have never served in public office and had positions of allocative responsibility when it comes to public health, education and other social services? Where are the potty plebiscite-mongers going to get the money from? And as I’ve said repeatedly, I object to all CIRs- including the one that Labour and the Greens seem intent on holding on asset sales. I think the CIR Act 1993 was a mistake and it should be repealed, or else limited to genuine areas of public concern like criminal justice policy.