Would you still be of that opinion if Fisher’s review discloses an significant error in Binnie’s report?

Binnie was not appointed to adjudicate. He was appointed to advise. I would expect that advice to be scrutinised. Collins is the one who has to face the public and justify the decision — not Binnie

How could any Kiwi accept that as other than a breech of faith and trust in our Justice/ Govt relationships.

This is actually more serious than most other day to day Govt. issues.

No doubt many will disagree, as I said, due to their own opinions of the Bain case but they should reflect on that as this is not about what they think but about the progresion of the Justice system, good and bad and it’s ultimate accountability to those persecuted rightly or wrongly.

Maybe the Nats. should wake up one morning and realise that they destroy the voters trust by behaving this way and that’s why despite doing lots of good things their results in the polls are beginning to show the trend that will continue. With Findlayson ( List MP.) dishing many voters, despite his seeming inablity or unwillingness to be voted into an electorate seat, constant disclosures of the sort referred to above, how long before all trust has gone.

As Boehner says –

“They won the election,” Boehner said. “They must have forgotten that Republicans continue to hold a majority in the House…The president’s idea of a negotiation is roll over and do what I ask.”

http://www.mrctv.org/videos/boehner-presidents-idea-negotiation-roll-over-and-do-what-i-ask

Tell me how the above differs from your “reality”?

Herman Cain put it quite well in a piece today –

President Obama won the popular vote by 50.6 percent. OK, those of you that voted for him, you won. But you did not win the lottery. Here’s what you won.

You won a president who wants unlimited federal spending powers with no federal debt ceiling. Would you give unlimited credit to a person who has maxed out all of their credit cards? If you say yes, then respectfully, you are a fool.

You won a president who is asking Congress to spend an additional $50 billion for unidentified projects. This would of course be the same Congress that has not passed a budget since 2009. Do you run your finances without a budget, or at least some idea of how you are going to make ends met? Well, you probably don’t.

You won a president who wants to raise taxes by $1.6 trillion over 10 years, while telling you that it will help reduce the deficit. Do the math folks. That’s not true. It would raise minimal revenue and cause a big decrease in employment and the creation of new jobs. All you have to do is to look at the real history of tax increases. But you see, President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi know you don’t know the history, and they figure you are too gullible to learn.

Obama voters, you won a president who is still campaigning, so he can keep using the lapdog mainstream media to tell you what he wants you to believe instead of telling you the truth. Strip away your preconceived notions about media channels that Obama told you not to watch, and you just might learn something.

You also won a coming fiscal cliff disaster, because Obama knows he can let it happen and you will agree with him that it’s all the fault of the Republicans. You drank the Kool-Aid for four years, so he expects you to just keep on drinking to the very last drop.

Except, the very last drop this time will mean a lot of economic pain and suffering for a lot of families, namely, no jobs! It will mean that our nation’s credit rating will most likely be downgraded again. It will also mean that gas prices will go back up and stay up, and that federal spending will continue to get bigger, while the size of our economy gets smaller.

The very last drop will also mean more turmoil in the rest of the world, because of the continued loss of respect for America’s economic and military strength, due to this president’s inability to lead decisively and forcefully.

Obama voters, you won! But do you like the prize? Read this commentary again in two years and let me know. God willing, I will still be here writing, on the radio and TV explaining what I have been saying for the last four years.

Maybe some of you will wake up.

The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready. 

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command. 

The story continues that now General Rodiguez would take General Ham’s place as the head of Africom. 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/28/general-losing-his-job-over-benghazi/

They had people who could have saved those in the embassy, but they let them die.

People died: Obama lied.

How do you like your Rice cooked. I suspect she will be history once the groundswell of opinion hits the Obama admin.