Guest Post: HOBBIT #1: An Unexpected Journey , Review – John Stringer.

December 31st, 2012 at 11:00 am by David Farrar

[There are NO spoilers here: we all know the story of ].

I took Domestic Goddess to see this last night.  We watched the 48 frames per sec 3D version (there are three options) and this is the way to go, although 3D gives some people a headache. I loved it, there is no going back, and 3D/48 is the future (like talkies and colour TV).  The future is full immersion with the audience ‘inside’ the movie using 360 cameras (now achievable) and being able to shift yourself about as one of the characters with different perspectives (10 years time?).  I have already seen this done in live theatre with wrap around screens, projection and live performance.

Far o’er the Misty Mountains cold

To dungeons deep and caverns old

We must away ere break of day

To seek the pale enchanted gold.

I WAS STUNNED.  This is the best cinematic experience I have ever had.  Peter Jackson is brilliant.  I’ve had occasional doubts about him (Lovely Bones) but this proves (or reproves) he is a true genius and can do anything with film. I have no hesitation calling him the greatest filmmaker and story-teller alive.  Guillermo del Toro (Hell Boy, Pan’s Labyrinth) also a great director, was originally hired to direct, but moved on after the union delays. I am so glad Jackson was hands-on here to complete the tale in his characteristic style. Hobbit #1 is another stunning classic in the canon of film and will forever be the crossover movie into 48 frames.  Andy Serkis (Gollum) managed the second film unit, so establishes himself as a close Jackson colleague, having starred in many Jackson productions.

Sequel Syndrome Challenges

Telling The Hobbit on the tail of LoTRings is a daunting task.  Most sequels flop or arrive as re-hashed re-grooves.  But The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a completely new experience, with a different but complementary ‘feel’ to LotRings.  It is doubly awkward, because it comes before LotRings, so Jackson is working backwards with characters and plot. He fleshes out the Shire and Rivendell more within their contexts.  Gandalf is more wizened here and quirky (less the austere all-powerful wizard) and a maia with much more personality and obvious weaknesses. There are five mysterious maiar in Middle-Earth: Gandalf the Grey, Radagast the Brown, Saurman the White and two unnamed others.


The movie starts slowly as narrative, but this is fine, as we spend 20 minutes establishing rich characters (Bilbo and the dwarves).  Jackson fleshes out the Hobbit dwarves more deeply as a people (tinkers, tailors, toy makers, their lust for gold, their vulgarity and stubbornness) in contrast to the lithe gracefulness of the elves. Hob1 is perfectly paced, with action, back story, flashback, and appropriately placed drama roller coasters. One is never bored.


Martin Freeman (Bilbo) channels Ian Holm (Bilbo in LoTR) to create a seamless transition between the two actors. Ian Holm is in this too, as the older Bilbo in the first 20 minutes, along with Elijah Wood as Frodo to establish the latter’s connection to the earlier story, when in the book he is not present. Freeman is perhaps best know to us from The Office (UK). I was dubious about his casting at first, but he is fantastic. Hugo Weaving returns as Elrond and Cate Blanchett as the magnificent Lady Galadriel with gorgeous dresses.

Thorin II Oakenshield, son of Thráin, son of Thrór, King Under the Mountain has a nemesis. Azog is a pale, scarred orc captain who rides a warg, visceral and threatening, like some zombie SS Einsatzgruppen at work in Poland. His son Bolg features later in the Hobbit story.

Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield (so-named after fighting Azog with a real log of oak) is perhaps a little pretty for me here, with his Jesus eyes; he also sounds very like Boromir which I found distracting.  I would have cast him more bulbous-nosed, stumpy and war-scarred (not Fabio meets Conan).  Bombur looks like a cartoon Obelix, but otherwise the dwarves are brilliant, with Mark Hadlow of Christchurch the dwarf with plaited white hair.  Jackson captures the essence of Tolkien’s dwarves, with their Celtic livery, accents and roguish lustiness. I love their head-butting greeting. They are best characterized as a dwarfish army in a flash back to a great battle with the orcs, where we witness classic Tolkien epic brought to visual extravaganza.  The allusion of the dwarves to the Jewish Diaspora is obvious (which I have written on elsewhere) as well as the adoption of Jewish mythical “golem.”

Barry Humphreys (Dame Eda) unrecognizable as the Goblin King is brilliant with his hideous neck goiter.  His voice and dialogue is gripping, and ghastly, evoking chilling isolated terror of being caught down there in his kingdom with nowhere to go, in the hands of some psychopathic serial killer who will kill you long and slow.  Ugh.  (“Be good children, or the goblins will get you!”). His demise by Gandalf is apt. The variety and design of the goblins is great. I loved the messenger goblin with deformed feet on a flying fox.  The goblins (small orcs) with their long ears are well characterised (if moving a little too quickly for my eyes).  I would have preferred more medieval hoods and armor much like they were portrayed in Labyrinth (David Bowie) but this is Jackson’s style.

Gollum is a real star in this, and obviously should be.  His character and schizophrenia are crafted more and he is portrayed a little blacker than in LotRings and slightly more dangerous, perhaps with the added confidence of having his Ring. The riddle scene with Bilbo is critical and Jackson carries this off.  There is a gut-wrenching scene where Gollum has lost Precious (after 500 years) and is arched, gasping desperately at the water’s edge, lamenting the loss of his everything and all.

I don’t know what happened to Christopher Lee’s Saruman in this movie, he is pallid and ordinary, like a school headmaster lecturing a student on his way to a fancy dress party.

Special Effects CGI

The special effects are amazing, but 48 frames a second is unforgiving and a few fakes are evident.

  1. The two heavy axes on the bald dwarf’s back appear obviously plastic at times, they sway and move as if light.
  2. Hobbit feet seem prosthetic and rigidly clumsy at moments.

However, the covering of horses in wool and packing them out to make them seem like little ponies as the company ride out of the Shire is brilliantly convincing.  I am not a huge fan of CGI.  Most CGI creations move too quickly, to mask the limitations of the technology; I would have liked the orcs and wargs to slow down a bit so I can take them in. The underground dwarf kingdoms contrasted with the ramshackle maggot labyrinths of the goblins, also underground, are among the most startling special effects and cinematography of the film (and rival LotRings) are gob dropping in their sweep and creativity.

Jackson does well to restrain Smaug in Hobbit #1; we get only tantalizing glimpses, and never a full view, but enough to evoke the terror and power of this Fire Drake from the North, of which more later.The three stone trolls are brilliant and just how Tolkien wrote them.  I enjoyed this episode for its humor and fleshing out trolls more as viable creatures with personality rather than as mindless oxen of LoTRings.

Gawihir Windlord and his wonderful giant eagles are again the cavalry hooray factor, and they play across the other star in this show, New Zealand, with gorgeous sweeping vistas and landscapes (no need for CGI here).  Jackson uses visual hyperbole: precipices drop not hundreds of feet but thousands, toppling trees hang inches from chasms, destinations lay on horizons swathed in mist, etc.


There are moments of real dramatic pathos here, although the film lacks a romantic element (like Arwen and Aragorn) hinted at only slightly by collegial affection between Galadriel and Gandalf.  The two moments that stand out for me, are:

1) BIlbo invisible with the ring on about to stab Gollum through the throat, who cannot see, but senses the hobbit.  They stare at each other full of loss, hatred, desperation, fear, loathing, compassion all-in-one. This evokes the central line of the movie, spoken by Gandalf at the beginning, “true courage is to know when not to take a life” obviously setting up Gollum’s critical role in the whole long epic.  Frodo confronts the same crossroads. Bilbo’s insight and compassion are moving, a lesson to us all.

2) The second scene is similar, as Thorin and Azog eye each other up in the dramatic forest burning scene.  Thorin heir of Durin marches magnificently towards Azog through fire, like the Terminator, to avenge his fathers, a gripping moment of goody vs baddy that ends not quite as you expect.

Weak scenes

A few implausible scenes that bordered on the annoying rollicking of Tintin:

1) Toppling down in to the goblin tunnel that no one would have survived.  Not one compound fracture; are dwarves made of concrete?

2) The collapsing platform inside the goblin kingdom with everyone onboard, after mass slaying of goblins, is too Indiana Jones. We need plausibility to create real terror throughout the epic.  If they survive anything, it becomes ho hum. Good fantasy is ‘real.’

3) The Stone Giants scene was a bit slo. mo. Transformers for me, and the characters hanging on to them as Ragnarock is played out, might have been best edited out of the movie.  Although, how can you omit the Stone Giants smashing mountains?


Somewhat contradictory, I still enjoyed the Disney-esque rabbit Santa sleigh of Radagast the Brown.  He is a wonderful character, and adds breadth to Gandalf’s valar order.  Radagast played by Sylvester McCoy (the 7th Dr Who) is reminiscent of Catweazel played by Robin Davies. I especially enjoyed the assault on his quaint dilapidated forest cottage by large shadowy spiders, a hint of things to come. He adds real humor while contrasting completely the sinister yet mysterious Necromancer in the ruined tower (the Witch King of Angmar returned) that preoccupies Galadriel so much.

There is no Jackson cameo here, that I could see.  Also, Radagast is using Gandalf’s staff from the LotRings movies.  I don’t know if this is significant to later Hobbit films, or whether it was an unnoticed prop share between the actors (unlikely).  So watch for that in Hob#2.

Music and Title Lettering

Light reflecting across uneven (ie handmade) brassy title  lettering in Tolkien script, tick. Theme sung by Neil Finn, excellent.  I liked how Jackson sub-titled his movie “An Unexpected Journey” about 20 minutes in, the dual titles and how they fitted with LotR three sub-titles was always going to be problematic.  Jackson’s ability to chop visual story-telling into related and coherent chapters is one of his strengths.

Length and How to End Hob#1?

I wondered how Jackson could spin this out across three movies, but he achieves this admirably.  Hob#1 is a coherent self-contained movie in its own right, but obviously part of a whole.  It has its own drama (fights, the riddle episode, the three stone trolls, the burning forest, the goblin kingdom) and we await so much more: Beorn, the Battle of Five Armies, Smaug, Dale, the Lonely Mountain. This is such a rich and deep tale that it can easy stretch three movies (good on New Line Cinema for agreeing to that).

But how to end Hob#1?  I wondered as we drew to a close how Jackson might do this.  I won’t spoil this for you, but let’s just say it is a genius segue to LotRings but using the context of the Hobbit with an eye for detail.  Nuff said.

This was so good I would go back the next day and watch it all again.  Enthusiastic 10/10. I recommend 3D 48 frames version (take your glasses to save $1).

Looking forward to Hobbit #2 next Christmas.

BASIC STORY for the Uninitiated: Hobbit #1

  • Dwarves live in magnificent opulent kingdoms of power and wealth underground toiling and mining.
  • They are corrupted by lust for gold and the jewel Arkenstone (the heart of a mountain).
  • A fire drake name of Smaug attacks the realm of the Dwarves like a flaming Exocet missile entering a terrorist bunker.
  • Dwarves flee and are dispossessed (sack of Jerusalem 70AD by the Romans).
  • Smaug snuggles into a mountain of gold and gems plunder (Scrooge McDuck’s swimming pool of money).
  • Not heard of for 60 years.
  • Durin’s-heir Thorin Oakenshield  gathers willing dwarves to seek to retake their homeland.
  • Birds have started returning to the Lonely mountain, a prophetic sign the dragon will be dispossessed.
  • No one will help.  Enmity between dwarves and elves for past grievances.
  • Gandalf gathers 13 dwarves and 1 hobbit (Bilbo).
  • Adventures on the way towards the Lonely Mountain and Smaug’s stolen lair with monsters and battles.
  • While lost in the heart of the mountain and the goblin kingdom, Bilbo meets an unusual creature called Gollum in a fetid lake.

He finds a magical invisible-making ring, the possession of Gollum for 500 years.

35 Responses to “Guest Post: HOBBIT #1: An Unexpected Journey , Review – John Stringer.”

  1. Dean Papa (788 comments) says:

    and for an alternative opinion

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. Fentex (3,327 comments) says:

    Although I think high frame rates are the future I don’t think 3D is. Personally I’m well over the dim and uncomfortable experience.

    I saw The Hobbit in the full HFR 3D experience and enjoyed it, and left the theatre wanting to see Smaug in all his terrible glory, I was left wanting the next movie which must be a satisfying result for the producers.

    There were times the spectacle of the movie had me thinking “This can be done in little ‘ol New Zealand?” And I think they’re off to a good start stretching the story to three movies.

    There’s clearly more CGI in these movies than the LoTR movies and I’m contemplating watching Fellowship to compare, I’m curious to see how the experience compares now.

    I was particulary impressed by the eagles and Gollum. I feel the best effect of 3D in the movie was Gollums close ups and the eagles arrival.

    But I suspect I’d enjoy it more brighter without those damn glasses. I cannot believe 3D theatres don’t sell better, more expensive but comfortable and wider glasses at a premium to eke more cash out of 3D.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. hmmokrightitis (1,919 comments) says:

    Might want to read the reactions to the review DP. The vast majority pan the review for being utter overblown shite. And I couldn’t agree more. Is it the best film ever made? No. Is it really good? Yes. And 48FPS 3D is a great medium to deliver it in.

    I don’t doubt some reviewers will pan it – good luck to them. Why not, instead of merely link-whoring, provide your own reasoned rebuttal? Or does your tribe not like anything to do with Mr Jackson?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. mikenmild (23,638 comments) says:

    I have only seen the movie in 2D so far. I enjoyed if very much, but thought that it was too long while paradoxically feeling a bit rushed through the story. I had an argument at home about this: being faithful to the book by including everything versus making a movie that can tell a story in 90 to 120 minutes.
    As a film, I felt that it could have had an even slower build up in the Shire, would have benefited from a few less characters and at least one of the huge action secens could have been curtailed or even cut altogether.
    Overall though, it is a pleasure to see the work of a master film-maker.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Dean Papa (788 comments) says:

    “The vast majority pan the review for being utter overblown shite.”

    so not that dissimilar to Stringer’s review?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. kowtow (13,219 comments) says:

    “the best cinematic experience I’ve ever had” pfft,come on folks it’s just a movie FFS!

    We really do live in an age of over the top bullshit and hype.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. cha (6,209 comments) says:

    so not that dissimilar to Stringer’s review?

    But Dean, an attention whore’s gotta do what an attention whore’s gotta do to be noticed.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. simonway (507 comments) says:

    The Necromancer is Sauron, not the Witch-King.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. hmmokrightitis (1,919 comments) says:

    Wow, strangling kittens Monday huh DP?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. iMP (2,665 comments) says:

    Kiwiblog auto-technicals seems to have had trouble with the word “valar” Gandalf’s order, in this review, and substituted “maia” automatically, unless its a Green Party conspiracy.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. Pete George (24,828 comments) says:

    [There are NO spoilers here: we all know the story of The Hobbit].

    I don’t know the story of The Hobbit. I started reading the bok when I was young (I think it’s a children’s book) and didn’t get past the first few pages. Not my sort of story.

    I’ll watch the movie some time I guess but unless it’s vastly different to the LOTR movies it will only be out of curiosity, I don’t expect it to be my sort of story – still.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. Scott Chris (7,957 comments) says:

    I’m inclined to agree with the Telegraph reviewer:

    As a lover of cinema, Jackson’s film bored me rigid; as a lover of Tolkien, it broke my heart.

    Apart from anything else, Jackson really should stick to directing and employ a professional screen writer.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. Dean Papa (788 comments) says:

    I love kittens. Although I ‘ll admit to being a bit on the grumpy side, due to having missed MVG’s 9 darter live, because I was instead catching up on the latest kiwiblog discussion concerning the Bain compensation claim.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. Rodders (1,790 comments) says:

    re Sir Christopher Lee – he sounded almost like he was reading his lines. I have read that he felt, at his age he wasn’t up to flying to NZ again, so his scenes for the Hobbit movies were filmed over 4 days in London.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. iMP (2,665 comments) says:

    Rodders, that’s interesting. Lee has such a great film voice and presence, but I guess we forget his age; and that explains Saruman’s less than rivtetting contribution to Hobbit 1.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. Peter (2,094 comments) says:


    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. gump (2,346 comments) says:

    I thought it had some really brilliant parts (like the riddle scene) but it could have done with some better editing as there were a few times towards the end of the film when I caught myself looking at my watch.

    In my opinion, the biggest problem was that Gandalf saved the party *every* time they got into trouble. I know that this follows the text, but it makes the action scenes somewhat repetitive & boring.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. Azeraph (626 comments) says:

    The only thing i obviously disapproved of is how our media went na na over it’s opening. I’ve yet to see it and i found i never got far into the book when i was young as i had read lotr first.

    The Wheel of Time concludes this year, finished by Brandon Sanderson who was chosen by Robert Jordan’s wife to complete the series.

    A Memory of Light.

    20 years this series has been written over.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. Sonny Blount (2,043 comments) says:

    iMP (969) Says:
    December 31st, 2012 at 11:54 am
    Kiwiblog auto-technicals seems to have had trouble with the word “valar” Gandalf’s order, in this review, and substituted “maia” automatically, unless its a Green Party conspiracy.

    They are correct. Gandalf is not one of the Valar, he is of the Maiar.

    [DPF: Kiwiblog auto-technicals are me, and I know my Tolkien :-)]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. Fentex (3,327 comments) says:

    I think that British reviewer is right – if you want a subtle production of The Hobbit standing alone then An Unexpected Journey is not especially good at being that. And as a rule I do think Peter Jackson isn’t a person to look to for subtleties.

    That is not however what the producers wanted nor paid for. They got what they paid for, an entertaining theatrical spectacle that will reap large profits and be an experience worth the price to the audiences.

    Plenty of time ahead of us for someone to make a smaller more nuanced film of just the one book.

    Speaking of Christopher Lee, I was surprised to see him. I hadn’t heard Saruman would featrue and am not surprised that his advanced years limited him. I thought Ian McKellen was showing some fatigue as well.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. Longknives (6,406 comments) says:

    Guest Post: Longknives “The Hobbit”

    The movie is a steaming dog turd. One of the dullest and most overblown spectacles I have ever had the misfortune to see.
    Gushing fans in New Zealand are letting their fervent Nationalism overlook this fact.
    International critics and fans have not been so blind…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  22. bc (1,754 comments) says:

    Metacritic (an aggregate of film reviews) has the Hobbit at 58%
    To use the old days of exam grades, would that put it at a C+ ??

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  23. hmmokrightitis (1,919 comments) says:

    And IMDb has it at 8.4 – which puts it, within their scales and ratings, well within the top 200 movies of all time. In fact, close to the top 100.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  24. mikenmild (23,638 comments) says:

    It’s a money-maker, it showcases New Zealand and the great film-making talent that we have here. As a piece of cinema, it’s of average worth.
    What I’d like to see is some movies that take Middle Earth in different directions – say a movie set entirely in the Shire, or one about the Rangers wanderings in the North.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  25. snice1 (29 comments) says:

    Some great scenes but definitely overlong. As Roddy Doyle said about James Joyce’s Ulysses, the man needed a good editor.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  26. Steve Wrathall (364 comments) says:

    My 6 & 8 y.o. boys & I loved it. Glad to see Pinus radiata is thriving in Middle Earth. Two quibbles:

    Why didn’t Bilbo put on the frigging ring and gut the white orc?

    Why didn’t the eagles fly them all the way to Lonely Mountain?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  27. Dean Papa (788 comments) says:

    how LOTR should have ended

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  28. bchapman (649 comments) says:

    The Melbourne Age reviewer was less than impressed.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  29. Azeraph (626 comments) says:

    Happy New Year everyone!

    Don’t drink and drive.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  30. Left Right and Centre (4,397 comments) says:

    I love what PJ has achieved but things like LOTR and The Hobbit just aren’t my bag, baby.

    I like the symmetry of his big epic efforts… two trilogies of three hour films linked to each other.

    Is there going to be a third to make it a trilogy of trilogies?

    I’m waiting for him to make something that just goes for the all out no holds barred LCD wow factor that schlunky mwah putanahutees such as myself would salivate to see.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  31. mikenmild (23,638 comments) says:

    I’d like to see him work on something original in story and vision. I still think Heavenly Creatures is his best film so far.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  32. Pete George (24,828 comments) says:

    Heavenly Creatures is the Jackson film I enjoyed the most. But he seems to be addicted to fantasy stuff.

    Perhaps he could do a real kiwi story. Say, a fantasy about a boat sailing from the far side of the earth 2000 years ago, and having to deal with giant moa and giant eagles, and maybe giant tuatara. And leave it open as to whether they survive.

    Or he could remake Goodbye Pork Pie.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  33. Viking2 (14,374 comments) says:

    Good or Bad here’s the payback for NZ.

    Travel websites have reported significant growth in searches and bookings for New Zealand this month, after the worldwide release of The Hobbit.

    The flight search website Sky recorded a 102 per cent increase in worldwide searches for flights to New Zealand this month compared with December 2011, including a 117 per cent spike in searches for flights to Wellington.

    The foreign currency exchange group Travelex has reported a 26 per cent increase in pre-orders for New Zealand dollars compared with December 2011.

    Air New Zealand bookings from the United States were reported to have nearly doubled on the day before the November 28 world premiere in Wellington, and increased by a third in Japan after a Hobbit promotion there.

    The worldwide tour operator Trailfinders, which has introduced a Hobbiton Express Day Tour from Auckland for 2013, has reported almost a 10 per cent increase in forward bookings to New Zealand for the new year.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  34. Dave Stringer (218 comments) says:

    Jackson’s cameo is in the scene early in the movie, where the dwarves are fleeing the mountain followed by fire from Smaug and the odd bit of rolling masonry.


    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  35. pq (728 comments) says:

    I have never seen a Jackson movie that had any personality or soul. And of course they are insufferably long, and utterly self indulgent.
    Some friend drags you along 48 frames per second 3d oh God please don’t take me again, let me seea European love movie with some real people in it.

    The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey barely leaves the driveway. The film lasts for 11 minutes short of three hours, and takes us to the end of chapter six in Tolkien’s original novel, which falls on page 130 of the official movie tie-in edition. That’s half an hour per chapter, or one minute and 20 seconds per page. The work of the sombre Hungarian auteur Béla Tarr, whose grinding tale of apocalyptic poverty The Turin Horse ran to a mere 155 minutes, feels nippy by comparison.

    This film is so stuffed with extraneous faff and flummery that it often barely feels like Tolkien at all – more a dire, fan-written internet tribute. The book begins with the unimprovable ten-word opening sentence: “In a hole in the ground there lived a Hobbit.” Jackson, by contrast, starts with an interminable narrative detour about a mining operation run by a team of dwarves, involving magic crystals, orc armies and details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote