<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Elias recuse herself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F E Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066302</link>
		<dc:creator>F E Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack5,

&lt;blockquote&gt;
   I still wonder whether lawyers would dare criticise the judges in this small country for fear of antagonising them and prejudicing the judges against themselves and future clients. Or are legal eagles and judges super human?
  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not super human, but you can see why I like to stay anonymous.&#160; I could not say some of the things that I do say here on KB without it.

 Kea,

Not race, but previous possession.&#160; The commonality of the ethnicity of those owners is merely a coincidence of history as far as the law is concerned.&#160; As I noted, exclusivity of waterways is not unknown to the Common Law.&#160;&#160;

Charlie Brown,

How on earth has Elias CJ anything to do with the claim being made, or an appeal of the High Court decision being lodged with the Supreme Court?
  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack5,</p>
<blockquote><p>
   I still wonder whether lawyers would dare criticise the judges in this small country for fear of antagonising them and prejudicing the judges against themselves and future clients. Or are legal eagles and judges super human?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not super human, but you can see why I like to stay anonymous.&nbsp; I could not say some of the things that I do say here on KB without it.</p>
<p> Kea,</p>
<p>Not race, but previous possession.&nbsp; The commonality of the ethnicity of those owners is merely a coincidence of history as far as the law is concerned.&nbsp; As I noted, exclusivity of waterways is not unknown to the Common Law.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Charlie Brown,</p>
<p>How on earth has Elias CJ anything to do with the claim being made, or an appeal of the High Court decision being lodged with the Supreme Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlieBrown</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066200</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlieBrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She should be fired full stop. How could such an absurd claim ever come this far? What a b!tch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She should be fired full stop. How could such an absurd claim ever come this far? What a b!tch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kea</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066183</link>
		<dc:creator>Kea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F E Smith, I see your point about ownership and property rights. That is usually how these claims are advanced. However I question that argument and suggest they are conferring those rights on the basis of race. Certainly that is my impression when the &quot;property&quot; is air, water, or the sea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F E Smith, I see your point about ownership and property rights. That is usually how these claims are advanced. However I question that argument and suggest they are conferring those rights on the basis of race. Certainly that is my impression when the &#8220;property&#8221; is air, water, or the sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066181</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calling for Elias to recuse herself on the grounds the Maori Council was once a client and that creates a conflict suggests that the government may not be as confident of their case as they portray publicly.  If this met the conflict test then we may need a significantly wider panel of judges that we have currently]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling for Elias to recuse herself on the grounds the Maori Council was once a client and that creates a conflict suggests that the government may not be as confident of their case as they portray publicly.  If this met the conflict test then we may need a significantly wider panel of judges that we have currently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack5</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nostalgia (11.26 post): so if our elected representatives find fault with the Chief Justice we have communism?
As a simple citizen I thought the judges were to interpret laws made by our governments, and flesh them out with the the case law that comes from our Western heritage. 

As a layman I find it confusing to see how this tradition and system meshes with the &quot;rights&quot;  we have inherited, through the treaty, of a stone age society without a written language, without  a sense of nation or state, and without any formal legal code.

As a layman I am also a little sceptical because of the large revenue the treaty settlement business generates for lawyers. The claimants assure us that the settlement business (and hence legal process) will never end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nostalgia (11.26 post): so if our elected representatives find fault with the Chief Justice we have communism?<br />
As a simple citizen I thought the judges were to interpret laws made by our governments, and flesh them out with the the case law that comes from our Western heritage. </p>
<p>As a layman I find it confusing to see how this tradition and system meshes with the &#8220;rights&#8221;  we have inherited, through the treaty, of a stone age society without a written language, without  a sense of nation or state, and without any formal legal code.</p>
<p>As a layman I am also a little sceptical because of the large revenue the treaty settlement business generates for lawyers. The claimants assure us that the settlement business (and hence legal process) will never end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostalgia-NZ</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066130</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostalgia-NZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Fran O&#039;Sullivan, the Government are expressing no confidence in the Chief Justice. 
Communism, here we come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Fran O&#8217;Sullivan, the Government are expressing no confidence in the Chief Justice.<br />
Communism, here we come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack5</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Krazykiwi in his 4.55 post is correct in drawing attention to the comparative case of Chris Finlayson&#039;s role as Minister of Treaty Negotiations after acting for Ngai Tahu in its claim against the crown. Finlayson obtained for Ngai Tahu the &quot;relativity clauses&quot;, which outline that once governments spend $1 billion measured in 1994 dollars,then Ngai Tahu and Waikato Tainui each receives 17 per cent of the value of remaining deals which go over it, while Ngai Tahu receives 16.1 per cent.

The settlements now exceed more than $1 billion in current dollars, and probably also in  &quot;1994 dollars&quot; the date of the settlement.

The &lt;i&gt; NZ Herald &lt;/i&gt; described the two tribes achieved this by tough negotiating. In Ngai Tahu&#039;s case, that would have been by Finlayson.

Now Finlayson&#039;s presiding over the whole settlement process. Presumably, this means he gets to stamp  top-ups he negotiated.

Still, few will care. Just as few give a stuff that Ngai Tahu&#039;s growing businesses apparently operate tax free under the tribe&#039;s group registration as a charity.

As always, I find F.E. Smith&#039;s posts well informed, interesting, and useful for a layman.. I&#039;m sure his integrity matches his knowledge, but I still wonder whether lawyers would dare criticise the judges in this small country for fear of antagonising them and prejudicing the judges against themselves and future clients.  Or are legal eagles and judges super human?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krazykiwi in his 4.55 post is correct in drawing attention to the comparative case of Chris Finlayson&#8217;s role as Minister of Treaty Negotiations after acting for Ngai Tahu in its claim against the crown. Finlayson obtained for Ngai Tahu the &#8220;relativity clauses&#8221;, which outline that once governments spend $1 billion measured in 1994 dollars,then Ngai Tahu and Waikato Tainui each receives 17 per cent of the value of remaining deals which go over it, while Ngai Tahu receives 16.1 per cent.</p>
<p>The settlements now exceed more than $1 billion in current dollars, and probably also in  &#8220;1994 dollars&#8221; the date of the settlement.</p>
<p>The <i> NZ Herald </i> described the two tribes achieved this by tough negotiating. In Ngai Tahu&#8217;s case, that would have been by Finlayson.</p>
<p>Now Finlayson&#8217;s presiding over the whole settlement process. Presumably, this means he gets to stamp  top-ups he negotiated.</p>
<p>Still, few will care. Just as few give a stuff that Ngai Tahu&#8217;s growing businesses apparently operate tax free under the tribe&#8217;s group registration as a charity.</p>
<p>As always, I find F.E. Smith&#8217;s posts well informed, interesting, and useful for a layman.. I&#8217;m sure his integrity matches his knowledge, but I still wonder whether lawyers would dare criticise the judges in this small country for fear of antagonising them and prejudicing the judges against themselves and future clients.  Or are legal eagles and judges super human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searching</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066081</link>
		<dc:creator>searching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 07:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Sir John McGrath, a former Solicitor-General, who appeared countless times for Government, and Sir William Young, a brother of a former National Party President, should also recuse themselves.    That would make it 3 down...enabling Gault Tipping and Anderson who all were involved in the  Ngati Apa judgment  to sit.

Comments  from our legal brethren.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Sir John McGrath, a former Solicitor-General, who appeared countless times for Government, and Sir William Young, a brother of a former National Party President, should also recuse themselves.    That would make it 3 down&#8230;enabling Gault Tipping and Anderson who all were involved in the  Ngati Apa judgment  to sit.</p>
<p>Comments  from our legal brethren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066044</link>
		<dc:creator>tvb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not think it was automatic for Elias CJ to be Head of the Supreme Court.  The title remained the same in name only.  That decision was Helen Clark&#039;s and Margaret Wilson.  But it was Jenny Shipley who appointed the Chief Justice to be head of the High Court in 1999?.  That decision was always in the hands of the Prime Minister.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think it was automatic for Elias CJ to be Head of the Supreme Court.  The title remained the same in name only.  That decision was Helen Clark&#8217;s and Margaret Wilson.  But it was Jenny Shipley who appointed the Chief Justice to be head of the High Court in 1999?.  That decision was always in the hands of the Prime Minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F E Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066034</link>
		<dc:creator>F E Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;so you consider giving once racial group exclusive rights to the nations water “Justice”
  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Actually, I have little issue with it so long as there is a well reasoned opinion that is justified by the law as it is.&#160; That means that there can be such things as private waterways, depending on how much of the Common Law you think was imported into NZ at the time of the signing of the Treaty.

Moreover, I am very much of the opinion that it is wrong to consider the issue as one of race. The issue is one of ownership, not race.&#160; The law is, and should be, blind to the issue of race.&#160; The case could, hypothetically, just as much have been brought by the descendants of the first European settlers in a region, arguing that they purchased the water rights from the local Iwi, thus giving them exclusive rights over both Maori and non-Maori alike.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  a view to treating all people equally. I thought that was how the law was supposed to work anyway
  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not at the expense of property rights, it isn&#039;t.&#160; I don&#039;t have equal access to your home, and nor does anyone else. Same principle applies.&#160; Different jursdictions have slightly different views on this, compare the UK position on mineral rights (they belong to the Crown) and the US (you own everything below the surface of your property).

 Of course, it may just be that I have more regard to individual and property rights than your more socialist position!
  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>so you consider giving once racial group exclusive rights to the nations water “Justice”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, I have little issue with it so long as there is a well reasoned opinion that is justified by the law as it is.&nbsp; That means that there can be such things as private waterways, depending on how much of the Common Law you think was imported into NZ at the time of the signing of the Treaty.</p>
<p>Moreover, I am very much of the opinion that it is wrong to consider the issue as one of race. The issue is one of ownership, not race.&nbsp; The law is, and should be, blind to the issue of race.&nbsp; The case could, hypothetically, just as much have been brought by the descendants of the first European settlers in a region, arguing that they purchased the water rights from the local Iwi, thus giving them exclusive rights over both Maori and non-Maori alike.</p>
<blockquote><p>
  a view to treating all people equally. I thought that was how the law was supposed to work anyway</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not at the expense of property rights, it isn&#8217;t.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t have equal access to your home, and nor does anyone else. Same principle applies.&nbsp; Different jursdictions have slightly different views on this, compare the UK position on mineral rights (they belong to the Crown) and the US (you own everything below the surface of your property).</p>
<p> Of course, it may just be that I have more regard to individual and property rights than your more socialist position!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kea</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066018</link>
		<dc:creator>Kea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F E Smith, so you consider giving once racial group exclusive rights to the nations water &quot;Justice&quot;. That is good to know, but my view differs. 

Why do you think the legal system would need to be perverted ? I think the Government should legislate the outcome, with a view to treating all people equally. I thought that was how the law was supposed to work anyway, so it is hardly a perversion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F E Smith, so you consider giving once racial group exclusive rights to the nations water &#8220;Justice&#8221;. That is good to know, but my view differs. </p>
<p>Why do you think the legal system would need to be perverted ? I think the Government should legislate the outcome, with a view to treating all people equally. I thought that was how the law was supposed to work anyway, so it is hardly a perversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbaiter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066014</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;why doesn’t the Government just legislate a favourable outcome?&quot;

Because they are so parlous in what they represent that they will probably need the support of the racist party to have any hope of remaining in power after the next election.

They could change that by actually making a stand, and articulating a coherent position, but apparently its more important to dance and sing with imbeciles in order to remain popular with a sector of the populace who doesn&#039;t even vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why doesn’t the Government just legislate a favourable outcome?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because they are so parlous in what they represent that they will probably need the support of the racist party to have any hope of remaining in power after the next election.</p>
<p>They could change that by actually making a stand, and articulating a coherent position, but apparently its more important to dance and sing with imbeciles in order to remain popular with a sector of the populace who doesn&#8217;t even vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F E Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066002</link>
		<dc:creator>F E Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;(The “right thing” being a decision that does not divide our country.)
  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
and Justice be damned!!!&#160;

Rather than perverting the legal system, why doesn&#039;t the Government just legislate a favourable outcome?
  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(The “right thing” being a decision that does not divide our country.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and Justice be damned!!!&nbsp;</p>
<p>Rather than perverting the legal system, why doesn&#8217;t the Government just legislate a favourable outcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nasska</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066000</link>
		<dc:creator>nasska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1066000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[chrisw76

I think we can take as granted that should the decision go against the Maori Council then the Maori protest industry will take to the streets.  They&#039;ve hardly had a setback since Eva Rickard&#039;s started the ball rolling so a defeat now would leave them gutted.

Regrettably, we have gone so far down the appeasement track that IMHO they have little to fear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chrisw76</p>
<p>I think we can take as granted that should the decision go against the Maori Council then the Maori protest industry will take to the streets.  They&#8217;ve hardly had a setback since Eva Rickard&#8217;s started the ball rolling so a defeat now would leave them gutted.</p>
<p>Regrettably, we have gone so far down the appeasement track that IMHO they have little to fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kea</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065999</link>
		<dc:creator>Kea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;You could look at it the other way as well: Assuming that the Supreme Court rules for the Crown, then any complaint that the judges simply didn’t understand the Maori Council argument wouldn’t hold water.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very good point.

 Maybe she should hear the case and we can just hope she does the right thing. (The &quot;right thing&quot; being a decision that does not divide our country.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You could look at it the other way as well: Assuming that the Supreme Court rules for the Crown, then any complaint that the judges simply didn’t understand the Maori Council argument wouldn’t hold water.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very good point.</p>
<p> Maybe she should hear the case and we can just hope she does the right thing. (The &#8220;right thing&#8221; being a decision that does not divide our country.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbaiter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065998</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But most of the public gets their information from media reporting of judicial decisions, and most journalists are clueless when it comes to anything legal.&quot;

Maybe so, but many of the public know this whole damn scenario is not that complicated, and they view it just as a politicised racist junket and a rort at the expense of taxpayers and all it needs is one political party with enough guts to pull the plug on it and it would all be gone tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But most of the public gets their information from media reporting of judicial decisions, and most journalists are clueless when it comes to anything legal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe so, but many of the public know this whole damn scenario is not that complicated, and they view it just as a politicised racist junket and a rort at the expense of taxpayers and all it needs is one political party with enough guts to pull the plug on it and it would all be gone tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbaiter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065996</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Imagine appointing a Judge, to hear this case, who used to represent the interests of white nationalists.&quot;

Quite.

The screams of bias would be shrill and unending.

But even more hypocritical, they would probably be coming from those &quot;open and fair minded&quot; people who are presently supporting the judges appointment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Imagine appointing a Judge, to hear this case, who used to represent the interests of white nationalists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quite.</p>
<p>The screams of bias would be shrill and unending.</p>
<p>But even more hypocritical, they would probably be coming from those &#8220;open and fair minded&#8221; people who are presently supporting the judges appointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisw76</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065995</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisw76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could look at it the other way as well: Assuming that the Supreme Court rules for the Crown, then any complaint that the judges simply didn&#039;t understand the Maori Council argument wouldn&#039;t hold water.

Cheers, Chris W.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could look at it the other way as well: Assuming that the Supreme Court rules for the Crown, then any complaint that the judges simply didn&#8217;t understand the Maori Council argument wouldn&#8217;t hold water.</p>
<p>Cheers, Chris W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F E Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065993</link>
		<dc:creator>F E Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;public perception of Elias CJ may differ.
  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is a fair point, although I think that perception is unfair to Elias CJ.&#160; But most of the public gets their information from media reporting of judicial decisions, and most journalists are clueless when it comes to anything legal.
  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>public perception of Elias CJ may differ.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That is a fair point, although I think that perception is unfair to Elias CJ.&nbsp; But most of the public gets their information from media reporting of judicial decisions, and most journalists are clueless when it comes to anything legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauleastbay</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/should_elias_recuse_herself.html/comment-page-1#comment-1065988</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauleastbay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=69796#comment-1065988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone know what the grounds for appeal are other than they didn&#039;t like it.

Maanu Paul&#039;s son is a District Court Judge and one daughter is a lawyer.  No suggestion of anything other than its a very samll legal world in new Zealand]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know what the grounds for appeal are other than they didn&#8217;t like it.</p>
<p>Maanu Paul&#8217;s son is a District Court Judge and one daughter is a lawyer.  No suggestion of anything other than its a very samll legal world in new Zealand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
