R E Jones, Mr or Mrs Nooki, does draw water, and have influence. You do NOT.

Bob Jones – a businessman, boxing aficionado and columnist raconteur – knows more, and has more influence, in matters of law and legal process, than Nookin – lawyer.

It’s not flipper – it’s flipped

I really am afraid you have completely flipped your lid. I am not campaigning for anyone. I am not trying to re-litigate anything. I have a pretty good understanding the PC decision and have not misrepresented it anywhere. You are on the wrong thread in so many different ways. Take your bile elsewhere.

Yes.

But ‘step by step’ is the pragmatic route and not one of over confidence.

Earlier post should have said ‘if they do not uphold the sales.’

And if they do uphold the sales the Crown have no higher Appeal.
On a pragmatic basis of having the opportunity to have another bite at the cherry if the case is lost: better to have one up the sleeve than none.

If we didn’t have a spineless government they would be seeking to recover costs.

You just do not get it.
You, and all your crew, are attempting to relitigate matters that have already been decided.
You continually attempt to re-open, and relitigate, matters on which there can, nor will be, further meaningful debate.

If you will not listen to reason, nor read and learn from actuality, rather than speculation / misrepresentatiion (even of the Privy Council) / lies / bullshit, then ridicule is requried to get your attention. Nevertheless, it seems to have at least got your attention.

In your message you raise only two matters of interest to me: Jones and Thomas.

R E Jones, Mr or Mrs Nooki, does draw water, and have influence. You do NOT.

Thomas (the case, the outcome and the injustice to Thomas) , Mr or Mrs Nooki, has so many similarities to Bain, that if you really understood what happened to Thomas, and how it was eventually put to rest, you would not be campaigning for the bullshit JFRB idiots.

Give it up: it was either Elvis or the dingo. Either way, Binnie was right, Collins and her stalking hofse (the ***** judge) will go down the tube.

Oh, one further point. Is Tamahere next?

Go back to sleep. I am going to get a rainbow for dinner.

It will never happen and the train will run for ever.

From the 1865 deed of sale:

Me ona rakau (With its trees)
me ona kowhatu (its stones/minerals)
me ona wai (its water)
me ona awa nui (its rivers)
me ona roto (its lakes)
me ona awa ririki (its streams)

me nga mea katoa o taua whenua o runga ranei o raro ranei i te mata o taua whenua
(and all appertaining to the said land or beneath the surface of the said land)

Not sure what brought that on Flipper. I asked why Collins should recuse herself. Normally a person who has to act judicially (ie, a judge, adjudicator, arbitrator) should recuse if there is actual or perceived bias. Collins is not required to act judicially. She is one of a number of people (collectively called “the Cabinet”) who have been asked to make a payment. Of course she has to participate in the process. Where are the lies, half-truths and distortions in that?

What standing has Bob Jones got in all this, by the way? Has he suddenly become the gospel?

If it is any consolation, I am more than happy the Arthur Allan was compensated. I am also happy the Rex Haig wasn’t. It’s called having an open mind as opposed to being perpetually afflicted by some bad experience in the past.

Oh, if you really want to get your rocks off by childishly distorting names, just fill your boots. It’s not clever and adds little to your case.

But of course.
(My wife and I always give thanks to the Taniwha every time we hook a rainbowion Lake Tarawera.)
And the MSM (circa 2012) let them get away with it.
Not one pointed question put to the MC and their followers.

As the Maori council said after the High court decision, they were disappointed that the judge focused only on legal matters.

??

Should the judge also have considered the opinion of friends and consulted with taniwha?

I was not posting in support of any particular eye colour – just from personal knowkedge of a terrible injustice that required Robert David Muldoon and an AUSSIE judge (plus Peter Goodon & Archbishop Johnstone) to remedy – over the objections of the wionderful NZ judiciary, whom, when push came to shove, valued their “job knighthoods” over the system they had used to persecute A A Thomas.

By the way, you silly fools, if you have not read R.E.Jones (in NZ Herald) this morning, try reading (if you are able) and selling him on your lies, half truths, diversions and distortions.