<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current Affairs shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulus</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093957</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely you should include Shortland Street.

There are more current affairs going on there, that in those named in this blog !!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely you should include Shortland Street.</p>
<p>There are more current affairs going on there, that in those named in this blog !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmokrightitis</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093887</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmokrightitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im still dealing with the fact that you linked to and quoted Glucina DPF.  WTF?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im still dealing with the fact that you linked to and quoted Glucina DPF.  WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HC</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093867</link>
		<dc:creator>HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time there were some good programs on television, and some were good nature or history documentaries. TVNZ7 showed some good ones at least, when that was still on FreeView. For current affairs I expect something along the lines of the BBC&#039;s Panorama or whatever else may come near to that. But hey, in NZ it is more like &quot;baked beans from a can&quot; quality for viewing, that we get. Poor and appalling, and it is time to turn the remnants of TVNZ into a couple of real public broadcasting channels again, similar to Australia&#039;s ABC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time there were some good programs on television, and some were good nature or history documentaries. TVNZ7 showed some good ones at least, when that was still on FreeView. For current affairs I expect something along the lines of the BBC&#8217;s Panorama or whatever else may come near to that. But hey, in NZ it is more like &#8220;baked beans from a can&#8221; quality for viewing, that we get. Poor and appalling, and it is time to turn the remnants of TVNZ into a couple of real public broadcasting channels again, similar to Australia&#8217;s ABC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HC</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093865</link>
		<dc:creator>HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on David Farrar, most those programs are not proper, quality &quot;current affairs&quot; programs. Such as most stuff broadcast on 60 minutes, 20/20 are over-dramatised, highly emotive or shock-stories, in some cases not even NZ made, or not that relevant to NZ viewers. There was only the very odd good show on 60 minutes on TV3 last year, like the expose on Bronwyn Pullar and the Exit Strategy documentary on ACC. Much of the rest was not much worth viewing. 

Sunday is presently not on, as I note, and before it was reduced to half an hour, which is too short. Most of what they showed last year was light, bizarre or emotive contents. Q+A also tends to have a very long break over Christmas and into the new year, and it is generally OK, but apart from that and The Nation (with which I detected a bit of an overly government friendly bias), the other shows on TV3 are mostly focused on overseas issues or stories.

Native Affairs is good with some stories that no other channel but Maori TV shows, but it is primarily targeting just a section of the population.

So this Sharp 7 trash is space that could be used much better for REAL current affairs, rather the nonsensical self-promotion of over-paid moderators and media VIPs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on David Farrar, most those programs are not proper, quality &#8220;current affairs&#8221; programs. Such as most stuff broadcast on 60 minutes, 20/20 are over-dramatised, highly emotive or shock-stories, in some cases not even NZ made, or not that relevant to NZ viewers. There was only the very odd good show on 60 minutes on TV3 last year, like the expose on Bronwyn Pullar and the Exit Strategy documentary on ACC. Much of the rest was not much worth viewing. </p>
<p>Sunday is presently not on, as I note, and before it was reduced to half an hour, which is too short. Most of what they showed last year was light, bizarre or emotive contents. Q+A also tends to have a very long break over Christmas and into the new year, and it is generally OK, but apart from that and The Nation (with which I detected a bit of an overly government friendly bias), the other shows on TV3 are mostly focused on overseas issues or stories.</p>
<p>Native Affairs is good with some stories that no other channel but Maori TV shows, but it is primarily targeting just a section of the population.</p>
<p>So this Sharp 7 trash is space that could be used much better for REAL current affairs, rather the nonsensical self-promotion of over-paid moderators and media VIPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hj</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093810</link>
		<dc:creator>hj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with politics is that we vote for parties and parties are able to be subverted by groups (e.g the red &quot;greens&quot;). It then takes precision to flay out the necessary ideas a democracy needs to think about but news programs are influenced by advertisers preferences, time (attention span) and ideology of the particular organization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with politics is that we vote for parties and parties are able to be subverted by groups (e.g the red &#8220;greens&#8221;). It then takes precision to flay out the necessary ideas a democracy needs to think about but news programs are influenced by advertisers preferences, time (attention span) and ideology of the particular organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hj</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093803</link>
		<dc:creator>hj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Radio NZ have a pro immigration bias (just like the Guardian and Economist). If it was just the national Front who made statements about immigration they would be justified (perhaps) in not reporting them. Along with David Farrar -(National Realestate) they maintain a deafening silence on the findings of the Governments own Savings Working Group. It appears they (as a group of progressive liberals) don&#039;t agree with it.
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/reviews-consultation/savingsworkinggroup]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radio NZ have a pro immigration bias (just like the Guardian and Economist). If it was just the national Front who made statements about immigration they would be justified (perhaps) in not reporting them. Along with David Farrar -(National Realestate) they maintain a deafening silence on the findings of the Governments own Savings Working Group. It appears they (as a group of progressive liberals) don&#8217;t agree with it.<br />
<a href="http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/reviews-consultation/savingsworkinggroup" rel="nofollow">http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/reviews-consultation/savingsworkinggroup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duggledog</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093799</link>
		<dc:creator>duggledog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reid, what you&#039;ve got here is a bunch of people whose experience of NZ is practically nil. And if they are from the provinces, that was a long time ago. They don&#039;t go back there, they don&#039;t know anyone from there and if they do, they say &#039;we should catch up for a beer sometime&#039; if they see them.

TV1 got rid of all the David Attenborough / BBC content, remember? Who broadcast The Blue Planet? Prime. What&#039;s back on TV1 now? David Attenborough. Hey - memo - this stuff rates!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reid, what you&#8217;ve got here is a bunch of people whose experience of NZ is practically nil. And if they are from the provinces, that was a long time ago. They don&#8217;t go back there, they don&#8217;t know anyone from there and if they do, they say &#8216;we should catch up for a beer sometime&#8217; if they see them.</p>
<p>TV1 got rid of all the David Attenborough / BBC content, remember? Who broadcast The Blue Planet? Prime. What&#8217;s back on TV1 now? David Attenborough. Hey &#8211; memo &#8211; this stuff rates!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duggledog</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093790</link>
		<dc:creator>duggledog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#039;ve said before, Kiwis generally speaking don&#039;t give a flying fuck about current affairs, much less politics, even less global &#039;movements&#039;. Which you can see clearly in the MSM and the fact so many people are actually taking Labour and the Greens seriously. 

Hence the abortion we have on at 7 p.m. I just saw a promo with graphics &#039;painted&#039; on - arrows pointing to what the presenters were talking about. I mean where do they get these people? It looked like a music video from 1988]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, Kiwis generally speaking don&#8217;t give a flying fuck about current affairs, much less politics, even less global &#8216;movements&#8217;. Which you can see clearly in the MSM and the fact so many people are actually taking Labour and the Greens seriously. </p>
<p>Hence the abortion we have on at 7 p.m. I just saw a promo with graphics &#8216;painted&#8217; on &#8211; arrows pointing to what the presenters were talking about. I mean where do they get these people? It looked like a music video from 1988</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093789</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My perfect current affairs show would include award-winning serious professional journalists from print, TV and radio, and only the best journos, and only the best stories.

The host is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; repeat not important to me. I don&#039;t care if a crotchety fat hairy old man in his dressing gown presents it, I don&#039;t give a fuck. In fact I&#039;d prefer a crotchety old fat man in a dressing gown over &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; current host, bar none. But I don&#039;t care because, to me, &quot;current affairs&quot; does not equal bimbo lightweight bullshit lest audiences get furrowed brows. 

Journalists like for example, Leighton Smith, Larry Williams, Fran O&#039;Sullivan, Phil Kitchener etc presenting on issues that matter.

Stories like Novopay for example and asking questions like if we already know from Joyce&#039;s leaker briefing paper precisely what the process issues from the ministry&#039;s perspective are and we&#039;re conducting a technical audit to find out that side, why pray tell do we also need an expensive third enquiry who will simply summarise both of those papers into a somewhat more elegant, &quot;high-level&quot; tome? Is it because you want to deflect the heat completely into somewhere else like the consultancy of the four who gave the go-ahead who joins Talent2 as one of the baddies? Is that why you&#039;ve staffed it with an apolitical figure and another from a consultancy? 

But who cares what I think, that&#039;s why I&#039;d watch those sort of journalists run stories that matter, because they think of things I would never, and that&#039;s why I haven&#039;t watched a current affairs show for ages. It&#039;s lightweight babbling bullshit aimed at morons. I mean surely someone in the television anatomy realises that the pursuit of such shit as they dish out continually is counter-productive, and is the reason more and more thinking people, high earners, have departed, never to return. Does this not matter to them?

Apparently not. Isn&#039;t that a shame. The rather sad thing is the 7 o&#039;clock slot is the perfect place to start de-dumbing the population - high brow times like Sunday morning is where shows like Seven Duh really belong. But the entire media have got it wrong. For decades now they have chased the dollar. As the classified advertising &quot;rivers of gold&quot; started drying the media have more and more focused on this: the audience aren&#039;t readers/listeners/viewers anymore and haven&#039;t been for some time. In times past we were brains, fed with analysis and &quot;all the news &lt;b&gt;fit&lt;/b&gt; to print.&quot; But since all the media changed that definition and we all became &quot;customers,&quot; the media has pursued us like it was selling toothpaste, with the audiences carefully analysed and segmented and fed according to the practiced tried and true marketing-driven segmentations. This switch as anyone alive on or before the 80&#039;s can witness, happened to us then and there is little comparison to the MSM today and then, is there. And it will just get worse. Pity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My perfect current affairs show would include award-winning serious professional journalists from print, TV and radio, and only the best journos, and only the best stories.</p>
<p>The host is <i>not</i> repeat not important to me. I don&#8217;t care if a crotchety fat hairy old man in his dressing gown presents it, I don&#8217;t give a fuck. In fact I&#8217;d prefer a crotchety old fat man in a dressing gown over <i>any</i> current host, bar none. But I don&#8217;t care because, to me, &#8220;current affairs&#8221; does not equal bimbo lightweight bullshit lest audiences get furrowed brows. </p>
<p>Journalists like for example, Leighton Smith, Larry Williams, Fran O&#8217;Sullivan, Phil Kitchener etc presenting on issues that matter.</p>
<p>Stories like Novopay for example and asking questions like if we already know from Joyce&#8217;s leaker briefing paper precisely what the process issues from the ministry&#8217;s perspective are and we&#8217;re conducting a technical audit to find out that side, why pray tell do we also need an expensive third enquiry who will simply summarise both of those papers into a somewhat more elegant, &#8220;high-level&#8221; tome? Is it because you want to deflect the heat completely into somewhere else like the consultancy of the four who gave the go-ahead who joins Talent2 as one of the baddies? Is that why you&#8217;ve staffed it with an apolitical figure and another from a consultancy? </p>
<p>But who cares what I think, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;d watch those sort of journalists run stories that matter, because they think of things I would never, and that&#8217;s why I haven&#8217;t watched a current affairs show for ages. It&#8217;s lightweight babbling bullshit aimed at morons. I mean surely someone in the television anatomy realises that the pursuit of such shit as they dish out continually is counter-productive, and is the reason more and more thinking people, high earners, have departed, never to return. Does this not matter to them?</p>
<p>Apparently not. Isn&#8217;t that a shame. The rather sad thing is the 7 o&#8217;clock slot is the perfect place to start de-dumbing the population &#8211; high brow times like Sunday morning is where shows like Seven Duh really belong. But the entire media have got it wrong. For decades now they have chased the dollar. As the classified advertising &#8220;rivers of gold&#8221; started drying the media have more and more focused on this: the audience aren&#8217;t readers/listeners/viewers anymore and haven&#8217;t been for some time. In times past we were brains, fed with analysis and &#8220;all the news <b>fit</b> to print.&#8221; But since all the media changed that definition and we all became &#8220;customers,&#8221; the media has pursued us like it was selling toothpaste, with the audiences carefully analysed and segmented and fed according to the practiced tried and true marketing-driven segmentations. This switch as anyone alive on or before the 80&#8242;s can witness, happened to us then and there is little comparison to the MSM today and then, is there. And it will just get worse. Pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Right and Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093784</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Right and Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hang on....

When I&#039;ve watched 60 mins or 20/20.... how much of that is NZ content? It&#039;s always padded out with American shit or global shit. No problem... but use the name NZ to describe it... I don&#039;t think so.

Geez... I&#039;ve never even heard of The Vote, 360 or 3rd Degree. Or The Nation. Will have to look them up. Oh ok they&#039;re new two of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on&#8230;.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;ve watched 60 mins or 20/20&#8230;. how much of that is NZ content? It&#8217;s always padded out with American shit or global shit. No problem&#8230; but use the name NZ to describe it&#8230; I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Geez&#8230; I&#8217;ve never even heard of The Vote, 360 or 3rd Degree. Or The Nation. Will have to look them up. Oh ok they&#8217;re new two of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viking2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093773</link>
		<dc:creator>Viking2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why didn&#039;t they put the dam show on TV2 where it would catch on with the &quot;younger &quot;audience and continue with a decent current affais on TV1. 
Duuurgh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t they put the dam show on TV2 where it would catch on with the &#8220;younger &#8220;audience and continue with a decent current affais on TV1.<br />
Duuurgh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete George</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093758</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a major difficulty facing Seven Sharp is they are targeting a very different, younger net savvy audience to TV1&#039;s traditional News/Close Up audience. 

If many of those who didn&#039;t switch channels don&#039;t like it they will switch off. And I know that a lot of younger people never think of checking out TV1. 

It could take quite a while for the audiences to adjust, if it doesn&#039;t flop too much and get dumped before that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a major difficulty facing Seven Sharp is they are targeting a very different, younger net savvy audience to TV1&#8242;s traditional News/Close Up audience. </p>
<p>If many of those who didn&#8217;t switch channels don&#8217;t like it they will switch off. And I know that a lot of younger people never think of checking out TV1. </p>
<p>It could take quite a while for the audiences to adjust, if it doesn&#8217;t flop too much and get dumped before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gazzmaniac</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093749</link>
		<dc:creator>gazzmaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having not seen Seven Sharp, but having seen the show it is based on, The Project, on Channel Ten, I would say that a light hearted look at current affairs is pretty good.  The Project is a good show, and it&#039;s not pretending to be a full on current affairs show like 60 minutes (which are usually rubbish with one sided reporting).  They take the piss out of everyone equally.
I do hope that Seven Sharp has been made to work well in NZ, because that format does work well in Aussie.  It has certainly put Channel 10 back on the map for current affairs.
And over here at least you can watch ABC and SBS for real current affairs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having not seen Seven Sharp, but having seen the show it is based on, The Project, on Channel Ten, I would say that a light hearted look at current affairs is pretty good.  The Project is a good show, and it&#8217;s not pretending to be a full on current affairs show like 60 minutes (which are usually rubbish with one sided reporting).  They take the piss out of everyone equally.<br />
I do hope that Seven Sharp has been made to work well in NZ, because that format does work well in Aussie.  It has certainly put Channel 10 back on the map for current affairs.<br />
And over here at least you can watch ABC and SBS for real current affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093741</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have never seen, nor never will see, Seven Sharp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never seen, nor never will see, Seven Sharp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dime</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093726</link>
		<dc:creator>dime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DPF - are you going to appear on seven sharp at some stage? or would like to? 

you seem overly generous in your praise and defense of this garbage show. 

Im sure NZ could handle a 30 min version of the oreilly factor. just include international news when needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPF &#8211; are you going to appear on seven sharp at some stage? or would like to? </p>
<p>you seem overly generous in your praise and defense of this garbage show. </p>
<p>Im sure NZ could handle a 30 min version of the oreilly factor. just include international news when needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom101</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093725</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven Sharp makes Holmes look like the BBC.  I&#039;d biff out all the shows listed for one decent current affairs programme, with extended hard but fair interviews of the major players in the economy, business and politics.  If we are going to own a television system then we should at least have that.  If not, just flog it off and be done with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven Sharp makes Holmes look like the BBC.  I&#8217;d biff out all the shows listed for one decent current affairs programme, with extended hard but fair interviews of the major players in the economy, business and politics.  If we are going to own a television system then we should at least have that.  If not, just flog it off and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093714</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s usually just Bomber Bradbury moaning about it because no one will give him his own show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s usually just Bomber Bradbury moaning about it because no one will give him his own show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tropicana</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093713</link>
		<dc:creator>tropicana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drivel (non dribble).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drivel (non dribble).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manolo</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093708</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantity galore, quality none.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantity galore, quality none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alloytoo</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/current_affairs_shows.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093689</link>
		<dc:creator>alloytoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71317#comment-1093689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s drivil.

The article on banks and interests rates was too poor to call journalism. 

Has no one in TVNZ done a basic course in economics?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s drivil.</p>
<p>The article on banks and interests rates was too poor to call journalism. </p>
<p>Has no one in TVNZ done a basic course in economics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
