General Debate 24 February 2013

February 24th, 2013 at 8:00 am by Kokila Patel
Tags:

211 Responses to “General Debate 24 February 2013”

  1. thedavincimode (6,590 comments) says:

    And lo, on the seventh day God spaketh thus:

    “I hope those mad pricks who are ruining my reputation on Kiwiblog take the day off. Boy, have I got an unpleasant surprise for them!”

    Vote: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. sbk (310 comments) says:

    and on the eight day he invented the blog and gave PG a PC…on the ninth day he said oops !.

    Vote: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Yvette (2,745 comments) says:

    The Vatican on Saturday strongly condemned media coverage of a report that is said to contain information about the influence of a gay network and financial mismanagement within the Vatican, and which may have triggered Pope Benedict’s decision to resign. But in his statement, a spokesman for the Vatican did not deny the report’s existence or dispute the description of its findings.

    Lombardi also questioned the moral authority of the media. “Those who present themselves as judges, making heavy moral judgments, do not, in truth, have any authority to do so,” he said. “Those who consider money, sex and power before all else and are used to reading diverse realities from these perspectives, are unable to see anything else.”

    While speaking out strongly against the tone of the media coverage, Lombardi did not confirm or deny the existence of the 300 page report by the cardinals or its contents. He did not discuss the effect the report had on Pope Benedict’s decision to resign.

    Lombardi’s statement on Saturday is a continuation of his initial response to the report on Thursday, when he said, “Neither the cardinals’ commission nor I will make comments to confirm or deny the things that are said about this matter.’
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/23/vatican-gay-scandal_n_2748470.html

    There is also threats of the Pope’s arrest, the Rhode Island issue and Los Angeles, as well as stories that people will occupy Roman Catholic churches at Easter demanding compensation for the priests’ sex offences.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Yvette (2,745 comments) says:

    God could be busy – or may, mysteriously, already have been busy

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Keeping Stock (10,181 comments) says:

    Nice to see that the Ministry of Justice has post-humously cleared Greg King on any wrong-doing. Given that the Dom-Post had chased him for comment on the allegations on the morning that he disappeared, I wonder how they are feeling at the news. There was nothing wrong with seeking comment in itself, but the denials that they had really made them look bad…

    http://keepingstock.blogspot.co.nz/2013/02/greg-king-vindicated.html

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Manolo (13,517 comments) says:

    Best wishes to a good, decent man: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10867291

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. Keeping Stock (10,181 comments) says:

    Amen to that Manolo; best wishes to Phil and his family in these tough days.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    For a party trying to rebuild and regain some sort of credibility Rodney Hide put on an amazing act at the party conference yesterday.

    They think you must have horns, and hate the poor, and hate the Maori, and hate the unions – well, that’s true.

    He then went on to refuse to revisit that, to some enthusiatstic applause and laughter. He also called 3 News bastards.

    I can only presume he ws being deliberately provocative and playing to a constituency. But his act was not a good look for a wider audience, he simply reinforced extreme views of Act.

    I don’t know what party officials and John Banks thought of Hide’s act but it won’t have helped in earning back any party credibility.

    Rodney Hide’s ‘hate’ speech

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 19 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Scott Chris (5,981 comments) says:

    Yeah, well I’m an agnostic, dyslexic insomniac.

    Stayed up all last night reading GD and wondering: Is there is a dog?

    (it’s an oldie but a goodie)

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Manolo (13,517 comments) says:

    And this was not a good look for a party fighting for it’s survival. To me it was disgusting.

    According to UnitedFuture’s bible, the whorish Dunne’s book, the one that P.G. can recite flawlessly, Hide was disgusting.

    Yes, he was speaking his mind, something so alien to the fence-straddling language so prevalent in the speech of the chameleon’s party.

    Vote: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Hide is free to speak his mind, but speaking it like that at a party conference is suicidal for a party clinging to survival.

    Hide attacked 3 News. How smart is that?

    ACT leaders in private fund probe

    A judge will decide whether ACT leader John Banks and his predecessor Don Brash will face charges over allegations they misled investors in company prospectuses.

    That prosecution is continuing through the courts.

    This isn’t new news, it could be seen as timed payback. Fighting with media may get immediate attention but it’s not always the sort of attention that will help your party.

    It’s biting the hand that feeds it.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 8 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. kowtow (7,953 comments) says:

    Excellent piece on the Illegal Immigration industry in Australia. And now thanks to JK ,we can share in it too.

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/overrun_by_what_the_press_council_says_i_cannot_call_illegal_immigrants/

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. Yvette (2,745 comments) says:

    Banks faces legal threat
    Act leader accused of finance law breach

    A judge is considering whether Act Party leader John Banks should face charges this month for allegedly misleading investors.
    The threat hung over Banks’ head as he took the podium at yesterday’s annual party conference.
    Court papers supplied to the Herald on Sunday allege that because Banks was an executive director of finance firm Huljich Wealth Management, he has absolute liability for false statements in the company prospectus
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10867333

    After Penny Bright’s actions have so successfully cleared John Banks of wrong-doing in those organisations she has raised this matter with –
    the Police, the Serious Fraud Office, the Securities Commission and Parliament, through a petition to the House of Representatives
    why is a Wellington court, case brought by retired Wellington accountant Graham McCready, still allowed to bugger around with this?
    Have they nothing else to hear?

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. UglyTruth (4,551 comments) says:

    There is also threats of the Pope’s arrest, the Rhode Island issue and Los Angeles, as well as stories that people will occupy Roman Catholic churches at Easter demanding compensation for the priests’ sex offences.

    Another theory is that proof exists that gospel of Barnabus is an original text. Biblical scholars have generally maintained that it is a forgery, but if proven to be legitimate then it adds to the number of early texts which contradict the Christian story of the crucifixion.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. krazykiwi (9,189 comments) says:

    Seeing the scapegoat thread reminded me of this: Taylor Swift – I knew you were trouble (Goat Edition).

    Oh, and to DVM’s first comment, the goats are on the left :)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. UglyTruth (4,551 comments) says:

    why is a Wellington court, case brought by retired Wellington accountant Graham McCready, still allowed to bugger around with this?

    Because the court would be seen to have prejudice if it didn’t looking at the evidence that the system will not prosecute it’s own fraud.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    flufftastic: Sunday Sundaes

    I’m at BK 7:10am-9:10am. Five soft serve helpings in my cup. I get five because the bloke I get is so generous each time.

    Fat white people this morning including my personal favourites a fat as anything mother and about four white kids ranging in age from 1-9. Two of the boys were just fucking fat. Their faces were like mini Gerry Brownlee style and yet somehow even more mis-shapen than him. It was grotesque to say the least. Credit where cridt’s due… the kids could run for at least ten metres.

    That’s a great breakfast for the kids eh? Fast food on a Sunday morning. And then one fat kid was sent up with more cash for more goodies. Just because you are a fat moron…. don’t turn your young boys into fat slobs. One boy was normal looking… the baby/ toddler? Don’t know.

    And then… another really fat ugly old white woman and another porky pig fat male child. You shouldn’t have hanging neck flab at seven years of age… whoa… fuck me…

    Saw a couple of other fat white adults there…. and then finally some humanoid shaped white people came through…. so the ratio shifted to about 50/50 fat fucks:ok shape. One fella was pregnant but the rest of him was ok.

    You know the ones where their fuckin *arms* are fat? Like… even the forearms have given up and started expanding like balloons? Yeah…

    Oh well… it’s not rocket surgery… finding fat people in their natural habitat. Disgusting retards. And they do look like idiotic retards.

    By my fifth soft serve I was only going through the motions. I wanted to break-up with my dessert cup. I think it’s time I saw other food groups. I took some home-made biscuits for the BK crew and some for the bread deliverer… but I missed the latter so BK got his biscuits too. Good fun.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. Rodders (1,790 comments) says:

    ???

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. iMP (2,345 comments) says:

    GASP! Is Ed Hillary allowed to be Canadian?

    http://conzervative.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/ed-hillary-the-canadian/

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. OneTrack (2,833 comments) says:

    lrc -but we all know it is their “genes”, so completely out of their control, so not their fault. Somehow it is BKs fault and their advertising. Advertising must activate the genes or something.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    flufftastic:

    In town… dancing right next to where I’ve put my coat down. Turn around… and some fuckwit has put it on and sitting down in it.

    Ripped my coat off this prick’s back and he got thrown out. Who are these people? You’re asking for a beating when you touch things that aint yours. I tried to make that as melodramatic as I could for the muppet… try to get the message across that it’s not actually ok at all to do that.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  22. OneTrack (2,833 comments) says:

    PG – “Hide attacked 3 News. How smart is that?”

    and “It’s biting the hand that feeds it.”

    You are joking aren’t you? I think it is tv3s charter that they are against ACT and anything approaching “right wing”.

    They are pwogwessives and they know we need to be told. And it usually involves more taxation and more state control.

    So, no. Hide was attacking an ACT enemy, the same as he would attack The Greens and Mana. Nothing more.

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  23. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    OneTrack (222) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 10:01 am

    lrc -but we all know it is their “genes”, so completely out of their control, so not their fault. Somehow it is BKs fault and their advertising. Advertising must activate the genes or something.

    I see that all the time- fat fuck parents create fat fuck kids. It’s really sad. The fat parents that do that to their kids are braindead. I wouldn’t even take my kids to those shitholes… if I had kids. I only go for the soft serve once a week on Sunday and even that’s got out of hand. I’m meant to stick to one-two only and without the massive toppings I add on.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  24. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    for enthusiastic do you say en*foo*siastic or en*the-u*siastic?

    Same for Muesli. Some kiwis pronouce the word as ‘moosli’ whereas I make it ‘*meu*esli.

    I hear some very strange pronunciations on talkback. One very intelligent sounding man was saying feral as ‘ferile’ with a stronger emphasis on the second syllable. The host then said it as I would as a sort of ‘ferul’ emphasis more on the first syllable.

    Dreadful kiwi speak: Listen to the work ‘drown’ next time spoken by a broad kiwi accent. It comes out something like dra-ee-ow-urn. Cultural cringe or own the uniqueness with pride?

    The fella they talk to when anything Pike River mine comes on the news… I have to turn the volume off. Oi’d loike thum toe roi-opun thoir invoistigoition unto thar Poike Roiver Moine deesarstar. I have to turn quite a few broad accents off. Horrible sounding. If only everyone could speak as nicely as the Tongan royal family.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  25. Longknives (4,686 comments) says:

    My pet hate is thickos that don’t know the bloody difference between ‘Lose’ and ‘Loose’.
    I guess that’s what happens in a country where you let Secondary School kids answer exams in ‘Txt speak’….
    (God help us if we mispronounce a Maori word though…)

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  26. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    kowtow#

    thanks for the link to Australian ‘socialist style immigration’.

    “…..Oh, by the way, somebody might like to ask the new immigration minister why, in the last few years alone, thousands of ‘asylum seekers’ have returned to their supposed ‘country of persecution’. This is another big secret the department is hoping does not become public: asylum seekers are granted Protection visas, only to travel back to Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan, marry their arranged brides and lodge applications for large groups of ‘family members’. And curiously, many of these asylum seekers, returning to their country of origin, do not have jobs; that is, their travel is funded by welfare payments, which they continue to collect while overseas…30’000 – 40’000 more asylum seekers may arrive before the federal election in sept….30’000 are currently waiting in Indonesia…..5 boats arrived just yesterday[sat] and I think that may be a record….”

    John Key is too Islamic for Helensville….too gay….too socialist….just too wrong. :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  27. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    I was watching the Food Truck programme a bit on One. The fella Michael starts off by saying he wants to find a non-sugar alternative to L&P and cola full sugar drink. And I’m talking to the TV saying ‘mate… you’ve heard of Coke Zero, yeah?’ That’s game over right there pal. I drank three litres of Pepsi Max last night. No sugar… drink as much as you bloody want.

    Is that a kids programme? The way they talk down to the viewer and the playschool soundtrack shit oh dear. The way carers talk to hard of hearing geriatrics in resthomes.

    The L&P sure.. no low calorie version so far that I’ve seen… but cola/ lemonade? You’re joking, right? How incredibly stupid.

    And he went to Waiheke… of course he did. Can you take me to…..a wankytown? Actually the people there seemed a cut above your average moron Stuff commenter. Even the kids could string sentences together with thoughtful coherence. Michael kept on repeating ‘give that a whirl’. Get one more fuckin kiwi as phrase ya drongo… how about ‘there- wrap ya laughin gear around that bi-arch’?

    That’s my fault for watching shit innit?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  28. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    I guess that’s what happens in a country where you let Secondary School kids answer exams in ‘Txt speak’….
    (God help us if we mispronounce a Maori word though…)

    So very true Longknives……basic education of children is now secondary to their PC education.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  29. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    I don’t know of any exams where you are allowed to answer in txt speak, longknives.
    It seems you do though. Can you please refer me to to the papers where this is allowed?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  30. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    LR&C: Keep chowing down on fast food soft serves and it won’t be long before you will be one of those fat people you mention in Burger King!

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  31. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    Longknives (2,184) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 10:28 am

    Didn’t English at one point have lots of different spellings for words and then they became universally the same? (in their respective BE and AE forms).

    And now with textspeak… it’s going back to ‘spell words however the fuck you feel like.’ Just like centuries ago. Cool.

    And most of a generation have come through with atrocious English language skills and sound dreadful and ignorant.

    I’m not perfect either but I care dammit… I care. I like words. Consternation is a recent word I saw in a KB post. What a great word. Pizzazz… my gift back to KB. Here… have the word pizzazz. It’s everything you always wanted in a noun.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  32. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    bc (775) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 10:38 am

    I reckon!! I actually made the same comment to the guy who poured all five of them for me. He thinks I’m off the planet.

    You’re not wrong- except I’ve been running 10kms a day, lifting weights, I’ve got a strict diet of low calorie only options on a standard day and keep an obcom eye on the scales. If they start going up too much then I’ll die diet hard with a vengeance to get back down to my happy weight.

    I doubt if those StayPufts have ever run 10kms in one day in their whole lives. They look just like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man from Ghostbusters. The stereotype doing it’s thing right in front of me was just too much to bear. I was trying not to crack-up too much as I watched feeding time at the zoo.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  33. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Pete George-

    I have always said you are a slimy coward, and your dishonest attacks on ACT today make me even more sure of that opinion.

    Rodney Hide did not say he hated the poor and the Maori.

    He made a joke about hating unions.

    You have deliberately misrepresented this, in the same manner you misrepresent so much.

    Despicable posturing coward.

    Vote: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  34. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    LRC#

    When I lived in NZ I new that kiwis had a differant accent based around the vowels. At the time I didn’t think it too serious a problem. Afterall, all English speaking places have different accents.

    Now that I have lived in Aus for 20 yrs, I would go so far as to say “some kiwis, NOW speak a form of Pidgeon English”. I’ve been back to NZ often over the years, and I do at times[not too often] have trouble understanding what some ‘young’ shop staff are saying. Americans ect would find it difficult more often I would think.

    Over the last 10 yrs I have often read via ‘stuff reports’ the praising of kiwis ‘unique pronunciation of English’. These reports have come from the education dept, schools, govt depts, Maori advocates, MP’s ect ect. – like they are proud of it. I think it has only made matters worse.

    It doesn’t bode well in the long run for the individuals who speak like that…as it really is a matter of lazyness more than anything else….some will not get jobs….moreso in customer service…which is the place of last resort for the under educated. Tourism is also a major source of income for NZ, and the higher the levels of professionalism, the higher that prices for services can be charged out at.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  35. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    Harriet (1,118) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 11:02 am

    I’ll have to invent some headphones that make all accents sound like Fiona Bruce. Then when I’m at BK I’ll hear ‘Get out from under that table’ in lovely, pleasing, exquisitely well-rounded tones…

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  36. eszett (2,374 comments) says:

    Redbaiter (2,116) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 10:58 am
    Pete George-

    I have always said you are a slimy coward, and your dishonest attacks on ACT today make me even more sure of that opinion.

    Rodney Hide did not say he hated the poor and the Maori.

    He made a joke about hating unions.

    Actually, red, he did say that.
    I’Il accept that he probably didn’t mean it that way and was only referring to the unions.

    However even the audience seems to have took it the way that he meant all three and offered him to clarify and he did not take up that opportunity.

    But funny to see you work yourself up into a rage and become defensive when one of your pet politicians says something unfortunate.

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  37. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    from Harriet:

    moreso in customer service…which is the place of last resort for the under educated.

    There might be a lot of truth to that assertion but I meet people all the time with degrees and upwards of degrees that are working in retail. I met a bloke working in the Telecom shop in Porirua. Masters. Seven years of tertiary education. And not in some dumbarse history or English degree… a real one… chemistry and physics or something bloody hard. I’m really impressed by his qualifications and said as much. He *is* the manager I think though. He thought I’d smoked a bit too much that day. I tried to talk my way back onto his good side but it was like trying to climb back up a waterslide greased with baby oil…. hahahaha. Talk about awkward.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  38. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    Re: ACT party get together

    If rich white men want to throw their money away into lost causes then let them I say. (Of course they could have done something useful for the country with their money like paying their employees more, but oh well)

    Remember: ACT party = John Banks.
    Nuff said!

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 8 You need to be logged in to vote
  39. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    Re: Txt speak

    With smartphones txt speak seems to dying away I noticed. Not that a lot of people I know used txt speak anyway, so I admit I haven’t got a lot to base that theory on!

    Speaking of which, I’m still interested in which examinations it is allowed to use txt speak in. Or is longknives talking crap?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  40. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    eszett (1,899) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 11:16 am

    hahahaha…. what are those superstars polling now man? Is it….. 0.0001%?

    John Banks or some clown was saying that 5% and six seats would be good. Yeah, that would be good eh? Do you know what else would be good? If hot sexy blonde triplets in their twenties called Fellatio, Allota Vagina and Pussy Galore turned up on my doorstep looking for a good time.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  41. eszett (2,374 comments) says:

    Well, LRC, just ask John Ansell, he’ll probably tell you they can get 40% or so. About as probable as the triplets showing up at your doorstep.

    No, wait, on second thought, the triplets are far more probable.

    Anyway, it will be interesting how ACT will try and re-invent themselves in time for the next election. I doubt that National will gift them Epsom once again, especially not if they are polling below 2%.

    The sole purpose meaning of Act existence right now is merely to provide one vote for the government.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  42. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    eszett (1,900)
    February 24th, 2013 at 11:44 am

    Yes, well- there’s a few Act voters now living within the protective confines of the Karori Wildlife Sanctuary where they can roam free from all of their natural predators. Keeping a few of them there just in case the numbers really take a nosedive. Preserve some of them for future breeding programmes if need be or it might be another tragic loss of NZ’s precious remaining biodiversity.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  43. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    What’s the difference between Rodney Hide and Pete George?

    RH wore a suit jacket in yellow canary. PG has the brain of a yellow canary.

    Ba Doom Chhhhh

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 8 You need to be logged in to vote
  44. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    “….Anyway, it will be interesting how ACT will try and re-invent themselves in time for the next election. I doubt that National will gift them Epsom once again, especially not if they are polling below 2%….”

    They don’t need to re-invent themselves as Key will just keep pissing on National voters and sending them there…or to the Conservatives.

    Have you committed the act of last resort ezette – the act of disiplining an insolant child with a smack for their own future benefit – an act of love between a parent and child?

    Did you use a wooden spoon….where the child can easily differentiate between that and a hand – a hand that is more often used in other acts of love….like cuddleing a child?

    They’re gonna leave Socialist National in droves ezette. :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  45. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Redbaiter – if one statement was all that was involved and your interpretation is correct you may have a point but that wasn’t all. Hide said:

    They think you must have horns, and hate the poor, and hate the Maori, and hate the unions – well, that’s true.

    It’s highly debatable you can claim that just refers to the unions. But there was more. Jim Kopkins paraphrased:

    There was a little moment there where you said “Everybody knows Act hates the poor, hates Maori, hates everybody, well it’s true.”

    I just wonder whether you’d like to come back and revisit that.

    Hide replied:

    No!

    Hide was happy to leave Hopkins’ interpretation as it stood – he laughed and so did some of the Act assemblage.

    I haven’t deliberately misrepresented anything, I have reported exactly what was said.

    Are you claiming that Hopkins deliberately misrepresnted what Hide said? If so why would Hide have chosen to not clarify?

    There can really only be one answer to that. Which makes you wrong.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 9 You need to be logged in to vote
  46. Jack5 (4,906 comments) says:

    The ethnic re-engineering of New Zealand continues apace.

    A Hooerald report states that 36 unaccompanied gatecrashers from the Tampa have since brought in 207 family members!

    Highly skilled, highly educated immigrants that all intelligent countries want? Yeah, right.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10867305

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  47. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Hide merely said he did not want to revisit it, because he had no reason to.

    He did not understand at that time of course that cowards like you (and eszett) were running all over the blogosphere completely and deliberately misrepresenting what he had said.

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  48. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    Pete George (16,392)
    February 24th, 2013 at 12:08 pm

    All the contextual interpretive skills of a supermarket self-checkout unit.

    Listen to how RH said what he was saying- said in jest.

    RH also had a dry sarcastic crack at TV3. Something along the lines of ‘where are they? There they are! I know they’re on a tight budget’. He might or might not actually think what he was saying seriously- however the style was definitely one of ‘I’m having you on- not to be taken seriously’.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  49. Manolo (13,517 comments) says:

    P.G., I’m utterly befuddled by your naivety and lack of comprehension.
    Are you taking us, the readers, by fools or what?

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  50. krazykiwi (9,189 comments) says:

    bc –

    if rich white men want to throw their money away

    You could have observed that if ‘people want to throw their money away’… but no, you choose to demonstrate what you hate in one spiteful statement.

    And you’re left in charge of school children’s minds.

    Shameful.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  51. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    Jack5 (2,818)
    February 24th, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    hahaha….. Auckland’s well gone anyway. What’s another 10 000 extended family members? Send them to live in South Auckland… .they might vote to go back to Tampa.

    They’re not immigrants… they’re ‘reunified refugee family members’. We love refugees!! We especially love the way they all learn English to a high standard and integrate so well.

    Mind you… white kiwis can’t speak English so why the fuck should anyone else bother?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  52. Longknives (4,686 comments) says:

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/new-zealand-high-schoolers-to-use-text-speak-on-national-exams/

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10409945

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10409902

    “Principals are questioning the New Zealand Qualifications Authority’s move allowing pupils to use text abbreviations in this year’s exams.”
    But according to BC I am ‘talking shit’.

    Vote: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  53. Manolo (13,517 comments) says:

    A former Immigration Minister – who changed the Immigration Act to detain boat people indefinitely after a ship packed with asylum seekers was reported to be heading for New Zealand – said this week he had misgivings about allowing extended family of refugees.

    Tuariki John Delamare, now an immigration consultant, warned an unchecked criminal element was entering the country and tighter screening was needed.

    “If it was up to me I would institute lie detector tests.” He said there were a “significant” number of immigrants entering the country under refugee categories who were “bad people from day one”.

    Do we need more of these people? Heck no!

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  54. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    whoa- what is that unholy stench? Stinks to high heaven!!

    Someone on this GD has let rip the mother of all brainfarts. GEEZ THAT FAIR REEKS!!!!!!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  55. wat dabney (3,724 comments) says:

    bc,

    (Of course they could have done something useful for the country with their money like paying their employees more, but oh well)

    And then presumably they’d be undercut by everyone else paying the market rate, and go out of business. Then their employees would be paid precisely zero.

    Why do you hate workers so much, bc, that you want to see them thrown out of work like that?

    You seem to be so completely out of touch that you fail to understand that job security has a significant financial benefit of its own.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  56. noskire (835 comments) says:

    bc (777) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 11:31 am
    Re: Txt speak

    Speaking of which, I’m still interested in which examinations it is allowed to use txt speak in. Or is longknives talking crap?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10409902

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  57. wat dabney (3,724 comments) says:

    And you’re left in charge of school children’s minds.

    bc is a teacher?

    No wonder he’s got absolutely no clue about the value of job security.

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  58. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    wat dabney (2,375)
    February 24th, 2013 at 12:36 pm

    No wonder he’s got absolutely no clue about the value of job security.

    I love the strike out code.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  59. eszett (2,374 comments) says:

    Redbaiter (2,117) Says:
    February 24th, 2013 at 12:15 pm
    Hide merely said he did not want to revisit it, because he had no reason to.

    He did not understand at that time of course that cowards like you (and eszett) were running all over the blogosphere completely and deliberately misrepresenting what he had said.

    Funny, the other members at the conference did understand that what he had said was ambiguous (at best).

    Deliberately misrepresenting,red? How so?

    He was even asked to clarify by his own team. That did not ring a bell with him, when not the journalists or his opponents but his every own team ask him to clarify his comments?

    Who knows, maybe his comments were deliberate to get back at the backstabbing he had suffered from the party. After all, he has nothing to loose.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  60. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    How long before handwriting dies out? How long before they stop teaching it in schools? Why do you need to teach anyone how to do that now? Everything uses a keyboard or a screen these days.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  61. Reid (16,111 comments) says:

    All the contextual interpretive skills of a supermarket self-checkout unit.

    Yes I used to wonder if PG deliberately takes the piss or whether he really does believe what he writes. I concluded awhile ago it’s definitely the latter and he really doesn’t understand the conservative mindset in any way which is a shame, for him, because you can’t be a proper “Mr. Reasonable” if you can’t even understand a simple thing like that. Lefties have never been able to pull it off, they truly don’t get us and perhaps that’s Pete’s problem, he just can’t escape the vortex.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  62. krazykiwi (9,189 comments) says:

    LRC, soon perhaps. The concept of ‘clockwise’ is a rapidly fading one!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  63. krazykiwi (9,189 comments) says:

    Reid, since it’s psychodiagnosis Sunday, my thesis is that pete sits on the fence on issues because he feels that to take a position something will have other’s believe he’s motivated by disapproval of the opposite case. It’s likely that he applies this yardstick to others, and therefore feels he’ll be on the receiving end of the same judgement.. so all the better to remain perpetualy postulating and avoid said judgement.

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  64. joana (1,983 comments) says:

    Geert Wilders found Australia to be the most repressive Western democracy he has visited. What sort of reception would he get here?

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  65. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    …. an now for a quick update of the meta-analysis of home viewer surveys this week which has the median predicted last episode date of Seven Sharp moving up a week from Friday 21 June 2013 to Friday 14 June. That is all. Thank you.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  66. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    “Geert Wilders found Australia to be the most repressive Western democracy he has visited.”

    It has too many of the most disgusting academic Stalinists.

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  67. Left Right and Centre (2,883 comments) says:

    If you want a good example of someone who slips very dry, quick and witty telling sniping little smarmy comments about his interview subjects right under their noses without them always knowing it’s happened look no further than Marcus Lush doing Radiolive breakfast. That’s the art of the dry comment. It’s dry. It’s subtle. It reaches the intended subjects like a secret handshake while leaving those with no sense of humour none the wiser. It’s an intelligence test. Compared to Marcus Lush I thought that Rodney Hide’s comments were obvious in their intended nature.

    I was in a club two weeks back and I accept that clubs are chock full of twats and that’s fine. I was telling one of these young fondued geniuses to fuck off…. using the words fuck off… right in his face… but I did it with a really big smile on my face. It’s amazing what you can get away with saying to people if you’re mixing the verbal content with positive and happy non-verbal signals.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  68. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Manolo at 12:21 pm

    P.G., I’m utterly befuddled by your naivety and lack of comprehension.

    Who’s naive? Do you really think Hide wouldn’t be well aware of what would be inferred?

    And actually whoever runs @ActParty on Twitter seem to be well aware as well, going by this exchange:

    @PeteDGeorge
    Rodney Hide’s @ActParty “hate the poor, and hate the Maori, and hate the unions – well, that’s true” cringe speech.

    ACT Party ‏@actparty
    @PeteDGeorge Those are not ACT’s views.

    Pete George ‏@PeteDGeorge
    @actparty Thanks, it’s important to make that clear, but will struggle to be covered. Can you give me a statement? I’ll circulate it.

    ACT Party ‏@actparty
    @PeteDGeorge will do.

    So Act Party does not dispute the widely held interpretation, and say they will clarify that it does not represent Act Party view.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 8 You need to be logged in to vote
  69. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    krazykiwi:

    my thesis is that pete sits on the fence on issues

    Funny, reporting a transcript is “sitting on the fence”. Asking the party for clarification of their position is “sitting on the fence”.

    And all the other things I get criticised for are “sitting on the fence”. That’s a tired old diss KK, a lazy fallback when you have no argument.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  70. Reid (16,111 comments) says:

    Who’s naive?

    You are Pete. If you really truly believe it wasn’t simply a joke, you’re a complete and utter idiot. Seriously, you are. If you were a lefty and simply trying to rark it up then it would be understandable, but you appear actually to believe Hide really wasn’t simply joking. Which makes your understanding of politics and the people in it around about the level of a particularly dim 12 year old.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  71. HB (298 comments) says:

    I have seen hundreds of NCEA papers – never seen txt speak on them.
    I don’t know any teacher who would let their students write like that

    We have discussed the handwriting issue at our school. Even the ‘laptop’ class has to handwrite in English and Soc Sci. They will need to write their external exams for NCEA so need to be used to writing regularly (as opposed to typing).

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  72. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    he really doesn’t understand the conservative mindset in any way which is a shame, for him, because you can’t be a proper “Mr. Reasonable” if you can’t even understand a simple thing like that.

    Ah, Reid, the expert on the mindset of righties – except you obviously don’t understand a simple think like the mindset of righties who don’t believe in your god.

    And, what universally accepted by righties conspiracy are you promoting this week?

    If reid and krazykiwi represent the mindsets of all righties it’s a much smaller group than I thought.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  73. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    If you really truly believe it wasn’t simply a joke, you’re a complete and utter idiot.

    Reid, if you believe it was “simply a joke”, said at one of the most media intensive occasions for Act, and Jim Hopkins re-emphasising it for Rodney to re-emphasise it, and then stirring up TV3 was “simply a joke”, then either Hide has completely forgotten about how politics and media works, or you are the idiot.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 7 You need to be logged in to vote
  74. Reid (16,111 comments) says:

    Pete, when Fat Bastard on The Spy who Shagged Me said that he likes eating babies, was he telling the truth, as you see it?

    But seriously, WTF about saying something that you knew TV3 would take out of context and report deadpan on, because they’re raging screaming insane lefties, don’t you understand?

    Don’t you get the whole point of not withdrawing it was so that TV3 would report it? That that was why he waved at them? Don’t you get that?

    I mean fucking der Pete. You really are a moron aren’t you. I mean look at it like this, idiot.

    IF it really WAS true, then do you think they’d admit it? And if they were going to “admit” it, do you seriously think they would have done it in that way?

    Not that it is true, lest you misunderstand.

    (It’s a shame I have to keep pointing out that it’s not true and I’m just using the hypothesis IF to make a point, isn’t it, but with you Pete, your naivity knows no bounds, so who knows what the hell you’ll take out of what I just said.)

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  75. nickb (3,675 comments) says:

    Another day, another GD FUBAR by forced and misplaced Pete George moral outrage.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  76. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    Re: Text speak language in exams

    From NZQA:

    NZQA spokesman Steve Rendle this afternoon said there had been no change in the authority’s policy on abbreviations in NCEA (National Certificate of Educational Achievement) exams.

    “NZQA strongly discourages the use of text-speak or any abbreviations — the priority for candidates is to be as clear as possible,” he said.

    He said NZQA had no separate policy for text message short cuts in exams and had made no change on its general policy on abbreviations.

    “Where language is an important part of the standard being assessed, candidates could be penalised for using abbreviations. Clear answers are what the markers are looking for.”

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10409983

    Ok to summarise:
    - NZQA has NO policy on the use of text language in exams, it is treated like using an abbreviation
    - When use of language is being assessed, such as in English papers, use of text language will be penalised (as it is with the use of abbreviations)
    - Text speak and abbreviations is STRONGLY DISCOURAGED
    - Markers are looking for clear answers. So if you want to use text language go ahead, but given that markers are of a different generation to teenagers sitting exams, there is a pretty high change the marker won’t know what you are saying, not leaving much to mark.

    So hardly an endorsement, quite the opposite in fact. If you used text language in an exam I wouldn’t be expecting a pass mark coming your way!

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  77. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    krazykiwi @ 12.22pm

    Oh enough of the faux outrage already!
    Now I must of missed my invitation to the ACT party get together, so I can’t say this for sure, BUT …
    Although I’m not a gambling man I’d put a decent wager on the people there being some combination of rich, white and male. I’d even go further and put a wager on the majority of people there being all three.

    Not being spiteful, just pointing out the obvious!

    Oh and in your last sentence, I think you have me confused for someone else. Sorry to disappoint!

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  78. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    wat dadney: krazykiwi is a little bit befuddled. I’m one of those workers you say I hate so much!

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  79. Ryan Sproull (7,060 comments) says:
    They think you must have horns, and hate the poor, and hate the Maori, and hate the unions – well, that’s true.

    It’s highly debatable you can claim that just refers to the unions.

    Yes, it’s much more likely he was saying that you have to have horns.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  80. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    But back to ACT. All this chat over a party that barely registers in the polls. Goodness me!

    Remember folks: ACT = John Banks.
    Even if National tries to convince the good people at Epsom to vote for Banks at the next election, I very much doubt enough of them could live with themselves to allow Banks to win again.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  81. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    Hey Guys, no point getting into dialogue with Pete George over jokes, he just doesn’t get the concept that jokes are not supposed to be taken seriously.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  82. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Government rape facilities to be built in Canada:

    “Pro-family groups such as Concerned Women of America have warned that these ‘gender identity’ laws will increase the already rising incidence of bathroom attacks on women by sexual predators, who will count on using the new law as an alibi if they get caught. The government ought not risk making it easier for sexual predators to escape justice and re-offend another day.

    And children of course are the biggest losers here: “If you had a 9-year old daughter, how would you feel about a man going into the bathroom after her? How is that child supposed to discern whether the man in the bathroom with her is a rapist, a peeping tom, or merely an innocent ‘transsexual’ who thinks he’s a woman trapped in a man’s body? It is unconscionable for legislators to put vulnerable, female children in such a dangerous position.

    “To be clear, we’re not saying that individuals who identify as ‘transgendered’ are sexual predators. Rather, there will be an increased legal opportunity for sexual predators and peeping toms who pretend to be ‘transgendered’, to enter female bathrooms. These miscreants will count on being able to escape prosecution, if caught or suspected, by simply claiming that they’re ‘transgendered’ and they are just exercising the right to ‘express their female gender’. How can a police officer possibly know otherwise?

    “Several women have been killed in the United States in bathroom attacks, and there have been numerous reports of attacks in Canada as well. Do we really want to make it easier for sexual predators to get in close quarters with vulnerable women by pretending to be transgendered?”

    But these militant activists and social engineers really don’t give a rip about such ugly consequences. All they care about is thoroughly destroying society and all of its long-standing social institutions and sexual values, replacing it all with their radical social and sexual anarchy.

    Indeed, the activists know that such legislation is a great way to attack Christian businesses, charities and churches as well:
    “Adding the terms ‘gender identity’ and gender expression to the Act will lead to trampling of religious freedom and conscience rights. The militant activists pushing this bill are not interested in using it as a protective ‘shield’. Instead, they will use it as a ‘sword’ to target Christian and other faith-based businesses, religious institutions and charities for holding biblical beliefs on human sexuality.

    “This will also invite trouble for private businesses and even religious institutions which will be compelled by the law to permit their employees to dress up in the opposite sex. Is it beyond the pale to imagine a male employee at a Christian charity filing a human rights complaint for not being allowed to dress up as a woman while at work?”

    Yes, all these attempts at radical social engineering are not only about destroying a nation, but singling out Christian moral concerns, beliefs and practices. The militants have declared war on everything we hold near and dear, and will not rest until our concerns have been muzzled and eliminated.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  83. Elaycee (4,333 comments) says:

    LR&C 1.33pm:

    I was in a club two weeks back and I accept that clubs are chock full of twats and that’s fine.

    Heh….. :D

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  84. RightNow (6,844 comments) says:

    ACT is merely a zombie party anyway, walking dead. Brash did in the ACT party nearly two years ago in an inept, vile and foul manner. Rodney is free to say what he likes about ACT, it’s not the same party he led. Banks is a moron, I hope he does get his beans in court, Brash too.
    If Hide started a new party I’d vote for him.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  85. cha (3,856 comments) says:

    And just when you thought reality TV had bottomed out……..Welcome To Myrtle Manor….

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  86. Scott Chris (5,981 comments) says:

    he just doesn’t get the concept that jokes are not supposed to be taken seriously.

    Depends whether Hide was dog whistling or not. Quite likely it was a nudge and a wink to the likes of Manolo and Kowtow. ACT are desperate to get votes and they don’t really care who votes for them.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  87. thedavincimode (6,590 comments) says:

    cha

    Hard to see it competing with Housos.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  88. Reid (16,111 comments) says:

    Depends whether Hide was dog whistling or not.

    Scott it was a tactic to get news coverage. That’s all it was. – Say something outrageous in the expectation that lefty idiots, being idiots, won’t be able to tell whether or not you’re being serious, and will report it as if you meant it. Simple. And it worked. Only morons fell for it and who cares about them because they’ll never vote for ACT anyway. But those who might vote for ACT also hear about it and have a little smile to themselves, as the smug but totally ignorant and self-righteous little shits in the lefty media get all lathered up over it. I wouldn’t be surprised if Morning Report does a piece on it tomorrow morning, as well. Let’s hope so. In fact they’re probably working on it right now.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  89. wat dabney (3,724 comments) says:

    Depends whether Hide was dog whistling or not

    What a load of crap.

    You clearly don’t have the first idea about Hide’s views.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  90. wat dabney (3,724 comments) says:

    Harriet, you may well have a good point but your problem is that you have cried wolf too much. Nobody listens to you any more because you’re mad and bitter. Your ludicrous hyperbole on gay marriage showed you are someone we can safely scroll past without wasting precious seconds reading the recycled lies of some pedophile priest.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  91. Reid (16,111 comments) says:

    On another topic, what is it about lefties that they can’t keep their hands out of taxpayer/ratepayer pockets when it comes to getting themselves re-elected?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10867309

    Councillor Cameron Brewer blasted Brown for “going around assuring people that he’s supposedly prudent” when the cost of his own office was increasing.

    “This is not any ordinary office. This is a ratepayer-funded campaign machine and people wonder why no one’s prepared to stand against him and his army of advisers and consultants.”

    [One of] Brown’s [six] spokesman Glyn Jones said in a statement the mayoral budget was set by law and his office only spent what was needed to fulfil the mayor’s leadership role get himself re-elected.

    So far the office had spent 10 to 20 per cent less than budgeted each year.

    “the mayoral budget was set by law”

    Don’t you love the disingenuous of it and the rigorous questioning of that statement by the loyal repeaters “journalists?”

    Possibly they forgot to mention that “set by law” really means: the mayor put’s it forward and then once people agree he gets a majority on it, it’s deemed by law to be set. Which means the mayor can just put forward any old thing and it will still be “set by law.”

    http://www.3news.co.nz/Draft-budget-calls-for-Auckland-rates-rise/tabid/1607/articleID/274131/Default.aspx

    I wonder how many free ratepayer-funded lunches it took before the six spin-doctors sitting in conference came up with that “set by law” line?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  92. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    PG: You really must stop getting your information from the MSM… or dare I say it, being dishonest. I was AT the ACT conference…it is completely incorrect that Hide “refused to revisit…” the jest about the poor, Maori, and unions…IN FACT the MC, sensing that the fuckers would misuse what was clearly intended as a jest, invited Hide to come back and clarify, which he duly did, and very eloquently too…

    His ” well, that’s true” was clearly intended to refer to our dislike of the unions, and not the poor and Maori…as the rest of that part of the speech made quite clear.

    At the very least, you are being very naive; you are probably being mischievous, and possibly even downright malicious…Mind you when you are in “party” whose conference could be held in an old telephone box I guess one can get defensive…

    But back to the conference…Was that you surrounded by the bodyguard of ex SA paratroopers Russell?

    Vote: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  93. UglyTruth (4,551 comments) says:

    Possibly they forgot to mention that “set by law” really means: the mayor put’s it forward and then once people agree he gets
    a majority on it, it’s deemed by law to be set. Which means the mayor can just put forward any old thing and it will still be “set by law.”

    It’s similar to “passed into law”, a little word magic to give the impression that the act in question has authority.

    What are the odds of people knowing what law really is when the state feeds them bullshit about it’s meaning?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  94. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Jeez, I thought PG was in a minority of one….then I took a look at the rest of the above comments…

    How many of you loftily opining on whether Hide was making a joke (I am the first to agree it didnt come out right) were actually THERE? Because if you weren’t, seeing the bit that ran – entirely predictably – on TVNZ last night will give you no clue to the context…which was created by several sentences which came before…(I am assuming what was on TV3 was the same, perhaps with a bit more breathless outrage….)

    However…when Hide looked down the TV3 cameras and said “bastards!” THAT was “just joking, but not really” IMO…but then I know the man well, and share his view of the quality of the MSM, TV3 in particular….

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  95. Viking2 (11,283 comments) says:

    Well I just happened to have watched what Rodnet said on TV1 news last night and had no bother with it at all. I was clear that he was referring to the unions.

    But then that’s just me. A lot more intelligent and perceptive than fence siiters like Pete and willy wankers like ezet et al.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  96. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    To be honest David, I couldn’t care or less what Rodney said. He’s a bit irrelevant these days (if he was ever relevant).

    I couldn’t help but notice this comment from you about United Future: “Mind you when you are in “party” whose conference could be held in an old telephone box I guess one can get defensive”.
    Now that’s a bit rich when United Future is polling at 0.2% and Act is polling at 0.1% (Source: Most recent Colmar Brunton poll)
    That’s a 100% more :)

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  97. cha (3,856 comments) says:

    Would the resident apologists like to defend the behaviour of Cardinal Roger Mahony who when confronted with the evidence complained that because nobody told him he didn’t know that fucking around with kids wasn’t on and then when he’s called out over his appalling conduct he compares himself to his god. Fucking scum.

    http://news.msn.co.nz/worldnews/8603712/us-cardinal-not-taught-about-sex-abuse

    In two years spent in graduate school earning a Masters Degree in Social Work, no textbook and no lecture ever referred to the sexual abuse of children

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/02/la-cardinal-calls-himself-scapegoat-in-sex-scandal/

    this scandal is putting us, the clergy and the church, where we belong-with the excluded ones; Jesus was painted with the same brush as the two thieves crucified with him

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  98. Manolo (13,517 comments) says:

    After such deserved hammering, is P.G. rapidly becoming KB’s new Phil Ure? :D

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  99. Scott Chris (5,981 comments) says:

    You clearly don’t have the first idea about Hide’s views.

    True – I mean, how can you be both a perk buster and a perk taker. Hard to reconcile.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  100. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    What I would like to know Pete, is from where did you get the bit about Hide “refus[ing] to revisit that”? That statement is not a matter of opinion, or interpretation, it is 100% untrue…Jim Hopkins – himself a former journo, so knowing exactly that the pricks were going to do with that comment – asked Hide to stay, explained with as much levity as he could why the joke didnt come out right, and asked Hide if he would like to come and “do that bit again”…which Hide then immediately did…

    How in the name of Lucia’s deity can you get: ” he refused to revisit that” from THAT sequence of events? Come on PG, I’d really like to know….you can’t have been there, or this comment would be unnecessary…

    bc: Have you ever heard of the margin of error? Perhaps some chap who is better informed than me on matters statistical can explain why your statement about relative electoral support is non-sensical…

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  101. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    One thing I’ve learned Manolo – you know things are a tad sensitive when the low blows start coming.

    DG – I’m aware with how the media works. I presume you would agree that Rodney would be well aware of what the media can do with any comments made, especially at an event where media are encouraged to attend.

    Presumably he would be aware of the risk of commenting as he did. Sure he was joking, that was obvious. But joking that could easily be taken as being about hating the poor and hating the Maoris – when Act already have a reputation of being anti poor and anti Maori – risks getting lambasted and scorned.

    And the result of this may impact more on National – because they get milder criticism in the same vein, and Act are trying to try themselves almost inseparably with National. It might make no difference in the end for Act, but it could drag National down just a bit more. Which may be enough to lose them the next election.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  102. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    But you haven’t answered the question Peter…WHY did you claim in your original post that Hide “refused to revisit” his comment when that is absolutely untrue?

    (I’d offer to pose the question another way, but it’s simply not possible to do so…)

    If you were repeating second hand information from the MSM or elsewhere, have the guts to say so….

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  103. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    David Garrett do you really think that ACT is going to rise, phoenix like, from the Ashes?

    I still get shit from them in my inbox, goes unread, should mark it as spam really.

    ACT is a party that committed suicide and is now a laughing stock

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  104. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    DG – see this video from about 55s – Rodney says No to revisiting the “hate the poor, hate the Maori, hate the unions” from Hopkins and TV3 then cut and said “He refused and took direct aim at 3 News”.

    Is that incorrect?

    And, ah, most voters get their political pointers from the MSM, that’s where elections are won and lost. It may not be a great way of doing it but it’s reality.

    And why would @ActParty say it is not a party view but also not dispute what was reported?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  105. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    PG: Yes, that is totally incorrect…see my comment at 5.59….as anyone else who was there will confirm, THAT is what went down, not some cut and pasted version from some prick at TV3..

    And on the subject of the MSM and ACT generally…

    Andrea Vance from Stuff has written three pieces on the ACT conference…each one containing disparaging remarks about me (I am used to that) and “facts” that are just plain wrong. Her masterpiece this morning in the SST refers to ACT’s “zenith” of five MP’s in 2008…in fact ACT had NINE MP’s in both 1999 and 2002, a fact which Ms Vance could have verified if she had looked further than Wikipedia…seriously, Google “ACT Party” and see what you get….

    This is exactly the sort of shit we got all the time from these bastards…

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  106. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    My census form arrived today. Perhaps it is the libertarian streak in me coming to the surface but I bloody object to some of the questions.

    I can deal with the questions on page one, they are a bit intrusive but nothing that I object to answering. However page two is where the fun starts.

    As far as I am concerned it is none of the governments business…

    What language I speak (Q13)
    What my health is like (Q16) & (Q17)
    What my religion is (Q18)
    If I smoke or not (Q20) & (Q21) & (Q22)
    What my relationship status is (Q23)
    What my qualifications are (Q26) & (Q27) & (Q28)
    What my Income is (Q30) & (Q31) & (Q32)

    I think that for the first time I will simply refuse to answer these questions. If the wankers want to fine me then so be it. The government has no need to know any of this information.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  107. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    And now I am in full stride (and it’s not even alcohol fuelled; I am on the wagon!) I personally disagreed with ACT’s media strategy (sorry Shelley) which was basically to appease the bastards and try and be nice so we’d get at least some coverage…We would have done a lot better to say something like “You can’t be relied upon to report accurately so piss off” to the ones about which that was true, and speak to the real journos only….

    As I have said on here several times, I always got a fair shake from the journos at RNZ, the supposed “Red Radio”…the questions were on point- if not always easy to answer – and I was always treated with courtesy and allowed to give my answer without being talked over….

    In another era, Patrick Gower would have had his microphone shoved up his nose when he stuck it into interviewees’ faces…Not all change is progress….

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  108. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    DG – so where is the Act Party response with refuting evidence? That shouldn’t be hard.

    I asked @ActParty to give me a statement on it and I would circulate it. They said they would, but so far nothing. If the party wants their official version they need to get it out.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  109. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Still waiting Pete…the comment is only three up, so I dont need to repeat it again…notwithstanding your clearly shaky recall….

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  110. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    David Garrett

    If you ever feel the need to shove a microphone up the nose of that buck toothed prick Gower then I will gladly contribute to your legal fund.
    The man is a hack, nothing more or less.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  111. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    Come on David, Pete is hoping that all of us ACT supporters will come across the aisle and support the one true “honest man” of NZ politics, that man with morals, the man with integrity, the man with a dead possum sitting on his head.

    aka the political slut Peter Dunne.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  112. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    What do you suggest we do Peter? Ask them to play Hide’s speech on TV start to finish, a la Alistair Thompson? Yeah, they will do that….

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  113. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Did Act not record it? If they knew what could happen that would be a good safety precaution.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  114. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Wat dumbness#

    “…..Your ludicrous hyperbole on gay marriage….”

    Since when was defending women and girls from being raped hyperbole?

    You admitted that you read this -

    “…To be clear, we’re not saying that individuals who identify as ‘transgendered’ are sexual predators. Rather, there will be an increased legal opportunity for sexual predators and peeping toms who pretend to be ‘transgendered’, to enter female bathrooms. These miscreants will count on being able to escape prosecution, if caught or suspected, by simply claiming that they’re ‘transgendered’ and they are just exercising the right to ‘express their female gender’. How can a police officer possibly know otherwise?…”

    Most people like yourself Watty, have been dumbed down by all the emotion involved and simply gone along with the flow.

    A while back my friends were outraged that same-sex couples are denied surrogacy here in QLD, so I asked them: “Why don’t the rights of children matter?”

    This is the pathetic -and only- response that I got:

    “I don’t see how their parent’s sexuality affects the rights of a child.”

    I pointed out that no child in the history of the world has had ‘homosexual parents’. Every child has one mother and one father.They seriously didn’t get it watty. A child has the right to their natural mother and father.

    Imagine that – the right to designer children but no rights to the natural parents. how selfish and immature!

    It was the first time I was really confronted by the stupidity of such arguments and I was also surprised that it was such BRUTE stupidity.

    However Watty, I am now less surprised with the comments you make! :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 7 You need to be logged in to vote
  115. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Are you actually trying to make a fool of yourself Pete? Yes of course someone recorded it…Let’s say the cameraman and Boscawen swore affidavits that TV3′s version was cut and pasted bullshit…do you think they are going to report that? Do you think ANY of the MSM would report it?

    I am starting to see why you are or were chief pamphlet deliverer for your man….Despite your claim to the contrary, you clearly have no idea how the abysmal MSM operates in this country…

    Are you a betting man? I wrote a letter to the editor of the SST this morning pointing out the error in Ms Vance’s story regarding ACT’s “zenith” of five MP’s; the fact that she was about 95% out …do you think they will publish it?

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  116. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    DG – you should at least get on record your version of what happened, even if it doesn’t get out to MSM it should be posted or press released so there is an official rebuttal. Otherwise in the future only one version will be found easily when it is Googled.

    I’m not chief pamphlet deliver for anyone but myself. Most of what I do is not party related, I operate independently. You’ve just blasted me and media for making things up, why are you doing likewise?

    I’m well aware of how media operates in this country. I’ve confronted Gower over coverage myself. You can’t change what was broadcast but you have to put it on record what your side of the story is.

    Did you advise Vance of her error? If you do that reasonably some journos are happy to at least acknowledge the error and are unlikely to repeat it.

    Ranting and raging is the least effective way of dealing with it.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  117. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    What tgher fuck does any of this matter Pete George and David Garrett

    Rodney Hyde is a washed up politician from a washed up party – FAILURES!!!!

    Normal people don’t fucking care – they are more worried about the depredations of current politicians not the antics of mediocre ex ones

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  118. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    You go on about the heady days of ACT David Garrett when they had nine whole MPs and where did they go from that Mate?

    Down the toilet and they deserved to, it wasn’t the media that consigned ACT to oblivion it was the ACT MPs themselves

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  119. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    DG @ 5.59pm
    Yes, I do know what a margin of error is. That’s why I put one of these :) next to my comment.

    It’s a bit sad that ACT is polling at the margin of error though. If you do the minus part of the plus or minus the margin of error, it puts ACT at zero!
    You can’t really blame the media for the low polling. Interesting comment about Radio NZ though, I tend to agree. With current affairs consisting of 15 second soundbites these days, Radio New Zealand is fast becoming the only place to get any detailed coverage about current issues.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  120. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    Ye gods, I find myself agreeing with Andrei (last two posts of his anyway).
    Quick, better go and look for the four horsemen of the apocalypse – it’s the second coming! :)

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  121. bc (1,355 comments) says:

    Wow Harriet, just when I think you can’t say anything more stupid then what you have said before, along comes your 6:40pm post!

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  122. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Andrei: surely “normal people” are’nt concerned about politics at all…more about things like…Why did Harold Camping get the date of the end of the world wrong…three times; who’s going to make the rapture and who’s not; whether the next pope turns out to have been a member of the Hitler Youth or had a “special friend” at the seminary…?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  123. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    The fact that you think that David shows how out of touch with everyday real people you are – which of course is why ACT is gone burger

    The politicians that can connect with the people are the ones that are going to be successful, the ones who look down their noses at them, maybe even mocks the things they care about with groteseque media created caricatures well……

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  124. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    jesus christ you are a fucking moron pete.

    not only a moron but youre just sad. you actually think youre part of the game.

    you think youre framing debate on blogs with your boring comments.

    i can just imagine when some staffer reads one of your inane emails meant for an MP “oh god, its that fuck wit pete george again”

    as for “i told act id circulate their statement” hahahahaha best they get right on it then! pete george will retweet it, blog about it and then bore us with it.. with his boring comments tacked on the end.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  125. nasska (10,917 comments) says:

    Poor bugger….I know how it feels.

    Ref: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x78svr6pta8b3bo/Bad%20Day.jpg

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  126. nasska (10,917 comments) says:

    My blonde girlfriend had just finished giving me a blowjob when she looked up at me and said, “I read that if you eat pineapples it will make your spunk taste nicer.”

    “Really?” I asked.

    “Yes,” she replied, “But I’ve been eating a tin a day for weeks now and yours still tastes horrible.”

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  127. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    “….Wow Harriet, just when I think you can’t say anything more stupid then what you have said before, along comes your 6:40pm post!…”

    “….Homosexual,Sir Adrian Fulford, High Court Judge and judge on the United Nations International Criminal Court has said, “We have suddenly travelled a long way in a very short period of time. To use the language of ‘Star-Trek’, it’s as if the warp-drive has suddenly been attached to LGBT rights. Pink Law will not be an anomaly but rather the shape of things to come….”

    Did you get that bc? “…Pink Law will not be an anomaly but rather the shape of things to come….”

    Designer kids with no rights to have their natural parents raise them – designed by those who demand rights under ‘equality’.

    NZ LGBT have no shame! :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  128. Rodders (1,790 comments) says:

    Is this the same Harriet who said he “didn’t see a problem with depressed gays hanging themselves.”?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  129. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Andre is right. ACT are gone. Started out OK but them just became a bunch of bi-sexual progressives. And then in the utmost bizzaro move, suddenly appeared with John Banks as their leader, who had meantime morphed into a bisexual liberal himself. For fucks sake what a fuck up.

    Sure they got pilloried by an extreme left media, but they were always too gutless to face down that media, (some even went so far as bawl like babies and beg for forgiveness) so they got what they deserved.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  130. krazykiwi (9,189 comments) says:

    bc – sorry, I wrongly suggested that you were a teacher. My recollection is that you’re involved with the education sector, and possibly an employee of a union.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  131. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    so the answer is the statist conservative party. cool. who needs fun when we can have “conservative values”.

    we can all live like pete george. awesome.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  132. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    “….Is this the same Harriet who said he “didn’t see a problem with depressed gays hanging themselves.”?…”

    Stop being a fuckwit.

    From memory,

    That line was INCLUDED in a comment along with the fact that happy expectant mothers don’t get abortions – depressed expectant mothers do. Therefor hanging oneself to some, is a matter of choice.

    Or they were words to that effect.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  133. Rodders (1,790 comments) says:

    Harriet (1,126) Says:
    February 2nd, 2013 at 10:07 pm

    I don’t see a problem with depressed gays hanging themselves – after all – have you ever met a happily pregnant women who gets an abortion?
    No you don’t, instead you meet a depressed pregnant women who has an abortion.

    It’s all about choice!

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  134. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    See? Some don’t have a problem with abortion – so why should I have a problem with gays hanging themselves!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  135. cha (3,856 comments) says:

    Oh dear, it seems accidentally killing people is a family trait.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  136. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Ah, there you are Russell! so was that you at the farm, surrounded by big hearty chaps in black shirts with no ties?

    We ACToids were all bi-sexuals now!! Last week I was a “leftist”…is there no end to your adjectival armory?

    so russell…I’m sure you wouldn’t just be a “sideline stan”…what party are actively involved in?

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  137. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    You’re so fucken dim Dime you’re not worth any effort at all. Just a blundering dumbarsed fuckwit who is so fucking out of touch he didn’t even know Chucky Chauvel was as queer as a church mouse. Just like your big bruvver bigot bruv, who with his hatred of the Tea party and his obsession with gun grabbing and his insane hatred of Sarah Palin and his Marxist sourced hatred of religion and his own bisexuality would be just the kind of freak Barack Obama loved to meet in the Chicago bath houses he used to frequent before he became POTUS. Both of you are so badly fucked up politically you’re no use to anyone, right or left. Good for giving head jobs to queers who like it from old white men and that’s about it.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  138. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    By Cripes you can tell when Russell is fresh up from his afternoon sleep! Sitting in front of his computer in his fatigues, tin hat on…stroking the barrel lovingly…whadda guy!

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  139. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    bahahahaha take a deep breath wussell.

    sorry im not as fixated on other peoples sexuality as yourself.

    usually the homophobes like you are the ones who secretly crave cock.

    its funny how you write about wanting to be “free in the woods” (naked im guessing with some other dudes) but you also want everyone to vote conservative. the guys who want to introduce restrictive laws.

    its almost like youre not against a select few being in charge, as long as youre one of them. then maybe you could get back at all the mean boys who picked on you at school.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  140. bhudson (4,736 comments) says:

    @Red,

    That was somewhat fulsome. What was the problem? Did dime perhaps suggest that Colin’s CCCP were not the right choice for NZ?

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  141. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Other than the Christians, the rest of NZ males have become flaccid metro sexuals – to frightened to stand up to a bunch of poofs in the defence of children and their welfare.

    You’ll all too fucken scared of being called names!

    Weak. Weak. Weak. Weak. Piss fucken weak! :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  142. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    What Dime suggests is hardly a matter that interests me. He’s just another dumb progressive troll who can’t work out its either the Maori Party or the Conservatives if he wants to keep Labour and the Greens out of power. He clearly prefers the Maori Party, so fucking good luck to him, the fucking ignorant time wasting drooling gape jawed progressive fuckwit. Just the kind of uninformed half educated dumbarse who is to blame for NZ being so far down the socialist shit hole they’ll probably never get out.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  143. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    “Weak. Weak. Weak. Weak. Piss fucken weak!”

    Sooo right..

    Oooh oooh oooh , Redbaiter’s being offensive. Quick, email Mr. Farrar.

    Fucking pants pissing eunuchs the lot of them.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  144. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Russell: You know how the most successful of the old wildcatters – back in the days when the derricks were wood and the men were made of steel – used to walk over a lease and get a raging bar on if there was “black gold” underneath it? Were you one of them back in the day, when the Aussie desert and PNG were the new frontiers?

    Damn have I heard some stories about you! Turning a nine inch collar with your bare hands when the chain tong broke….tell that to the young people today….and they’ll never believe it!

    “pants pissing eunuchs” …Priceless!!

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  145. bhudson (4,736 comments) says:

    Ah, so it was that. He spurned the advances of Colin Craig. Him and over 97% of other voters.

    As for the choice, some might see the Maori Party as more reliable an option than Col. After all they have done everything they said they would; supported as promised and opposed as notified. Col, on the other hand, is subject to charges of making stuff [polling] up.

    So who is more reliable?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  146. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Don’t worry Dave, I know if I ever come after you, the first thing you’re gonna do is start bawling and apologising. Going on past history that is.

    BTw, there’s no such thing as a nine inch collar. Can see now why you only ever made AD after what was it, six years?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  147. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    bahahahaha yeah, its my fault reddy.

    so what you’re saying is you want to keep john key in power :) thats good to know.

    funny how you were backing the statists before the last election. where would we be now if they had got in? bigger government? laws against having fun? cool!

    and clearly, Dime interests you. why else would you reply? surely youre too busy fighting your sexuality, yelling at neighborhood kids etc to reply to someone who doesnt interest you.

    are you attracted to me red? cause i suspect youre a bottom.. youd see dime as a power top.

    please stop thinking about me when you masturbate.

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  148. bhudson (4,736 comments) says:

    @David Garrett,

    Red is neutered by irrelevance. He may as well be an eunuch.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  149. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    It was getting very entertaining but dime, that last comment is the pits.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 10 You need to be logged in to vote
  150. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Come after me Russell? Kanohi Road Kaukapakapa…come on out any time…I wouldn’t come at night though…not if I were you…

    Nine inch collars? Depends how deep the hole is Red…probably didn’t go to 8,000 metres back in your day…

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  151. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Why not, you up a tree with all the other possums?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  152. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    I can see old Red standing at the brake… cheek swollen by a double dose of Redman..a bunch of black roughnecks cowering by the draw-works, waiting for his next order…sound effects on the play station turned up full….

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  153. Monique Watson (1,062 comments) says:

    Fucking hell. What a bunch of children.

    The media is destroying two political parties and you guys are arguing about how boring PG is and whose party is most likely to fit in a telephone box.

    Heads up, but they’re both fucked. By MMP and by a hostile media that thinks it’s heroic to portray the smaller parties as bum boys to National.

    And the smaller parties fall right into the trap by the appeasement approach. “If we be nice to Gower then he won’t eviscerate us. Except he;s your typical generation X fucktard who has been fed a diet of scarcity and revolution from day one courtesy of those marxist clowns in the Greens. Instead of being neutral he thinks he’s performing some kid of public service and boom there goes our independant media.
    I’d like to see more of RH arsing around because he looks human and this may serve to neutralise the hostile media. Can you tell Peter Dunne to arse around to increse his support PG?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  154. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Peter Dunne has never done anything but arse around. Just like his bum boy Pete, millions of words over the years and not a damn thing said.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  155. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Monique: If you have the elusive elixir which will lead the media to report politics without partiality, then Go You! At the very least, do post it here so we can all spread the good news… I’ll even risk the practising cert by helping Dime to hold Gower down while you pour a dose down his gob…

    Does anyone know if journos who work for the quality papers (as they used to be called) such as the Washington Post and the Daily Telegraph are allowed to have blogs, upon which they proclaim their political opinions?

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  156. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    The males in NZ are going to allow the gays to design kids – and design their rights.

    The rights of having no access to their natural parents. The rights not to be bought up by their natural parents.

    There goes childhood.

    “Equality’ will be a myth for some kids of the next generation.

    The kids of gays! How ironic! :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  157. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    An oldie but a goody, how a leader deals with uppity journalists, in this case a Frenchman. What is even funnier is the way the translaters don’t know how to handle it

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  158. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    DG – i dont think id need help holding gower down… just another reddy is attracted to me.

    Harriet – thats the first post of yours ive read tonight. what are you on about?

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  159. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Monique – Dunne has enough to do now, sole MP, party leader, electorate and ministerial responsibilities make it hard to save the party at the same time.

    It really needs a new generation to step up, it would be a potentially lucrative political opportunity, but little sign of that happening.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  160. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    dime#

    Kiwi males are hardly protesting in the streets about the welfare of children.

    Gays in Paris do though! :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  161. graham (2,285 comments) says:

    Oh I don’t know, Monique, I’m finding it quite entertaining!

    Pedantic Pete trying to over-analyse Rodney Hide, Reid bitching at Pete, David Garrett bitching at Pete, Manolo bitching at Pete, everyone bitching at the MSM, everyone laughing at ACT (and Pete), dime bitching at Pete, nasska’s 8:00 joke, Red bitching at dime, David and dime bitching at Red, Red coming back at David, Pete bitching at dime, getting told he’s a moron, and then predictably moaning about it on his blog.

    Only problem is, I’m just about out of popcorn.

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  162. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    harriet – thats cause the french will protest everything :)

    what am i protesting about exactly?

    what end game am i after?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  163. Andrei (2,532 comments) says:

    It really needs a new generation to step up, it would be a potentially lucrative political opportunity, but little sign of that happening.

    ROFLMAO – hey Pete,

    (1) Why do we need United Future? What value do they add?

    (2) What do they stand for?

    (3) If you aspire to a political career, as a career politician rather than being motivated by a vision which describes 90% of our current crop, why would you join them?

    (4) If you are the leader of a political movement what is your major task?

    Peter Dunn and United Future are a waste of space!

    And in the latestr poll nor one person sampled said they would vote for them – not one

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  164. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    graham – pete has a blog? lol bet the readership is huge. i can just imagine the 14 paragraph post on the cost of lettuce

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  165. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    They call him Dime because it’s twice as much as what his opinion on any subject is worth.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  166. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    wow stunning comeback reddy. just hilarious.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  167. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    A bit better than you letting slip you’re as bi-sexual as your big bruv.

    Run in the family does it?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  168. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Artificial insemination[designer children] already don’t have the legal right to one or both of their parents in Australia.

    If a child is ‘born’ in a gay relationship, and demands to see and/or live with their natural mother/father instead of their gay parents, they are now legally denied that by law.

    Children therefor are NOT allowed to live/see their own natural parents of the opposite sex to their gay parents.

    In other words, they HAVE to recide in a MM or FF relationship by law!

    This is far differant than the traditional adopted child not being allowed to live with their natural parents as their adoptive parents are MF.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  169. Pauleastbay (5,035 comments) says:

    nothing on telly fellas?

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  170. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    im not bisexual reddy. if i was i wouldnt be hiding it. unlike you i dont see the shame in it.

    you should download that iphone app. the one where your phone beeps if you walk by another dude wanting gay sex. that way you wont have to go on dates etc. just get some dick and lighten up

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  171. Pete George (23,345 comments) says:

    Peter Dunn and United Future are a waste of space!

    Far from it, they are quite useful for National this term and have a deciding say on a lot of legislation.

    They give National an option that doesn’t require the Maori Party, many will see that as not a waste of space.

    National’s options are severely limited if they don’t have potential coalition partners in the mix. They were polling over 50% coming into the last election but that was pulled back to prevent them ruling on their own, under MMP that has never happened and it is likely to remain one of the least palatable outcomes.

    So anyone that wants to increase National’s prospects in the forseeable future must see the necessity of having some support party options.

    Like it or not that’s the nature of MMP.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  172. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    Harriet – my best friend is a gay chick. i might father her child in a year or two. youre cool with that right?

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  173. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    oh dear…Bedwetter has been on the gins at the old folks home.

    Plus he called me a poof….how will I cope???

    Never mind, the poor old lad can run off to his censored blog where he can call us all names and have the likes of kris and D4J agree with him.

    Oh..and Dime, while I think that you might be right about bedwetter being a bottom I think that he may well be bisexual. If there is any masturbating being done by the demented old prick it will be why he is dreaming of Lucia Maria.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  174. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    Dime…does this pal of yours have big tits?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  175. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    No dime, no one is cool with that.

    This will explain it better -

    At birth a baby needs to attach to his mother. In the first months of his life, she must be available to appropriately meet his needs, to smile on him, to delight in his smiles. He learns to trust mother-love. Then as her son matures, she must allow separation and encourage competence. The baby crawls away from the mother and then looks back, checking for her presence, her approval. At some point in the first two years of life the baby realizes that there are two sexes and to which he naturally belongs. He identifies with his father. The mother must not stand in the way of his relationship with the father. The father must be available for identification.

    Joseph Nicolosi speaks of the importance of shared delight, moments when father and son engage in an activity that is mutually pleasurable.[23] For example, the father tosses his son up in the air. At first the boy is a little frightened, but then realizes that he is safe and this is fun and wants the activity repeated again and again. The mother may object “Be careful.” But the father ignores her. It is in moments like this that the boy takes the first steps on his journey to manhood.

    A child will not identify between their gay parents – no matter how ‘butch’ one may be.
    If an 8 yld child decides that living in a gay relationship is not suitable for them, they by law will have to stay.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  176. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    Dime

    Despite the ravings of an idiot like Harriet I think that you would be doing a great thing to father that kid. But hey, as I said, if you decide against it and she has big tits give me a call.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  177. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    graham: Excellent sir..

    PEB: No, firkin nothing…not even on Sky….this is much the best show in town tonight…well, perhaps not “in town”, but certainly out here in the rural sector…Johnboy and his sheep jokes must be due shortly…

    Russell: Are you aware of the new game for your playstation? It’s called “Pulling hard”…You’re stuck in the hole, at 8,420 feet…the company man is flying out and is going to run you off if you’re not free by the time he gets there…you’ve given two blackfellas a good hiding round the back of the sump, but a ute full of their mates has just arrived at the lease…Which threat are you going to deal with first?

    Go for it my son!

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  178. Pauleastbay (5,035 comments) says:

    I have to quote David Garret from another thread here today which sums up this thread ……the sordid mire….. lovin’ it and of course BB your question was the question we all wanted to ask, really it was – mint

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  179. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    “But hey, as I said, if you decide against it and she has big tits give me a call.”

    Why, do you know someone attracted to women?

    “my best friend is a gay chick. i might father her child in a year or two”

    Poor little tyke. A fag for a dad and a dyke for a mum.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  180. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    harriet – what if its a girl?

    my friend is loaded. Dime is loaded. we have the resources.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  181. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    “Why, do you know someone attracted to women?”

    its not unusual to know people who are attracted to women reddy. i guess in your scene it is though!?

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  182. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Dime: Leave the old chap alone for a minute…he needs to get his tooled hard hat on and try and work out how sensitive his joystick is with the new game…

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  183. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Dime……..are you a big fat old selfish prick that can sing?

    And goes by the name of Elton?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  184. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    “Dime is loaded.”

    Go to a clinic and get it cured.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  185. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    Harriet – nup. straight as :)

    but Dime is not getting any younger and i trust gay friend more than anyone else on the planet. so she may be the perfect choice to have my devil spawn

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  186. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    You’ve got a big mouth for someone who only ever made AD Dave.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  187. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    reddy – get what cured? being loaded? i dont think thats an std. at least not one thats on my radar.

    speaking of std’s. were you freaking out in the 80′s? when youd be at those dude clubs? being horsed by god knows who..

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  188. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    Hey Red, while I have you have you manged to come up with that one victory in your ten year plus war against the left yet?

    You know, the one (well you actually said you had enjoyed many victories) that I asked you about over a year ago?

    And a couple of other things I should ask you.

    1. Just what happened in the US election?, did you not say that the mad female from Alaska was going to be the POTUS?, how did that all go by the way?

    2. How will you cope when they do take all the guns away?, it is going to happen Reddy.

    3. And how about that birth certificate?…ha ha ha

    If you cannot cope with all that I will settle for you telling me all about one of your many victories. Come on then, how about it?

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  189. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    One of my many victories?

    Well how about making you look like a gibbering idiot every time you show up?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  190. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Harriet: since it’s Sunday and all…your comment reminds me of one of the great quotes…after Elton John successfully sued some British rag which claimed he played with boys at his mansion, he said on the courtroom steps: “They can call me a fat poof who can’t sing, but they mustn’t tell lies about me”…Good eh?

    Russell: Kanohi Road is the first on your right, heading north past the KKK pub on SH 16…

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  191. big bruv (13,571 comments) says:

    Oh Reddy…still can’t name one eh?

    Do you consider your life a failure?….I think it is fast coming to the point when you will have to admit that to yourself.

    Fancy that, fighting for ten years and being a loser.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  192. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    How about your house Dave?

    Oh, it’ll probably be the one with the derelict Leylands and the empty vaseline jars lying everywhere.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  193. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    As long as I’ve got commies like you apoplexing Bruv its never been a failure.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  194. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Oh Harriet…and here’s me being all charitable and trying to tell an amusing anecdote from the Inns of Court, aimed at no-one here…

    Dime: You can just see him in those leather chaps; the ones with no arse in it, and the frills all up the outside of the legs…Black scarf hanging out of the left top pocket, signalling things to the other hard leather men that red blooded chaps like you and me don’t want to know about..

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  195. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    “They can call me a fat poof who can’t sing, but they mustn’t tell lies about me”…Good eh?

    Fair enough too.

    I’m just sayin the kids could do better.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  196. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Russell: Shit, you’ve been out and cased the joint already! How did you know the old Jag was built when the company was controlled by British Leyland? Must be those military field glasses….you can’t see the rust from the road….

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  197. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Hey Dave, your house is surrounded by empty tissue boxes too right?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  198. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    Reddy – I’m in bed now. Wanna know what I’m wearing?

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  199. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Hey dime….if you havn’t already gone to bed to have a pull over big titted tarts…..click on last nights GD…..the last video link on the page I posted for Johnboy, has a fucken hot chick singing in french….. :cool:

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  200. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Probably your big bruvver.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  201. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    Naah Dave, its just with the mustache and all that, I knew that’s how it would be.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  202. Harriet (4,616 comments) says:

    Probably your big bruvver.

    hhahahhahhahahahhahahah

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  203. cha (3,856 comments) says:

    Eefin and hambonin at Harrys.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  204. dime (9,675 comments) says:

    Reddy – interesting that your thoughts automatically go to picturing two dudes…

    Harriet – umm ok? Lol

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  205. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Russell: so how’s “Pulling Hard” going on the playstation? Challenging enough for ya big guy? Remember, gently does it…don’t pull too hard and twist off…anyone can do that…

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  206. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    You got me there Russell..no, fair do’s…I did have to severely trim the ‘tache back when the hard leather men got the wrong idea…how did you work out the signals in those bars in the Village? What with you having left school at 14…

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  207. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    That’d be the same age as you started right?

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  208. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    jesus, you have been spying russell! yes, I admit it…started at 14, out by 31 with a couple of pieces of parchment…but by Godfathers I never did manage 8000 feet of open hole….it takes a rare Man to do that…

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  209. David Garrett (6,786 comments) says:

    Dime: You mentioned “horsing” before…is that when one guy gets in behind another guy who’s wearing those leather chaps with the arse cut out…the big hairy buttocks all exposed….is that how it goes?

    God, I’ve created one hell of an image there…I’ll need two sedatives to get that out of my head before bed….

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  210. Redbaiter (8,032 comments) says:

    “I admit it…started at 14,”

    Don’t feel bad, most kids don’t go to school until they can talk properly.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  211. thedavincimode (6,590 comments) says:

    [sigh font] … and to think that he’s been trying so hard to be credible and authoritative.

    Oh well, just another small tack on his path to vindication. He’s had these little setbacks before and always managed to bounce back … and repeat the experience …

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.