<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parliament 28 February 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/parliament_28_february_2013.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/parliament_28_february_2013.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tauhei Notts</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/parliament_28_february_2013.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tauhei Notts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=72067#comment-1104636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This government has been given insufficient credit for the way they are tackling rorts in the Student Loan scheme.
Sorting out these rorts should have been done years ago.
I am thinking here about fringe benefits granted by companies owned by the  borrower and other bits.
Example; if I have shares in Fonterra Investment fund and get a $72 dividend it will be tax free as it is a Portfolio Investment Entity.
A student loan borrower&#039;s $72 dividend will be tax free, but the tax man will take $12 of that dividend to reduce the student loan.  That is, 12% of the pretax sum of that dividend.
It is difficult to explain, but this government is on the right track.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This government has been given insufficient credit for the way they are tackling rorts in the Student Loan scheme.<br />
Sorting out these rorts should have been done years ago.<br />
I am thinking here about fringe benefits granted by companies owned by the  borrower and other bits.<br />
Example; if I have shares in Fonterra Investment fund and get a $72 dividend it will be tax free as it is a Portfolio Investment Entity.<br />
A student loan borrower&#8217;s $72 dividend will be tax free, but the tax man will take $12 of that dividend to reduce the student loan.  That is, 12% of the pretax sum of that dividend.<br />
It is difficult to explain, but this government is on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
