<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The racist George Galloway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristanb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104220</link>
		<dc:creator>tristanb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 04:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1104220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know what makes me mad? That Father Christmas, aka Santa Claus. I hate him so much.

I stopped believing in Him as a child, and since then, I guess I&#039;ve hated him. Makes perfect sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what makes me mad? That Father Christmas, aka Santa Claus. I hate him so much.</p>
<p>I stopped believing in Him as a child, and since then, I guess I&#8217;ve hated him. Makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1104163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why the theists here have such a hard-on for Richard Dawkins, who he chooses to debate, and whether or not he hates god. It&#039;s all completely irrelevant to George Galloway being labeled a racist for walking out of a debate based on the nationality of his opponent.

Perhaps superficially similar, but very different people with very different motivations.

From what I have read and seen, Dawkins&#039; rejection of god is not philosophical so that would be a fair reason for not wanting to get in a debate with a religious philosopher about it. Arguments based upon a question of certainty can easily be challenged - but philosophical counter arguments much less so. Like sword vs cloud. Entertaining for some - but not really telling us anything.

Galloway on the other hand is a politician who has taken up Islam. He&#039;s mimicking Ahmadinejad when he rejects the existence of Israel. He&#039;s not exactly anti-Jewish (he says), but against the idea of a Jewish nation. Anti-zionist perhaps.

Kinda silly when you consider that Islamists want exactly the same thing for their religion: Islamist states. Islamic Republic of Iran anyone?

Galloway&#039;s view is most likely motivated by his religion. He has taken sides in a religious-political conflict. Refusing to argue based on nationality just shows he is a twat. Both him and his opponent would have been a reasonable match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why the theists here have such a hard-on for Richard Dawkins, who he chooses to debate, and whether or not he hates god. It&#8217;s all completely irrelevant to George Galloway being labeled a racist for walking out of a debate based on the nationality of his opponent.</p>
<p>Perhaps superficially similar, but very different people with very different motivations.</p>
<p>From what I have read and seen, Dawkins&#8217; rejection of god is not philosophical so that would be a fair reason for not wanting to get in a debate with a religious philosopher about it. Arguments based upon a question of certainty can easily be challenged &#8211; but philosophical counter arguments much less so. Like sword vs cloud. Entertaining for some &#8211; but not really telling us anything.</p>
<p>Galloway on the other hand is a politician who has taken up Islam. He&#8217;s mimicking Ahmadinejad when he rejects the existence of Israel. He&#8217;s not exactly anti-Jewish (he says), but against the idea of a Jewish nation. Anti-zionist perhaps.</p>
<p>Kinda silly when you consider that Islamists want exactly the same thing for their religion: Islamist states. Islamic Republic of Iran anyone?</p>
<p>Galloway&#8217;s view is most likely motivated by his religion. He has taken sides in a religious-political conflict. Refusing to argue based on nationality just shows he is a twat. Both him and his opponent would have been a reasonable match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muggins</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104153</link>
		<dc:creator>muggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1104153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can Dawkins get to know something that doesn&#039;t exist? 
Billions of Chinese don&#039;t believe there is a god. 
Also, Church of England schools do not have priests. I went to one for four years so I should know. The only religious teacher at the school I went to was the Chaplain , who only took Divinity classes and the like. 
As for the Latin teacher ,he was devoutly Social Credit, hence those in the class that weren&#039;t interested in Latin used to ask him about Social Credit.We all learnt more about Social Credit than we did Latin. 
Einstein did not believe in a superior being.
Dawkins writings are a bit beyond me but I agree with him when he says god is a delusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Dawkins get to know something that doesn&#8217;t exist?<br />
Billions of Chinese don&#8217;t believe there is a god.<br />
Also, Church of England schools do not have priests. I went to one for four years so I should know. The only religious teacher at the school I went to was the Chaplain , who only took Divinity classes and the like.<br />
As for the Latin teacher ,he was devoutly Social Credit, hence those in the class that weren&#8217;t interested in Latin used to ask him about Social Credit.We all learnt more about Social Credit than we did Latin.<br />
Einstein did not believe in a superior being.<br />
Dawkins writings are a bit beyond me but I agree with him when he says god is a delusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Papa</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104123</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1104123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have just watched part 1 of THE TROUBLE WITH ATHEISM, and that will be all I watch. This Rod Liddle fellow comes across as a ponce, which means the rest of the program will be unwatchable. While it could be argued that Dawkins is also a ponce, at least he makes a coherent argument. I see nothing of that from Liddle, and his claim that Stalin was an atheist immediately raises a red flag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have just watched part 1 of THE TROUBLE WITH ATHEISM, and that will be all I watch. This Rod Liddle fellow comes across as a ponce, which means the rest of the program will be unwatchable. While it could be argued that Dawkins is also a ponce, at least he makes a coherent argument. I see nothing of that from Liddle, and his claim that Stalin was an atheist immediately raises a red flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103989</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott, have you read the God Delusion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, have you read the God Delusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMP</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103988</link>
		<dc:creator>iMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the frothy-at-the-mouth anti-religionsists, I thoroughly recommend this erudite and fair BBC/Guardian one-hour documentary by agnostic investigative reporter Rod Liddle THE TROUBLE WITH ATHETISM (Dec.2006). 

It focuses on atheism for its perceived similarities to religion, as well as arrogance and intolerance. The programme includes interviews with a number of prominent scientists, including atheists Richard Dawkins and Peter Atkins and Anglican priest John Polkinghorne. It also includes an interview with Ellen Johnson, the president of American Atheists.  REALLY GOOD WATCH.

Here&#039;s Part 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i20vLIgBt4M]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the frothy-at-the-mouth anti-religionsists, I thoroughly recommend this erudite and fair BBC/Guardian one-hour documentary by agnostic investigative reporter Rod Liddle THE TROUBLE WITH ATHETISM (Dec.2006). </p>
<p>It focuses on atheism for its perceived similarities to religion, as well as arrogance and intolerance. The programme includes interviews with a number of prominent scientists, including atheists Richard Dawkins and Peter Atkins and Anglican priest John Polkinghorne. It also includes an interview with Ellen Johnson, the president of American Atheists.  REALLY GOOD WATCH.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Part 1. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i20vLIgBt4M" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i20vLIgBt4M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103979</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contrarian – my dear chap – I can see why you call yourself the contrarian, because you are happy to argue opinions contrary to the facts.

I think Mr Dawkins has been very clear in what he has said. He is specifically talking about the God of the old Testament.He is not talking about &quot;all concepts of God&quot;. He is specifically talking about the God of the old Testament. He hates that God as a misogynist, malevolent bully.

I think his opinions are abundantly clear my dear old thing. He hates God while he also denies his existence. I appreciate that seems a little mixed up, but that is where Mr Dawkins is at right now.

One can only hope that one day he actually gets to know God. Hopefully he might change his mind?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contrarian – my dear chap – I can see why you call yourself the contrarian, because you are happy to argue opinions contrary to the facts.</p>
<p>I think Mr Dawkins has been very clear in what he has said. He is specifically talking about the God of the old Testament.He is not talking about &#8220;all concepts of God&#8221;. He is specifically talking about the God of the old Testament. He hates that God as a misogynist, malevolent bully.</p>
<p>I think his opinions are abundantly clear my dear old thing. He hates God while he also denies his existence. I appreciate that seems a little mixed up, but that is where Mr Dawkins is at right now.</p>
<p>One can only hope that one day he actually gets to know God. Hopefully he might change his mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMP</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103974</link>
		<dc:creator>iMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott, if Richard Dawkins is an atheist, and God doesn&#039;t exist, how can he hate him?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, if Richard Dawkins is an atheist, and God doesn&#8217;t exist, how can he hate him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMP</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103972</link>
		<dc:creator>iMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a word &quot;racism&quot; covers more than &quot;race.&quot;  It also concerns xenophobia (fear of &quot;others&quot;) as well as bigotry. Galloway is a class A &quot;racist.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a word &#8220;racism&#8221; covers more than &#8220;race.&#8221;  It also concerns xenophobia (fear of &#8220;others&#8221;) as well as bigotry. Galloway is a class A &#8220;racist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wrathall</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103961</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wrathall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should the Jews leave the West Bank? Don&#039;t the Arabs like &quot;diversity&quot; in their communities?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should the Jews leave the West Bank? Don&#8217;t the Arabs like &#8220;diversity&#8221; in their communities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103925</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But don&#039;t put me down as a Dawkins defender, personally. I don&#039;t even like him or his writings.

But the whole &quot;He just hates god&quot; is ridiculous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But don&#8217;t put me down as a Dawkins defender, personally. I don&#8217;t even like him or his writings.</p>
<p>But the whole &#8220;He just hates god&#8221; is ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103917</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”

Yes but he, at various times, as said the same for other concepts of God (not just Christianity) and the God of the Old Testament was like Dawkins says.

Secondly you are making an error based on your own beliefs. Because you believe in the Christian God as the one true god you are placing YOUR beliefs onto Dawkins in that because he wrote a book about the concept of God being a delusion he must mean your concept of God. That is a mistake - he is talking about ALL concepts of god, not just the Christian god. Therefore you cannot say he hates god because he doesn&#039;t believe in any god. He hates all gods and no gods because he doesn&#039;t belief it/them or they to exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”</p>
<p>Yes but he, at various times, as said the same for other concepts of God (not just Christianity) and the God of the Old Testament was like Dawkins says.</p>
<p>Secondly you are making an error based on your own beliefs. Because you believe in the Christian God as the one true god you are placing YOUR beliefs onto Dawkins in that because he wrote a book about the concept of God being a delusion he must mean your concept of God. That is a mistake &#8211; he is talking about ALL concepts of god, not just the Christian god. Therefore you cannot say he hates god because he doesn&#8217;t believe in any god. He hates all gods and no gods because he doesn&#8217;t belief it/them or they to exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrubone</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103914</link>
		<dc:creator>scrubone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TheContrarian: that was sarcasm. Sorry you missed it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheContrarian: that was sarcasm. Sorry you missed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103910</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Lane Craig is not a creationist, Scrubone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Lane Craig is not a creationist, Scrubone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103908</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contrarian – sorry I missed his latest book. You are quite right I am referring to &quot;the God Delusion&quot;. In his book he says “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” 
― Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

So if that is not hating God, I don&#039;t know what is?

We both agree that he was abused as a child by a teacher. The reports I read stated that the abuser was also a priest. It being a church school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contrarian – sorry I missed his latest book. You are quite right I am referring to &#8220;the God Delusion&#8221;. In his book he says “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”<br />
― Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion</p>
<p>So if that is not hating God, I don&#8217;t know what is?</p>
<p>We both agree that he was abused as a child by a teacher. The reports I read stated that the abuser was also a priest. It being a church school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrubone</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103889</link>
		<dc:creator>scrubone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Following the debate with Christopher Hitchens in 2009, the website, Common Sense Atheism commented: “Craig was flawless and unstoppable. Hitchens was rambling and incoherent. Frankly, Craig spanked Hitchens like a foolish child.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Clearly, it&#039;s because he&#039;s a creationist.

http://www.bethinking.org/what-is-apologetics/dawkins-refuses-god-debate-with-william-lane-craig.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Following the debate with Christopher Hitchens in 2009, the website, Common Sense Atheism commented: “Craig was flawless and unstoppable. Hitchens was rambling and incoherent. Frankly, Craig spanked Hitchens like a foolish child.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Clearly, it&#8217;s because he&#8217;s a creationist.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bethinking.org/what-is-apologetics/dawkins-refuses-god-debate-with-william-lane-craig.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bethinking.org/what-is-apologetics/dawkins-refuses-god-debate-with-william-lane-craig.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrubone</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103888</link>
		<dc:creator>scrubone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Instead, here’s Galloway at his best, slicing and dicing the US Senate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah yes, his senate committee testimony. Where he loudly proclaimed that he&#039;d never received a single barrel of oil. Of course, that&#039;s not what he was accused of but hey, he said it loudly so he&#039;s awesome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Instead, here’s Galloway at his best, slicing and dicing the US Senate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah yes, his senate committee testimony. Where he loudly proclaimed that he&#8217;d never received a single barrel of oil. Of course, that&#8217;s not what he was accused of but hey, he said it loudly so he&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheContrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103875</link>
		<dc:creator>TheContrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;He specifically in his latest book talks about how horrible God is&quot;

His Latest book was The Grand Design not the God Delusion.

He wasn&#039;t molested by a priest/teacher. It was a Latin teacher - there was no priest. You are saying that because it makes your argument sound better. So it has nothing to do with anything.


Dawkin&#039;s talks about how horrible religion is, not specifically God. He dislikes RELIGION and disbelieves in God. Again you conflating too singular things to make your argument sound better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He specifically in his latest book talks about how horrible God is&#8221;</p>
<p>His Latest book was The Grand Design not the God Delusion.</p>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t molested by a priest/teacher. It was a Latin teacher &#8211; there was no priest. You are saying that because it makes your argument sound better. So it has nothing to do with anything.</p>
<p>Dawkin&#8217;s talks about how horrible religion is, not specifically God. He dislikes RELIGION and disbelieves in God. Again you conflating too singular things to make your argument sound better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Papa</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[watching the video of the incident, it certainly didn&#039;t take long for the shrieks of racism to follow. But clearly Galloway isn&#039;t a racist, while there is a certain irony in the eagerness of the Israeli student debater to play the race card. Galloway is somewhat pompous and arrogant at times, but that shouldn&#039;t be used to discredit his viewpoints. Looking at the video, and at that audience of earnest wet-behind-the-ear oxford student toffs, it is possible that Galloway suddenly realised he didn&#039;t in fact want to be there, and who could blame him!

Instead, here&#039;s Galloway at his best, slicing and dicing the US Senate. My fav bit occurs at the 40min 55s point, &quot;Senator Coleman thinks that&#039;s funny&quot; remarks Galloway in a devastating put down of the Senator. Poor Norm, he got totally &#039;pwned&#039; by Galloway. You can tell Norm is squirming inside by his unconvincing attempt to feign indifference during his public evisceration, but the smirk on the face gives him away. Norm later tried to get Galloways&#039;s statements excised from the record, not sure if he succeeded with that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4LDQixpCa8]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watching the video of the incident, it certainly didn&#8217;t take long for the shrieks of racism to follow. But clearly Galloway isn&#8217;t a racist, while there is a certain irony in the eagerness of the Israeli student debater to play the race card. Galloway is somewhat pompous and arrogant at times, but that shouldn&#8217;t be used to discredit his viewpoints. Looking at the video, and at that audience of earnest wet-behind-the-ear oxford student toffs, it is possible that Galloway suddenly realised he didn&#8217;t in fact want to be there, and who could blame him!</p>
<p>Instead, here&#8217;s Galloway at his best, slicing and dicing the US Senate. My fav bit occurs at the 40min 55s point, &#8220;Senator Coleman thinks that&#8217;s funny&#8221; remarks Galloway in a devastating put down of the Senator. Poor Norm, he got totally &#8216;pwned&#8217; by Galloway. You can tell Norm is squirming inside by his unconvincing attempt to feign indifference during his public evisceration, but the smirk on the face gives him away. Norm later tried to get Galloways&#8217;s statements excised from the record, not sure if he succeeded with that.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='560' height='345' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/b4LDQixpCa8?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/the_racist_george_galloway.html/comment-page-1#comment-1103869</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=71983#comment-1103869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contrarian – what does it have to do with anything? Well here is a man who hates God. He specifically in his latest book talks about how horrible God is. What is the source of all this anger? Surely if a man is molested at the age of 9 or 10 by a priest/teacher that would be a good explanation for his anger?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contrarian – what does it have to do with anything? Well here is a man who hates God. He specifically in his latest book talks about how horrible God is. What is the source of all this anger? Surely if a man is molested at the age of 9 or 10 by a priest/teacher that would be a good explanation for his anger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
