Why did Labour put Trevor up?

I'm surprised Labour put up as their nominee for Speaker. While of course National would always have made sure the numbers were there for David Carter, a different choice could have put pressure on the and United Future and ACT to vote for Labour's nominee.

But the moment they nominated Trevor, everyone thought it was a piss take. In they literally laughed in the House when he was nominated. Trevor being nominated for Speaker is a bit like Brendan Horan being made Racing Minister. The mere fact you want the job, isn't enough of a qualification to get the job. In fact I declared on Facebook and Twitter that if the new qualification for parliamentary jobs is that you really would like it – well then I declare my candidacy for Minister of Finance!

Labour could have either nominated a Labour MP who would be seen as a serious contender, or with a bit of mischief nominated a different National MP (who would have declined but the point may have been made). No one would have laughed at the nomination of Ross Robertson or .

In fact I understand Annette's latest thinking is that she won't stand for Mayor of , as that would allow Little into Rongotai. Hence so long as Labour looks competitive in 2014, she plans to stand again and will be Labour's nominee for Speaker after the election. If that is the plan, would have made sense to put her up now.

So why did Labour put Trevor up? The only reason I can think of is it was the only way they could try and get him out of caucus and ensure he has nothing to do with their next election campaign!

Comments (38)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment