Comments on: Why just home detention?

By: pq

pq — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:48:28 +0000

i said to my dear wife , can I go out look up a little girl underdress,she said husband, i have seen you with my own eyes you are a strong man, and it is what is in your heart of photo nhat is good , the little girls and their fathers trust you, we have serious and
proper relatiionships

By: Rufus

Rufus — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:20:33 +0000

Oh look, last week there was a pedophile who was an old, non Christian, white guy (much like Nasska, or DPF). Moralising basterds. Hypocrites. I now hate all those old white guys. Especially non Christian ones.

/sarc

Wouldn’t it be more honest to say that some HUMANS are shitheads? Some bash their kids. Some are pedophiles. Some fly planes into buildings.

By: Harriet

Harriet — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:28:58 +0000

David Garret#

If your familiar with the Daniel Morcombe case here in QLD, the trial has got the go ahead, but the accused who killed the 12yr has just changed his name by deed poll to ‘Shadow Hunter’ – and Daniel also has a twin brother.

That guy IS a real sick fuck!

By: gracious

gracious — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:22:00 +0000

Thanks David, I still think the least the could throw in would be public castration, but maybe Im just bored lol

By: Harriet

Harriet — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:14:22 +0000

Cha – “…Seems home detention is par for the course if you’re a prominent person…”

You’d get life.

By: David Garrett

David Garrett — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:06:59 +0000

gracious: Much would surely depend on the precise nature of the “pornographic” images on his computer, which may be loose use of words by the writer of the story……as Graeme E has pointed out, there is considerable difference between objectionable images – which for me would include images of fully clothed little girls wearing “I’m a slut” T shirts (go to your nearest shopping mall), high heels and heavy makeup – and pornographic ones….

This is clearly a disturbed man who deserves the opprobrium he is no doubt getting…but it is never wise to judge cases from media reports…Home D and public outing among his God bothering community may well be an appropriate sentence…

By: snowy

snowy — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:43:32 +0000

A five year old? Imagine if it was your daughter he’d done that to.

It’s got nothing to do with race – he’s simply a fucking dirty old prick.

By: gump

gump — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:41:38 +0000

@Longknives

You are wrong.

Inmates in NZ prisons are not allowed to use computers with Internet access.

By: liarbors a joke

liarbors a joke — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:40:55 +0000

I’ll tell you why he only got home d ..in 3 words…Judge Raoul Neave.

By: nasska

nasska — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:34:18 +0000

gracious

….”does a judge have no discretion of his own?”…..

Surprisingly little it would seem. The issue has been discussed at depth on these forums several times & it seems that judges are bound by previous sentences with little discretionary leeway. If they do go overboard the sentence is usually appealed successfully.

Governments set the maximums…..that is where the pressure for realistic sentences must be applied.

By: gracious

gracious — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:24:39 +0000

Thanks RRM – does a judge have no discretion of his own?

By: cha

cha — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:23:23 +0000

Seems home detention is par for the course if you're a prominent person.

By: RRM

RRM — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:18:29 +0000

maybe you could give me the reasons why a man with 1000 child pornography images on his pc, images upskirting a 5 year old, that he has been in contact with…. why this man gets home D?

Gracious – That was answered before you even asked it, in the third comment on this thread.

http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/why_just_home_detention.html/comment-page-1#comment-1093519

I can see you’re new here. For future reference: Read anything Graeme Edgeler says, he is generally always correct.

By: scrubone

scrubone — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:11:44 +0000

And since someone sensible might bring it up, yes, I condemn this man’s crimes and the sentence he was given without reservation.

By: scrubone

scrubone — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:10:32 +0000

How is that comment race baiting.

If you can’t read, don’t write.

By: gracious

gracious — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:09:32 +0000

How is that comment race baiting. Its factual – maybe you could give me the reasons why a man with 1000 child pornography images on his pc, images upskirting a 5 year old, that he has been in contact with…. why this man gets home D? But hey if you support the sentence, dont accuse me of race baiting, because I dont support the sentence

By: scrubone

scrubone — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:03:22 +0000

oh….so the 4 that gave me the thumbs down, are obviously happy with home detention for that sick fuck…..so what else do you support? Man/child love?? It would appear so,.

Yea, it coudn’t possibly be because of your race bating…

By: RRM

RRM — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:53:08 +0000

Au Contraire, Krazykiwi…

McNeil and Capill really, really are hypocrite christians who spouted christian morality and brimstone while at the same time being kiddy-fiddling perverts.

But yes I’d happily bash them

By: RRM

RRM — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:47:35 +0000

Spartans! What is your profession?

OOH OOH OOH!
OOH OOH OOH!
OOH OOH OOH!

By: gracious

gracious — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:39:48 +0000

oh….so the 4 that gave me the thumbs down, are obviously happy with home detention for that sick fuck…..so what else do you support? Man/child love?? It would appear so,.