12 questions with Katherine Rich

March 19th, 2013 at 3:00 pm by David Farrar

An interesting 12 questions with Katherine Rich:

3. Was there, and is there still, sexism in the House?
Yes, but you’d strike that anywhere. Just think about the way politics is reported. I’ve never seen a “Battle of the Babes” sort of headline for any electoral battle between male candidates or seen them described with words like feisty, perky or shrill.

Very true.

4. How did you cope with that?
I can’t think of any recent example, but years ago I’d deal with issues with either a sense of humour or by choosing battles. Sometimes I’d be less patient or polite. Although I would, of course, never resort to violence, I did tell one colleague who patted my pregnant tummy too many times that if he did it again I would punch him on the nose. I said it with a smile, but with sufficient firmness that he didn’t do it again.

Heh, I wonder who it was?

8. Your role at the Food and Grocery Council can be a controversial one, especially when you are opposing food campaigners on issues such as food labelling and salt. Are you doing God’s work?
I don’t see it as controversial. I see it more as providing the other side to a lot of grocery industry discussions. You’d be surprised but many shock/horror stories about the food and grocery industry aren’t true. I don’t doubt the sincerity of those who call for fat taxes, bans, salt regulation or all sorts of different warning labels, but many ideas are completely unworkable. A fat tax in New Zealand would raise the price of cheese and butter, so support for these ideas falls away when Kiwis understand the implications. There’s only so much salt, fat and sugar that can be removed from a product before [it] tastes like cardboard. Eating a healthy diet and moderation in all things is something I talk about a lot.

I love that quote I have bolded.

12. Will you always be a Tory?
I’m a centre-right thinker and I did vote Labour in ’87 – my first vote – when they were the more centre-right party.

I voted Labour in 1987 also.

Tags:

14 Responses to “12 questions with Katherine Rich”

  1. iMP (1,307) Says:

    1987, the Lange utopian wave [cue motivating Obama video clips]. Worked as well for us as a chocolate teapot. I stayed true.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. pq (728) Says:

    I can not believe you Farrar, this is the end of you and me, because you voted Labour in 1987, that’s it pal, you are in big trouble, I rescind your medal of Quixote

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Graeme Edgeler (2,904) Says:

    Surely an male MP/candidate has been called feisty?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. RRM (7,207) Says:

    I don’t doubt the sincerity of those who call for fat taxes, bans, salt regulation or all sorts of different warning labels

    :lol: LOL, talk yourself up sweetie.

    The last time I heard Catherine Rich radio whatever, she was sneering in the most hateful tones about what an utter idiot some food labelling campaigner or another was. It wasn’t very professional sounding at all…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Manolo (9,858) Says:

    DPF, twenty five years later you continue to vote Labour…..lite. :D

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Chthoniid (1,912) Says:

    I voted Labour in 1987 also.

    Oh snap. To be fair, the Nats weren’t really cutting it as a CR party then however.

    if he did it again I would punch him on the nose

    I believe some male MPs have in fact, resorted to fisticuffs. It’s a useful precedent.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. David Garrett (3,753) Says:

    Graeme E: I was called “National’s poodle” once…but it was by the Carpet Inspector so I guess it doesnt really count…

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. iMP (1,307) Says:

    Oh DPF, this is all a bit too (Katherine) Rich for me…

    1. “All West Coasters are feral” – Helen Clark (a woman)

    2. (of John Campbell) “A sleasy little creep” – Helen Clark (a woman)

    Katherine, you’re a delicate flower.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. iMP (1,307) Says:

    Maybe someone should get some public trough funding and write a book of parliamentary insults since 1840. That would be interesting. If it had a gender breakdown and researched nuanced acculturated patriarchal typology it could be a PhD at Victoria).

    …(Why did I have that third coffee at 3.30pm)…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Redbaiter (2,999) Says:

    Judging by the bimbo quality of the questions, this was an article for “New Idea” right?

    The whining wet liberal/ progressive Katherine Rich a Tory..??

    FFs…!!!!!

    God save us from the deep ignorance that is overtaking this country.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. Psycho Milt (1,344) Says:

    The last time I heard Catherine Rich radio whatever, she was sneering in the most hateful tones about what an utter idiot some food labelling campaigner or another was. It wasn’t very professional sounding at all…

    I’m sure she’s quite capable of not doubting their sincerity while still considering them idiotic food faddists who need to be kept from turning their bizarre obsessions into regulations inflicted on the rest of us. Basically, her answer to “Are you doing God’s work?” for the Food and Grocery Council could have just been “Yes.”

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. David Garrett (3,753) Says:

    Oh Christ, he’s arisen from his afternoon nap…

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. BlairM (2,018) Says:

    I’m glad Rich has found her vocation. I didn’t think much of her as an MP. She was as wet as Kim Kardashian in a shoe shop.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. Nigel Kearney (354) Says:

    It’s true that if Rich had been a male, she would never have had to endure these insults. But that’s because she wouldn’t have been high enough on the National list to get into Parliament at all.

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.