HoS Herald editorial:
You have to hand it to the National Road Safety Committee. These public servants don’t conceal their view that the Cabinet needs to lower blood-alcohol limits for drivers. While the politicians wait, inexplicably, for research on safety gains of lowering the adult alcohol limit from 80 to 50 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood, the committee pulls no punches.
The HoS and Herald has been running a campaign for over a year demanding the Government do what it says, and not complete its research. To have a hysterical editorial saying that it is inexplicable they are waiting for research speaks for itself.
They also mischaracterise what the research is. It is not research into whether there would be safety gains from lowering the blood alcohol limit to 50. You don’t need research to tell you that. There would also be safety gains from lowering it to zero. There would be safety gains from dropping the speed limit to 20 km/hr.
What the hysterical HoS demands the Government not find out is how much of an impact a lower limit would have, and what the cost would be – ie how many people legally drive at an 50 to 80 level, and would be criminalised for doing so in the future.
If you claim there is no need to know this data, then why is 50 the right level to go to? Why not 60? Why not 40?
Its latest Safer Journeys report says: “Any level of alcohol increases driving errors, and affects alertness, skill and judgments … we need the adult legal breath-alcohol concentration limits to better reflect the risk that alcohol poses to all road users and communities.”
Of course any level of alcohol increases risk. Just as any level of speed increases risk.
The committee has leapfrogged the research project – an excuse for inaction by former Transport Minister Steven Joyce – and suggested a new solution: variable limits for types of drivers. While those under 20 already face a zero limit, the committee proposes new levels “lower than the default” for those with drink-drive convictions, commercial licences, in different adult age bands and with existing demerit points.
Not a bad idea. Worth considering.
It is worth looking at the blood alcohol levels in over 25 year old drivers who are fatally injured. In 2011 it was:
- None – 36
- 0 to 30 – 68
- 31 to 50 – 3
- 51 – 80 – 2
- 81 to 100 – 2
- 100 to 150 – 3
- 150 to 250 – 20
- 250+ 15
I’m yet to be convinced drivers in the 51 to 80 range are the problem.