A Sonja Lawson complained to The Press Council:
Miss Lawson phoned a complaint to the editor of Taranaki Daily News, followed up by a letter, alleging factually incorrect and misleading information relating to the ‘abusive faxes’ column comment. She followed this up over a month later with a further letter complaining about both articles.
She complained that no response had been received to her multiple calls, faxes and now letters to her claims that the articles are inaccurate, unfair and unbalanced; that her privacy had been breached as she had name suppression; that the headlines were inaccurate and misleading; that the paper had used subterfuge and had refused to correct errors. She demanded retraction and apologies in a prominent place in the paper.
Very ironic that she is guilty of sending offensive communications, and when the paper reports this, she starts sending them numerous communications.
The editor of Taranaki Daily News responded to the Council that the published articles had been taken from a Court of Appeal decision and a hearing in the Hawera District Court, and he was unaware of any inaccuracy. Furthermore no suppression order was in place regarding Miss Lawson. …
Miss Lawson does not have name suppression (the Court of Appeal judgment is available online) and the newspaper had a right to report each case.
I’m amazed this case even went to a full hearing of the Press Council. Her allegations of name suppression are a figment of her imagination and I thought that would be enough to make her complaint invalid.
Also in terms of dopey complaints, we have an H Malcolm who complained to the ASA over this Tui billboard:
“Mine’s a Footlong
Just like Subway’s Yeah Right”
The delicate complainant said:
“I believe this billboard breaches public decency by the inference to male genitalia and is unsuitable for public viewing.”