Shearer said he had lodged a privileges complaint with the Speaker regarding Dunne’s statement to a select committee that he did not leak the Kitteridge report into the GCSB.
Took them long enough. I indicated on Saturday that a complaint to the Privileges Committee was logical. Much more sensible that the hysterical rushing to the Police to try and get a Police investigation, for something that is not a criminal matter.
Fairfax Group executive editor Paul Thompson said politicians should tread carefully before embarking on a witch hunt. That could have a chilling effect on how journalists covered politicians.
Fairfax would protect the communications between its journalists and any contacts, regardless of whether they were the source of sensitive information or not.
“The protection of our sources is paramount,” Thompson said.
“We will resist any attempt to force us to release that sort of information.
If the issue is referred to the Privileges Committee, I don’t expect they would ask Fairfax to co-operate. And Fairfax should not.
But they can ask or order the Department of Internal Affairs to reveal the e-mails between Dunne and Vance.
Thompson also rejected suggestions there was more to the relationship between Dunne and Vance.
NZ First leader Winston Peters has claimed to see emails that were personally embarrassing but Thompson said Fairfax was “absolutely” backing Vance.
Claims are easy. He should produce them if he has them.
“Andrea is a very talented journalist, she has done some terrific work this year,” he said.
“Her handling of the GCSB report was absolutely faultless and there was nothing improper going on. We are 100 per cent behind her.”
Which is what I said on Saturday.
He also rubbished a claim by former National Party president Michelle Boag that Vance leaked the emails to Peters.
“That’s ludicrous,” Thompson said.
With respect, yes it is.
Opposition parties were likely to lodge a complaint with Parliament’s Speaker that Dunne misled Parliament last week when he told a select committee he did not leak the GCSB report.
Dunne maintained he did not leak the report, although he canvassed the prospect with Vance.
That is the issue of privilege. Whether Dunne lied to the select committee.
Prime Minister John Key said today he did not believe Dunne should quit Parliament, regardless of whether he leaked the report.
If leaking means resignation from Parliament, then the only MP left in Parliament would be Ross Robertson.
Also the PM gets no say on whether an electorate MP from another party resigns or not.
Dunne was not the first MP to leak information and he said Labour MP Lianne Dalziel had remained in Parliament after being sacked as minister for leaking material to the media.
And Winston Peters was found by the Privileges Committee to have misled Parliament (and everyone else) on his knowledge on the donation from Owen Glennto his lawyer to cover his legal expenses. He did not resign in the face of that finding. Ultimately the voters make their judgement, as they did on Peters in 2008 and will on Dunne in 2014.
“An investigation by the Privileges Committee is required to get to the truth of the matter. New Zealanders are still none the wiser as to who leaked the Kitteridge Report. All we have is an MP who has resigned as minister but refuses to co-operate with the inquiry,” Shearer said.
“The matter cannot lie here. This is why we have taken the matter to the Privileges Committee to get to the bottom of who leaked the report,” Shearer said.
That is not the role of the Privileges Committee. However their role can be to investigate if Peter Dunne lied in his select committee testimony. There is a difference.
It will be interesting to see how the Speaker rules. On the face of it, it would seem an appropriate issue to be referred to the Privileges Committee. Misleading a select committee is a serious issue.Tags: Andrea Vance, Peter Dunne, Privileges Committee