Gavin John Gosnell – dismissed as an “evil nobody” by the family of his victim – has been jailed for at least 18 years for the murder and dismemberment of teenager Hayden Peter Miles.
Gosnell, an unemployed 28-year-old, was convicted by a jury on April 16 of the murder of the 15-year-old at the end of a seven-day trial. …
Hayden had gone missing in August 2011 and it had been 111 days before it was known what had happened to him.
“To find out that Hayden had been murdered and then dismembered brought me to my knees,” she said. “My family is forever broken.”
She was tormented by thoughts of Gosnell laughing and mocking Hayden while the teenager cried and begged for Gosnell to stop the fatal beating.
She said she would speak for Hayden, demanding of Gosnell: “How dare you beat and torment me? How dare you dismember my body and bury me in graves? My family buried me with dignity. I am missed every single day.”
Another family member said: “I know now there is such a thing as pure evil.” …
This is what he did:
Justice Chisholm said Hayden was drinking with Gosnell and Gosnell’s partner at their flat when Gosnell flew into a rage over a comment that the teenager made.
A prolonged beating involving punching and kicking followed. It involved Gosnell trying to break Hayden’s arms and legs, and it resumed three or four times.
Hayden was screaming and crying, while Gosnell laughed.
Hayden was not breathing properly and suffered a bleeding brain injury during the night after being put to bed.
His body was cut up the next day by Gosnell. A witness described him as again laughing.
So here is my question. Why did the Crown not ask for life without parole?
The Sentencing Act states in s103(2A):
If the court that sentences an offender convicted of murder to imprisonment for life is satisfied that no minimum term of imprisonment would be sufficient to satisfy 1 or more of the purposes stated in subsection (2), the court may order that the offender serve the sentence without parole.
Surely this is a case for which life without parole was designed for?
The other hideous person to be sentenced is the man who sold his 13 month old son for sex.
A “depraved” paedophile has been sent to prison for sexual offending against his infant son.
A 27-year-old South Canterbury man was sentenced in the Oamaru District Court this afternoon to eight years 10 months imprisonment by Judge Joanna Maze for offending which will have a profound effect on his child.
The man sat motionless in the dock as he was sentenced on a raft of child exploitation charges, including two of sexual violation and indecent assault, and selling the use of his then 13-month-old son for sexual gratification for $500.
A minimum non-parole period of five years was imposed.
I’m sorry but a five year minimum is not enough in my view. I think selling your child for sexual abuse, is even worse than being an abuser yourself.
He was granted permanent name suppression to protect the identity of his victim, the charges also included eight of doing an indecent act and 15 of making, possessing and distributing objectionable material and breaching a restraining order. The child is in the care of his mother.
Wouldn’t it be good if the victim (or in this case his mother) was offered a name change, so he can be identified without it naming the victim.Tags: law & order, sentencing