* a Jadis post – DPF has made his way out of the bush but is still analysing his data for his travel blog extravaganza
Cunliffe’s Labour has a problem with women. This week’s Herald-Digipoll highlighted that Labour is losing support from women. The reasons for loss of support aren’t simple. And while much of the support is crossing the aisle to National, it is also redistributing itself to the Greens.
But why is Labour losing the female vote?
- Is it the way that Cunliffe appears smarmy and a little creepy when he talks to camera or uses rehearsed lines?
- Is it because Cunliffe pretends he is ‘middle New Zealand’ while living in a multi-million dollar house with a combined family income over $500K?
- Is it because Cunliffe patronises women with his suggestion that he bought the multi-million dollar house so that his wife could pop home to breastfeed?*
Sure, all those perception issues matter but I think we need to unpack a little more. Some of Cunliffe’s policy is also turning women off.
The ‘baby bonus’ has backfired dramatically. Women who I’ve previously known to be Labour voters are surprised that Labour thinks a family with a $150K income needs as much help as their $50-$70K earning family.
Labour’s paid parental leave policy has also backfired. Women aren’t idiots. They too recognise that while it might be wonderful to have more paid parental leave it also needs to occur within the available budget. Many of the women I know run their home finances. They know how to live within their means and how to scrape together a bit more when the washing machine breaks down. They know that they are coming out of a tough time and they are still being careful with their own and household spending. So when Bill English suggests that yes at some point a modest extension to PPL could occur dependent on the budget then these women are much more likely to believe that than Cunliffe and Moroney’s “all and everything” approach.
Labour are also losing votes on Education. It is amazing this is even possible when National were doing such a good job of shooting themselves in the foot on Education and then the whole Novopay saga. Hekia’s recent announcements to fund quality teaching and leadership is pulling parents back to supporting National on Education. More importantly, Labour spent a whole lot of time on attack and have filled that opportunity for their alternative Education policy with… well, nothing.
I cheekily asked a few of my left-leaning friends why they thought Labour had a problem with attracting female voters. One response struck me: “I personally think Labour men are just as smarmy as National men, but the reason I am turned off by Labour is their women are, by and large, much more ineffectual than National women. For all their baggage, Collins, Parata, Kaye and Tolley on the front bench kicks Labour’s offering of Ardern, Mahuta and Moroney.”
So it seems it is not all about Cunliffe but that the women in Labour’s caucus need to either ‘step up’ or be replaced with some ‘new blood’. Oh, that’s right… Labour don’t believe in new blood. And a ‘man ban’ is unlikely to help this wee problem.
Most of all, Mr Cunliffe, stop patronising us womenfolk.
* this is not an attack on breastfeeding. It is an attack on a silly politician thinking women get won over by that sort of rubbish AKA patronising and just a little paternalistic.
Tags: David Cunliffe, Digipoll, Greens, Labour Party, National Party, women