* a Jadis post – by now you know the drill. DPF will return one day
So it turns out that yet again Cunliffe and the Labour team haven’t checked the numbers or the unintended consequences of a policy announcement. Ministry of Transport analysis shows that under Labour’s new policy many motorhomes would actually be charged higher Road User Charges – not lower as Cunliffe tried to suggest earlier today. Brownlee explains this latest clustertruck from the Labour team:
“But analysis by the Ministry of Transport shows that based on the difference between average and maximum weights for trucks versus motorhomes, the owners of many motorhomes would end up paying more for Road User Charges than they do today.
“Road User Charges already assume that a vehicle travels empty about half of the time, as trucks frequently do travelling from a depot to pick up a load, or returning to the depot.
“Motorhomes, however, generally carry their furniture, fittings and other material at all times, which means they weigh more than an equivalent unladen truck.
“The 4.6 tonne average motorhome is in a weight band required to pay Road User Charges of about $57 per 1000 kilometres. If paying by actual weight, Road User Charges would typically be between $50 and $70 per 1000 kilometres, depending on the exact weight of the vehicle and its fit out.
“So this policy would see many motorhome owners penalised rather than compensated, in some cases by as much as 22 per cent.
I wonder, was this Cunliffe’s intention? May be he is doing us a favour by stealth and getting those slow motorhomes (and tourists) off the road. The attack on the truckies was just a cunning sideshow. Yeah, nah… I call Clustertruck on this one
Tags: David Cunliffe, Gerry Brownlee, Labour Party, road user charges, Truck