Two new magazine covers

June 28th, 2014 at 12:00 pm by David Farrar

kimdc2

kimdc1

 

Circulating by e-mail.

Tags: ,

40 Responses to “Two new magazine covers”

  1. JMS (330 comments) says:

    Those Dotcon arms are way too thin, and the breasts way too small.

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. wat dabney (3,756 comments) says:

    Disturbing scenes from Dotcom Mansion as Harawira earns his coin

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. hj (6,991 comments) says:

    David Farrar Loves Jan Logie .

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Redbaiter (8,787 comments) says:

    Is this campaign of denigration of Kimdotcom by govt/ National Party supporting blogs in danger of becoming a threat to the expectation of fair and reasonable justice?

    John Key’s connection with the Whaleoil blog is fairly well known.

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 26 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Longknives (4,737 comments) says:

    How brown are Hone’s hands??
    Where on earth have they been?..

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. thePeoplesFlag (245 comments) says:

    Nicely racist.

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 25 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. dirty harry (481 comments) says:

    Fantastic !

    Vote: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Manolo (13,735 comments) says:

    Two skin colours, but the same crook.

    Vote: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Johnboy (16,483 comments) says:

    As a fat bastard….I want Kims diet plan.

    Where IS Womans Weekly when you really, really, really them eh! :)

    Vote: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. thor42 (971 comments) says:

    Classic!

    As for the “racist” thing, I call BS on that. Hone is being ridiculed because of his links to KdC – not because he is Maori.

    It would be racist (and *patronising*) to *not* ridicule or criticise Hone simply because he is Maori.

    Vote: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. CharlieBrown (1,011 comments) says:

    Don’t forget, John Key had Hone as part of HIS government rather than following nationals own policy of removing maori seats… when they could have governed without them. I just want to see them in government just to stick it to John Key and his socialist lite nationals and see the irony of maori seats bringing his socialist government down.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 13 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. dime (9,972 comments) says:

    He better get used to a mans touch.

    Fwag – how on earth is that racist

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. wikiriwhis business (3,996 comments) says:

    There’s nothing to know about NZ politics

    What was John Key sposed to know?

    He fired one of his MP’s simply because he wanted to ‘refresh’

    The smilin assassin who knows NZ politics is about a Nat/Lab coalition

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 12 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. duggledog (1,554 comments) says:

    Um, Harawira is the racist. Don’t forget the ‘white motherf***ers’ outburst, and the fact he said he’d rather his offspring did not marry Europeans. I have it on good authority that Hone cruises round the Far North in his classy poor man’s Rolls, the Chrysler, spreading some pretty nasty shit.

    Never forget that. I sincerely hope National bludgeon Labour with this potential bedfellow leading up to the election.

    Vote: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. Judith (8,534 comments) says:

    I wonder if it would be funny if I posted some of the great pics I have of John Key – especially the ones of him getting in touch with his generous feminine side?

    Then there is that one of him and Judith Collins wielding her whip – perhaps not ??

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 13 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. Longknives (4,737 comments) says:

    “and Judith Collins wielding her whip”

    Giggity!! Post that one….

    Vote: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. dirty harry (481 comments) says:

    no matter how hard that bastard harawira smiles…he’s still got those nasty evil eyes..

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. Judith (8,534 comments) says:

    @ Longknives (4,285 comments) says:
    June 28th, 2014 at 2:07 pm

    Yeah, and get immediately banned – it’s a bit on the rude side – but I thought it was funny! But then, I’ve been known to giggle at funerals, so I guess that doesn’t mean much!

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 11 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. ShawnLH (4,998 comments) says:

    ” But then, I’ve been known to giggle at funerals”

    Your not well in the head, are you Judith?

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 10 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. ShawnLH (4,998 comments) says:

    “Don’t forget, John Key had Hone as part of HIS government”

    As part of the Maori Party, where he could do littel damage.

    “rather than following nationals own policy of removing maori seats”

    That policy was dumped under Key for good reason.

    “I just want to see them in government just to stick it to John Key and his socialist lite nationals and see the irony of maori seats bringing his socialist government down.”

    Translation: “I want to destroy my country because I’m a petty political puritan pissed off that Key did not follow my personal policies.”

    That’s dumb, and, you don’t know the meaning of the word socialism, do you?

    Vote: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 5 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. CharlieBrown (1,011 comments) says:

    “That policy was dumped under Key for good reason.” – Its a good reason if your a socialist.

    The guy is damaging to the country – under him we will have seen 18 years of Helen Clark’s socialism, he had a chance to stop that. At least if he gets out now then we get a chance to see it right sooner.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  22. Johnboy (16,483 comments) says:

    Now tell me then Judith. When did you start to get this overpowering urge to say really witty things on blogs, hoping to gain attention from folk who don’t give a fuck? :)

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  23. igm (1,413 comments) says:

    Judith: I said once before you were a frustrated old bag . . . you have shown you are also a perverted, Labour-type old bag also. You are probably fantasising on getting a job in a massage parlour, but of course, the applicants need to be young and attractive!

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  24. jackinabox (776 comments) says:

    If you ignored them I’d say you weren’t feeling threatened.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  25. David Garrett (7,270 comments) says:

    duggle: I also have it on very good authority (a relative no less) that Hone is a nasty racist shit stirrer…

    And someone else said he has said he “wouldn’t be too happy” if his children married pakeha…I believe what he said was considerably stronger than that…

    igm: Well…there ARE parlours catering to some more unusual tastes…Judith may even have studied them in her bullshit sociology doctorate…

    Sociology…the discipline you study when you haven’t much discipline…

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  26. Rex Widerstrom (5,354 comments) says:

    The Vogue cover has it wrong. I don’t think it’s Hone who wears the pants in that particular relationship.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  27. HC (154 comments) says:

    What a “coincidence” that Key and others at the National Party conference in Wellington made exactly this topic one of their main topics today? The coordination efforts between David’s Kiwiblog and the National Party are impressive, I must concede. But given the immense resources available to Internet Mana Party, I think, whether we like or dislike it, they are going to possibly break the 5 percent threshold, no matter what National Party propaganda may try to tell people.

    Too many young and disaffected may just suddenly feel like sending a message this time, like Bob Jones did in 1984.

    This election will be full of surprises, I think, and Key and English are right, that it is not a given, that National will win this election. Fasten your seat-belts, John Key fans!

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  28. goldnkiwi (1,303 comments) says:

    I agree and was about to say that. I do not see Dotcom as the bitch.

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  29. IC5000 (111 comments) says:

    Can someone point out why Kim Dotcom represents such a threat to the National Party polling over 50% that DPF has written up a constant series of posts denigrating him?

    Vote: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  30. MikeG (425 comments) says:

    Here’s some better humour https://www.facebook.com/pages/Neetflux/269226069932101?fref=nf

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  31. goldnkiwi (1,303 comments) says:

    IC5000 (25 comments) says:

    June 28th, 2014 at 8:47 pm

    It is my opinion that he is a threat to New Zealand’s democracy and that should be everyone’s concern

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  32. IC5000 (111 comments) says:

    “goldnkiwi (902 comments) says:
    June 28th, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    June 28th, 2014 at 8:47 pm

    It is my opinion that he is a threat to New Zealand’s democracy and that should be everyone’s concern”

    Is that view based on his funding of leftwing politics or just the influence of money in politics in general?

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  33. ShawnLH (4,998 comments) says:

    ““That policy was dumped under Key for good reason.” – Its a good reason if your a socialist.”

    Whether anyone agree or disagrees with the Maori seats, they have nothing at all to do with socialism.

    “The guy is damaging to the country”

    Welfare numbers are down, welfare spending is down. and the country is in an economic recovery.

    How is he damaging the country?

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  34. CharlieBrown (1,011 comments) says:

    “How is he damaging the country?”

    Never in the last 30 years has so much wealth been spent by the state. At the time National criticized Labour for Big Government Socialist policies, National have not done anything to reverse those policies or the size of the state. The government makes up a huge proportion of the economy, it is far bigger than it was in 2005. National have also proceeded to increase tax on causes to advance social policy, it has banned legal alternatives to illicit drugs. Welfare spending has been redistributed, not dropped, welfare has even expanded into the private sector now. They have built an ungodly bureaucracy called the “Ministry of Business, Innovation and Enterprise” bursting at the seams with policy analysts and bureaucrats where the government chooses winners and losers in the form of selective government grants. We still have middle class welfare that national opposed vehemently in opposition. Working for families, kiwibank, kiwirail, Employment relations act all examples of poor government policy that national adopted with open arms.

    The national party are whores to the polls with absolutely no underlying principal to speak off. Its better to start the extraction of the festering socialist cancer now than to let it grow even more. The parties that sit further to the left of national are going to get in eventually, and if it isn’t now it will be next election where they will likely get in with a landslide and be in for several terms. Get rid of national this year, then labour\greens in the following 3 years and we can then have a center\center right government.

    Like it or not, if you vote national you are a “red” blooded supporter of Helen Clarks policies.

    Vote: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  35. adze (2,126 comments) says:

    @Peoplesflag

    You’re either trolling or an ass. Possibly both.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  36. ChardonnayGuy (1,206 comments) says:

    Hmm. Apparently KD voted Social Democrat back home in Germany.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  37. goldnkiwi (1,303 comments) says:

    IC5000 (27 comments) says:

    June 28th, 2014 at 9:24 pm

    Based on a non citizen interfering in our politics. Money isn’t the issue for me.
    I think that there have been perversions of our Justice system and the expectation of being able to pervert our politicians (that still has more to come (imo) when extradition to the US takes centre stage.

    Anyone that thought Schmidt was a benevolent Santa Claus should have had a reality check. Both of those pictures do not portray my take on it. No fool should consider Schmidt as Schultz nor as Hone’s bitch.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  38. IC5000 (111 comments) says:

    “goldnkiwi (904 comments) says:
    June 29th, 2014 at 3:32 pm
    IC5000 (27 comments) says:

    June 28th, 2014 at 9:24 pm

    Based on a non citizen interfering in our politics. Money isn’t the issue for me.”

    I think you’re wrong. The core issue is about the role of money in politics fullstop. Anybody entity or person which makes a donation to any political party or lobby group which seeks to influence policy should have be named and listed as a matter of public record.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  39. goldnkiwi (1,303 comments) says:

    I do not, I think they should all be anonymous, as what is one trying to achieve by being named? Fund/support/volunteer, whatever a party whose principles you support already, without expectation of effecting a change.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  40. IC5000 (111 comments) says:

    “goldnkiwi (905 comments) says:
    June 29th, 2014 at 5:35 pm
    I do not, I think they should all be anonymous, as what is one trying to achieve by being named? Fund/support/volunteer, whatever a party whose principles you support already, without expectation of effecting a change.”

    I’m just going by what has occurred overseas in particular the US where corporate and special interests funnel millions of dollars to lobby groups and Political Action Committees get their favoured candidates elected and enable them to adjust the legislative and regulatory frameworks for their benefits. It really comes down to the kind of democracy you want, one dominated by money or run for the benefit of the electorate.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote