Debate polls

Rachel Cunliffe blogs at Stats Chat on how meaningless opt in are. Three different opt in polls or surveys had ahead by 22%, ahead by 1% and Cunliffe ahead by 27%. They are NOT scientific.

I was on a plane so did not see the , but consensus seems to be David Cunliffe did well, apart from interjecting a bit too much. That is as I predicted.

Comments (43)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment