Piketty’s Errors

An interesting paper at SSRN. The summary:

's Capital in the 21st Century has been widely debated on theoretical grounds, yet continues to attract acclaim for its historically-infused data analysis. In study we conduct a closer scrutiny of Piketty's empirics than has appeared thus far, focusing upon his treatment of the States. We find evidence of pervasive errors of historical , opaque methodological choices, and the cherry-picking of sources to construct favorable patterns from ambiguous data. Additional evidence suggests that Piketty used a highly distortive data assumption from the Soviet Union to accentuate one of his main historical claims about global “” in the 20th century. Taken together, these problems suggest that Piketty's highly praised and historically-driven empirical work may actually be one of the book's greatest weaknesses.

You can download and read the full 43 page analysis. The sheer number of errors made Piketty are so large it is difficult to do a concise summary.  He gets dates wrong, amounts wrong, data wrong.

Comments (32)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment