<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kiwiblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Debate 13 February 2012 by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/general_debate_13_february_2012-2.html#comment-932695</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59794#comment-932695</guid>
		<description>And go NUCLEAR fatnuts. I am all for it.
Phark, the Greenies, the Lefties, the fucking paranoid. We will always hear about the bad Nuclear things, but MSM does not report on the good things.
Loss in transmission is a problem, there is an idea about Nuclear Batteries where the reactor is no bigger than a fridge. When expended it is removed and another battery replaced. Try and think ahead of the next 20 years.
Link/source? go search &#039;nuclear battery&#039;
edit &#039;Hyperion&#039; is the word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And go NUCLEAR fatnuts. I am all for it.<br />
Phark, the Greenies, the Lefties, the fucking paranoid. We will always hear about the bad Nuclear things, but MSM does not report on the good things.<br />
Loss in transmission is a problem, there is an idea about Nuclear Batteries where the reactor is no bigger than a fridge. When expended it is removed and another battery replaced. Try and think ahead of the next 20 years.<br />
Link/source? go search &#8216;nuclear battery&#8217;<br />
edit &#8216;Hyperion&#8217; is the word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by Fisiani</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932694</link>
		<dc:creator>Fisiani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932694</guid>
		<description>How do you vote for 3billion in cuts, 3 billions in asset sales and purchase 6billion worth of assets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you vote for 3billion in cuts, 3 billions in asset sales and purchase 6billion worth of assets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by Rightandleft</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932693</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightandleft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932693</guid>
		<description>I very much like the idea of the Party Vote being changed to a preferential voting system where we can rank parties. I couldn&#039;t vote for my first choice party in the last election (United Future) because I feared a wasted vote. Were I able to rank them I could have put UF as number one and National as number 2.  I also think the threshold should be lowered to 3% to allow for more proportionality while at the same time eliminating the loop-hole that allows parties like ACT, Maori or Mana to get in on electorate seats. The tail wagging the dog issue has always come from incredibly small parties getting in on this loop-hole with less than 3% of the vote.  

I&#039;m a fan of MMP because I grew up in the incredibly disfunctional FPP system in the US. I think more proportionality is a good thing and the best part of the NZ system is it doesn&#039;t give the minority power unlimited ability to stall and even block all legislation the way they get to in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much like the idea of the Party Vote being changed to a preferential voting system where we can rank parties. I couldn&#8217;t vote for my first choice party in the last election (United Future) because I feared a wasted vote. Were I able to rank them I could have put UF as number one and National as number 2.  I also think the threshold should be lowered to 3% to allow for more proportionality while at the same time eliminating the loop-hole that allows parties like ACT, Maori or Mana to get in on electorate seats. The tail wagging the dog issue has always come from incredibly small parties getting in on this loop-hole with less than 3% of the vote.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of MMP because I grew up in the incredibly disfunctional FPP system in the US. I think more proportionality is a good thing and the best part of the NZ system is it doesn&#8217;t give the minority power unlimited ability to stall and even block all legislation the way they get to in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Debate 13 February 2012 by nasska</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/general_debate_13_february_2012-2.html#comment-932692</link>
		<dc:creator>nasska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59794#comment-932692</guid>
		<description>Other_Andy

All good reasons why the wanky Greens should take a deep breath &amp; do some research before shooting their traps off.  You did, however, miss one of the major drawbacks.  Ref:  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-05/china-rare-earths-leave-toxic-trail-to-toyota-prius-vestas-wind-turbines.html

Clean &amp; green my arse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other_Andy</p>
<p>All good reasons why the wanky Greens should take a deep breath &amp; do some research before shooting their traps off.  You did, however, miss one of the major drawbacks.  Ref:  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-05/china-rare-earths-leave-toxic-trail-to-toyota-prius-vestas-wind-turbines.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-05/china-rare-earths-leave-toxic-trail-to-toyota-prius-vestas-wind-turbines.html</a></p>
<p>Clean &amp; green my arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by Tautaioleua</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tautaioleua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932691</guid>
		<description>I agree, road tolls and tax hikes are not the way forward for Auckland&#039;s transport woes. 

Sadly, central government has failed to join the party on this one, despite our embarrassing showcase at the Opening Ceremony of the RWC11 - trains completely halted, buses jammed to third world comparison and all access to the CBD cut off by congestion.

Astonishingly, of all options, the report failed to mention internal belt-tightening. I would have thought that this was the most sensible alternative.

Auckland&#039;s population is expected to double by 2050. If we don&#039;t improve public transport options now we will never host another international event again (and if we ever do it will be the source of all JOKES!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, road tolls and tax hikes are not the way forward for Auckland&#8217;s transport woes. </p>
<p>Sadly, central government has failed to join the party on this one, despite our embarrassing showcase at the Opening Ceremony of the RWC11 &#8211; trains completely halted, buses jammed to third world comparison and all access to the CBD cut off by congestion.</p>
<p>Astonishingly, of all options, the report failed to mention internal belt-tightening. I would have thought that this was the most sensible alternative.</p>
<p>Auckland&#8217;s population is expected to double by 2050. If we don&#8217;t improve public transport options now we will never host another international event again (and if we ever do it will be the source of all JOKES!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by Pete George</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932690</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932690</guid>
		<description>big bruv - there&#039;s nothing that indicates the tail wags the dog.

Bradforh&#039;s was a private members bill, not part of the government coalition. It was supported by nearly all MPs in the final vote, so that&#039;s just about the whole dog minus it&#039;s eyelashes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big bruv &#8211; there&#8217;s nothing that indicates the tail wags the dog.</p>
<p>Bradforh&#8217;s was a private members bill, not part of the government coalition. It was supported by nearly all MPs in the final vote, so that&#8217;s just about the whole dog minus it&#8217;s eyelashes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Debate 13 February 2012 by fatnuts</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/general_debate_13_february_2012-2.html#comment-932689</link>
		<dc:creator>fatnuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59794#comment-932689</guid>
		<description>Scott - built far away from the consumers? Not a good idea, loss in transmission causes inefficiency. For reliabilty a multi site, small scale plant approach is a much better answer. And not wind, which I understand can only ever supply about 30% of peak load.

The sooner the power generating SOEs and privatized the better; the first thing to go will be the loopy, idealist projects like wind power. Which has only resulted in higher power prices to make the projects viable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; built far away from the consumers? Not a good idea, loss in transmission causes inefficiency. For reliabilty a multi site, small scale plant approach is a much better answer. And not wind, which I understand can only ever supply about 30% of peak load.</p>
<p>The sooner the power generating SOEs and privatized the better; the first thing to go will be the loopy, idealist projects like wind power. Which has only resulted in higher power prices to make the projects viable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by bhudson</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932688</link>
		<dc:creator>bhudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932688</guid>
		<description>ste3e,

I am sure you would be happy to provide the link to John Key&#039;s endorsement of Len Brown&#039;s campaign where he said &quot;If Aucklanders choose to elect this man, I will give him money for his train set.&quot; Or words to the equivalent thereof.

What I think you might find happened is that Len painted all sorts of bright colours in his PT vision, knowing that he needed someone else to pay for them, and not first checking to see if they would.

Maybe he blindly thought that Labour would be returned to the treasury benches in 2011 as the public realised the foolishness of their ways in 2008?  That was, after all, the Labour election campaign in a nutshell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ste3e,</p>
<p>I am sure you would be happy to provide the link to John Key&#8217;s endorsement of Len Brown&#8217;s campaign where he said &#8220;If Aucklanders choose to elect this man, I will give him money for his train set.&#8221; Or words to the equivalent thereof.</p>
<p>What I think you might find happened is that Len painted all sorts of bright colours in his PT vision, knowing that he needed someone else to pay for them, and not first checking to see if they would.</p>
<p>Maybe he blindly thought that Labour would be returned to the treasury benches in 2011 as the public realised the foolishness of their ways in 2008?  That was, after all, the Labour election campaign in a nutshell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The lesbian pay gap by eszett</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_lesbian_pay_gap.html#comment-932687</link>
		<dc:creator>eszett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59926#comment-932687</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Andrei (1,189) Says:
February 13th, 2012 at 12:03 pm

    i bet more fundies will be along to ruin an interesting topic soon

Wasn’t going to bother –&lt;b&gt; this is just another empty headed thing about empty headed people who have not a clue about what life is really about.&lt;/b&gt;

The sad thing is all those Lesbians who spend their lives climbing the corporate ladder will be food for the maggots soon enough.

What will they be worth then?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the supreme ironic statement of the week goes to..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Andrei (1,189) Says:<br />
February 13th, 2012 at 12:03 pm</p>
<p>    i bet more fundies will be along to ruin an interesting topic soon</p>
<p>Wasn’t going to bother –<b> this is just another empty headed thing about empty headed people who have not a clue about what life is really about.</b></p>
<p>The sad thing is all those Lesbians who spend their lives climbing the corporate ladder will be food for the maggots soon enough.</p>
<p>What will they be worth then?
</p></blockquote>
<p>And the supreme ironic statement of the week goes to&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Debate 13 February 2012 by Scott Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/general_debate_13_february_2012-2.html#comment-932686</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59794#comment-932686</guid>
		<description>Yea, the noise pollution issue with wind turbines is a problem. Should be built in remote areas like Central Otago where the natural landscape has been ravaged by humans already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, the noise pollution issue with wind turbines is a problem. Should be built in remote areas like Central Otago where the natural landscape has been ravaged by humans already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by Other_Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932685</link>
		<dc:creator>Other_Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932685</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mr Brown said Aucklanders - faced with a rapidly growing population and an already congested roading network - had to make some hard decisions to meet a $10-15 billion shortfall for a package of major transport projects over the next 30 years.&quot;

Easy. Stop the rapidly growing population, limit immigration.
New Zealand&#039;s population has almost doubled in 50 years.
It now stands at 4.5 million. How much is enough?
5 million, 10 million, 20 million........?
People are fleeing other parts of the world (Europe and Asia) to New Zealand for the life style.
Compared to other palces, quiet, wide open spaces, unpolluted.......
Very soon we will have the same problems.
You Don&#039;t Know What You&#039;ve Got Til It&#039;s Gone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mr Brown said Aucklanders &#8211; faced with a rapidly growing population and an already congested roading network &#8211; had to make some hard decisions to meet a $10-15 billion shortfall for a package of major transport projects over the next 30 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Easy. Stop the rapidly growing population, limit immigration.<br />
New Zealand&#8217;s population has almost doubled in 50 years.<br />
It now stands at 4.5 million. How much is enough?<br />
5 million, 10 million, 20 million&#8230;&#8230;..?<br />
People are fleeing other parts of the world (Europe and Asia) to New Zealand for the life style.<br />
Compared to other palces, quiet, wide open spaces, unpolluted&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
Very soon we will have the same problems.<br />
You Don&#8217;t Know What You&#8217;ve Got Til It&#8217;s Gone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Debate 13 February 2012 by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/general_debate_13_february_2012-2.html#comment-932684</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59794#comment-932684</guid>
		<description>chiz (282) Says: 
February 13th, 2012 at 5:37 pm 
For some years now it has been possible in some countries to buy transgenic fish that glow in the dark. Now someone has realised that you don’t just have to look at them in an aquarium and has taken the next step. Yes, its The Glowing Sushi Cooking Show. Totally verboten of course if the greens had their way.

Did anyone check if your shit glows? all the way to the sewage ponds? Quite funny, imagine driving the motorway to Albany and the shit ponds glow! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chiz (282) Says:<br />
February 13th, 2012 at 5:37 pm<br />
For some years now it has been possible in some countries to buy transgenic fish that glow in the dark. Now someone has realised that you don’t just have to look at them in an aquarium and has taken the next step. Yes, its The Glowing Sushi Cooking Show. Totally verboten of course if the greens had their way.</p>
<p>Did anyone check if your shit glows? all the way to the sewage ponds? Quite funny, imagine driving the motorway to Albany and the shit ponds glow! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by bhudson</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932683</link>
		<dc:creator>bhudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932683</guid>
		<description>reid,

I&#039;m sure the stock standard answer from the electoral commission would be &quot;nobody was interested in politics with the rugby world cup on.&quot;

In fairness the PM did express his personal intention to vote for SM. And every left wing candidate and leader was more than happy to state their support for MMP.

A genuine, open education campaign may not have yielded what you want in any case.  A genuine education campaign would have given the public all of the objective information to make up their own minds. That would, almost certainly I suggest, have led to a spread of votes across the alternative options.

Meanwhile it is no secret that the MMP campaign encouraged supporters to vote to keep MMP and select FPP as the alternative option as they were very sure that it would fail in a 1-on-1 run off against MMP.  Clever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reid,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the stock standard answer from the electoral commission would be &#8220;nobody was interested in politics with the rugby world cup on.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fairness the PM did express his personal intention to vote for SM. And every left wing candidate and leader was more than happy to state their support for MMP.</p>
<p>A genuine, open education campaign may not have yielded what you want in any case.  A genuine education campaign would have given the public all of the objective information to make up their own minds. That would, almost certainly I suggest, have led to a spread of votes across the alternative options.</p>
<p>Meanwhile it is no secret that the MMP campaign encouraged supporters to vote to keep MMP and select FPP as the alternative option as they were very sure that it would fail in a 1-on-1 run off against MMP.  Clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by Rightandleft</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932682</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightandleft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932682</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recall campaign promises of GST rises and massive rate increases from Len in 2010. I expected him to improve infrastructure within the existing budget or with the help of the central government. If there are to be tolls they should only be charged on the new roads, such as the second harbour crossing.  This way a free alternative will still exist, the same as with the Northern Gateway toll road. The new harbour crossing could become a HOT (high-occupancy/toll) motorway such as exist in California and the Washington DC metro area.  When traffic increases on the original bridge the toll on the new bridge/tunnel goes up, when traffic is lighter it falls.  This prevents it ever becoming too congested.  High occupancy vehicles, taxis and buses are exempt from the toll, encouraging car-pooling and public transport.  The Northern Busway would then avoid the bridge bottleneck as well, increasing its efficiency. The old harbour bridge would likely need a smaller toll to keep everyone from using just it when there is no traffic, but the Upper Harbour Highway should remain a totally free alternative.  

That is the only scenario where I&#039;d be willing to put up with tolls. I don&#039;t like the idea of them at all and if they are used they must be entirely electronic so as to avoid creating brand new bottlenecks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall campaign promises of GST rises and massive rate increases from Len in 2010. I expected him to improve infrastructure within the existing budget or with the help of the central government. If there are to be tolls they should only be charged on the new roads, such as the second harbour crossing.  This way a free alternative will still exist, the same as with the Northern Gateway toll road. The new harbour crossing could become a HOT (high-occupancy/toll) motorway such as exist in California and the Washington DC metro area.  When traffic increases on the original bridge the toll on the new bridge/tunnel goes up, when traffic is lighter it falls.  This prevents it ever becoming too congested.  High occupancy vehicles, taxis and buses are exempt from the toll, encouraging car-pooling and public transport.  The Northern Busway would then avoid the bridge bottleneck as well, increasing its efficiency. The old harbour bridge would likely need a smaller toll to keep everyone from using just it when there is no traffic, but the Upper Harbour Highway should remain a totally free alternative.  </p>
<p>That is the only scenario where I&#8217;d be willing to put up with tolls. I don&#8217;t like the idea of them at all and if they are used they must be entirely electronic so as to avoid creating brand new bottlenecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by mikenmild</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932681</link>
		<dc:creator>mikenmild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932681</guid>
		<description>We had a referendum.  Opponents of MMP had the opportunity to promote their alternatives, and failed to put a convincing case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a referendum.  Opponents of MMP had the opportunity to promote their alternatives, and failed to put a convincing case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Len&#8217;s Auckland taxes by ste3e</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/lens_auckland_taxes.html#comment-932680</link>
		<dc:creator>ste3e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59921#comment-932680</guid>
		<description>John Key is reneging on supporting Len Brown who was elected mayor on the &#039;build the train set&#039; ticket... just like Key said he would not. Busy supporting the yanks as they turn NZ into the new Guantanamo, guilty until proven innocent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Key is reneging on supporting Len Brown who was elected mayor on the &#8216;build the train set&#8217; ticket&#8230; just like Key said he would not. Busy supporting the yanks as they turn NZ into the new Guantanamo, guilty until proven innocent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932679</link>
		<dc:creator>reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932679</guid>
		<description>Shame we can&#039;t ask how come the referendum to ditch it didn&#039;t get hardly any publicity whatsoever by comparison to the hysterical level of publicity we were all subjected to when FPP was on the table.

Amazing how many people who claim they really are serious defenders of our democracy seemed happy to go along with the charade last election. Almost as if they didn&#039;t want to rock the boat. And I&#039;m not talking about bloggers I&#039;m talking about political leaders and journalists, mostly. They&#039;re the influential ones and almost all of them on both sides, were almost totally and utterly silent.

Weren&#039;t they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame we can&#8217;t ask how come the referendum to ditch it didn&#8217;t get hardly any publicity whatsoever by comparison to the hysterical level of publicity we were all subjected to when FPP was on the table.</p>
<p>Amazing how many people who claim they really are serious defenders of our democracy seemed happy to go along with the charade last election. Almost as if they didn&#8217;t want to rock the boat. And I&#8217;m not talking about bloggers I&#8217;m talking about political leaders and journalists, mostly. They&#8217;re the influential ones and almost all of them on both sides, were almost totally and utterly silent.</p>
<p>Weren&#8217;t they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption Contest by Viking2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/caption_contest-34.html#comment-932678</link>
		<dc:creator>Viking2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59914#comment-932678</guid>
		<description>Griff (1,378) Says:
February 12th, 2012 at 9:54 pm

girls are pink boys are blue
you got balls wot happened to you


Griifs is best so far.
But;

When are you going to grow up Little John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griff (1,378) Says:<br />
February 12th, 2012 at 9:54 pm</p>
<p>girls are pink boys are blue<br />
you got balls wot happened to you</p>
<p>Griifs is best so far.<br />
But;</p>
<p>When are you going to grow up Little John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MMP Review by Tautaioleua</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/the_mmp_review.html#comment-932677</link>
		<dc:creator>Tautaioleua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59929#comment-932677</guid>
		<description>Every registered party should be forced BY LAW to actively consult with its wider constituency in relation to the candidates on list. Unfortunately, some parties have abused the list by favouring certain factions/ideological positions. This is the enemy of New Zealand democracy.

We use to entertain unionists every now and then who would only turn up when the list was being discussed on the agenda for example. Stack voting at its prime, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every registered party should be forced BY LAW to actively consult with its wider constituency in relation to the candidates on list. Unfortunately, some parties have abused the list by favouring certain factions/ideological positions. This is the enemy of New Zealand democracy.</p>
<p>We use to entertain unionists every now and then who would only turn up when the list was being discussed on the agenda for example. Stack voting at its prime, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption Contest by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/02/caption_contest-34.html#comment-932676</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=59914#comment-932676</guid>
		<description>A bunch of pinkos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bunch of pinkos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

