<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kiwiblog &#187; Emily Simpson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/tag/emily_simpson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The material the SST pulled</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/04/the_material_the_sst_pulled.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/04/the_material_the_sst_pulled.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Farrar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/04/the_material_the_sst_pulled.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few people would have seen stories about pages being ripped out of the SST magazine Sunday, because of the editor&#8217;s letter from Emily Simpson. So what was it that is so bad? All Emily did was quote a few lines from sex blogger &#8211; Always Aroused Girl. She even asterisked out the really naughty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few people would have seen stories about pages being ripped out of the SST magazine Sunday, because of the editor&#8217;s letter from Emily Simpson. So what was it that is so bad?</p>
<p>All Emily did was quote a few lines from sex blogger &#8211; Always Aroused Girl. She even asterisked out the really naughty words, but did leave in scream, ecstasy and spit. Oh dear &#8211; the horrors.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/new%20zealand%20editor%20letter.html">deleted editor&#8217;s letter is here</a>.  Can&#8217;t say it seems too over the top for me, but I guess the SST were more worried about a commercial backlash.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newsrooms_and_journalism/2008/03/new_zealand_ethics_of_journalism_tested.php">Editor&#8217;s Weblog</a></p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/tag/censorship" title="censorship" rel="tag">censorship</a>, <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/tag/emily_simpson" title="Emily Simpson" rel="tag">Emily Simpson</a>, <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/tag/media" title="Media" rel="tag">Media</a>, <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/tag/sst" title="SST" rel="tag">SST</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/04/the_material_the_sst_pulled.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

