Oh dear. I have already blogged on Labour’s release about tax paid by Google and Facebook. But I overlooked they don’t even know the difference between revenue and profits.
David Clark, ironically a former Treasury staffer, said:
“It’s not just Facebook that funnels revenue through its low-tax Irish counterpart. Google New Zealand does it too. That company paid just $109,038 tax on $4,447,898 in revenue. That’s two per cent, way below our 28 per cent corporate rate.
This is as bad a mistake as Andrew Williams one. These are not statements made under pressure, but ones put out proactively by MPs for the media.
So David Clark thinks tax rates are paid on revenue. Sigh. An article in the Herald gives us some facts:
Clark’s comments that Google NZ appeared to have paid only 2 per cent tax last year was “a bit inept” and misleading, Vandenberg added.
“We get mesmerised by sales figures and people get outraged about how much tax companies should be paying but then you come along and apply a little bit of tax law.”
A company was required to pay tax on profit before tax, not on revenue, Vandenberg said.
Financial statements show Google New Zealand’s revenue last year was $4,447,898 but its profit before tax was only $56,803. It paid $109,038 in tax, making a loss of $52,235.
Facebook New Zealand’s financial statements show revenue of $427,967, a taxable profit loss of $66,696, and $14,497 paid in tax. The company ended up with a loss of $81,193.
So in fact Google paid more in tax than they made in profit, for their NZ subsidiary. Clark wasn’t just wrong with his 2% claim – he was massively wrong.
And Facebook NZ made a loss, yet paid tax (as some expenses are not claimable off tax).
Clark said his point yesterday was that companies were sending their revenues out of the country “one way or another”.
Trying to ignore the fact his statement was factually incorrect and bogus.
And Google are not sending any revenues out of the country. This is Labour xenophobia at play. NZ advertisers have decided to advertise with Facebook Ireland. This is no different from an American company hiring a NZ company to do research for it. Is Labour saying that any NZ company that has overseas clients should be forced to pay tax in the country their clients reside in?
He criticised the way Facebook used its Irish operation, which pays just 12.5 per cent tax, to determine revenue and expenses.
“This ensures the company can put most of its revenue through countries with low-tax systems,” he said.
Wah, wah, wah – it isn’t fair. Of course they choose to operate from a low tax company. This is why low tax countries attract business.
He called for the New Zealand government to work with other major countries, like Australian, to review international tax treaties and create a fairer system.
Yeah, good luck with that. Unless every country in the world signs up – then companies that can be flexible with where they are based will be based where the taxes are lower.
This is like trying to ban countries from offering higher wages, as people may move to a higher wage country.
UPDATE: David Clark has updated his release to remove the references to tax being levied on revenue, not profit.