Matthew Hooton writes in NBR:
Labour’s New Zealand Council will soon consider John Tamihere’s application to re-join the party.
Despite Mr Tamihere being encouraged by current leader David Shearer, who believes he would make a fine social development minister, the council faces a terrible dilemma.
Either choice will define Labour for a generation – neither in a good way.
But will the Council overlook:
On the other, Mr Tamihere has offended all the party’s factions.
The Women’s Council may have forgiven him calling them “frontbums” and for slamming Helen Clark.
But, since leaving parliament, Mr Tamihere has continued to be an outspoken critic of identity politics, including feminism.
A year ago, he attacked David Cunliffe for selecting Nanaia Mahuta as his running mate: ”The only thing she’s lacking is a limp. Then he would have got the disabled vote too.”
Choosing her made Mr Cunliffe “smarmy,” he said.
His relations with Rainbow Labour are no better, having called gay people a health hazard to the rest of the community.
Nor is Mr Tamihere a friend of the unions.
Then, in February, he backed Act’s charter schools policy, planning to set one up.
“All we’re looking at doing,” he said, “is bringing the best practice from Remuera to the west.”
Mr Tamihere has also lost friends in Labour’s caucus.
A month ago, he criticised them on national TV: “The front bench is not firing, across the whole line, whether it’s health, welfare or education.”
I think it would be great for Labour to have a member and MP who supports charter schools!
Nevertheless, rejecting Mr Tamihere is also fraught with risk.
There is almost no precedent for a rejection, and certainly none involving a person of his calibre.
A judicial review would be certain and no doubt Mr Tamihere is already operating with the benefit of legal counsel.
Mr Shearer’s encouragement of Mr Tamihere’s return would surely be brought up in court and it would be argued the council, dominated by unionists and Rainbow Labour, was not an impartial jury.
If Shearer has encouraged him to join, and the Council declines, I think it would show Robertson is in control of the party.
Even worse for Labour are the political risks.
Mr Tamihere and Winston Peters are again on good terms.
If Mr Tamihere joined NZ First, the two could hit the road in the provinces and West Auckland portraying Labour as controlled by feminists and gays with no residual interest in good old working-class kiwi blokes.
That would undoubtedly transfer 5% of the vote from Labour to NZ First, putting the former down to 25% and the latter well above 10%.
Mr Tamihere may dream of being social development minister in a Labour-led government.
But, if his membership application fails, it’s not impossible to imagine him as social development minister in a National/NZ First coalition.
An intriguing thought. However I seem to recall there is some bad blood at the family level between Tamihere and Peters.Tags: John Tamihere, Matthew Hooton