The Herald reports:
A referendum will be held on asset sales after confirmation that a petition under the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act gained the support of 10 per cent of eligible electors.
The petition, organised by the Keep Our Assets coalition and led by Grey Power president Roy Reid, asked: “Do you support the Government selling up to 49 per cent of Meridian Energy, Mighty River Power, Genesis Power, Solid Energy and Air New Zealand?”
Shares in Mighty River Power were first floated on May 10 this year.
The Clerk of the House of Representatives, Mary Harris, today said she was satisfied the petition had more than the 308,753 signatories required on March 12, the day it was delivered.
The Clerk was originally expected to announce the results at 1pm.
But an embarrassing mistake by Greens co-leader Russel Norman has marred the release for Opposition parties.
Dr Norman tweeted the news this morning, having missed the embargo.
He then tweeted an apology.
The coalition had two months to collect 16,000 valid signatures after the initial count was deemed just short of the number required. After a thorough checking process, it was estimated that 327,224 eligible electors signed the petition, about 18,500 more than required.
This is the fifth petition under the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act to proceed to a referendum.
The Speaker is expected to present the petition to the House tomorrow.
The Government will then have a month to set a date for holding the referendum or specify that it is to be a postal referendum.
The date of the referendum must be within a year of its presentation to the House, unless the House by a 75 percent majority vote agrees to postpone it for up to a further year.
If I were the Government I’d do a postal referendum as soon as possible – say December.
Labour’s SOE’s spokesman Clayton Cosgrove said the asset sales programme must be halted until after the referendum.
“John Key must respect the democratic process. Over 327,000 Kiwis have called for a referendum. Their voice must be heard,” he said.
What nonsense and hypocrisy.
If Labour and Greens are now claiming a referendum trumps an election, then why did they vote against allowing parental correctional smacking when 87% voted it should not be a crime? They voted down a bill to allow it, just weeks after the referendum. National voted against also, but at least National has never claimed a non-binding referendum should trump an election policy.
The point of the referendum is to politically damage the Government. Now fair enough, but let’s not pretend it is anything else.
Of course taxpayers now pick up the cost of the referendum, on top of the hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars spent on collecting signatures.
The reality is that National got a mandate for its policy at the election. This was not some minor obscure policy. It was a policy debated for 10 months after it was announced in January 2011. It was at the centre of the election campaign. Labour’s entire campaign almost was focused on stopping the partial sales, and the result was they failed.