What would TOP’s bottom line do the fishing industry?
One of TOP’s five bottom lines is:
To revive our fish stocks and marine habitats, this bottom line calls for an immediate end to bottom trawling in our most damaged inshore areas (like the Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana), before phasing out the practice in stages.
This non negotiable policy is to phase out bottom trawling in our entire EEZ over time. This is an extreme proposal. Only two countries out of 200 ban bottom trawling entirely – Belize and Palau. This is ideology, not science.
We already have significant restrictions on bottom trawling. They are:
- Bottom trawling is not allowed in 40% of our deeper waters, and 31% of our EEZ
- Only 1.7% of the EEZ is bottom trawled every year, and most of this is in areas previously trawled.
- In the last year the new territory bottom trawled was only 4.3 square km, which is around 0.0001% of the EEZ
Around 75% of commercial fish catches are caught by trawling. The seafood sector contributes $2.45 billion to GDP and supports 14,500 jobs. TOP’s bottom line is to destroy 75% of that industry, so we can join Belize and Palau.
One can sensibly debate whether there should be more (or less) of the EEZ closed to bottom trawling. But that is vastly different to insisting on a total ban, over time. It would destroy jobs and an entire industry.
And again I remind people this is one of their five non negotiable policies as the price of government. And this is why the thought they could be part of a centre-right government is farcical.



