Otago Uni has nothing to apologise for

The Herald reports:

The University of Otago has apologised after asking its students an exam question about the ethics of representing a terrorist.
The question led some students to breakdown and cry during the exam last week after it brought back painful memories of the recent Christchurch mosque attacks in which a gunman killed 51 people.
One of those sitting the exam had a cousin killed in the attacks, a student told the Herald.
The question asked whether lawyers should be obliged to represent someone who attacked their place of religion, the Herald understands. …

Palmer also sent an apology on behalf of the lecturer who set the exam question.
“My intent was to come up with a situation where the cab rank rule would impose a truly horrific burden on a lawyer, leading to a discussion about good cause and whether the rule should be retained,” the examiner said. 
“I should have realised that the scenario I presented was likely to cause distress, and I am deeply sorry.”

I don’t understand why the University is apologising. If the students want to become criminal lawyers they will face potentially horrific burdens such as representing despicable people. It will be distressing.

Comments (66)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment

%d bloggers like this: