Sanders a step too far for Brooks

David Brooks writes in the NYT:

A few months ago, I wrote a column saying I would vote for over Donald Trump. I may not agree with some of her policies, but culture is more important than politics. She does not spread moral rot the way Trump does.

Now I have to decide if I'd support Bernie Sanders over Trump.

We all start from personal experience. I covered the Soviet Union in its final decrepit years. The Soviet and allied regimes had already slaughtered 20 million people through things like mass executions and intentional famines. Those regimes were slave states. They enslaved whole peoples and took away the right to say what they wanted, live where they wanted and harvest the fruits of their labor.

And yet every day we find more old quotes from Sanders apologizing for this sort of slave regime, whether in the Soviet Union, Cuba or Nicaragua. He excused the Nicaraguan communists when they took away the civil liberties of their citizens. He's still making excuses for Castro.

He's like Jeremy Corbyn. So long as you oppose the West, he supports you.

Populists like Sanders speak as if the whole system is irredeemably corrupt. Sanders was a useless House member and has been a marginal senator because he doesn't operate within this system or believe in this theory of change.

He believes in revolutionary mass mobilization and, once an election has been won, rule by majoritarian domination. This is how populists of left and right are ruling all over the world, and it is exactly what our founders feared most and tried hard to prevent.

Liberalism celebrates certain values: reasonableness, conversation, compassion, tolerance, intellectual humility and optimism. Liberalism is horrified by cruelty. Sanders's leadership style embodies the populist values, which are different: rage, bitter and relentless polarization, a demand for ideological purity among your friends and incessant hatred for your supposed foes.

A liberal leader confronts new facts and changes his or her mind. A populist leader cannot because the omniscience of the charismatic headman can never be doubted. A liberal sees shades of gray. For a populist reality is white or black, friend or enemy. Facts that don't fit the dogma are ignored.

Many senior Democrats are getting nervous that a Sanders candidacy would not see Trump re-elected, but also see the GOP reclaim the House and increase their majority in the Senate.

But Biden won big in South Carolina and that could set him up for Super Tuesday. The current 538 forecast is:

  1. Contested Convention 60%
  2. Sanders 28%
  3. Biden 11%
  4. Bloomberg 1%

So Biden is the only real alternative to Sanders. If Klobuchar and Buttigieg are sensible they pull out and endorse Biden.

Comments (83)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment