Former Alliance Minister Bunkle arrested for shop lifting
November 15th, 2007 at 8:53 am by David FarrarPhillida Bunkle, who served in Helen Clark’s Cabinet from 1999 to 2001, as Minister of Consumer Affairs has been arrested after allegedly trying to steal food to consume. The alleged goods shoplifted are a bottle of Stone’s green ginger wine worth $15.20 and two blocks of Fagg’s coffee each worth $7.19 in her bag.
Well the Government did always believe in redistribution of wealth, but that’s taking it to a new level!
Related posts:
- Rickitt in UK news for shop lifting
- Redistribution of Wealth
- Minister called a ginger rodent
- Greer on Gingas
November 15th, 2007 at 9:14 am
Typical thieving socialist – but she should quickly join the Labour party (if she is not already a member) in order to claim immunity from prosecution.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:23 am
Police will not proceed with any charges, as this demented trollop is in the Auntie Helen club and you can break the law at will when you are a member of the exclusive sicko club of nitwits !!
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:33 am
Give him a break David, he’s just practising what he truely believes in, socialism. It’s just that now he is no longer a minister it’s illegal. If he was still minister of consumer affairs this would be called ‘government policy’.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:36 am
Good to see the stupid woman was just stealing the essentials ay?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:39 am
Sounds like she’s trying to qualify for a Labour list seat. She’s got theavery down pat, and as a former politician we know she can lie through her teeth…..
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:47 am
She must be wishing she was a Labour MP as no proscution would ever occur as it’s not in the public interest.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:48 am
A green ginger and a couple of faggs- For a second there I thought you were talking about Labour’s new cabinet appointments.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:08 am
She probably thinks the Validation Act covers covert actions by ex parliamentarians. Wasn’t there some “funny” business to do with Parliamentary Services and Alleged accommodation rorting?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:22 am
Nick C, “he” is actually a she. Maybe read and get your facts straight before frothing. Just shows there isn’t much thinking behind your posts.
DPF, nice dog-whistle.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:37 am
“DPF, nice dog-whistle.”
Nice attempt to censor.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:42 am
Andrew – I took Nick’s post to be a slight against her slightly homely appearance.
http://www.executive.govt.nz/images/pic_bunkle.jpg
I wouldn’t say she looks like a man, but perhaps a female Paul Holmes in the photo at the link above.
—
Also, it’s not a dog whistle unless it’s a hidden subtext aimed at only a subset of readers. In this case, I don’t think there’s any hidden subtext. The post is clearly intended to mean the same thing to all readers.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dog+whistle+comment
—
Also, it looks like her own facts aren’t straight, unless it’s still 2001.
http://home.xtra.co.nz/hosts/Bunkle/
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:43 am
Yeah, nothing to see here, move along.
After the left it’s all about being principled. Yeah right.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:51 am
Redbaiter, are you familiar with the term “irony”.
I said nice dog-whistle, because this isn’t a partisan or political issue, yet it is turned into one. First post: “typical thieving socialists”.
What, right-leaning people don’t steal?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:55 am
I went into paknsave recently and had my own bag, and put my stuff in it and went to the till there I unloaded my stuff and paid for it.
If Paknsave didn’t have a policy of not using carrier bags it is possible she just made a mistake
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:04 am
“What, right-leaning people don’t steal?”
Left people lack morality. Moral relativity is a staple of socialism. It has to be, or those who advocate for it or practice it would be racked with guilt. That aside, your smug pretentious comment was an attempt to intimidate the owner of this site into highlighting issues that might damage the image of socialism. You do it. All the slime on KBB and the Standard also do it. Keep it up Mr. Farrar. Take no notice of these arrogant swine and their attempts to control thought and speech.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:09 am
Lee C – I would’ve leaned towards that explanation too. I’d doubt she’d have any need or desire to be a thief. Still, the article makes it seem that she paid for some items and was leaving the store with the wine etc. Seems unlikely she’d forget a heavy item like a bottle of wine. Tough one.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:13 am
I justy don’t approve of ‘trial by media’ it’s too lazy a habit to get into and too easy to manipulate.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:29 am
A lady best known for the immortal lines from Parliamentary Services for “having a strong sense of entitlement”.
JC
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:56 am
lee C- they don’t ping you for shoplifting until you try and leave the store with the goods. In a supermarket you could stuff all sorts of goodies into your pockets and down your shirt and they can’t do a thing about it until you actually try and leave the shop without paying. Until then, even if you look suspicious, they can’t charge you with anything.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 12:24 pm
It isn’t a dog whistle. It is something that people who are interested in politics might be interested in. DPF has had a long history of posting snippets from here and there, it is only when we start getting close to elections that a bunch of people come out of the woodwork and start labelling that as dog whistling or manipulating opinion or whatever crap those on the double standard are coming up with today.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
LeeC.. Of course Pak and Save have trollies and carry baskets, there’s always a veritable mountain of the latter, and if one is caught short with more goods than anticipated a quick jaunt back to the entry would suffice.
If this wasn’t so tragic, amusement may take the form of trolling through her historic speeches and highlighting those with regards to morality on various topics.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 12:37 pm
Makes you wonder about the National womens hosptial jackup eh?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Dementia and its onset or is it karma. helmet great line; green ginger and a couple of faggs…..
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
I’ll tell you once, and I’ll gladly tell you as much as you want to hear,,
Blondes with glasses are totally dysfuntional and hysterical.
Anne Hercus has been recently described as such in the media.
I will say they are usually boring people who stick to sneering down their noses at the marginalised, but they are known to break with convention;
hence the hysterics in what ever form.
You may have noticed the banks are filled with blondes with glasses.
They are complete drones to the system and having no creativity or originality make excellent sheep. Very clinical and colourless in personality.
Unfortunately, when they do go awol from reality its in a big way, no half way measures. Thet go from one extreme to the other, basically I suspect because they don’t know how to think for themselves. Very system driven.
Anyway, instead of going on at length about these suspect individuals who cast suspicion on all others, I will ask one question to this blog and if anyone can answer I will never speak of these strange begoggled females again on this blog.
Name two blondes with glasses who contributed to history.
Obviously, Anee Hercus does not count.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
It’s clear the woman isn’t short of a dollar (presently in England, house on the market for half a mil) so it seems inconceivable that it’d be calculating thievery at work – the risks vastly outweigh the rewards, specially for a public figure – no matter how much it neatly fits the “thieving socialist” paradigm.
Having encountered the woman a few times and come away with the impression that there weren’t quite the requisite number of sheep in the top paddock even a decade or more ago, it may well be that kehua / Lee C have it right – perhaps borderline dementia at work.
If so it’s somewhat tragic, as it would be if this were anyone of any political persuasion. Perhaps withholding judgement till the facts are presented might be the humane thing to do.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
Poor dears probably suffering from the same mental afflications as her former Dear leader is.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 2:26 pm
hinamanu asks:
German Chancellor Angela Merkel wore glasses as a teenager. I assume she has had laser surgery or wears contacts as she’s never seen with them now. Hillary Clinton also wore glasses in an earlier incarnation.
Well you didn’t say “contributed positively to history…”
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Rex,,
Almost tempted to give that to you, but sorry, no cigar.
I’m talking about recognised glass wearing blondes and both those individuals are not as such.
Sorry for the technicality, but for you r effort I’ll give you a clue on one
Tennis.
And she’s the only one I can think of in years of trying.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:11 pm
Sorry hinamanu, but sport doesn’t make history, it’s just a pastime that distracts the masses while real history is being made
Thus I excluded sportswomen from my calculations.
As for Hillary, she is well recognised as a glasses wearing blond by most, though I grant you that knowing Merkel wore specs is a bit too wonkish perhaps.
So half a point maybe?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Hillary has aquired blonde.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Rex,,
I’ll give you a point if you can tell me the tennis player.
I’m not sure if you’re completely correct in sport not making history.
the names certainly stay with us.
Ali, Bradman, Sullivan, Ashe, Connors, Mantle, Palmer, Woods, Borg, Pele,,,,,,,
No, I don’t think you’re driving down the fairway with skill and authority at all.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:26 pm
“Hillary has aquired blonde.”
There you go
And I’ve never sen her give a speech wearing glasses.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
quire = unbound, in sheets. Hence aquired.
I could have meant that, suggesting blondes have more fun (or not, depending on their predilection).
However, I am not that smart. I meant acquired.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
And I’ve never seen Bill Clinton give a speech wearing a beard. But he once had one, and he made history ;-P You didn’t specify “blond and wearing glasses while making history. Can’t narrow the rules now the match has begun!
As for the tennis player – Martina Navritalova?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:36 pm
i hope the tucker wasn’t flogged for any peace activists hiding in the Kapiti region that the Police missed
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
No Rex, further back.
your semantics would see you argue well in a court of law.
and Gerry ‘acquired’ is what I thought you said.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Hinemanu, if you are discounting some because there is no cigar involved, then that may narrow the field even more.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Hinamanu, sorry.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Hmm,
The semantics are flowing.
Anyone know any glasses wearing blondes who made a positive input to history. I believe the original term was contribution.
Interesting names have come up and added relevance but no solid names (change that to identities) yet.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Which in fact means the question has not benn satisfactorily answered.
(semantics included)
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 4:31 pm
Hinamanu….Perhaps Paris’s eyesight might fade one day.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
That chick who beat the male tennis player after he claimed that women’s tennis was a joke. Forgot her name though. It was one of those names that swings both ways….
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 4:40 pm
“Hinamanu….Perhaps Paris’s eyesight might fade one day.”
Will be intriguing to see with the middle aged spread.
Pammies nearly middle aged, think she’ll go for lenses.
but the women I’m talking about really have no sex appeal.
But somehow they always get well offf husbands. I suspect they hook middle aged insecure business men and move in to fill the void.
being blonde makes them socially acceptable of course.
As you can tell, I gnaw on this bone quite heavily, but yet to be satisfied with the answer.
But,,
Does Navritalova wear glasses??
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 4:44 pm
PaulL,,
yeah, you got her,, Billie Jean King.
Ok, now I’ll make things easier,, this is really hard eh people.
One more blonde with glasses who contributed to history.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:00 pm
Billie Jean King was a blonde?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:02 pm
yes she was
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:02 pm
As opposed to Billie Holiday who was black
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:03 pm
Kind of sandy blonde. (Avoiding using the phrase “dirty blonde” because then I’d be talking about Paris again).
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Damnit PaulL that was my cigar! But all tennis-playing lesbians look the same to me
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:05 pm
Penicillen. The guy who got the credit whose wife actually did all the work…was she blonde with glasses? Marie Curie….was she blonde? (Most of these scientists wear or wore glasses, that’s the easy bit. Finding the blonde one is hard).
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:06 pm
Ok people, one more,
is it possible.
why is this so hard ????
There’s got to be a lesson there.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
PaulL,,
sorry,,
Marie Curie was Brunette.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Yessssss!! *does victory lap of Kiwiblog*
“Navratilova, 44, looked glaringly human Tuesday. She broke her glasses in the last game against Testud and Vinci, fumbling to fix them during the match’s final points.”
source here.
I’ll take half a cigar. I’m a humidor half-full kinda guy
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Navratilova definitely wore glasses. I’m just doubtful on the making history thing. Oldest Wimbledon or something was it? There must be some limit to what we call history though – by at least some definitions we are all making history every day. I think hinamanu’s argument is that playing tennis doesn’t make history, Billie Jean was quite important in women’s rights in sport.
There must be one of those famous scientist types from way back when who was blonde? Maybe after work when I have time to look for photos I can find one.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
I looked on Billie Jean King’s website for a blonde photo. Could not find one. Plenty of her with black hair in her playing days.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 6:46 pm
Hmm. Are we now demanding _natural_ blondes?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 6:54 pm
Like hell BJ King (what an interesting name!) had blonde hair! what about robert redford (or is he a dirty ginga?)
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:10 pm
Uggghhh.
This is not about flippin Robert Redford.
Now,,
It seems I was wrong,, Billie Jean King was not a blonde.
Now we’re back to finding TWO blondes with glasses who contributed
meaningfully to history and so far it can’t be done
So far I am a flippin genius.
Yes PauLl,, natural blondes. They are the truly dysfuntional and hysterical individuals I originally commented on.
Now,, any more takers ???
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:14 pm
“I think hinamanu’s argument is that playing tennis doesn’t make history, Billie Jean was quite important in women’s rights in sport.”
Faaaaaaa,,
I said sport counted as history!!
It’s hard enough finding two prominent blondes with glasses let alone being fussy about their back grounds.
But,,
good news, we’re back to one.
Navratalova must count.
Sheesh.
ok guys, you can do it,, one more.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Wearing spectacles, or carrying drinks?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
What?
NO!!!!!!!
Blondes with glasses.
No one can tell me two Blondes with glasses who contributed meaningfully to history
Personally, I believe its impossible and have yet to be given two confirmed identities.
I have so far in essence out witted this blog!!
Could anyone have even thought of the question ??
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
“I have so far in essence out witted this blog!!”
How deluded this foolish cretin is ? Some mothers do have them .
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:45 pm
Barbie?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:45 pm
HA!!!!!!!
Cacofinix says I’m deluded
the proof is in the pudding,, he is proved to be outwitted
My sarcasm and peals of victory shall ring in his ears for ever
Well,,
for many years anyway
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:47 pm
I thought Gerry had a good question. Many blondes with glasses of beer may have changed history. Do sunglasses count? Do reading glasses count? The thing that is hard is that many women take their glasses off for photos, so it is hard to tell whether they wear glasses or not by just looking at photos. And for some reason Wikipedia doesn’t seem to think it is important to tell us whether or not individuals wore glasses.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 7:57 pm
“And for some reason Wikipedia doesn’t seem to think it is important to tell us whether or not individuals wore glasses.”
ok, intelligent point.
I’m talking blondes with permanent use of spectacles, not just for reading.
Two who contributed meaningfully to history.
So far Navratalova has been accepted.
One more.
I thought Billie Jean King was blonde, but apparently not.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:10 pm
Shit, I can’t think of any significant number of blondes who have permanent use of spectacles, let alone ones that did something significant. These days very few people wear spectacles full time, it is largely reading glasses only. The only people who would are those who don’t care about their appearance, and most of them wouldn’t bother to dye their hair blonde.
You do of course know that natural blondes are a very small part of the population? The rest all care enough about their appearance to dye their hair.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:17 pm
‘You do of course know that natural blondes are a very small part of the population.’
no, I did not know this.
But as I explained, the banks are full of blondes with glasses.
And no, I am not going to ask each one if they’re dyed.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:21 pm
oh you’re all finding blondes over here? I was waiting at another thread.
Blondes dont need glasses – that’s why it’s a tricky question. They all have 20-20 vision. they are physically close to perfect.
maybe try some scandinavian history someone
when are we going to get pulled up for being sexist or blondist or brunettist or maleist?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:21 pm
But are those just reading glasses, or permanent? Bet you that when they go out to the night clubs they don’t have them on. And I also bet they aren’t natural.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:26 pm
“My sarcasm and peals of victory shall ring in his ears for ever
Well,,
for many years anyway ”
I just thought I could to link to your blogger profile hinamoocoward ?
Vote:Ouch !!
November 15th, 2007 at 8:27 pm
‘Blondes dont need glasses – that’s why it’s a tricky question. They all have 20-20 vision. they are physically close to perfect.’
now, this is what you call a revelation. I am definitely going to research this. With the next blonde with glasses I see.
PauLl,,
I think you defeated your own logic.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:34 pm
cacofinix,,
you can’t answer the question, so find you a mass debate somewhere.
Vote:you know where they all are. I have peaked the minds of intelligent men and we are plunging depths beyond ‘very interesting’ let alone where the big and little hands are pointing.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:34 pm
Sue Kedgley! Has contributed meaningfully to food history. Sandra Coney! Has contributed meaningfully to, ah, um, something…that’s right, world peace.
Vote:Margaret Wilson! Has contributed meaningfully to changing history by making the Speaker’s role partisan.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Did I? Where? I think that your logic is self-defeating, since you are looking for notable achievements of a very small segment of the population. It doesn’t tell us anything. If there were going to be any they would be German or Scandinavian, and I’m not sure that I am up with everything that goes on in foreign languages. Maybe a politician?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Piqued, not peaked.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:37 pm
“when are we going to get pulled up for being sexist or blondist or brunettist or maleist?”
my thought exactly for a while, but I feel the question so intriguing the PC crowd want the answer before they file for my demerits
Remember, this has practically been an all day question and the end is still not in sight.
I shall check my demerit situation tomorrow.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
i don’t think anyone’s mentioned collar and cuffs…the blondist component has been relatively tame and it is true they’re less intelligent than those raven-headed geniuses amongst us
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
‘Sandra Coney! Has contributed meaningfully to, ah, um, something…that’s right, world peace.’
I shall put this under consideration.
google time.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
I can’t believe you guys I have just been reading this thread
Shocking
This is what the left at Kiwiblogblog has to say
It’s precisely this thin veneer of really nasty bigotry that seemingly bubbles away under the surface of Right wing politics that keeps many centrists oriented to the Left.
And I hate to say it but they are right The nastiest bigoted comments do in fact come from the right in the blogoshere. We are in danger of loosing our credibility. Visit public address they have less visitors and posts but the debate is really civilized and they are on the left.
One day some enterprising Journo is going to do a story about poltics in the blogoshere,
God lets hope they do not visit here.
Can some one link to a Rightish site that has intelligent reasoned conversation please ?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
“I shall check my demerit situation tomorrow.”
Jellyfish’s don’t have to worry about the demerit board …
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
well I think the problem is just as I put it – blondes are of such a physical type that they dont need glasses and as such they dont exist.
and anyway blondes most definitely have an influence over history by way of their magical mystery powers over men whether they have glasses or not. so the question is not their ability to be meaningful but whether they actually need glasses.
but I guess my argument here fails if it is put up against the standard PC basis – i.e. we all the same so there should be an even spread of glasses across all hair colours. silly silly pc
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:47 pm
Was Eve a blonde and Helen the apple ?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:47 pm
Is the question only blondes with glasses, or any blondes with eyesight defects? So if they wear contacts that is also included?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:50 pm
oh santa claws grow up.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:53 pm
Well,,
I believe this question has stimulated good democratic healthy discussion and taught me very much. Even Cacofinix must’ve learned something and thats saying something.
I think he neds to be reported to the SIS. He seems very interested in prying individuals private information.
Santa,,
Get a life. Humour can be used as a learning step.
Its the socialists who are diminishing our democracy.
Vote:They don’t care what we say on this blog as long as they can make us say less.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
“Even Cacofinix must’ve learned something and thats saying something.”
I tire of you’re constant put downs spineless wimp .Would you to say it to my face? No, thought not, twisted coward !
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 8:58 pm
“Is the question only blondes with glasses, or any blondes with eyesight defects? So if they wear contacts that is also included?”
Blondes with glasses prefer glasses. Go figure.
They used to wear real large lenses to make their eyes look big and angry.
like Deirdre on coro st.
then they turned to narrow lenses to look squinty and mean.
And no one see’s it. masters of deception. But thats only my opinion.
Vote:But I’m sticking to it.
November 15th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
PaulL opines:
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
Errr the second par on is mine. Couldn’t see the bloody HTML tags
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:01 pm
“like Deirdre on coro st.”
Don’t break a fingernail dear hitting that keyboard , do you get a sore bum ?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:01 pm
OK, very few attractive people. Better?
(Actually, I have to confess that those bank chick types with glasses are pretty hot)
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:03 pm
Sandra coney looked very dark haired, but I will put this to a vote
Who believes Sandra Coney is a blonde with glasses
Yea or nay
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:03 pm
ssssshhhhhhhh PaulL. You not allowed to call women hot these days. dont you know?
well not in nz anyway
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:05 pm
Cacofinix vote doesn’t count
He couldn’t answer the question, his input is irrelevant.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
stuff this i am off to drink merlot cabernet sauvignon by the bucket full , bye bye bro & co….I’ll be back Auntie Helen Offal Pit Manager.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
The silly thieving socialist clearly misses taking other people’s poperty so she though she would try this just to keep her hand in.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
in your office I spose
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
vote – wouldn’t have the foggiest. i always turn away when she comes into reading or other range.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:10 pm
“We are in danger of loosing our credibility.”
For fuck’s sake, the spelling and grammar is appalling from Santa Claws.
You lose credibility.
Vote:You loose your bowels.
November 15th, 2007 at 9:10 pm
Of course you’re allowed to call women hot. It’s when you point out that they’re not hot that you get into trouble. Actually, that’s something I like about English chicks. They have a much better understanding of where the line is between some light banter that shows you’re human, and things that are inappropriate.
(Caveat: the partner can get a bit annoyed when I call other women hot…)
Hinamanu – will need a link to a photo to assess that.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:14 pm
“Sandra Coney! Has contributed meaningfully to, ah, um, something…that’s right, world peace.”
I can’t really get a consensus on Sandra Coney Bugalug
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:16 pm
Bugalug,
Can you get a link tio a clear pic of Sandra for everyone to decide if she’s a blonde with glasses.
you just may have hit the jack pot.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
I don’t know about a jack pot, but I am certain who is a crack pot .
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:24 pm
i’ve got it. phillida bunkle bunkle!
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:26 pm
A bunkle was doing a bunk from the Auntie Helen gym cause she got hungry and thought she could steal like the Labour Party do .
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:29 pm
Lol, lol, lol vto,,
Does anyone even know her in Australia
I said positive contribution.
Cacofinix,,
I thought you were gong to your so called office for your so called champagne.
Can’t answer a question and can’t prove anything bout yourself.
Just betray yourself on a daily basis. share a lot in common with dear leader.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
Buggerlugs
Extra vowels mean loose bowels
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:45 pm
“This is what the left at Kiwiblogblog has to say”
I suggest you keep crap like that off Kiwiblog. If people want to know what that bunch of sick hate driven psychos have to say, they’ll go there. I don’t know how you can give any credibility to such blatant hypocrisy.
The whole purpose of the site is to attack Kiwiblog and Mr. Farrar personally, and their standard of behaviour is far worse. They’re control freaks. They burn with the obsession to control what other NZers think and say. They want to impose their stinking one party socialist system upon free men.
They’re embittered political troglodytes, Marxist throwbacks who still think the fight is between the worker and capitalism. They don’t know that they themselves, with their totalitarian objectives and their poisonous attacks on democracy and free thought and speech have become much more of a threat to liberty and civilisation than capitalism has ever been or ever will be.
BTW, I went there, and here’s a few examples of the stuff that Santa Claws thinks gives them the high moral ground. Where’d you learn how to reason Santa? From some left wing “educator”?
————————————————–
It’s no secret political arguments attract the mentally unwell as a place to vent their urges, how does it feel to be labeled one of them? To BE one of them?
I have a funny feeling he was locked in a cupboard as a kid.
So bags, tell me about your mother.
Bags – you’ve obviously got a personality disorder of some kind
He is getting a bit D4Jesque isn’t he. All the crazy with none of the typos.
Hey Bags – don’t be frightened mate, we don’t think badly of you or of your illness
A friend of mine who works in television said that a lot of the journos in the Parliamentary Press Gallery referred to him as Dumbc*nt Garner
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:47 pm
“Buggerlugs Says:
For fuck’s sake, the spelling and grammar is appalling from Santa Claws.
You lose credibility.
You loose your bowels.”
Is that it, is that all you have in the forum of political debate? take me for instance, I have dyslexia and unless the spell checker doesn’t pick it up, i’m screwed, but am I to be dismissed for the odd spelling mistake.
Wow. Your standards are exceedingly high for one so anonymous. Still if we are to be slain for one’s spelling and grammatical application of the Queens english, then I guess we are one step closer to that right wing nirvana so desperately sought.
I am intrigued by that last line though? Was that meant to be clever? It sure as hell wasn’t even slightly funny. Still, we try with what we’ve got eh.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 9:52 pm
I see Redbaiter is delighting in the political debate once more.
“political troglodytes, Marxist throwbacks”
No no, tell us what you really think. And you’re different from them?
“free men”
Are you red, are you truely free. I’m guessing you are still paying tax. I’m guessing you don’t smoke the odd joint. I’m guessing you don’t yell fire in a crowded theatre. I’m also guessing you don’t care much for true free thinkers.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:05 pm
Oh, missed this one. Its from Nih btw -
“I’m not commenting though [on kiwiblog] and have no intention of anything other than laughing my fucking ass off at you cretins.”
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:12 pm
“tell us what you really think”
Exactly how many other people have delegated you to express their views for them Paul?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:38 pm
You really don’t make any sense.
If you are taking the literal use of my wording, you are barking up the wrong tree. However you seem to miss the tenor of the well used and loved (shall we say cliche) “Tell us what you think”.
Oh bugger there I go again using the first-person, plural personal pronoun. Shame shame, that so belittles my political argument as to render me useless, or not. I thought we came here for political argument, but if we are just playing blogosphere linguistic scrabble, then I guess the fine art of political debate is gone forever.
Don’t take this wrong, as I really don’t want to pursue a character attack, but do you get out often? I mean if you were to have a political chin wag in a bar with some people and then start picking apart their grammatical imperfections, I could see punches thrown. I mean this in the nicest possible way.
Or shall we look at this in a different light? Does one get a sense of superiority by picking grammatical incongruities? Is this a power thing? It’s not too far off the classical hall monitor, or dear we say it, playground bully.
I’m sorry of my banding about of the 1st person personal pronoun, I’ll try to abstain from the aforementioned grammatical willy-nillyness and minimise the use of the seemingly banal yet obviously offensive cliche.
But then we’d hate to see two birds in the bush used where one would suffice, wouldn’t we.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:41 pm
So I guess the answer is none. Right?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:42 pm
Hinamanu, thanks for the light-hearted fun, while it lasted.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Hang on a minute, who’s to say that I am indeed referring to actual living people, but indeed the voices that preside inside one’s head. I could in fact by applying the orthographically correct 1st person plural pronoun to me, the we as in I, that is, those of us that are represented in the singular which yet seem to manifest itself in the we, yet all along only being able to express thyself through the somewhat spectacularly fast yet dyslexically challenged fingers of the physical presence that is me.
Having fun are we? You see when Jack Nicholson used the term in a movie, I really doubted there was someone in the audience so jacked off at the aforementioned first-person plural personal pronoun, that they stormed out of the building in disgust. Still there’s a chance that it may still happen. I suggest you don’t go to any Jack Nicholson suspense movies, it may offend.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
So commies out there. If someone wants something, but doesn’t have the money to pay for it, its OK to steal that thing. Have I got that right? .
..and Bunkle doesn’t exactly have an unblemished record does she?? Wasn’t there some other time she mistook the taxpayers money for her own??
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
“Hang on a minute .. followed by a couple of hundred or so words of incomprehensible gibberish.
Don’t worry about it anymore Paul, I’m quite aware of why you think you’re speaking for an audience of like cheering brain damaged collectivists, ….and everything you say shows me that I’m more correct about that reason than I ever imagined.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:23 pm
Just popped back in and saw that Paul must be swotting for his school cert (or whatever it’s called these days) English exam.
He asks “Is that it, is that all you have in the forum of political debate?”
Actually, young chap, that wasn’t about political debate. It was about spelling. Try and keep up. Good luck with the exams.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:29 pm
Hinamanu -
Vote:You have me worried now. The picture of Coney I found was with her old man the great Tom Pearce (watch the lefty loonies go crazy over that), but I see from a quick Google that she’s kind of sandy blonde, leaning towards light brown…could I swap her for Suzy Cato? Surely she’s done something for history?
November 15th, 2007 at 11:32 pm
“So commies out there. If someone wants something, but doesn’t have the money to pay for it, its OK to steal that thing. Have I got that right? .”
Excellent, we’re getting somewhere here folks. Engaging in a little druggist’s/heinz dilemma. It’s nice to see Kholberg in all of his glory and weakness showning his face here.
Well you see, if we were to apply the “good old day” axiom that the esteemed Garth George (of the literary Georges you know) so fondly adheres to, of course one shouldn’t steal, it’s just wrong.
However if one was to assume that there might be an alternative answer (it can happen even within religious dogma), then there are several possibilities to pursue.
a) One should steal the … because everyone has a right to choose life, regardless of the law, or even
b) One should steal the …, because saving a human life is a more fundamental value than the property rights of another person
But Kohlberg wasn’t without criticism. Still it’s applying a model of development to a dilemma posed by the Redbaiter.
The world is just so bland if we are all to assume the black and whites (right and wrongs) of the good old days were a utopian goal. We progressed from the old black and white TV for a bloody good reason.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:36 pm
Bug
I thought we came here for an argument, “No you didn’t”
kool, beast eye kep up weth mi spellng lessonz then.
Does hall monitor mean anything?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:42 pm
“Excellent, we’re getting somewhere here folks.”
Yep. You’re at long last acknowledging you’re a commie.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:47 pm
Jesus Paul, you sound like a badly-written Monty Python sketch.
Hall monitor? Is that what Labour will be putting in everyone’s home to make sure we’re not belting our kids, eating KFC, smoking, planning terror attacks or diddling the tax department?
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:54 pm
Or is that the twat that sits in blogs and abuses people cause their spelling isn’t up to scratch, Touche?
Red, label me what you like if that makes your world a happy place. If you are trying to offend me, belittle me whatever – goodluck?
I just thought we call came here for a little political ding dong, not muck slinging nor spell checking.
Bug, it’s not poorly written, it’s verbatim, and yes it’s python. You see I went to Spamalot on Broadway a couple of weeks back and the crap that is bandied about here as political discourse deserves nothing less than to have python or at the very least Perrin thrown at it, sorry you missed those references.
Vote:November 15th, 2007 at 11:59 pm
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 12:09 am
“Red, label me what you like”
You labelled yourself. I asked “commies out there” to respond, and you obliged.
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 8:22 am
“Hinamanu, thanks for the light-hearted fun, while it lasted.”
I now make this official.
It is impossible to find any blonde with glasses who conributed meaningfully to society. The question was raised almost 24 hrs ago and has come up utterly lacking. I suggest that those of you on either side of the political spectrum who are middle aged single business men consider how many blondes with glasses seem to be very open and friendly towards you. And dismiss them immediately.
Be warned, their charm is deep and engaging and it is easy to forget they are nothing but ice blocks with glasses. Stone cold.
I would say more, but decorum dictates god form.
No, I have not been stung by any blondes with glasses.
I saw a bumper sticker once that said ‘boring women have good lives’ and from there I realised blondes with glasses are exactly that description.
I find it intriguing on such an intelligent blog I have not been contradicted.
Or in fact maligned. Oh yeah, 4got about Cacofinix.
Vote:He says he has an office and oodles of champagne. There’s a Tui moment there.
November 16th, 2007 at 8:42 am
Kerry Prendergast (ouch, that hurt). Germaine Greer
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 10:39 am
llew
yes, finally
One confirmed identity.
Had no idea Germaine was a blonde with glasses.
I wouldn’t say dysfunctional but hysterical……
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 11:05 am
Well she wore/wears glasses, blonde in some photos anyway.
Might argue as to positive influence – but then I spent ages googling for a picture of Margaret Thatcher in glasses.
Probably has me on some sicko google watchlist for that.
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
hinamanu.
Vote:Ever heard of a brunette with crooked teeth that ever contributed anything worthwhile to society?
November 16th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Clark Gable
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 9:21 pm
Monty nailed it first into the thread.
Vote:November 16th, 2007 at 9:31 pm
All property is theft Burt, come on you know that!
Vote: