Has Rudman outed Complainant A?
June 10th, 2009 at 11:45 am by David FarrarBrian Rudman wrote in the Herald:
One was a married woman who had stood unsuccessfully for selection as a candidate for Labour Party nomination in last year’s election
Now that narrows it down massively from activist to candidate nominee, and makes it pretty easy for someone to use Google to make an educated guess.
Note I will delete comments that mention the likely name – or any name.
Incidentally, this makes it even worse for Richard Worth – if he was hitting on not just a Labour Party activist, but an actual candidate – that is damn reckless.
UPDATE: It is actually the combination of Goff’s comments on her appearance, and Rudmans column that makes identifying her fairly simple. So Phil has helped out her!
Related posts:
- Rudman on Labour selections
- Rudman warns Labour could lose Mt Albert
- I agree with Rudman
- Complainant #2
June 10th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
News Flash: Worth is an idiot.
We had actually picked up on that one thanks.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
“Worth is an idiot.”
It is a disgrace that such an idiot was kept in at the expense of people like Stephen Franks.
The National Party, that seeks popularity only by repeating the ideology of the opposition in a slightly different language, needs a complete clean out at the top.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
David
was it a reckless act
Vote:or
a worthless one?
June 10th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
How much truth is there in the allegations themselves? They seem to be watered down with every narration
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
The muppet of a woman took her complaint to the muppet leader of the opposition and he failed to keep focus on the allegations and decided to use it as a political point scoring tool. Either that or it was always a point scoring exercise.
This is a disgrace – Goff should stick to attacking Key using stuff he has made up… Oh hang on….
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Just been doing a bit of a google search without much luck. Anyone suggest any other terms I could add to my search?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
thnorriss
Try “shameless political muck raking”
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
DPF
Any chance you can get the txt messages and post them on this blog? Perhaps Goff could make a few up – he seems to be good at that.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Google is probably overloaded as people try to identify this woman.
Vote:Labour party records of candidate nominations are probably being frantically shredded.
June 10th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Ok, we can’t guess names here David, but can we summarise what we do know about the woman? Be good to have all the facts in one place.
[DPF: Probably - will depend on context. She is potentially a victim here so I do not wish to cause her distress by identifying her]
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
She shouldn’t be hard to track down, since Goff has told us she is “strikingly beautiful”. Most lefty women are hideous old bags, so this one should stand out.
I recommend ignoring Google, but use Google Images.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
…….I do not wish to cause her distress by identifying her.”
Aahhaa! So you know who she is then.
[DPF: I think so yes. Thanks to Goff's comments and Rudman's column]
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
oh dear, oh dear, oh dear
surprisingly easy to find that only one labour female nominee fits the profile.
Honey Trap anyone? Surely even Worth wouldnt be stupid enough to come onto a member of the opposition party if she wasnt playing along with him to see what she could extract, either in the form of work, or evidence to hang the silly prick by.
Actually and on reflection, I suspect that Worth is stupid enough. Born to rule patrician – check. Very smart – check. Zero nouce – check. Bullet proof self regard – check. Arrogant Fool – check.
The perfect target.
Just lucky I guess that Labour didnt get pictures – assuming of course that they didnt.
Fortunately Goff is as stupid as Worth and is coming across like a panty sniffer himself.
Looking at the harrasment emails, Worth invited her for a swim, and asked her to bring him a tie back from a trip to Pakistan. IS THAT IT??
Yup, thats clearly harrasment.
Wonder what the other half of the text messages say – you know, the ones she texted him back with… funny how Goff isnt mentioning them.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
THE TEXTS (as released by Goff)
* Do you want to come swimming?
* How you getting on with the Goa purchase?
* Does that possibly mean you might be back [in India] in mid January with a discreet ITG group?
* You are my favourite new best friend to use a Facebook expression. RWW
* I don’t need anything. Perhaps a tie from the Indian School of Business at Gachibowli but that might be impossible. RWW XX
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
exactly Pat. Is that it?
Be still my beating heart!
I thought Worth had gone to a Private School- where’s the whipped cream, the handcuffs and the limp celery?
No wonder the alleged victim took so long to identify that this was inappropriate harassment…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
What great sport our pollies provide for us. As a group they are so venal feral and anal that they paint big targets on their foreheads and let us take aim.
The sad thing is that they are also charged with governing us and their behaviour is such that one wouldnt trust them to govern a punch up in a pub let alone a whole country.
Until they can drag themselves collectively out of the gutter and start to show some behaviour that qualifies them for even a modicum of respect they will as always remain but dog turds on the soles of my shoes.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Hilarious. Five lame texts vs Goff’s “strikingly beautiful” comment. Spot the one that refers to the woman’s appearance.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
God how long would it take to type “I don’t need anything. Perhaps a tie from the Indian School of Business at Gachibowli but that might be impossible. RWW XX” in text with full punctuation and capitalisation, even with predictive on? Didn’t the man have anything better to do?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
KiwiGreg asks:
He’s a list MP, remember. By definition he represents no one, is therefore beholden to no one (other than his leader) and has no purpose whatsoever other than to make up the numbers amongst the automatons who vote “yay” or “nay” on the command of their political bosses (if they want to maintain their list ranking, that is).
Yet more evidence that our system of representation needs an overhaul. When’s that going to happen, by the way? When more important constitutional issues are off Key’s agenda, like who Dick was trying to dick? Glad to know the PM, Cabinet and media all have their priorities right.
DPF:
There are no victims in this sorry story of sleaze, DPF. No one has behaved in a way that merits the slightest consideration whatsoever. I’m loathe to sound like a former PM, but it’s time to move on. If and when this woman wants to step out from behind Goff’s skirts with her accusations, let her. Meanwhile Worth has got his just desserts.
This is fiddling (in every sense of the word) while Rome burns.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Maybe John Key now needs to go back and look at how the master politician Helen Clark handled all the curly questions around DBP and the other ratbags that she was covering for.
H2 to H1 before meeting Sainsbury et al,
Vote:H2 : Now Helen – When you are asked about this “Worth”business -Remember to say “oh well thats something I’m leaving for the Police. -You mustn’t been drawn out any more on this issue. Just then say I have nothing further to say and know you don’t care what” Phil Goff “is going on about you have a country to look after not a press pack to keep in business.
H1 : Yes Heather- I must remember to do that- it worked every time with speeding and doone and all those other tough corners we got out off.
June 10th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Fuck, using Google Images to surf through Labour candidates is a painful process.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
The first person to out her was Key. He made the complaint public.
[DPF: No he did not. He made the existence of the complaint public - but not the complaint itself - big difference. And presumably he was asked if there had been any other complaints, so he merely told the truth in response]
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Mt Albert candidate list has some strikingly beautiful women…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Who else has Worth appointed to Boards?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I think the problem with suggesting it’s the failed Mt Albert candidate who works at Auckland University and did a paper suggesting clitorechtomies were a positive practice in Muslim marriages is that, with all due respect to her, I’m told that it would take many, many drinks before one considered her “strikingly beautiful.”
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
* Does that possibly mean you might be back [in India] in mid January with a discreet ITG group?
* I don’t need anything. Perhaps a tie from the Indian School of Business at Gachibowli but that might be impossible. RWW XX
These two texts are definately in response to a text sent by the women to Worth, the second in particular is most likely in response to the women asking Worth if he would like her to buy something for him. I find it hard to understand that someone who is being bombarded with offensive texts and objects to it, would then offer to purchase something for them.
I wonder when the MSM are going to get off their collective arses and ask Goff to proove his allegations. I wont hold my breath.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
“Fuck, using Google Images to surf through Labour candidates is a painful process.”
Go to advanced preferences filter and click the “ignore offensive content” tab – that should cut 98% of them out.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Gotta love NZ politics. Recession, what recession? Bunch of moronic fools the lot of them. This is pathetic Chinese Whispers at a primary school level controversy.
PS Goff comes off the worst here, should have stayed well out of it. Who is advising him?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Sadly, the PM has yet to learn that nice guys finish last, even in NZ.
Worth should have been ruthlessly dumped, instead of ‘resigning’ in Phase 1. Whatever he did to upset JK was clearly unforgiveable, and should have been dealt with accordingly.
Then Complainant A would have been a witness for the prosecution, and for Worth to explain. Should have been End of Story – leave the rest to the police.
But Phase 2, over a week now, has been a disaster. It started with Worth’s protestations of innocence, and we have since had a drip feed of confusion. The witchhunt of Complainant A, and no doubt eventual outing, are starting to look like victimization of a minor party who had little to do with the big blowup.
But maybe a trawl through Worth’s ministerial appointments will throw up some interesting names….
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
go to Whale Oil
then have a look for:
Immigration scam set up fake job offers
Vote:NZH 4:00AM Monday Dec 08, 2008
By Alanah May Eriksen
June 10th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
@macdee whut? Whale’s lead article is a full expose, no need to search for it. Not bad looking but if strikingly beautiful the photo doesnt do her justice.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
KG just have a look a bit further
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Wow married to a convicted fraudster. Perhaps she has learned how to commit fraud by her husband?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
I officially give this woman no credibility whatsoever. I hope she and Goff are fucked. There is no way I am going to trust a bitch that knows her husband is committing fraud and then is supposedly sexually harassed. Yeah right. What a bitch.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Right about now there is an ordinary looking Indian women somewhere regretting that she trusted Mr Goff’s professionalism
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Goff – professionalism – oxymoron
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Can’t wait for the next Labour List placings, and see what she got for her efforts.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
KiwiGreg – “strikingly attractive” is a very subjective opinion, especially on Phil Goff’s side of the political fence
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Guys, please… DPF is identifiable as the owner of this blog and could easily be sued. For his sake, tone it down a tad, huh?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Great link macdee – I reckon Phil has a problem on his hands
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
What is he going to be sued for?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Also makes one wonder if the Korean complainant was just a coincident or part of a grand scam. Also adds some credibility to the Worth denials.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
DPF
Any chance you can shoulder tap Goff to publish the womans cell phone number. Sounds to me that she is complaining that the txt’s were not suggestive enough.
I’ll flick here this and see if Goff get’s all excited: “hey I think u r hot – wanna play?” Ohhhhh nasty – could get somebody fired….
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
For what it is worth Worth should drag her ass into court immediately for defamation. If he has solid ground saying he did nothing particularly wrong he should prove it by showing her up to be a fraud.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
inventory2>“strikingly attractive” is a very subjective opinion, especially on Phil Goff’s side of the political fence
Waxing her mustache off is probably enough to qualify her for a top Goff Leftie Chick Rating.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:42 pm
davidp – lmao
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Always good to see that misogyny is not dead on the right wing of the political spectrum.
It’s also funny to see Oily Perm Boy commentating on others looks, him being such an attractive lad and all!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Phil-(in)-Goff must have spent his entire adult life surrounded by total bush-pigs if he thinks she is “strikingly attractive”. Oh, hang on….
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
So there is actually at least 1 woman in Labour who is not drop dead ugly AND who likes men ???? Sorry – I’m not buying it.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Always good to see that misogyny is not dead on the right wing of the political spectrum.
You got a problem with someone finding a particular women attractive sonic?
I must have miseed the scorn you laid on Goff regarding his misogyny when he was salivating over her being ‘strikingly attractive’.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Bevan
Key made Goff say that – he held a loaded gun to his head. Actually it was the same gun he used to shoot some babies which he was eating at the time.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
I see Bevan is unaware of what the word misogyny means. Could everyone avoid using big words so he can keep up?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Now, now Bevan – you should know that sonic is allowed to be a hypocrite. It’s rule #23(c)(i) in the Lefty Troll Handbook
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Tell that woman to never go to a party conference in Dunedin.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
I2
The problem is that sonic never actually says anything – he just snipes at everyone else and never commits to an opinion. So after he has derailed a tread and distracted it there is nothing concrete to link to later to show that he is a supreme hypocrite.
Sure you can find hundreds of links where he has skirted around an issue but never ever a firm opinion that can be called up later on.
For this reason Kimble is right: sonic is nothing more than a troll and should be 100% ignored. If sonic want’s to state his position I’ll engage. Otherwsie… he is just noise.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
burt, I would actually say Sonic is “all piss & wind like the barbers cat”
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
I stated a position there burt, this thread and the complimentary thread at whale oil show, yet again, that certain sections of your side of the political spectrum continue to exhibit a high degree of misogyny (note I chose my words carefully. not sexism misogyny)
Sorry if contrary opinion bothers you so much that you have to stoop to the overused word “troll” but it’s your choice.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Whafe
See – perfect example. The dim-bulb has attacked the other posters here because they have behaved in a manner similar to his beloved leader. IE: Talked about the physical characteristics of the woman. Yet you won’t actually find sonic saying he thinks it is wrong, bad, good or otherwise. Just noise – he noted that it is happening. Well F-Me any dim-bulb can see that from reading the thread or listening to what Goff has to say. Will sonic condemn Goff – no. He will only point it out in others an offer no opinion on it.
Piss and wind is a perfect description.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:39 pm
DPF – I think you are falling for the hysteria and fear that seems rampant these days. If this person is a failed labour party candidate then there is no reason at all not to list all the failed labour candidates. Its all public information.
Then I can make decisions about removing various names from the list.
Why is everyone so frightened of public information.
And I think that someone who is trying to blackmail a prime minister is hardly one who wants anonymity !! From what I heard on radio live this afternoon there is nothing in the emails that is in the category Goff said they were. Still stupid, but harmless – like – “would you like to go for a swim?” Jezz – Goff is out to lunch if he thinks this is eveil.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
I see burt still does not know what misogyny is, not got a dictionary in the house burt?
I’ll give you a wee clue, saying that someone is attractive is not misogynistic, indeed it is the reverse.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
I just posted the following on “the standard”. I think the honey-trap fraud scenario is very likely now:
Hmmm…the Bonny and Clyde of the Labour Party perhaps. Looks like she might have learnt a trick or two from her “colourful” husband.
This revelation makes the honey-trap scenario much more plausible.
Here is a very simple explanation of why the texts were deleted and the phone-calls were not recorded:
1. The really vulgar texts never existed. That is just a fabrication. It can’t be proved they ever existed at all.
Vote:2. The phone-calls were initially recorded. But Worth didn’t give up anything incriminating on those either. So, rather than put up evidence that was a total non-event, it was better to say the phone calls weren’t taped. Then a whole story could be invented about all the disgusting things that Worth had said to her.
June 10th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
Ha Tv3 is identifying her tonight.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
I see burt still does not know what misogyny is, not got a dictionary in the house burt?
I’ll give you a wee clue, saying that someone is attractive is not misogynistic, indeed it is the reverse.
Please tell us sonic, who in this thread has displayed a misogynistic attitude?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
“burt (3132) Vote: 3 1 Says:
June 10th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
So there is actually at least 1 woman in Labour who is not drop dead ugly AND who likes men ???? Sorry – I’m not buying it.”
Or even
“gingercrush (102) Vote: 5 0 Says:
June 10th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
I officially give this woman no credibility whatsoever. I hope she and Goff are fucked. There is no way I am going to trust a bitch that knows her husband is committing fraud and then is supposedly sexually harassed. Yeah right. What a bitch.”
Need I go on?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
“Need I go on?”
yeah – why not. Start naming the ones who aren’t “drop dead ugly”
BTW. Goff just named Neelam Choudary as the woman. Atrractive maybe – beautiful -nope
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Hi there DPF – obviously TV 3 doesnt share your fear. theyve just announced who she is
A……………. S……………..
Yes – quite stunning.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
Maybe you need a refreasher on the definition sonic, neither of those statements displays a hatred of the individual because she is a women. With the first comment in particular you are trying to draw a very long bow to try and hint that burts statement could be anywhere near mysogynistic. You are using a very simplistic definition to support your viewpoint….
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Really burt?
” There is no way I am going to trust a bitch that knows her husband is committing fraud and then is supposedly sexually harassed. Yeah right. What a bitch.”
Now we have a real person I think you guys are in real trouble, cue interview with Campbell with tears, article in woman’s day.
Poor old Nats!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
HA HA HA- Goff now wants to close the matter down. Bad luck Phil, not only is Neelam Choudary identity out in the open – so will her husbands past demonstrate what an innocent little immigrant she really is
sharpen the knives folks
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:18 pm
Indeed Patrick, after all why would the sleazy Nats need any women or immigrants to vote for them!
You go for it mate, and see how it plays.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:20 pm
you seem fairly confident the MSM wont show this for the scam Goff and Choudary are involved in, why is that Sonic?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Here is a link to the Herald article about the fraud. It looks like she had involvement in it. So, her credibility is shot to shreds so far as I am concerned.
A honey-trap. The best explanation available that fits the facts.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
Even leftie radio is saying what a joke this particular claim from Goff is
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/AudioArchive/AudioOnDemand/tabid/344/language/en-NZ/Default.aspx
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:29 pm
Indeed Patrick, after all why would the sleazy Nats need any women or immigrants to vote for them!
Compared to sleezy people who engage in honey traps? Married to people who have run immigration scams?
Lets hear you denounce those…..
I’ll put the kettle on, we may be waiting a while.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Well done WhaleOil. Well done Guyon Espiner. Well done macdee for finding the link.
Phil Goff – must try harder
Now, when is Phil Goff going to answer the question as to whether Whale’s Neelam Choudary and macdee’s Neelam Choudary are one and the same? Before Saturday, we hope!
http://keepingstock.blogspot.com/2009/06/phils-goof.html
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Whaleoil has more to come.
Vote:http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/content/standby-more-labours-honey-trap
June 10th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Er um guys.
As Sonic says you should get a dictionary and read up and reflect.
I am amazed at this debate. The complainant (whoever she is) wants to have a quiet chat with our PM to tell him what Worth has done. Goff puts in a quiet word of warning intending it is not acted upon.
Worth has already been summarily dumped because of someone else’s complaint and a police investigation.
So what do you think about the judgment of your beloved leader? Many of you seem to relish in the denigration of a woman who, whoever it is, obviously wants to remain private and merely express her concerns to the leader of our country.
And your angle is?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Nice try micky. But doesn’t strike you as a bit ironic that this woman is today active in Mt Albert trying to get Indians to vote for Phil Goff’s hand-picked candidate and friend? And all the while Phil Goff is trying to ramp up the pressure on Key? Sorry pal, his bluff has been called tonight.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
“The complainant (whoever she is) ”
Dont you watch the Tv news mickey? Her name is Neelam Choudary. She is the Labour party’s latest attempt at a neutron bomb
no one is disputing Worth is a randy old fool but what a bunch of amateurs you Labour lot really are
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
And?
If during Budget week Goff got up in the house and accused Worth of offering government positions for sexual favours then you may have a story.
He did not.
Key sacked worth and publicised the fact that he had received this hitherto private complaint.
Goff has been getting into Key because his handling of Worth has been so poor.
Sorry guys but there is no conspiracy.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Er um guys.
As Sonic says you should get a dictionary and read up and reflect.
Please show me where any poster here has displayed hatred towards Mrs Choudary because she is a women.
If not, you may want to get a dictionary yourself. Just don’t borrow sonic’s, he doesnt know the definition either.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Not just the TV Patrick – Stuff leads with it as well
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/2489703/Woman-at-centre-of-allegations-revealed
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Mickey you are unbelievable to continue with your standard-standard line on this. There was little doubt from the moment Goff started pushing this publicly that the woman’s identity would be revealed. There is no reasonable expectation for the complainant to meet with the PM, and his primary failings in this affair have been to have ever entertained the notion in the first place. He should always have said it wasn’t a matter for him to deal with personally, his staff should handle it.
Vote:Goff and the woman clearly have no firm evidence and it is more and more looking like she has tried to set up a situation to embarass the government. Goff has not handled it well, and it beggars belief that he kept pushing it in the public arena while at the same time expecting her privacy to be maintained. FFS he himself was too scared to appear with Slater on Close-Up, how could he possibly think people like Slater would not dig up the dirt.
What do I think of Key’s judgement? Poor – he should never have said as much as he did, he should always have left his staff to deal with Goff and this woman. He should learn when to shut up and when to delegate.
What do I think of this woman’s attempt to have her cake and eat it by making the allegations and expecting not to have them scrutinised more closely? Foolish and highly suspicious, she isn’t looking like a victim except of her own making
What do I think of Goff’s handling of the affair? If only it was BBQ weather.
What do I think of the commentary from you, the standard-standard and similar blogs? To be expected – cry Victim loud enough and often enough and expect it to silence rational assessment.
June 10th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Although Stuff only says “Labour Party member” and doesn’t mention her attempt to be Labour’s Botany candidate, or her canvassing in Mt Albert.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
“If…Goff got up in the house and accused Worth of offering government positions for sexual favours then you may have a story”
bullshit he didnt – and where’s the proof that it ever happened mickey?
was it
Vote:* Do you want to come swimming?
or
* How you getting on with the Goa purchase?
or
* Does that possibly mean you might be back [in India] in mid January with a discreet ITG group?
or
* You are my favourite new best friend to use a Facebook expression. RWW
or
* I don’t need anything. Perhaps a tie from the Indian School of Business at Gachibowli but that might be impossible. RWW XX
????
June 10th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
a honey trap? is richard worth the victim in all this?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Robinson – as far as this particular “allegation” goes, he may well be
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Bring back the Dear One, at least she could generate a decent scandal.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
“I don’t need anything. Perhaps a tie from the Indian School of Business at Gachibowli but that might be impossible. RWW XX”‘
Wasn’t that the text that she showed to her husband and asked what “xxx” means?
If so, up til that moment it was all rather cordial wasn’t it? When would a woman who was aggrieved and harassed by another man in a predatory fashion as it is alleged Worth did, turn around and ask him what he wanted, assumedly as a gift from a family holiday in India?
This is now laughable.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 8:40 pm
Cactus, did you read the herald article on how both this woman and her husband were recently involved in immigration fraud?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/recruitment/news/article.cfm?c_id=83&objectid=10546912
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Mike Williams little sojourn to Australia prior to the election is beginning to look like a major success compared to Goff’s attempts to discredit the Govt. He is shown in his true colours as a shrill muck raker who couldn’t organise a decent scandal if his life depended on it.
Vote:Net net a great result for the Govt. They get rid of a complete waste of space and Labour is shown to be complicit in the whole affair. Presumably the same morons who advised Mike Williams re the H Fee are behind the machinations here.
All I can say is long live Phil Goff as Labour Party leader. I can feel a right wing generation coming on…..
June 10th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I’m looking forward to the next instalment from WhaleOil – when did Worth and Mrs Choudary last enjoy a coffee and a chat together?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:13 pm
So her husband, and a preferred candidate of the Labour Party were both involved in an Immigration Scam.
This is becoming something of a norm in the Labour Party. Immigration = Money. Simple Formula, and think that the Police should now be involved to recover ALL the mails, txts, and voice tabs from their strange communications.
As for Honey Trap 2, there is a lot more information coming down the tubes on this viper.
Women under sexual duress always have breakfast with the perp. Tui Moment!
Goff is looking more like a big girls blouse by the hour.
Maybe his candidate for Mt Albert will turn out to be Universal Soldier. Yeah Right!
Hopefully he won’t have been involved at all in the arms trade, or deniable operations with unregistered deniable operations.
Blood Diamonds anyone?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:26 pm
All this palaver about why Worth resigned if there were no impending police charges? Isn’t that the right thing do when drawn into a scandal? Step aside and take the bad tarnish off parliament? It’s the Westminster way.
Has Worth got a partner?
I ask because all the focus so far has been on this sensation yet a story of spending a night with another woman slowly boils away apparently under police scrutiny. Personal reason… like to sort out his relationship?
Perhaps his partner has said she can’t trust him in a job where he travels? Perhaps that’s his reason?
(I assume his partner is a ‘she’ because to date I haven’t known any homosexual men who expect complete monogamy).
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:59 am
Oh dear – now the private woman who wants to remain anonymous has been convicted – along with her husband – of immigration scams.
Poor old Goff – instaed of claiming Key as a victim, hes got an own goal.
Dumb shit.!
Vote: