Electoral Law discussion

September 2nd, 2010 at 4:15 pm by David Farrar

The four speakers are , , and . I missed some of the written constitution session as I had to go out and buy a new power cord for my laptop.

Power is speaking first. Basically just going over work to date – MMP referendum, new Electoral Commission, EFA repeal. Highlighting that the crucial thing with its replacement has been a transparent inclusive process.

Power has effectively said that any further changes to the finance law will require identification of some clear harm to be fixed, that is agreed across the political spectrum. This means that not everyone will be happy, but that there will be nothing that any group finds offensive.

Next up was Chauvel. Mainly focusing on why MMP is good.

Joseph argued that the Maori seats should not be entrenched and in favour of a longer and fixed parliamentary term. I agree with him on all points. He only favors a fixed term if it is longer.

However Joseph is pessimistic on the chances of reform.

Finally Morris is up. Focusing on conduct of MPs. Says discipline of MPs should not be left to party leaders.

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to “Electoral Law discussion”

  1. Viking2 (11,471 comments) says:

    All good but until parliament reforms its own way of working nothing changes. Until whipping is trashed and MP’s allowed to vote according to their constituents will rather than the bosses with the money then we will continue with the same bad law and policy that we have had for a longtime now.
    The only time for whips is on confidence and supply. No need for bullying beyond that.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. MikeNZ (3,234 comments) says:

    Good point

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote