Armstrong on good year end for National

December 21st, 2013 at 11:00 am by David Farrar

at NZ Herald writes:

’s opponents have long worked on the assumption that John Key’s Government – like all Administrations – will inevitably be ground down and worn out by the failings which destroy all Governments ultimately – namely the accumulation of mistakes, embarrassments, duplicity, expedience, arrogance and (the real killer) the feeling that from the Prime Minister down the Administration is no longer listening.

Things reach a tipping point where a clear majority of voters deem a Government has reached its use-by date. At that point it is as good as being all over. There is no way back.

Labour and its allies have seen their task as one of hastening that decline and ultimate fall. Because Key is the embodiment of National’s ongoing success, Labour has devoted considerable effort to pinning the blame on him when things go wrong or look dodgy.

In order to ping Key, Labour has become far too consumed by the minutiae of day-to-day political conflict which largely passes most people by.

Unfortunately for Labour, the Prime Minister – assisted by poll data – has an instinctive and almost always accurate ability to diagnose what is really unnerving voters amid which issues he must tackle and those he can safely afford to ignore.

Labour need to pick one or two issues that really matter to people and relentlessly push those issues. Instead they run around after the headline of the day.

It means ensuring that in their portfolio work, Cabinet ministers are almost always on the side of majority public opinion.

Be it the number of non-urgent operations carried out by hospitals, the crime rate, prodding welfare beneficiaries back to work or building new roads to unclog Auckland’s traffic – things which really do matter to people – Key and National devote considerable attention, effort and resources to getting it right.

As long as National continues to focus on such fundamentals, all the huffing and puffing provoked by matters like Key’s handling of legislation covering the security agencies pale into relative insignificance as far as many voters are concerned.

Such things are treated as the flotsam and jetsam of political life.

Key has been helped by David Cunliffe seeking to reassert Labour’s dominance of the centre-left since taking over his party’s leadership.

Labour seems to be doing well at picking votes up off the Greens. Less so, off National.

In his speeches, Cunliffe likes to say a Labour Government he leads will not be afraid to use the powers of the state to intervene where a market fails. Well, someone else got there first.

His name is John Key. His sacrifice of his party’s ideology to cut a deal with Twentieth-Century Fox to ensure the furtherĀ AvatarĀ movies are filmed in New Zealand illustrated Key’s willingness to undercut Labour and leave that party punching at air.

The following day’s fiscal update also offered Labour little to complain about given its rosy growth forecasts and confirmation National remained on track for Budget surplus by mid-2015 – something which will give National huge cachet with voters.

The clincher came on Thursday. The Treasury’s growth forecasts have frequently turned out to be little more than mirages. Not so the latest official gross domestic product figures which had economic growth hitting a giddy 3.5 per cent in the September year.

Strong economic growth and a return to surplus will make an excellent base for re-election.

Tags: ,

10 Responses to “Armstrong on good year end for National”

  1. hj (5,674 comments) says:

    Population increase is government policy but Labour/Green are in onit too.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. MH (558 comments) says:

    it’s almost like saying think global act local,then parliament doesn’t matter except for divvying up tax revenue,if it’s local issues that is the prime concern for Joe Savi ,then Key should be Mayor of Auckwardville and Len should be….MP for Foreign Affairs, BUT how many of us/them vote in local elections?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. duggledog (1,102 comments) says:

    Population increase = Maori return to their tribal areas; PIs go back to the islands?

    Vote: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Manolo (12,614 comments) says:

    National needs to confront Labour and the Green on their proposed economic madness and vision for NZ, that’s why the lunacies suggested by comrade Norman and Silent T must be exposed for what they really are.

    The election will be won or lost on that front.

    Vote: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. All_on_Red (941 comments) says:

    Agree entirely Manolo, but would our media publish it?

    Vote: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. hj (5,674 comments) says:

    According to David Hay the Green establishment want a nice little spot to the leftof Labour, being the “conscience” of the left… Could be crowded at that end (ss when groups take a turn at singing but only know one song)?

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. Colville (1,767 comments) says:

    Manolo.

    What is the saying about wrestling with pigs? You both get muddy but the pig enjoys it?
    Cunliffe and Wussell are both pigs.

    Nats need to stay aloof and just point at the good stuff…”we are doing well, why risk change?”

    and sure…if Key gets a “show me the money !!” chance by all means go for it, but dont engange on little stuff.

    Vote: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. OneTrack (1,953 comments) says:

    “Agree entirely Manolo, but would our media publish it?”

    “Our media” seem to be working pretty hard to not ask those questions. You could argue that there wasnt much point up until now, but with nine days to go until election year, they better start working on their patsy questions now.

    How about I help them along and give them a few pointers:

    Question 1 – What company tax rate and compliance costs are you and Russel Norman going to impose on the productive sector.
    Question 2 – How many companies will close, and people lose their jobs because of those costs?
    Question 3 – ( in response their chirpy “none”) Prove it, using basic Economics 101 concepts! Oh, you missed that course.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. OneTrack (1,953 comments) says:

    “the Green establishment want a nice little spot to the leftof Labour,”

    The hard-left spot labelled Communism? Hmm, thought so.

    Vote: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Mobile Michael (364 comments) says:

    Muldoon noted that the average voter wouldn’t know deficit if they tripped over it, presumably Labour and the Greens are hoping for the same.

    Vote: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.