Objectionable Unbound

Peter Cresswell has links to (and a jpg of) the Chief Censor’s ruling that the magazine published 15 years ago is deemed objectionable.

I agree that the magazine is objectionable, both in the legal sense and the wider sense.

Peter expresses his deep scepticism that Jim Peron was not the publisher. Others say there is no concrete proof. Not sure either camp can persuade the other.

Comments (22)

Login to comment or vote

%d bloggers like this: