About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

April 17, 2006 9:41pm by David Farrar

Archbishop Farrar

Looking at this baptism done by the Archbishop of York, I could be tempted to become a priest 🙂

Share this:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment25

Uncategorised
International

Related Stories

Archbishop Tutu on euthanasia
What will Archbishop Tamaki say?
Were they individuals or was it the Exclusive Brethren?

Comments (25)

Login to comment or vote

Ross Nixon

If you do, just be careful with using a microphone at the same time. Could be a shocking way to die! http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3195
0 0
Report
April 17, 2006 10:21pm
John Cawston

>I could be tempted to become a priest 🙂

And you get to administer “extreme unction” as well.

JC
0 0
Report
April 17, 2006 10:49pm
maria von trapp

David that’s a really inappropriate post.
0 0
Report
April 17, 2006 10:55pm
David Farrar

Only one of many Maria, only one of many.
0 0
Report
April 17, 2006 11:14pm
Whig

This is the accepted method in the Baptist and Brethren tradition. Except it’s common to wear white robes :oP Perhaps you should become a Baptist pastor instead?
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 12:17am
David Farrar

Prrrraise the Whig, the Whig speaks the truth of the Lord!
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 5:48am
Rob Good (Puntiki)

Goodness me……
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 12:59pm
burt

Ok we have seen the pool, now show us the altar !
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 1:43pm
brian_smaller

I cannot help shouting “Welcome the Resurrection”
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 1:52pm
woppo

For some reason that picture reminds me of those cartoons of missionaries in cannibal cookpots that you used to see a lot of back in pre-PC days.
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 4:29pm
maria von trapp

given that I know two Archbishops in this country I find all of this quite insulting.
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 8:59pm
David Farrar

Maria – you shouldn’t personalise generalised humour. All humour offends someone somewhere.
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 9:12pm
maria von trapp

Um, yes I can. It’s my right to take offence at whatever I choose. And it’s your right to post whatever you want (within the limits of the law obviously) but if you offend me, I’ll tell you.

I’m offended by this post for multiple reasons:

1. You objectify women (yet again)
2. You infer that Archbishops may have other motives for entering their profession. While this may have been the case some years ago it is very different now, particularly in the Anglican Church – your post reinforces damaging stereotypes.
3. I find point number 2 particularly offensive given how caring and dedicated the two Archbishops that I know are.

Thankfully, there is strict criteria for entering the Priesthood. And it’s even harder to become a Bishop (unless you’re that eejit Tamaki).
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 10:01pm
Whig

Maria:

1. The implication was that becoming an Archbishop would allow him to get cozy with women. Heaven forbid that DPF seek physical intimacy with women! In the church I came from that sort of thing could lead to… dancing… But god help us, if your Dad didn’t “objectify” your Mum, none of us would be here, so puhleeeze, give it a rest;

2. He inferred nothing of the sort! I have no idea where you get that from. The only inferrence of ulterior motives is regarding DPF himself.
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 10:50pm
woppo

Plenty of historical precedent for putting the boot into bishops.
With their penchant for dorky fancy dress, who could resist?

“But how durst you attack a live bishop in that fashion? I am quite ashamed of you! Have you no reverence for fine lawn sleeves? By Jove, you seem to have done it well.”
Charles Darwin, LETTER 108. TO T.H. HUXLEY. Sudbrook Park, Richmond, Thursday [July, 1860].
0 0
Report
April 18, 2006 11:38pm
David Farrar

The Whig is right. I was in no way suggesting improper behaviour by Archbishops towards women getting baptised. Everyone knows it is the Cardinals you have to watch – but not with the women!!

And being told one objectifies women, is one of those have you stopped beating your wife type allegations.

Yes I often post photos of attractive women. Guilty as charged. Does a gay guy posting beefcake photos means he is objectifying men?

My very positive dealings with female bosses, colleagues and friends in no way objectifies them. Hell I’ve almost lost count of the number of female friends I have who have said at some stage something like I am the only male friend they have who has not tried to sleep with them.

Likewise at my farewell function from Parliament I referred to a female colleague as the only person I concede as actually being more intelligent than me (I also said that with Don Brash having become an MP, I might have to concede I am now in third place 🙂

I think I have said on a number of occassions that female managers often make the best bosses. I’ve also said I think it is good to have had women make it to the top of politics, judiciary and business.
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 7:32am
Trouble

In fact, some of your best friends are women?
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 9:03am
David Farrar

Most, not some. Probably around 80:20 ratio.
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 9:11am
Mellie

I disagree, Whig.

The clear implication is about DPF’s motives – no problem with that, he’s proved what he thinks of women many times in the past so I’m not in any doubt there.

The problem is that he has suggested he become a priest so as to get into the same position (yes, hoho) as the Archbishop.

Far be it from me to speculate on whether that plan of attack is likely to be more successful than what DPF is doing at the moment, but it promotes a negative stereotype about priests.

Two of my uncles are priests and it’s enormously difficult not to be offended by the snide tone.

Call me a whinger, call me whatever you want, but this post reeks of mediocrity.
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 6:05pm
Whig

What does DPF think of “women”, pray tell Mellie? And which women specifically?
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 6:37pm
anon

another insightful post from the liberal wing of the National party.
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 9:00pm
David Farrar

Yes this post, like all of mine, get vetted by a National Party committee. The vote to make a joke about the Archbishop went through 37-31.
0 0
Report
April 19, 2006 9:34pm
Michael

“(unless you’re that eejit Tamaki)”

You take offence Maria for some but not all. So I guess it’s ok to denigrate Bishop Tamaki? Do you even know what a double standard is?

These baptisims happen every 7-8 weeks in my church and other churches I know of – so what is the big deal? We have male and female pastors involved. In fact, I was baptised by a female pastor.
0 0
Report
April 20, 2006 7:54am
Mellie

Esteemed Whig,

I will not fall into the trap of attempting to put words into DPF’s mouth – he will spit them out for sure!

Personally, I think Maria is not being illogical or inconsistent for criticising Tamaki – some of the faith values he professes to hold are anathema to the core of Christian being. While he is certainly to be commended for bringing the plight of families onto the social agenda, his methods, practices and other messages leave a lot to be desired from the Christian ‘faith’ of Destiny Church.

And the big deal is not the baptism, nor the fact that the Archbishop is in the font with the girl. If you’ll read the initial comments, you’ll see that it’s the perception and image DPF is projecting that is causing offence, rather than the reality.

PS. DPF: Touche – the vote was a tight one – had to win over the moral conservatives eh? 😉
0 0
Report
April 20, 2006 9:44pm
David Farrar

Mellie – if you say I have “proved” what I think, then I think you should reveal this proof. Considering half the time I don’t even know what I think about women, I’d be most intrigued by teh findings of your psychological study.
0 0
Report
April 21, 2006 7:12am

« Dancing With The Stars Advice

Japan to gain control of Int Whaling Commission »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 13K other subscribers

Highlights

Target achieved II
Good progress on attendance
Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments

Top Stories

General Debate 03 June 2026
Another British policing scandal
General Debate 04 June 2026
A win for democracy
Abolishing HR
Meet the Greens - ACC
Democrat says lock up the Jews
$600k on a website for a building!
Words that are now meaningless
General Debate 02 June 2026

Recent Posts

Words that are now meaningless 4 June 2026
Abolishing HR 4 June 2026
General Debate 04 June 2026 4 June 2026
Meet the Greens – ACC 4 June 2026
Democrat says lock up the Jews 3 June 2026
Another British policing scandal 3 June 2026
General Debate 03 June 2026 3 June 2026
A win for democracy 3 June 2026
$600k on a website for a building! 2 June 2026
Set housing outcomes not outputs 2 June 2026
General Debate 02 June 2026 2 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour 2 June 2026

Recent Comments

General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
Words that are now meaningless
David Garrett
Words that are now meaningless
David Garrett
Words that are now meaningless
Maggy Wassilieff
Words that are now meaningless
Charlotte Wells
Words that are now meaningless
CJames
General Debate 04 June 2026
David George
General Debate 04 June 2026
virtualmark
Abolishing HR
imalwaysright
Words that are now meaningless
mandk
Words that are now meaningless
Melbury
Words that are now meaningless
David Garrett
Words that are now meaningless
tf78
General Debate 04 June 2026
Jethrod
Words that are now meaningless
R

Links

Parliament fails to defend transparency
No Right Turn
"The principal view of human laws is, or ought always to be, to explain, protect, and enforce such rights as are absolute, which in themselves are few and simple."
Not PC
Word of the day
Hompaddock
The response to Budget 2026 has been unusually muted
Point of Order
You know what “does not pass the sniff test”? Labour’s incremental response to blatant corruption – this is why they plunged 7.5%
The Daily Blog
When is a Free Speech Union not a Free Speech Union?
The Standard
We Are a Country That Decided Housing Was The Economy
No Minister
My Opening Statement for the UATX Caplan-Jones Immigration Rematch
Utopia
Playing with numbers.
Kiwipolitico
Another non-tariff barrier
Offsetting Behaviour
Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 18
Stats Chat
Budget 2026
NZCPR
UK Conversion Therapy Ban, Digital ID, Rallies, Elections
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A central banker’s fiction
Croaking Cassandra
THE WORKING FROM HOME RACKET BY PUBLIC SERVANTS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Get Vaccinated Tomorrow Or Shut Your Pie Hole
Cactus Kate
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker

[email protected]

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2026 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d