About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

January 14, 2008 6:23am by David Farrar

The quarter million toilet

DOC has somehow managed to spend $245,000 on a toilet block. Incredible.

Share this:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment23

Uncategorised

Related Stories

$3.7 million for a toilet block!
$1.35 million for private toilets for bus drivers
Homosexual Law Reform 20 years on

Comments (23)

Login to comment or vote

Policy Parrot

I’m suprised the FSC hasn’t endorsed them considering its penchant for wasting money on silly projects.

[DPF: Off topic 10 demerits]
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 6:34am
Brian Smaller

$245K for a dunny? Holy Shit!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 7:12am
Lee C

Relax taxpayer, it’s just a long drop in the ocean…..
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 7:23am
Danyl Mclauchlan

Question for the day: could you train a monkey to rewrite and publish National Party press releases? Followup: if the Herald did so would anybody notice?

[DPF: To be fair it is the slow news season]
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 7:54am
Wycroft

I wonder whether it was also DoC, or just the Thames Coromandel District Council, which saw fit to remove a stunning, ancient pohutukawa from beside the wharf at Whangapoua Harbour to make way for a public loo? The dunny could have gone anywhere but in someone’s wisdom the tree had to go.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 8:37am
Lee C

Yes we are caught between two stools on this one.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 8:38am
Danyl Mclauchlan

<i>DPF: To be fair it is the slow news season</i>

Does that mean Claire Trevitt gets 20 demerits and a $50 dollar fine if she calls DOC and asks them for comment? Come on.

[DPF: I agree seeking comment should happen. Possibly it did]
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 8:41am
RossK

The amazing thing here is that they could probably have put in a cheaper toilet, invested the balance, and used the interest to pay someone perpetually to clean and service the toilet.

This sort of financial waste just makes our leaders seem detached from reality.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 8:43am
uk_kiwi

I bet the contractors added 50% because it’s a government job. Usual story.

It also depends on what the expected lifespan of the block is- if it’s going to last for decades then it probably represents good value for money.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 9:46am
Murray

Whaat are they doing, gold plating the turds?

I thought we only did that cabinet ministers.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 10:00am
gd

Yet another example of what happens when you let idiots spend OPM ( other peoples money)
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 10:49am
vto

new public dunnies around the country seem to always need to be flashy and architectural. Why, I am not quite sure. imho it is an excessive use of ratepayers money.

Especially when they are usually just as disgusting, tagged, crap-ridden and unappealing inside the cubicles as the old concrete block numbers.

pooooooo!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 10:53am
brucehoult

Hopefully it won’t fall into the gully then.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 11:34am
RRM

Always the quick conclusions. How many square metres is the toilet block? I.e. what did it cost as a square metre rate? Surely it’s hard to say “$245,000 is too much for a building” unless you know the size of the building?

Also Kerr Bay on Rotoiti is a stunning natural area, one of those places that sets New Zealand apart from anywhere else. Perhaps it was worth paying $20,000 for an architect to make sure it didn’t look like a concrete block bunker?

(More would have been spent on the Consultants who dreamed up the logos for Jenny Shipley’s Crown Health Enterprises…)
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 12:31pm
Owen McShane

You have to spend money if you want to keep demanding taxpayer funding.
Here is the real question.
If half a dozen of us controlled half of New Zealand’s land area (either as Conservation Estate or through designated land under the RMA) and given that most of New Zealand’s mineral wealth is under your control along with the best tourism areas and so on, would we need $300,000 a year from the Government or would we be paying taxes out of our earnings? (And after paying for all the real conservation actions required.)
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 2:18pm
Harpoon

Does anyone know details of any of the following, which are likely to have a bearing on the cost?:
— remoteness
— environment
— Lake Rotoiti in Nelson Lakes national park is at about 1000 metres above sea level — that means it gets pretty cold there. If the bogs need to be usable 24/7/, 365 days a year, then wouldn’t there be insulation and heating requirements to stop the water freezing?
— size of building
— necessary security measures
— whether another building had to be demolished as part of the construction project
— note the new bog serves the nearby campsite, carparking and tourism facilities (www.nzine.co.nz/life/rotoiti.html), so why do people think the bogs should be some sort of stinky skanky long-drop when it’s to serve tourists?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 3:28pm
RRM

Yes but realistically they’re never going to turn the whole conservation estate over to private enterprise to do with as they see fit, so I don’t understand the relevance of the question.

(Thank god – imagine a wilderness like Rotoiti with a giant neon Novotel or something up at the head of the bay! Or perhaps I’m mistaken to assume all New Zealanders would be horrified by this?)
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 5:21pm
duncan_bayne

My wife is currently training as a helicopter pilot, so I know how much it can cost to transport stuff by helicopter. If the toilet block is somewhere only accessible by air, I can see how it could easily become very expensive to build.

Question is: where was the cost-benefit analysis?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 7:32pm
John Dalley

Nice to see Nick Smith is being short with the truth on this little beat up.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 14, 2008 7:47pm
Oliver

Total waste of money, even as a public servant I don;t trust the current lot to spend my money properly.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 15, 2008 12:17am
Redbaiter

“Question is: where was the cost-benefit analysis?”

In the mind of the socialist, no such animal ever existed. If they ever did a cost benefit analysis of their ideology, they’d give us almost every dollar of our taxes back, not just the modicum wasted on this exercise.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 15, 2008 12:42am
yesom

The toilet block actually contains showers and a laundry facility for the camping ground next door.It is not grand at all.Its just well designed and functional.Lake Rotoiti is a regular stopping off point for buses heading down the West Coast so having 3 male and 3 female toilets is sensible when you have 60 people arriving at once.having a concrete floor is just common sense in a high rainfall area.
Its not really a big issue.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 15, 2008 1:17pm
Nigel

Seems to me if National want to be Government they should avoid doing ACT style attacks, it’s this sort of thing which makes me wonder if they are actually fit to govern.
It’s entirely possible to much was spent on the block, but short of screaming headlines there appears no genuine analysis by Smith on the rational behind the costings & given the importance of tourism & our “Clean Green” image to New Zealand, one would like to think Smith would be a little more careful before going publicity grabbing.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 15, 2008 2:11pm

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Minto on property rights

Help the hungry Japanese »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 13K other subscribers

Highlights

Target achieved II
Good progress on attendance
Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments

Top Stories

General Debate 03 June 2026
Another British policing scandal
General Debate 04 June 2026
A win for democracy
Meet the Greens - ACC
Abolishing HR
Democrat says lock up the Jews
$600k on a website for a building!
General Debate 02 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour

Recent Posts

Abolishing HR 4 June 2026
General Debate 04 June 2026 4 June 2026
Meet the Greens – ACC 4 June 2026
Democrat says lock up the Jews 3 June 2026
Another British policing scandal 3 June 2026
General Debate 03 June 2026 3 June 2026
A win for democracy 3 June 2026
$600k on a website for a building! 2 June 2026
Set housing outcomes not outputs 2 June 2026
General Debate 02 June 2026 2 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour 2 June 2026
Which language should be used first? 1 June 2026

Recent Comments

General Debate 04 June 2026
RoboRob
General Debate 04 June 2026
RoboRob
Abolishing HR
MCōs
General Debate 04 June 2026
RoboRob
Meet the Greens – ACC
RoboRob
General Debate 04 June 2026
MCōs
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
David Garrett
General Debate 04 June 2026
artemisia
General Debate 04 June 2026
Steve Todd
General Debate 04 June 2026
Steve Todd
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ian Boag
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
Abolishing HR
Inandout

Links

"The principal view of human laws is, or ought always to be, to explain, protect, and enforce such rights as are absolute, which in themselves are few and simple."
Not PC
The response to Budget 2026 has been unusually muted
Point of Order
You know what “does not pass the sniff test”? Labour’s incremental response to blatant corruption – this is why they plunged 7.5%
The Daily Blog
When is a Free Speech Union not a Free Speech Union?
The Standard
We Are a Country That Decided Housing Was The Economy
No Minister
My Opening Statement for the UATX Caplan-Jones Immigration Rematch
Utopia
Woman of the day
Hompaddock
Playing with numbers.
Kiwipolitico
A crime
No Right Turn
Another non-tariff barrier
Offsetting Behaviour
Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 18
Stats Chat
Budget 2026
NZCPR
UK Conversion Therapy Ban, Digital ID, Rallies, Elections
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A central banker’s fiction
Croaking Cassandra
THE WORKING FROM HOME RACKET BY PUBLIC SERVANTS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Get Vaccinated Tomorrow Or Shut Your Pie Hole
Cactus Kate
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker

[email protected]

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2026 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d