The case for banning leadership changes in election years

On my have made a case for National to ban leadership challenges in election years.

There has in only been one election year leadership challenge in the last 85 years, but the possibility of a challenge often results in endless negative stories and speculation.

So my proposal is Caucus has two years after an election to decide on the leadership, but once you get to the final 10 months or so before an election, it is time to implement your campaign strategy, not change the leadership.

In the article give three reasons why a ban makes sense.

Comments (56)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment

%d bloggers like this: