General Debate 15 May 2026
Karl du Fresne writes:
But the big surprise – one that even had the stranger next to me turning to me with a look of disbelief – was Mallard’s claim that the protest camp was funded by Russia. Yep, that’s right: Mallard reckoned someone paid for millions of dollars – yes, millions – worth of camping equipment that mysteriously turned up in Parliament’s grounds. Protesters suddenly had money to spend and he had no doubt that money came from offshore – Russia, he said.
Whoa! That came completely out of left field. My astonishment was shared by my fellow journalist David McLoughlin, who was also at the session and like me, thought Mallard’s claim was bizarre. No explanation was offered as to why Vladimir Putin should spend millions paying for anti-vax protesters to camp in comfort in the most distant capital in the world. Payback for New Zealand supporting sanctions against Russia following the Ukraine invasion, perhaps? Not totally implausible, but it’s the sort of far-fetched scenario that only an over-active imagination might come up with. Neither was it clear why the allegation had never emerged before.
Certainly there was feverish talk in 2022, some of it from the excitable, conspiracy-obsessed Sanjana Hattotuwa of the Disinformation Project (remember them?), about alleged Russian-sourced disinformation. Canada too was identified as a source of malevolent anti-vax propaganda, Jacinda Ardern noting the supposedly incriminating evidence that Canadian flags were being flown in the protest camp. But Russia spending millions on tents and sleeping bags? That was a new one.
Surprisingly, despite two political journalists being on stage with Mallard when he made the allegation, nothing has been reported, at least to my knowledge. Here was a former senior government politician – the Speaker of the House of Representatives and subsequently ambassador to Ireland – alleging malign foreign interference in our domestic affairs. I would have thought there was a story in it (“Russia funded Wellington protest camp, says Mallard”), but apparently not. Perhaps Cooke and Hurihanganui decided it was just Mallard running off at the mouth and not worth taking any further. But previous generations of political reporters, their news antennae twitching furiously, would have been pursuing him for elaboration.
What, if anything, should we make of it? For me it had echoes of former Waitakere mayor and Labour grandee Bob Harvey’s startling allegation in 2000 – similarly unsubstantiated – that the CIA was involved in the death of Norman Kirk, which had even his friend Helen Clark looking sideways at him. Mallard’s claim has the same slightly loony, off-the-wall quality. If he has evidence, he should front up with it. Otherwise people will be justified in concluding it was a case of Mallard in Fantasyland.
I look forward to all the media stories exploring the claim that Russia funded the anti vaccine mandate protest at Parliament. Maybe the Government should hold a Commission of Inquiry where the former Speaker can present his evidence.
Newsroom reports:
Media lawyer Steven Price questions how the Media Council could be placed to pick up the slack, on top of its existing workload.
“They have just got a bunch of volunteers who meet and sit, I don’t know, four times a year. That’s it. They take turns drafting the decisions. They have a staff of one, or one part-time person. How’re they going to handle it? They also have no expertise in broadcasting.”
This is actually an argument in favour. Just look at the stats.
The BSA has a staff of eight – and unbelievably six of them were lawyers. This probably explains a lot. Last year they only had 90 complaints to deal with, and the average cost per complaint was $18,500.
The Media Council runs on $325,000 compared to $1.67 million for the BSA. They dealt with 256 complaints at an average cost of $1,270.
Broadcasters currently pay $700,000 a year to the BSA. If they give even half of that to the Media Council, the Council will double its budget and only have a 33% increase in complaints to deal with.
And the Media Council don’t need expertise in broadcasting. They need expertise in media standards and complaints. That they have.
They already have 10 broadcasters as members including TVNZ, Radio NZ, Netflix, Warner Brothers and Amazon.
By Lucy Rogers
It ought to be international news, and it isn’t: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgz9k7pzggo There was a press release about this put out a day or two ago by the Israeli embassy in New Zealand (I only found out about said press release when I Googled the name of the report) and not a single New Zealand media outlet that I can find has reported on it.
This is despite the media ordinarily covering all matters Israel-related on practically a daily basis. Let’s review some examples. RNZ yesterday 13 May 2026 reported on a handful of movie stars who are allegedly being persecuted by that notorious hotbed of support for Israel known as Hollywood: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/595021/shame-on-hollywood-cannes-winning-writer-rails-at-stance-on-gaza
The same day RNZ reported on controversy caused by Israel’s participation in a Eurovision contest: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/595042/eurovision-song-contest-gets-off-to-a-tense-start-overshadowed-by-gaza
On 8 May RNZ reported on Israel killing the son of a high ranking Hamas leader (forever missed): https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/594607/israeli-attack-kills-son-of-hamas-leader-negotiating-with-trump-led-board
On 6 May RNZ reported on the UN calling on Israel to release the Gaza flotilla activists: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/594453/united-nations-demands-israel-immediately-release-gaza-flotilla-activists and on an Israeli court’s decision to extend their detention: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/594353/israel-court-extends-gaza-flotilla-activists-detention-by-six-days
There was more reporting on the flotilla activists on 3 May: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/594092/global-sumud-flotilla-calls-on-nz-government-to-intervene-after-israeli-interception
On 2 May 2026 there was reporting on the fact that one of the poor darlings on the flotilla allegedly has a concussion and a broken rib: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/594051/nzer-in-flotilla-intercepted-by-israel-has-concussion-and-possible-broken-rib-wife-says
This pattern goes on and on and on for months. But silence when it comes to the events which were the reason for Israel’s retaliation in Gaza in the first place.
The anti-Israel mob are hypocrites of the highest order. The intellectual dishonesty is truly limitless.
By the way, there was a UN report released some time ago which found that Israelis have engaged in rape of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. I do accept that this has happened, and I condemn it absolutely and unequivocally. However, it is outrageous to compare isolated examples of sexual assault committed by Israelis against Palestinians (sadly, rape occurs in any country) with pre-meditated mass rape condoned by Hamas leadership as an intentional weapon of warfare, which is what the evidence points to on October 7. Israel is a democratic state which has law enforcement systems which prosecute rape of Palestinians or rape of anyone else for that matter. The same cannot be said for Hamas.
The Post reports:
ANZ says it has lost the class action lawsuit over disclosure mistakes it made on 17,000 home loans, and may have to repay borrowers up to $125 million.
In a statement, ANZ chief executive Antonia Watson said the bank was disappointed with the court’s findings and might appeal.
The High Court has awarded summary judgment against ANZ for failures under lending laws designed to ensure borrowers understood their loan contacts and obligations.
The law that applies at the time was not a good law. The penalty of losing all fees was disproportional to the error they made. It is good the law has changed. However the law is the law, and trying to get Parliament to retrospectively amend the law to undermine a valid lawsuit was the wrong thing to do.
It is worth noting their maximum exposure has now been revealed to be only $125 million. The banking lobby tried to (and almost succeeded) in scaring MPs into a retrospective law change by claiming banks could be up for $12.9 billion, which would risk the financial stability. This can now be seen to be nonsense.
ACT have proposed six things in their immigration policy. Let’s take them in turn.
Deport serious offenders. Anyone on a residence visa who is convicted of a crime with a 10 year or more maximum sentence is deported.
No brainer.
Have skill categories expire each year
I think there is merit in regularly reviewing skill categories for skilled work visas. But an annual review will just mean needing to employ more public servants to do meaningless work. Some skill categories have had shortages for well over a decade, and will not be changing anytime soon.
A five year welfare stand down for residence visa holders
No brainer.
A $6 a day infrastructure surcharge on temporary work visas
Wow. ACT wants a new tax. This tax would be $2,190 a year or $10,950 for a five year work visa. This will probably lead to employers having to pay to cover this, so will make businesses less profitable, and increase prices.
Stronger English language requirements
Yep.
A dedicated overstayer enforcement unit
We have 20,980 overstayers in NZ. The acceptable level should be zero. Good policy.
The Herald reports:
Five Waikato regional councillors who last year campaigned on pushing for the council to leave Local Government New Zealand have voted to stay.
Elected members voted yesterday on a motion to cancel the council’s $91,539.24 annual Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) membership.
The motion was lost in a 10-3 vote, meaning Waikato Regional Council will stay a member of LGNZ until March 31 next year. …
During the last local body elections in October, a group of eight people campaigned as the Rates Control Team.
That team included elected councillors Maher, Downard, Dunbar-Smith, Hughes, Cookson, Reymer and McGuire.
On the team’s website, it was stated that one of their policies was to “Leave Local Government NZ”.
Yesterday, of the seven, only Hughes and Reymer voted to leave LGNZ.
This is spitting in the face of ratepayers. They had an explicit policy on which they were elected to leave LGNZ, and Maher, Downard, Dunbar-Smith, Cookson, and McGuire all a few months later did the exact opposite.
There can sometimes be times when a promise can’t be met. You might campaign to keep rates to say 4% and an earthquake hits and you need to spend more on rebuilding etc.
But this was not one of those cases. It was a very simple policy, and there can be no excuse for reneging on it months after the election.
English Councillors
English Councils
Welsh Senedd
Scottish Parliament
The UK may have gone from a three party system to a five party system. And Starmer may soon be gone.
Audrey Young has done a column looking at what a grand coalition between National and Labour could look like. Grand coalitions always sound good in theory – the two centrist parties working together in the country’s interest, shutting out the parties on the margins.
But what his overlooks is governments always become unpopular over time. And if the government consists of the two main parties, then the disgruntled will go to the parties further out, eventually propelling them to power.
In Germany the two main parties are now polling only 38% between them.
In Austria they are also at 38%, Netherlands 40%, Ireland 34%. They all had grand coalitions.
So a grand coalition is a great way to destroy the two main parties, and boost the other parties.
On Patreon (paywalled) I write:
In this post, I look at which electorates may change hands, based on the change in party vote since the election.
Often any analysis is done using a simple two party swing, but that doesn’t take account of the fact that the change in support for minor parties also can impact an electorate race.
So what I have done is take the split vote analysis for each marginal electorate. Below is Hamilton East

So the National candidate got 65% of ACT voters, 30% of NZ First voters, 88% of National voters etc.
I then look at how much the nationwide party vote has changed since the election, based on an average of recent public polls.

The difference in the current polls from the election results is multiplied by the 2023 party vote for each marginal electorate to project the party vote for that electorate today. So in Hamilton East National got 42.9% in 2023. You multiply that by 29.2%/38% and get a projection of 32.9%. Then you apply the split vote analysis to project the candidate vote on the projected party vote.
This is just a data model. It is not a prediction. It doesn’t take account of factors such as how the incumbent MP has done, who the opposing candidate will be, new boundaries, a change in split voting etc. It should be seen more as looking backwards at 2023, and saying what the outcome would have been then based on the current party vote polls.
I will work on a model which takes account of the new boundaries. This is challenging as the split vote data is only available at electorate level.
But for now, here is what seats Labour on paper would now lead in, based on the change in the party vote (remainder behind the paywall)
Brooke van Velden announced:
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden announced today that a test to strengthen the citizenship by grant process will be introduced from late 2027.
“Citizenship is a commitment to our shared responsibilities and privileges. By ensuring applicants understand these responsibilities and privileges, we strengthen what it means to be a citizen of New Zealand,” says Ms van Velden. …
“People seeking citizenship should understand New Zealanders believe in certain rights, like freedom of speech, or that no one person or group is above the law. This test ensures people have sufficient knowledge of their responsibilities and privileges before receiving citizenship by grant.”
Questions will include topics such as the Bill of Rights Act, human rights, certain criminal offences, voting rights, democratic principles, the structure of government, and travel to and from New Zealand. Applicants will be required to get 75% of questions correct to pass.
This is an excellent idea, and something I have mooted for well over a decade. Many countries, such as Australia, already do this. Their sample test is here. I got 19/20 correct.
Countries are not just land masses. They have values. Making sure aspiring citizens understand the basic values of the country they wish to join is good.
The Taxpayers’ Union has released its 2026 Ratepayers Report. There’s a huge amount of data there.
The ten highest average residential rates are:
These stand in contrast to Upper Hutt at $3,393.
For non-residential ratepayers, the top five are:
So the average commercial ratepayer in Wellington pays $53k to WCC and $22k to GWRC, for a Toal of $75k. And we wonder why so many businesses are closing in Wellington!
Jenna Lynch reports:
Despite previously denying any links to a troll account that ruthlessly takes the mickey out of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, Labour leader Chris Hipkins has now admitted it’s a former staffer.
The admission came after Stuff asked questions about how the account could access raw footage shot in the Opposition area of parliament.
So how were Labour found out?
Last year, The Post reported Labour saying the account was not linked to the party or any of its social media staff.
But a video posted recently appears to link the two, featuring – of all things – a toaster.
n September 2024, the official Labour account showed footage of Nicola Willis popping out of a toaster saying “no I don’t think so” after a voiceover asks if National will ease up on some of the cuts – finishing on the tagline: We’re toast under National.
Fast forward to April 30 this year, the Luxury Marmite Sandwich account posted a similar video of Christopher Luxon popping out of a toaster saying “you can make a marmite sandwich”.
The curious thing about the similarity of the clips is that they are clearly footage of the same toaster which appears to be located in the Opposition wing of Parliament, where Labour is based.
Great detective work. I look forward to the Nicky hager book on this!
A 29 year old journalist took on the 54 year old Police Commissioner over the Police Physical Competency Test. It consists of:
The pass times were three minutes for the reporter and three minutes 16 seconds for the Police Commissioner.
The reporter finished in five minutes and two seconds.
The Commissioner blamed through it in two minutes and 16 seconds – an entire 60 seconds faster than the pass time.
Safe to say the Commissioner is no desk jockey.

Almost half of the stories on Stuff’s politics page, are quoting Helen Clark. Doesn’t this tell you everything you need to know.
Radio NZ reports:
A leaked report completed for the TAB NZ by racing insiders says the horse racing industry is “unsustainable” without further tax breaks.
It also recommends allowing TAB NZ to run online casinos, shifting the cost of the industry’s integrity board to the government and making structural changes including consolidating property ownership and management.
No, no, no, no. If they can’t stand own their own feet, then tough. Bad enough they already persuaded Parliament to steal money from bets on greyhound racing in Australia, and give profits to the horse racing industry.
An AI summary of the status quo is:
So they already get very favourable treatment. And they have had bailouts in the past. No more.
The Herald reports:
Mariameno Kapa-King has split from Te Pāti Māori and announced the launch of a new political party, Te Tai Tokerau Party.
Kapa-Kingi’s new party will campaign in the 2026 General Election in November.
Excellent news.
A good analysis of how NZers vote by gender by Sam Crawley.

So NZ First and ACT consistently do better with men than women. Labour consistently better with women. National varies. In four elections they did better with women than men, and in six the other way.
Judith Collins was first elected to Parliament in 2002, almost 24 years ago. This is when I first met her, as I was an opposition staffer.
National only got five new MPs in 2002 – Judith Collins, Sandra Goudie, Don Brash John Key and Brian Connell. Three of those five MPs would go on to become National Party Leaders. It was overall a good intake. One, we don’t mention!
Despite being a brand new MP, Judith ran a campaign that exposed Lianne Dalziel as having lied over a leak she denied. It ended with Dalziel’s resignation. What hasn’t generally been reported is that the senior National MPs at the time were quite dismissive of Judith’s campaign against Dalziel, and basically said it was not going to achieve anything. Judith proved them wrong. She had to fight hard and battle to be taken seriously, and proved the doubters wrong.
Judith also achieved in her first term an inquiry into the effect of Agent Orange on NZ Vietnam veterans. This led to an apology and better support for veterans. Not bad for a first term opposition MP.
Judith went on to spend almost 12 years as a Cabinet Minister, where she managed a huge variety of portfolios. They included:
I can’t think of many other Ministers who would have had 20+ portfolios, and in basically every portfolio Judith had she managed them exceptionally well. She made changes where they were needed such as with science funding, law & order policy etc. Judith got through the original Three Strikes law.
In her Innovation portfolio she organised events which had NZ entrepreneurs raving to me about them. These are a bunch of people generally sceptical about government, and Judith brought stakeholders together in a way that added huge value.
Her ministerial offices were always one of the happiest and most loyal in the Beehive. Some Ministers would have tense relationships with their staff, but Judith’s office was always known as very high functioning and happy.
And of course Judith also became National Party Leader in a hospital pass in 2020. No one else could have taken over in that moment of crisis.
The Law Commission’s gain is National’s and Parliament’s loss.
(Given that David F. brings us his travel stories I am hoping he will allow this one).
A life passion of mine is a love of music – and especially going to concerts.
For a NZ perspective; upon Dave Dobbyn becoming a “Sir” I had the privilege of writing this piece and a couple of years back even had the superb Jason Kerrison and most of The Feelers play at our wedding.
Last night we (my wife Luciana and I) went to Split Enz at Spark Arena in Auckland on their Forever Tour. I first saw them in Palmerston North in 1982 as a 15 year old who pretty much ran away from home to go. I have all of their albums – and all of them auto-graphed by Eddie Rayner.
They were back after 20 years, and it was 44 years since I first saw them play. I was as excited going last night as I was at in 1982, but there was a problem. The previous week Luciana and I had been to Mumford and Sons. While I and, clearly, the rest of the crowd, loved it – Luciana not so much. Added to that, Luciana is from Brazil and, although being here for 17 years, I had a lot of trouble even beginning to explain much at of what there is to explain about the band. It did not even seem to matter when I told her that Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam (who we saw last year) regarded them as his greatest influence, alongside Neil Young, and refers to the Finns as his uncles. So, I had a marker; even though I knew I would love it, if they could convince her …
Over the years some band members have come and gone so the stalwarts on the stage were Tim Finn, Neil Finn, Eddie Rayner and Noel Crombie. They were supported by Matt Eccles and James Milne. They are not young but this week, before heading to Australia, their schedule was:

(Cred: https://13thfloor.co.nz/split-enz-spark-arena-may-9-2026-13th-floor-photo-gallery/#)
The concert was sold out and the stage set-up outstanding. They came out – in a typically bizarre way – played Shark Attack and any doubts from the crowd (possibly except one) evaporated and the people erupted.
The show was brilliant throughout as the busted through songs such as – Poor Boy, History Never Repeats, Nobody Takes Me Seriously, Give It A Whirl, Dirty Creature, One Step Ahead, Stuff And Nonsense, Message To My Girl, Double Happy, My Mistake, Hard Act To Follow, I Hope I Never, Six Months In A Leaky Boat, I Got You, I See Red and more.
They finished with Straight Old Line with the brilliant Noel Crombie on the drums and then the spoons – as only he could.
Tim Finn’s voice was outstanding. Even at 73 (“I was born in Te Awamutu, 25th of June 1952”) he did not hide away for a moment from the notes written in a younger man’s bizarre clothing. His energy and musicianship also incredible.
Neil Finn was his outstanding self throughout – as well as using that wit and band repartee that makes the audience feel like they are a part of a family occasion. His guitar playing – especially long solos – reminded everyone why he got to tour with Fleetwood Mac from 2018 – 22. His voice, at 67, simply brilliant.
Eddie Rayner is one of my long-term favourite musicians. Sometimes in the shadow of the Finn’s – but the architect of the iconic Enzo project. The longer the concert went on the more you understand how incredible and integral he is to their wonderful sound. His intro to Six Months in a Leaky Boat was stunning but a long way from being his only highlight.
Noel Crombie was as only he can be. He defines the long-term quirk of the band that sometimes masks the musical brilliance. I forgot to count how many instruments he played on the night – and have no reason why he smashed up a guitar as if he was Eddie van Halen (Neil Finn looked bemused too). More than anything though – he looked as if he was enjoying the night of his life … and it was infectious.
Matt Eccles on the drums and James Mile, bass, were both of the highest quality and, impressively, had great presence while deferring throughout to the core four.
Some songs they probably could have just played the instruments and the crowd would have provided the words. It was a deeply impressive performance … but had they won over the Brazilian? I asked … and got; “I really liked them. Everything!”
It is very hard to overstate the influence of Split Enz (and Crowded House) on NZ culture. When the great Australia rugby coach, Rod Macqueen, coached his last game, vanquishing the British Lions, in 2001 – his words to the crowd were: “To everyone out there, it’s bloody good to be Australian.” Last night I felt the same being a Kiwi.
The Post reports:
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown sent a letter to Heart of the City expressing concerns about its governance prior to Viv Beck being stood down as the organisation’s chief executive.
As far as I can tell Viv Beck was mainly stood down because politicians such as Wayne Brown and Chloe Swarbrick hated the fact she would say that the CBD isn’t particularly safe. They seemed to think that the answer is to stop talking about it, and then everyone will feel safer!
The problem for Beck is her organisation is funded by the Council. That means that they can’t be a strong independent voice for CBD businesses, as you can’t upset your paymaster.
My view is that no business groups should be funded by Councils. They should be funded by businesses who choose to join or fund them, because they see value in them.