General Debate 05 June 2026
Stuff reports:
The world is watching New Zealand’s housing crash — and asking what went wrong
This headline has it entirely wrong. House prices were unaffordable in New Zealand. They have fallen to more affordable levels. This is not a crash. This is the impact if policy designed to lower prices, so that more people can afford to buy a home.
This is not to say that falling house prices have not had some negative consequences. I suspect that the subdued economic growth is partially because households feel poorer because their house is on paper worth less than three years ago. We don’t take into account that our next house is also cheaper – we just focus on our current house.
But all policies and pros and cons, and the massive increase in house prices wasn’t sustainable. The correction is painful for some people, but still necessary.
Radio NZ reports:
Jasmine Hanham filmed herself harassing her neighbours and then posted it to social media platform TikTok.
Now her landlord Kāinga Ora has taken her to the Tenancy Tribunal to get her evicted for her antisocial behaviour.
That behaviour included covering her neighbour’s work car with stickers accusing him of “s*** parking” and filming herself verbally harassing her neighbours and posting the videos to TikTok.
The Christchurch woman told the tribunal she was struggling with parenting her high-needs children, which led to the outbursts, and that her tenancy shouldn’t be terminated.
But tribunal adjudicator Rebecca Morgan said in a recently released decision that while parenting can be overwhelming, the three antisocial incidents cannot be justified by stressful parenting.
Morgan ultimately terminated Hanham’s tenancy giving her two weeks to find new accommodation.
This would never have happened under the last Government. Their policy was to basically protect the abusers.
An academic has labelled the 10% increase in health funding as “austerity”. This made me realises that this was another word which once had a specific meaning, basically a cut in the level of spending, to a meaningless “spending did not increase as much as I think it should have”.
I asked on Twitter for examples of other words that once had a useful specific meaning, but now were meaningless. Some of the contributions were:
News.com.au reports:
A high-profile tech CEO has sparked debate after revealing he quietly axed his entire human resources department earlier this year.
Ryan Breslow, CEO of Bolt Financial, claims the HR team at the fintech firm was “creating problems that didn’t exist” and fostering a culture of complaining rather than productivity.
“The problems disappeared when I let [the team] go,” the Stanford University graduate, 32, claimed, according to The New York Post.
He is not the only CE to do this or discover this. I recall chatting some years ago to a very very successful CEO and he said that his first step in every new company he took over was to scrap the entire HR department, tell managers they are responsible for managing their own staff teams, and that there is an external law firm they can access for legal advice on employment issues. This CEO said that without fail the improvement in happiness in the company was huge.
Sally Clarke, a burnout and wellbeing consultant, told news.com.au that erasing HR is a “fickle” move that is “bound to backfire”.
A burnout consultant!!
Labou appear to have decided on a strategy of releasing as little policy as possible, making it difficult to assess the impact on us of a Labour-led Government.
Fortunately the Greens are not shy in releasing policy, so in the absence of Labour policy I am going to look at Greens policy to get some idea of what the costs will be of a change in government.
I will go through their policies in alphabetical order. My brain could not cope with reading too much Green policy in one sitting, so these will be spaced out over a few weeks.
Their first policy is ACC. They key aspects are:
So what would this cost, and who would pay for it?
A 2013 Treasury estimate put the cost of extending the ACC scheme at $1.5 billion, which would be $2.1 billion in 2026 dollars. Add in 21% population growth and you get $2.5 billion minimum cost.
Revoking co-payments just for physio is estimated to cost $65 million and physio is 25% of treatments so a conservative cost estimate (in reality number of treatments would increase massively) is $250 million.
So total annual cost of just this one policy is at least $2.75 billion a year. Thus would need the following tax changes to fund it:
Again this is just the cost of their ACC policy, not all their policies.
NBC reports:
Top House Democrats are condemning a Texas Democratic candidate days after she took to social media to say she’d turn an immigration detention center into a “prison for American Zionists” if she won.
Galindo, a therapist, finished with the most votes in the March primary in the Democratic primary for Texas’ 35th Congressional District, a new district that state Republican lawmakers drew to be friendlier to the GOP this fall. She’s running in a runoff against Johnny Garcia, who previously worked in the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office.
Galindo has made a string of controversial comments during her campaign. She wrote last week on Instagram that she’d turn an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center “into a prison for American Zionists and former ICE officers for human trafficking,” going on to claim that many Zionists are “pedophiles.”
95% of jews are Zionists so what she is really saying is that she wants to lock up all the Jews. Like a flash back to the 1930s.
Henry Nowak was an 18 year old student in Southampton, who was cut and stabbed five times by Vickrum Digwa. The Police were called and despite the fact Nowak was the one stabbed and wounded, they handcuffed and arrested him simply on the say so of Digwa who claimed Nowak had racially abused him and assaulted him.
The Police did not investigate. They did not take statements from witnesses. They arrested him because Digwa claimed he had been racist and assaulted him.
Nowak told Police he had been stabbed and he couldn’t breathe. They refused to believe him. They handcuffed the dying man.
This is what destroys trust in institutions.
Simon Watts announced:
Only elected councillors will be able to vote on council committees, in a move that strengthens democratic accountability, Local Government Minister Simon Watts announced today.
“Councillors are directly accountable to voters for their decisions. We are amending the Local Government Act 2002 so only elected members hold voting rights at council committee meetings,” Mr Watts says.
“Councils and the public nationwide have raised concerns about individuals holding voting rights on council committees, undermining decision-making and diluting the influence of democratically elected members.
“We’ve seen examples in the Far North, in Tauranga and in Hastings where individuals, such as iwi representatives and young people aged under 18, have been appointed to council committees and given voting rights without being elected by the community.
“That’s not democratic, so we’re fixing it.
An excellent move by the Government. Some may argue that unelected members on committees is okay, as decisions have to be ratified by the full Council. But that ignores the reality that getting the full Council to overturn a decision by a committee can take a huge amount of work and effort, and inertia often wins.
“While it is useful and appropriate that councils are able to make appointments that bolster the skills, attributes and knowledge of elected members, those individuals are not elected by ratepayers and therefore have no democratic accountability.
“Councils can still appoint non-elected members to offer professional advice and represent communities but those appointments will not come with voting rights or count towards a quorum.”
So you can still have an external accountant or lawyer on Audit & Risk. The benefit from them is their advice and knowledge, not their vote.
The Post reports:
A glitzy website launched to celebrate the opening of Wellington’s refurbished central library building Te Matapihi cost nearly $600,000, pushing the costs associated with the library opening to more than $800,000.
It was also developed and built by an Auckland company and has been denounced by one councillor as “gold-plated promotional spending”.
The Post was told, in an official information response that the production cost for the dedicated Te Matapihi website was $13,961.
However, it has since been discovered the full cost of designing and building it (the end-to-end delivery) was actually $595,801.
This is obscene. That wasn’t $600,000 on the library website where you borrow and reserve books. This was $600,000 on a website just to celebrate the new library building.
Think what this indicates about the contempt for ratepayers who fund WCC. Think what this indicates about why project after project blows out massively in cost. It is a culture problem. How did no in management not say “Hey no effing way are we spending $600,000 on a website for a building?”
The NZ Initiative released:
“Our cities have been meeting their housing targets for years while house prices kept climbing,” said Dr Benno Blaschke, Research Fellow at The New Zealand Initiative. “The housing targets gave politicians and communities a number to fight over while ignoring everything underneath.”
New research from The New Zealand Initiative, Beyond Targets, proposes a better way to hold councils to account: replace housing targets with price indicators. They tell planners whether people have real and affordable choices about where to live and build, or whether rules are forcing people and businesses into bidding wars over scarce permissions, jacking up prices.
This seems sensible to me. An outcome (where practical) is the better target, than an output.
The Post reports:
Labour’s Dr Ayesha Verrall is adamant that her fees-free GP policy will not overwhelm clinics, despite featuring no commitment to fund the training of more doctors.
The policy has faced sustained criticism from Health Minister Simeon Brown, who says the free visits would increase demand on GP clinics without any plan to increase the number of doctors.
“Right now, the biggest challenge facing patients is simply being able to get an appointment in the first place,” he said.
This is correct, I’ve just checked with my GP clinic, and no appointments for two weeks for my GP.
In a sit-down with The Post, Verrall said cutting paperwork for doctors through AI and her plans to introduce a triaging system would free up 4.5 million appointments overall.
This is magical thinking. There is no actual specific plan, just a belief akin to we will build 100,000 homes.
Labour’s modelling anticipated two million more appointments a year once the scheme was fully rolled out after Budget 2028 ‒ increasing the number of appointments from 24 million to 26 million.
We have 5,600 GPs so two million more appointments would need an extra 430 GPs by Labour’s own numbers.
Instead of patients booking their appointments through a first come, first serve system, a nationwide triage system would see patients assessed over the phone to determine the level of care they need and when.
Sounds like centralised rationing. Rather than being able to decide for yourself if you see a GP, you will need to go through the Ministry of Health!!
Verrall said this system meant many patients would not need to see the doctor at all, and instead be referred to a pharmacist or online resources on the Healthify website to manage symptoms
So the phone operator will decide whether or not you can see a GP, and may just tell you to go read a website instead!!
I am a fan of agencies having both English and te reo names. I am not a fan of agencies only using their te reo name as happened under the last Government.
If an agency (or their website) uses both English and te reo, which should be the primary language? Well, let’s look at the census data:
If your job is to serve the public, you shouldn’t need a ministerial directive to work out which language you use first.
The BBC reports:
Former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell has admitted embezzling more than £400,000 from the party.
Murrell, the estranged husband of the former first minister Nicola Sturgeon, pleaded guilty at the High Court in Edinburgh and has been remanded in custody.
The 61-year-old used party funds to illicitly purchase luxury goods, jewellery, cosmetics, two cars and a motorhome.
He admitted to embezzling a total of £400,310.65 between 12 August 2010 and 19 October 2022.
Maybe SNP really stands for Sneak, Nick & Pillage!
Sturgeon has said she had no idea he stole the equivalent of NZ$900k on household items. She never noticed the following:
She must have been very distracted!
The full list is here. Titular honours are:
To be Dames Companion of the said Order:
Mrs Susan Jean Hassall, ONZM, JP, of Cambridge. For services to education.
Professor Elizabeth Mary Rata, of Auckland. For services to education.
To be Knights Companion of the said Order:
Dr Paul Andrew Baker, of Auckland. For services to health.
Mr Peter Francis Boshier, of Wellington. For services to the State and the judiciary.
Professor Emeritus James William Chapman, of Palmerston North. For services to literacy education.
Mr David Charles Ellis, CNZM, of Ngaruawahia. For services to the thoroughbred industry and philanthropy.
Nice to see so many in education get honoured.
Radio NZ reports:
New Zealand First will campaign on establishing a Special Economic Zone at Marsden Point to “provide relief” from planning regulations and the RMA in the area. …
He explained the proposed party policy, saying a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) can have varied policies, but include tax breaks, wage subsidies, reduced regulation, and investment in physical, transport or communications infrastructure. …
Industries in that economic zone would not have to deal with local/ regional councils, DOC or other agencies, he said.
Instead, Peters said, planning rules and RMA consents would be “determined quickly by a government panel”.
“This expert panel would make decisions based on whether the changes will grow the economy and achieve the aims of the zone.”
Other “relief options” the party was considering were changes to the Overseas Investment Act to “make it easier for quality foreign investment in the zone to occur while at the same time protecting our national interest and ownership.”
So an SEZ would have lower taxes, reduced regulation, no local government restrictions, and easier foreign investment.
I propose two SEZs. One for the North Island and one for the South Island!
Dr Ruth Bonita writes:
How worried should we be about reports of a growing illicit tobacco market in Aotearoa New Zealand? We don’t yet know the extent of this market but it’s estimated to be 5-10 percent of the tobacco market, and we should take it seriously enough to avoid ending up like Australia, where it’s estimated that more than half of the total tobacco market and more than 90 percent of vapes come from illicit sources.
Australia is a disaster in terms of the black market.
Recent research showed that almost two thirds of 18-24 year olds who smoke report using illicit tobacco.
Getting them into the criminal system young!
This distribution points to how illicit markets develop; illicit tobacco is driven primarily by price. When legal cigarettes become expensive, the black-market grows. The growth of illegal cigarette sales is a rational, although unwelcome, response to rising prices.
Many New Zealand smokers are switching to vaping – a smoke-free nicotine product – which are widely available, well-regulated and relatively affordable. Readers don’t need reminding, but I’ll say it anyway: it’s the smoke from burning tobacco at very high temperatures that kills people, not – as far as we know – the nicotine. These smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes provide a legal substitute for those who would otherwise continue to smoke.
The direct implications for illicit trade are obvious. Where there are affordable and safer alternatives there will be less demand for illicit tobacco.
A legal less lethal alternative is much preferable to the illegal lethal black market in tobacco.
This matters. A 2026 paper published in the Society for the Study of Addiction suggests that Australia has in effect lost control of its tobacco and nicotine market. The combination of very high tobacco taxes and highly restricted access to vaping has contributed to a large and growing illicit market.
The authors conclude: “Punitive taxes on cigarettes and restricted access to lower-risk nicotine products have diverted Australians who use nicotine into illicit markets and may also have increased cigarette smoking among young people.”
By contrast, they note that New Zealand has seen faster declines in smoking alongside a smaller illicit market under a more permissive and controlled regulatory approach to vaping.
NZ is doing it right. Australis is not.
The Free Press reports:
A new report out today accuses both the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA) of spending tens of millions of dollars on electing Democratic political candidates, and prioritizing politicking over the needs and interests of their union members.
The report, conducted by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), Gevura Fund, and Rutgers University, among others, found that of the NEA’s $450 million annual disbursement budget from fiscal year 2025, less than $46 million, or 10 percent, was spent on activities directly representing the union’s constituents.
Public sector unions in the US are basically a branch of the Democratic Party.
The Times of Israel reports:
An Israeli tech company has revealed the content of tiny particles it hopes will one day be used to combat global warming by scattering millions of tons of them into the atmosphere to reflect away sunlight, the New York Times reported Thursday.
Stardust Solutions had previously kept the makeup of its geoengineering particles a closely-guarded secret, protected with nondisclosure agreements.
As it turns out, they are made from amorphous silica, which is a food additive, and calcium carbonate, which is in eggshells and limestone. …
So far, the company has only tested the particles in the laboratory and says it would not test them outdoors unless it were in partnership with a government to lay down the rules and limits of the test, according to the report.
Hey this could be an opportunity for New Zealand. Science is amazing.
By Lucy Rogers
Recently I wrote a Kiwiblog post about a major report on mass rape committed by Hamas on October 7 2023 which RNZ (and every other New Zealand news media outlet) were made aware of via a press release and knowingly refused to report on: https://www.civilc.org/silenced-no-more That is despite the avalanche of evidence (including 10,000 photos, 1800 hours of footage, and eyewitness testimony from over 400 witnesses) that Hamas engaged in pre-meditated mass rape as a weapon of warfare on October 7 2023, and despite the fact that RNZ ordinarily reports on anything Israel-related on practically a daily basis (and I provided a large number of examples proving that).
But despite that, only two weeks later RNZ has just reported on the fact that Israel was just added to a “sexual violence blacklist” by the UN for alleged sexual violence committed against Palestinians: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/596787/un-places-israel-and-russia-on-sexual-violence-blacklist
Even if the number of Israeli sexual assaults of Palestinians were remotely on the scale of Hamas’ sexual assaults of Israelis (of which there is no evidence) the hypocrisy is sickening. RNZ will report on sexual violence committed by Israelis but not on sexual violence committed by Palestinians.
Selective condemnation of sexual assault is evil.