Customer Service 101 Add this story to Scoopit!.

Just been forwarded an exchange of e-mails, which is doing the rounds, The two key e-mails are these:

From: Steve Hausman
To: ‘Events Team’
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: Quote #00002417; from The Great Marquee Company Ltd.

Hi Klaus

Paula and I went and viewed your marquee setup at Devonport the other weekend and unfortunately we did not like it.

So this is just to let you know we will not require your services on 7 April 2007.

Thanks for your assistance and we are sorry that it turned out this way although we are glad we looked at the marquee prior to booking as that would have been a huge disappointment.

Regards

Steve Hausman

Now get this reply. Incredible:

From: Events Team [mailto: events.team@thegreatmarqueecompany.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2006 6:30 p.m.
To: Steve Hausman
Subject: Thank You From The Great Marquee Company

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your reply. Your wedding sounded cheap, nasty and tacky anyway, so we only ever considered you time wasters.

Our marquees are for upper class clients which unfortunately you are not. Why don’t you stay within your class level and buy something from payless plastics instead.

Kindest Regards
Katrina
Office Manager
The Great Marquee Company

Almost too nasty to be true but I have checked the names and contact details of those involved and they are actual people – it is genuine. The e-mail has already gone through around 15 forwards so must be wellspread.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags:

68 Responses to “Customer Service 101”

  1. DenMT Says:

    I got this too and automatically thought ‘viral marketing’. But after a flurry of email with mates, it seems it actually is genuine.

    Egg on face, huh.

    DenMT

  2. phil u Says:

    obviously some of your lot dpf..

    wot with ‘upper-class’ clients..and all..

    wannabe toffs…currently working as lickspittles..(sad..eh..?..)

    are invariably national party supporters/voters..

    (anything else would be too ‘lower-class’ for them..eh..?..)

    feckin’ onanists/idjits..eh..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  3. Linda Says:

    I got it as well.

    I think someone might be looking for a new job shortly.

  4. Hamish Says:

    Ouch

  5. David Farrar Says:

    Phil – fuck off with your stereotypes please.

  6. Duncan Bayne Says:

    Phil,

    He may be rude and have a very poor understanding of customer service & word of mouth advertising … but at least he can find the ‘shift’ key on his keyboard :-P

  7. Seamonkey Madness Says:

    Duncan – LOL

    And a correction, its a she – Katrina, to be exact.

    No doubt her fan will be working overtime when it hits.

  8. AGJ Says:

    Phil…Zzzzzzzzz

    Yes this also arrived in my inbox this morning. Comedy Gold.

  9. Decentre Says:

    Whoar Phil, you really got a response there mate!! Bit too close to the bone eh DPF? Stereotypes exist for a reason!

  10. crasster Says:

    Amazing. I can’t help smile about the small amount of irony, DPF, the first post you make after celebrating the supression order slapped on the stolen emails is to release details of a private email. Of course there are differences…I am just saying there’s a dram of irony in this.

  11. mara Says:

    I bet Katrina felt GREAT for the time it took to compose and send her cathartic rant.I’ve bitten my tongue so often it’s probably blunter than normal but hell it can feel bloody good to unload sometimes.Also she will probably get another job in NZ if she changes her name. har har

  12. crasster Says:

    I’m just impressed anyone actually reads and/or comprehends phil u’s posts. I still haven’t decided whether it’s affliction or affectation.

  13. David Farrar Says:

    Decentre – no what I object to is wankers who try and bring cheap politics into non political threads.

    Craaster – no irony at all. One party to the e-mail has forwarded it on. That is allowed.

  14. kisekiman Says:

    Actually I liked the cut of her jib and if anything it has encouraged me to send some business heir way. Here’s the mail I’ve just sent to the The Great Marquee Company Ltd.

    Katrina,

    Thanks in advance for taking the time to field my enquiry.

    I enclose a picture of my current bivouac (left foreground) which although made from quality PVC, lacks a certain je ne sais quois and is hardly the envy of my neighbours.

    With that in mind I was looking to upgrade to something a little classier and I heard through the grapevine you were just the people to talk to.

    Kind Regards,

    Kisekiman.

  15. Paul Marsden Says:

    Her employer had better tread warily on dismissing her on this one. She’ll probably take a personal grievance action on account it was her ‘time-of-the-month’

    Atrocious customer relations of course, but brilliant sense of humour! (Think I might offer her a job…)

  16. Mike Readman Says:

    Sorry, but I don’t find this funny at all. 2 reasons: 1) This is the sort of service I’ve got before. 2) When I worked in customer service, those were the kind of customers I served. They probably did want something cheap and nasty.

  17. RedRag Says:

    Spot the irony.

    Previous post: Dr Don seeking an injunction on the publication of HIS private emails, presumably because some of them may be damaging.

    This post: The publication of a private email….that is damaging.

  18. Seamonkey Madness Says:

    Wow RedRag, you’re on the ball today.

  19. stan Says:

    i don’t see what the problem is – Steve could’ve just said: “we’ve decided to look at other options” or something, but he was a dick, so there’s nothing wrong with her reply

  20. Andrew Says:

    Craaster said: I’m just impressed anyone actually reads and/or comprehends phil u’s posts

    While Phil has breath there will always be a need for rehab centres.

    And he must do battle with dictionary.com for hours to turn up some of the reefer-length words. Hope he keeps posting. They are quite simply the best on-line reason why not to vote for the Greens.

    (Sorry DPF, cheap political-shot in an apolitical thread …)

  21. Span Says:

    Hmm having just visited http://www.thegreatmarqueecompany.co.nz I’m smelling a vague scent of rodent…

  22. Adolf Fiinkensein Says:

    I see the reply was sent at 6.30 pm. Just after office drinkies? Was it the boss him/herself, using a fictitious ‘office manager’ to take the flak?

    An excellent response, I thought.

  23. David Farrar Says:

    Red Rag obviously has no problems with theft and can not tell the difference between stolen e-mails, and an e-mail one party has willingly circulated.

    Some people are so morally challenged.

  24. insider Says:

    This was a wind up I’m sure of it. One of those evil viral campaigns perhaps…. Do I smell a Vestey?

  25. insider Says:

    Although I wonder if it is this wedding

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wedding/1WCCT83FIGB5M/103-1748252-0142257?ie=UTF8&reveal=all

    and she may be a lawyer

  26. kiwicockers Says:

    not much happening in auckland,i take it

  27. phil u Says:

    wot’s that david..?

    the class system is apolitical..?

    go figure..!..eh..?..who knew..?

    and i do prefer onanist over wanker..

    a tad classier..?..don’t you think..?

    esp if u r upwardly aspirational..eh david..?

    i’m bog-working class you see..and a celtic mix too boot..!

    that’s quite liberating really..

    ‘cos u can laugh at the self-deluded wannabe-pommy onanists (vainly) trying to ‘climb’..and the real hoot comes from watching their insecurities on offer as they strive to prove to all and sundry they are ‘there’…

    in some colonial sub-set class-system..

    (talk about self-deluded..eh..?..)

    also amusing how many of them are ‘in service’..yet have attitudes (above their stations)to burn..

    (tee.hee..!..)

    and..sorry david…but those who cleave to the class system..(esp aspirationals)…invariably vote tory..(it’s part of their aspirational..’the working class (c.f..labour)can kiss my arse..’..persona..eh..?..)

    you know that..!..i know that..!

    why the vipurative reaction..?

    to what was a gentle nudge..?

    the truth can’t hurt that much..?..surely..!

    and to that person who reckons i scour the dictionary looking for words..

    um..no..noddy..it’s called an education…and you get it from reading..

    and trying not to watch things like..oh..i don’t know..fox..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  28. Sean Says:

    David, I thought you were going to screen responses, so why is phul still harping on? My comments on an earlier thread were kicked back by the system because (it said) I had made too many comments. I have no problem with that, but can the system run the same check on phul? Cheers.

  29. Greenjacket Says:

    What a very odd person this ‘phil u’ is – can anyone else understand his posts?

  30. Kent Parker Says:

    I find them unreadable and just skip them. Sorry, phil, I’m sure you’re a likeable enough fellow.

  31. mara Says:

    You guys are so predictable and boring.Is there nothing that you cannot turn into a love/hate political fest?ZZZZ.Do you all secretly wank one another?This is a serious question?

  32. Paul Marsden Says:

    …and she may be a lawyer

    Posted by insider | November 17, 2006

    She is.

  33. crasster Says:

    Mara

    It is a bit weird, in a politically-oriented blog, you’d find politically-oriented comments. Like you, I was expecting friendly discussions about recipes and gardening. Of course the question whether the hundreds of people around the globe who participate in these discussions regularly meet for a wank session is a serious one. It’s not designed as a troll, I am sure.

  34. bwooce Says:

    @span: Do you mean what is on their website now?

    “Statement

    If you are emailing us or visiting our website because of the recent (inappropriate) email communication we had with a customer we would like to advise that we regret the exchange. We have apologised to the customer concerned and put processes in place to ensure it won’t happen again.

    With a long history in Auckland of supporting events with our marquee hire, we know that planning a wedding is one of the most stressful times in a person’s life and we do what we can to make it easy. We most certainly do not condone rudeness on the part of any of our staff or endorse the views in this particular response.

    You may be aware that the email that was forwarded by our customer has now reached some thousands of people. We do not believe it is fairly representative of the service that we usually provide, and perhaps more importantly it is generating many calls to the former customer which is stressful for him.

    We would rather not comment any further but move on having learned from this situation. Again, we pass our apologies on to this customer.

    Klaus Jorgensen
    CEO
    The Great Marquee Company”

  35. Slopsy Says:

    Span,

    Why do you smell a rat? I’m sorry but so many posts here involve the phrase “I smell a rat” invariably followed by an enigmatic “…” without sharing any more

  36. Slopsy Says:

    Sorry Span, why do you smell a rat?

    Sorry but so many posts seem to include the phrase “I smell a rat” invariably followed by an enigmatic “…” without spelling it out for simple folk like me

  37. Whaleoil Says:

    Phool has been at the crack pipe again and for God’s Sake get the fullstop key unjammed.

  38. Andrew Worth Says:

    Paula and Steve have had their sweet revenge, big time.

    I could almost look forward to getting an Email like that now.

  39. simon Says:

    Could this possibly be a fantastic piece of marketing ?

    I wonder how many hits the company site has recieved ?

    I can’t believe anyone would hire a marquee for a wedding without viewing it first (on line etc)

    I think its a set up…just a thought!

  40. burt Says:

    yes… (eh?) it’s like not me eh(?) it’s some crazy fucker called phil u. eh?

    but.. then… perhaps.. not .. but kind of… eh(?) yeh like im really weird (eh?) and its cool eh(?) because im all fucked up on drugs eh(?)

    what was i saying… like really.. eh?

  41. burt Says:

    its lucky that these guys (the events team) can’t pass retrospective legislation (eh?)

    just imagine… if you will… you don’t like my tent… all other tents are now illegal (eh?) since… 1918. funny (eh?) politics is everywhere (eh?)

  42. woolfie Says:

    If you go to their website they have a pretty good apology posted. Seems genuine.

  43. phil u Says:

    so whale-blubber…

    not content with..in forums… calling me ‘a fucked up drug wreck’..

    you are now accusing me of being a ‘crack-head’…

    (btw…whale-blubber..why don’t you try addressing the arguments occaisonally..?..you may find it rather liberating/refreshing..eh..?.i’m sure the rest of us would..)
    (what’s that you say..?..u only do insults..?..oh..ok..)

    and just for the record…many years ago..in another place…i hung off a crack pipe for a grand total of three months on the trot…..
    (that’s real’crack’..ie cocaine..not
    the local bath-tub speed u r referrring to ..whale-blubber..)..

    i (literally) ‘ran-away’ from it..to jamaica..to dry out..with the help of a large bag of jamaicas’ finest….

    horrified at the power of that particular drug..(the one i reckon is the most addictive)..and one which really fucks people/users up..(even more than booze does..)

    (i cd knock out a little thesis on that for you..(the ‘evils’ of crack)..but whos got the time..?..eh..?..)

    so whaleblubber…sorry to burst that little fantasy u r trying to build up..about ‘phil the crackhead’..

    but good old-fashioned local pot..and organic tea..are my poisons of choice…

    btw…whale-blubber..how are your life-long ‘issues’ with the demon-gin coming along..?

    (you risk (even more) serious brain damage with that particular evil..eh..?

    should be banned..!..eh..?

    so..i realy wd appreciate you not making up lies about me hanging off crack-pipes..

    eh..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  44. Jillypig Says:

    I’m thinking Katrina would be a fun person to know.

    Steve sounds like a bit of a sh*t stirrer and a pompous ass. Why would you write such an email? Just say thanks but no thanks rather than put the boot in at the end by saying you think their product is inferior. Then to ensure that the news media, and all and sundry know about it. What a vindictive man.

  45. Murray Says:

    Oh poor phool, did the nasty man blow your cover.

    Didums.

  46. AGJ Says:

    The day Phil doesn’t use “eh” in a comment is the day I vote Green.

  47. Michael (The Right Wing One) Says:

    I bet all of us who have ever worked in Customer Service has wished to say those words to a customer who really deserved it – but we bit our tongues because we had to.

  48. Whaleoil Says:

    Oh dear oh dear Phool.
    You really are a sad case aren’t you?

    Don’t know what you are wailing on about Gin for, anyone who knows me knows I don’t drink alcohol or take drugs.

    Crack, speed, Dope, pot ,P anything else you want to use or have used does only one thing. it turns you into a drug fucked wreck andr you posts and ranting and over punctuation simply prove my point.

    If anyone is an onanist it is you, perhaps you and chronic could form a frotteur-ists club.

    Now there is a good boy, off you go, light another dooby and drift off into oblivion whence you came.

  49. phil u Says:

    gee..funny about that…whale-blubber..

    anyone who knows me knows how virulently anti-speed/crack/p i am..

    go figure..!..eh..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

    btw..whale-blubber..u r someone i would really recommend should smoke some industrial-strength pot..

    u and yr alter-ego/toxic-twin muzza..(have u 2 ever been seen together..?..)..u cd both do with a good ‘stoning’..methinks..

    we cd get really optimistic..and hope it might rub some of yr nasty bits off..eh..?

    you cd both do with a dose of something/anything..

    seriously tho’..i’d recommend a good dose of ‘e’ for you both too..
    (y’know it was a therapy tool..eh.?..b4 the hysterical prohibitionists had their sway..)

    and u 2 cd certainly do with some therapy..eh..?

    wot with yr anger..and all..eh..?

    and muzza with the ‘guns’…and his anger..love of warfare.re-enacting massacres..

    sheesh..!

    go fix yr heads..!

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  50. Paul P Says:

    From the apology on their website listed earlier:

    “and perhaps more importantly it is generating many calls to the former customer which is stressful for him.”

    He must have forwarded the email on so serves the pompous git right if he’s getting heaps of phone calls.

    I agree with previous posters that he could have simply said thanks but no thanks.

  51. side show bob Says:

    Phil we have funny little mushrooms that grow around here ( March, April). There were some skinheads sitting in a paddock a the road a few years ago, funny thing was they thought they were one the moon or something like that. The men in blue had to come and take them home, it was a circus. If you think these would be beneficial in enhancing you greative jucies happy to send some as the cows won’t touch them.

  52. Adolf Fiinkensein Says:

    Judging by the latest message on the marquee website, Katrina has been fired. She probably gained for her ungrateful employer at least half a millin dollars free publicity. Employment tribunal, anyone? Pretty quick due process with natural justice and all, by the look of it.
    What an idiot.

  53. billy Says:

    Priceless :)

  54. phil u Says:

    um..side show bob…thanks but no thanks on the ‘shrooms’…

    my days of pschedelic adventures are long gone..

    i tell ya..

    good pot and a cuppa tea’ll do me.. !

    going to the pub..just to go to the pub..just bores me rigid…

    being drunk…bores me rigid..

    hangovers bore me rigid…

    you don’t get hangovers with pot ‘n tea..eh..?

    and the high/stone is much more pleasant than alcohol..

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  55. phil u Says:

    and interesting how whale-blubber has noted a connection between a miss-spent drug youth/adulthood…

    and lapses in (his) standards(?) in punctuation…!

    i wonder if he has told the scientists about his new findings..

    btw whale blubber..my tertiary studies were long after that miss-spent drug youth/adulthood…

    so i’m not sure how that fits with your colourful theories of ‘you’ve seen my drugs intake..and the damage done..’

    ‘cos i managed to go (academically) from 15 yr old drop-out to masters (hons)(2nd class) in five years..the shortest time possible..

    (ahem)..about the second class honours..

    you could blame the pot..or the raising of a little nipper at the same time…for that lapse from the potential of (hons)1st class..

    this is all just to disabuse yr misinformation/abuse of the gift that is marijuana….

    and brace yrself..whale-blubber..

    all going well..it’ll be legalised/decriminalised under the next centre-left govt..

    and that will remove the taint of control by common-garden crims..and gangs..

    you might even ‘spark-up’ then.eh..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

  56. maria von trapp Says:

    MSM has now gotten hold of this story. Good to see Craig Dale being brought back into the mix too ;-)

  57. Whaleoil Says:

    Having a degree only proves you can regurgitate what it is that Universities want to hear and that you can sit exams.

    I rate people with degrees at the same level as people who have had a lifetime of bludging. Most of the time they are the same.

    You only need a degree if you want to be somebodies slave.

    From the looks of your typing the degree was in Txt Spk.

    That is about all I could decipher from your rantings and ravings.

  58. phil u Says:

    i would agree that a degree only shows you can get a degree..

    but..y’know..if i’d drunk piss to anything like the degree i took other substances..

    there’d be no way i’d have got past first year..

    i only raised the subject..blubber..(can i call u blubs..?)

    as a gentle riposte to your (usual) scurrillous insults/allegations..

    anyway..whatever..

    fuck you’re boring..blubber..

    i don’t think i’ll bother any more..with you..

    eh..?

    see ya..!

    and say goodbye to yr toxic mate muzza for me..eh..?

    phil(whoar.co.nz

  59. JohnDalley Says:

    Klaus.

    Looks as though you have just learnt customer relations 101.
    All the good work can be undone by one dubb ass staff members comment.

  60. mara Says:

    crasster,
    you are half correct,but I do get titted-off always seeing political capital being attempted out of thin air.Of course I take a passingly passionate response to politics in NZ.I also get bored with the Pavlovian response of the over-educated twats who assume that the media should be alerted every time they pass wind.BTW..I have a really great,no fail quiche recipe that everybody should know about.Kiss,Mara

  61. Span Says:

    Sorry, my bad, that statement wasn’t up when I looked at their website, there was just some music and a grey box in the middle of the screen. Obviously I was on a crap connection or they were having some problems at their end.

    And now that I’ve seen the website, I remember seeing this company at several wedding shows in Auckland a few years back.

  62. Fred Says:

    Sounds accurate.
    The revenge of the cheap and nasties.

  63. Fletch Says:

    It’s true..
    My dad says he saw this story on Prime news, and they followed it up and contacted the company etc, etc, and they said it was wrong of the woman to write that and it would never, never happen again.

    Far from being ‘tacky’ and ‘cheap’, the woman getting married was supposed to be a lawyer or something…

  64. Fred Says:

    “Far from being ‘tacky’ and ‘cheap’, the woman getting married was supposed to be a lawyer or something..”.

    Blogs are a wonderful thing, ya just don’t know when your baseline is going to get recalibrated.
    :-) )

  65. AGJ Says:

    The Herald picks up the story. Poor Klaus had to fire his own wife.

    http://subs.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10411458

  66. krimsonlake Says:

    I honestly don’t feel a shred of sympathy for the couple who got that email. Their initial email was rude and unnecessary, and dare I say it classless. They were cheap and nasty in their initial email, showing a complete lack of manners and tact.

    Then they get offended because the recipient responds in kind, only with a little more flair? Crybabies!

  67. James Craig (2) Says:

    Wow.. I totally disagree with you there @krimsonlake. Where do you get “rude and unnecessary”? I would say the email was quite necessary considering they no longer wished to use the services of the great marquee company. And rude would have been to not send an email at all. People’s weddings are understandably important to them, and they deserve aboslutely to have things the way they want them on their big day. Katrina was way out of line responing like that, with comments that were quite hateful, speaking of the couple’s “class” as though she is something special herself. I own and operate NZ Marquee Hire in Auckalnd and I can assure you my customers would never receive such treatment, whether they went through with the purchase or otherwise.

  68. James Craig (2) Says:

    Wow.. I totally disagree with you there @krimsonlake. Where do you get “rude and unnecessary”? I would say the email was quite necessary considering they no longer wished to use the services of the great marquee company. And rude would have been to not send an email at all. People’s weddings are understandably important to them, and they deserve aboslutely to have things the way they want them on their big day. Katrina was way out of line responing like that, with comments that were quite hateful, speaking of the couple’s “class” as though she is something special herself. I own and operate NZ Marquee Hire in Auckalnd and I can assure you my customers would never receive such treatment, whether they went through with the purchase or otherwise.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.