NZ speaking softly so it can join human rights abusers

As I have blogged previously, New Zealand is campaigning for a spot on the UN Human Rights Council – an institution rapidly becoming as discredited as its predecessor. We should be running a mile from it, rather than cosying up to the dictators and abusers who make up a significant proportion of its membership.

Fran O'Sullivan notes that we appear to be refusing to condemn Iran's nuclear programme, so that we do not get offside with the Islamic states whose support is needed to get elected.

The unfortunate upshot is a perception that neither politician wants to speak frankly about Iran in case New Zealand's UN campaign is jeopardised by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference which is one of the dominant forces on the rights council.

The council – which includes a number of serial rights abusers – has been criticised by the Economist for making a fetish out of one-sided bashing. Its Islamic members have succeeded in passing a resolution saying free speech could be limited out of respect for religions and beliefs.

There is an unfortunate pattern emerging. If New Zealand puts its trade interests centre-stage, but only a strong bat on democratic infringements when they involve small basket-cases like Fiji, what do we stand for?

If gets elected, they should drop our bid to be on the Human Rights Council, and concentrate on UN institutions which are not as discredited.

Comments (46)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment