TVNZ reporting from Gaza

Karl du Fresne raises an issue of media ethics:

There was 's Europe correspondent Mark Crysell reporting on the 6 o'clock news from the Israeli town of Sderot, near the border with . Journalists congregate in town because won't allow them into Gaza and I presume it's the closest they can get to the Israeli bombardment.

Crysell, looking every inch the foreign correspondent in his flak jacket, talked about hearing Israeli exploding. He may have mentioned taking shelter from Hamas rockets, which are occasionally fired at Sderot. Then he said something like: “Here's my report”.

What followed was a report from inside Gaza, showing the usual scenes: wrecked buildings, grieving Palestinians, bloody hospital wards. Sure enough, it was Crysell's voice we were hearing over the news footage; but “my” report? How could it be Crysell's report when he was on the Israeli side of the border, well away from the carnage?

Surely even TVNZ wouldn't stoop to anything so blatantly dishonest as dubbing its own correspondent's voice over footage compiled by someone else (I suspect the BBC, which has people inside Gaza) and then claiming it as Crysell's own?

I think it is all part of the trend to make TV news seem immediate and unqiue.

The TV bulletins are full of “live crosses” now, even though they are reporting on issues that finished hours earier and don't need a live cross.

Comments (166)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment