About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

April 5, 2006 11:18am by David Farrar

28 times in a week!

Oh the energy of youth. A student has sex 28 times in one week with his teacher.

Boy will he have high expectations with his next girlfriend!

Share this:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment32

Uncategorised
Fun Things

Comments (32)

Login to comment or vote

ross

I’m guessing that the combined total of those 28 occasions probably didn’t last much more than 5 minutes. I wonder what grade he got from his school teacher. For his performance. His academic performance.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 11:32am
mikey bill

Isn’t 28 times a week around the normal amount? Am I underperforming?*worried look*
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 11:45am
brian_smaller

No wonder she has bags under her eyes.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 11:49am
David Farrar

Mikey – it’s meant to be with someone else involved 🙂
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 11:53am
Mark Lloyd

and according to femnazi’s ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS. excuse me while I stop myself from choking on their bile
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:01pm
Russell Brown

Mikey – it’s meant to be with someone else involved 🙂

BURN!!

Cheers,
RB
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:02pm
err..

Yeah, and I bet Graham Capill’s victims are right gagging for it too, now their sugar-daddy has been sent off to prison.

Seriously folks, this is in extremely poor taste. You’re talking about child abuse. DPF, I’d expect better. Not “Phwoarr! You go my son!”.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:02pm
Berend de Boer

DFP, this kid was 13 years old. He might be screwed for the rest of his life. It isn’t funny. If I was the father I would have shot that teacher.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:15pm
David Farrar

Oh come on err. The issue highlighted here is not the age of the student, but the 28 times. I would have blogged it if he had been 18 also.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:16pm
jimmy

You might begin to wonder, when it comes to adults having sex with underage children if females are not the biggest offenders. Hmmm

It is far less likely to be exposed than an underage boy has had sex with a woman than a girl has had sex with a male. Because a boy might be far less likely to feel violated and probably even feels good about himself after such an encounter. It is very likely a boy would seek out further encounters and not cooperate with authorities attempting to prosecute such an offender.

I know I wouldn’t have.

My bet is that previous commentors are little different in this regard.

Why are we kidding ourselves?
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:31pm
err..

Right, DPF. But would you have blogged it were this a male teacher who had taken two 13-year-old girls home, got them drunk and then had sex with one in front over the other? 28 times over the course of a week? Would you be jokingly commenting that the young girl would be expecting a lot from her next boyfriend?

If not, whence the double standard?
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 12:35pm
Adolf Fiinkensein

Considering only the energy levels and devotion to duty required and ignoring all the po faced debates about morals and ethics, I wonder – What’s all the fuss about? It’s only four times each day.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 1:04pm
mikey bill

With someone else??? NOW you tell me… 😉
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 1:05pm
David Farrar

err – no I wouldn’t joke about that. Like most people I think there is a difference between the two situations and happy to say I have a double standard there.

I don’t advocate the law should have a double standard however – just my sense of humour.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 1:14pm
Berend de Boer

err, indeed. This young boy was raped 28 times a week. This was forced sex according to all definitions in every law book on every civilized part of this planet.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 1:19pm
andrei

This young boy was raped 28 times a week. This was forced sex according to all definitions in every law book on every civilized part of this planet.

Nonsense this boy was not raped. raped means he did not consent and there is no way in the universe that he did not consent – physiological impossibility – especially 28 times in one week. Give us a break.

The womans actions were immoral – yes – illegal – yes but not rape, nowhere on this planet.

BTW It is part of some cultural traditions for a father to take his sons to prostitutes from about 13 or 14.

Do you know why?

I wonder how the multiculti elite would handle this if someone claimed it for themselves and sons
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 2:00pm
brian_smaller

As someone who was the “victim” of an older woman when I was 14 years of age I would have to say that it did me no harm at all. I certainly was not raped or abused.

Of course, in a cloud of hypocrisy, I would not want the same to happen to my daughter when she was fourteen.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 2:20pm
David P

28 times while drinking beer. Imagine what the total might have been if he were sober?
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 2:22pm
note:

In the Netherlands the age of consent has two categories. I believe one says that a 14 year old and above can consent always. The second category says that if under 14 but over 12 consent is assumed unlessd the youth complains. I assume you do not consider the Dutch to be civilized. Another uncivilzed nation is Chile where the age of consent is also 12. Mexico is also 12. There are also a couple of others; seven have an age of consent at 13, 31 nations are at 14 and that includes much of Europe.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 3:45pm
brian_smaller

“I assume you do not consider the Dutch to be civilized”

If you’ve ever been to down town Oosterbeck on a Saturday night you’d know the answer the that one.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 3:51pm
Berend de Boer

note, I would lookup those consent rules again. You might be in big trouble otherwise on your visit to Europe.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 6:23pm
libertyscott

This is one of those cases where objectively deciding if the boy is a victim goes out of the window. If the boy complained, then there is an issue – if they were merely caught, and the boy did not want to press charges then this shouldn’t go near the courts. The teacher may be guilty of conduct breaching her employment agreement, but that’s it. I actually find it quite abhorrent that if you take THIS case http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0208052teach1.html a woman can face decades in prison for something which is hardly damaging for life.

Yes I know if it was a man and a girl people think different but sorry men – there are differences between men, women, boys and girls. By its very nature, sex between male and female is typically (not always) a somewhat aggressive act by a male – so a female is less able to resist. It is difficult for a woman to force a boy to have sex unless he is aroused, the opposite is not so difficult.

There are issues of teachers abusing their power, and there are enormous issues of child abuse – but this case is on the borderline – if you think otherwise then the law should be enforced strictly. 15yo boys should go to prison for sex with 14yo girls. No? Well the National Party supports it, it refused to support the law being changed.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 7:59pm
Alex

Uh yeah, everyone who thinks that a man having sex with an underage girl is the same thing as a woman having sex with an underage boy… go shoot your yourselves; you’re too stupid to be alive.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 8:36pm
Logix

everyone who thinks that a man having sex with an underage girl is the same thing as a woman having sex with an underage boy

And in this age of contraception, the difference is?
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 8:48pm
andrei

Hey logix – the difference between girls and boys is not just a matter of plumbing.

Men think and behave differently than women.

Speak differently even.

In the real world, as opposed the ideal world of the mind police, most thirteen year old boys would be pretty keen to have it off with a female teacher if she is pretty enough.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 9:08pm
Spirit Of 76

Andrei, you’re dead right. I recall Miss Ayers was my teacher as a 12/13 year old, she jumpstarted me into puberty [along with Daisy Duke]. From that point on, my mother was always saying “Spirit, will you stop blowing your nose on your pyjama jacket”

As a 13 yo I would have been delighted to peel Miss Ayers back, well, give it ago anyway.
0 0
Report
April 5, 2006 9:48pm
James

Yep! When I was 13 I prayed to be raped by a hot saucy female teacher.Wasn’t to be but damm It would have been the bomb! Men and women are different…get over it. ;-0
0 0
Report
April 6, 2006 1:40pm
Brian (Shadowfoot)

Interesting comments defending the actions. I wonder how commenters would respond if it had been a gay male student with a male teacher.
0 0
Report
April 6, 2006 3:19pm
Eleanor

I think all the ‘boys and girls are different’ comments are missing the point. Sure, this kid may or may not be psychologically scarred by this incident but this isn’t just about a 13-year-old child who was sexually abused. It’s also about a 34-year-old woman who had sex with a child.

A person who has sex with children is a paedophile, and that is exactly what we should call this woman. She is a danger to the students in her care and probably severely mentally ill.

The male commentators probably identify with the boy in this case, but it should be remembered there is also a woman involved, a sick, perverted woman.
0 0
Report
April 6, 2006 9:27pm
James

A pedophile is someone who has sexual interest in PRE-pubersent children….not teenagers.It may be against the law and iccky but it ain’t pedophila.It must be remembered that our current views and laws on the age of sexual consent are at varience with our biology which has us ready for sex and reproduction from about 13 up and which our ancestors had no problem with.In the early days of the US it was common for children as young as 10 to be in relationships and treated as adults.To modern eyes this is just wrong but we have to remember that its only thanks to Capitalism and the rise of wealth levels that ended this practice as parents could educate their kids and allow them a longer growing up period before going out into the world.It is in no ones interest for young children in our society to be sexually active and reproducing and all that goes with it but lets respect the facts of reality that sex is a natural process and children are sexual beings…as offputting as that fact may be to us.
0 0
Report
April 7, 2006 6:25am
Logix

the difference between girls and boys is not just a matter of plumbing. Men think and behave differently than women. Speak differently even.

So on this basis you think they should be treated differently under the law?
0 0
Report
April 7, 2006 7:23am
mikeybill

What if a 16 year old ( of either sex) has sex with a 13 year old – is that paedophilia? or a 14 year old with a 12 year old?

Where and how is the line drawn?
0 0
Report
April 7, 2006 7:26am

« A day in the life of the Foreign Minister

Former Labour candidate charged with fraud »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 13K other subscribers

Highlights

Target achieved II
Good progress on attendance
Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments

Top Stories

General Debate 03 June 2026
Another British policing scandal
General Debate 04 June 2026
A win for democracy
Meet the Greens - ACC
Democrat says lock up the Jews
$600k on a website for a building!
Abolishing HR
General Debate 02 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour

Recent Posts

Abolishing HR 4 June 2026
General Debate 04 June 2026 4 June 2026
Meet the Greens – ACC 4 June 2026
Democrat says lock up the Jews 3 June 2026
Another British policing scandal 3 June 2026
General Debate 03 June 2026 3 June 2026
A win for democracy 3 June 2026
$600k on a website for a building! 2 June 2026
Set housing outcomes not outputs 2 June 2026
General Debate 02 June 2026 2 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour 2 June 2026
Which language should be used first? 1 June 2026

Recent Comments

General Debate 04 June 2026
Steve Todd
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ian Boag
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
Abolishing HR
Inandout
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
MCōs
Abolishing HR
artemisia
Abolishing HR
David Garrett
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
artemisia
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
peterwn
General Debate 04 June 2026
MCōs
General Debate 04 June 2026
Jethrod

Links

"The principal view of human laws is, or ought always to be, to explain, protect, and enforce such rights as are absolute, which in themselves are few and simple."
Not PC
The response to Budget 2026 has been unusually muted
Point of Order
You know what “does not pass the sniff test”? Labour’s incremental response to blatant corruption – this is why they plunged 7.5%
The Daily Blog
When is a Free Speech Union not a Free Speech Union?
The Standard
We Are a Country That Decided Housing Was The Economy
No Minister
My Opening Statement for the UATX Caplan-Jones Immigration Rematch
Utopia
Woman of the day
Hompaddock
Playing with numbers.
Kiwipolitico
A crime
No Right Turn
Another non-tariff barrier
Offsetting Behaviour
Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 18
Stats Chat
Budget 2026
NZCPR
UK Conversion Therapy Ban, Digital ID, Rallies, Elections
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A central banker’s fiction
Croaking Cassandra
THE WORKING FROM HOME RACKET BY PUBLIC SERVANTS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Get Vaccinated Tomorrow Or Shut Your Pie Hole
Cactus Kate
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker

[email protected]

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2026 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d