About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

July 27, 2007 5:49pm by David Farrar

Winston on You Tube

This should be saved for election year!

Hat Tip: Mike Heine

Share this:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment30

Uncategorised
Winston First

Related Stories

Winston does have some support though
Peters on Foreign Affairs in 1996
Hosking on Ardern and Winston

Comments (30)

Login to comment or vote

Michael S

That was one of the BEST I’ve ever seen on yout ube.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 5:59pm
manu

The perfect end to a perfect day. Excellent!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 5:59pm
Graeme Edgeler

“This should be saved for election year!”

Except that the person responsible for it would have to include their name and full residential address on the YouTube page and file a statutory declaration with Google…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 7:01pm
Inventory2

Great stuff!! Not of course that we should approve of politicians being satirised and mocked – no, that would never do he he he…….
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 7:13pm
Brian

That was from Mondays Facelift show
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 7:33pm
Frank

Many a truth spoken in jest!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 7:38pm
Michael

just beautiful, beautiful…. put that one aside dpf.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 7:39pm
roger nome

my favorite bit is the part about Bob Clarckson – just hillarious!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 8:00pm
ZenTiger

The Politicians want to ban satire of politicians.

But, it’s not really satire if its true, isn’t it?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 9:06pm
nzsyzygy

yeah baby yeah! how good is this? superb!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 10:22pm
Deane Jessep

Heh, heh, great stuff, got me thinking that the last line works several ways; for example:

…make a more permanent mark, we’ll all celebrate the announcement:

“That your greed has brought down, Helen Clarkkkkkkkk”
“That you have been rolled, by Ron Markkkkkkkkk”

etc…

Definitely file that one away.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 27, 2007 10:59pm
Redbaiter

“my favorite bit is the part about Bob Clarckson – just hillarious!”

If we had more real people like Bob Clarkson, and a hell of a lot less of indoctrinated loony left wing robots like Roger Nome, this country might be ble to claw its way out of the hole its in. Sadly, the left wing loons are in the majority, so it looks we’re fucked for some time yet.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 28, 2007 12:21am
Porcupine

You’ve gotta love Facelift

Clarkson is borderline Schollum and co isn’t he RB?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 28, 2007 10:22am
David Farrar

Porcupine – I’d be very very careful with what you are suggesting.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 28, 2007 10:41am
peterquixote

yous donts want to worry about porcupine fara,
he mean well,
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 28, 2007 1:32pm
peterquixote

also, another thing,
Winston correct,
we are in a financial crisis,
we do not rule our own economy,
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 28, 2007 1:35pm
Redbaiter

“Clarkson is borderline Schollum and co isn’t he RB?”

Clarkson like all of us, has his flaws, but its pretty nasty to make a smear like that based on the mainstream media and their obvious campaign to discredit the man. Much of the smug and simpering NZ media, indoctrinated as they are with politically correct Marxist doctrines, don’t like Clarkson because he doesn’t think like them. He still owns his own mind.

The reality is that he is a man of some achievements, and to be so, he must be capable of clear thinking. Merely because he refuses to subscribe to views that the Marxist academic left social hierarchy deem fashionable is no reason to malign Clarkson. To attempt to align him with a gang of alleged rapists because he is not politically correct is just a cowardly smear.

Clarkson, whatever human flaws he may possess does not deserve to be denigrated merely because he does not subscribe to fashionable PC social mores. Rather, his achievements and successes should be acknowledged. He is I repeat, a far more worthy citizen of this country than the likes of non achieving parasitical Marxist academics like Roger Nome who have for decades waged a social and political campaign that has brought this country to lows it has never before sunk to. (and they will take it a lot lower before it eventually bottoms out)

Clarkson is overall a clear positive. Roger and his mates are a clear negative. More like Clarkson will raise living standards in this country and allow us all to prosper. More like Roger, as times show us all too well, will bring us social decay, poverty and despair.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 9:19am
Porcupine

OK DPF and RB, my unfounded insinuation based on the MSM campaign was out of line. DPF, you are welcome to remove my comment.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 11:25am
roger nome

“He is I repeat, a far more worthy citizen of this country than the likes of non achieving parasitical Marxist academics like Roger Nome who have for decades waged a social and political campaign that has brought this country to lows it has never before sunk to.”

Who are you calling a Marxist Baiter? In fact I’m placed in about the middle of the lefty liberal quadrant on the political compass. A Marxist would be placed on the far left, and like you, would be well into the authoritarian territory. So give me a break, you probably don’t even no what a Marxist is. In fact I’ll bet my left testicle that you’ve never picked up, let alone read any of Marx’s books.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 12:26pm
peterquixote

but roger, honestly who would read karl marx,
when there are so many good comic books,
and pictures of girls mn things in them magazine,
i saw this good picture of heather roy once.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 7:08pm
Redbaiter

A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 7:21pm
Redbaiter

“Who are you calling a Marxist Baiter?”

So which part of that euphemism for legislative theft, “from each according to ability to each according to need” do you disagree with?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 7:25pm
roger nome

“A communist is someone who reads Marx”

The implication being that anyone who has ever read marx is so convinced by the self-evident truth of his work that they imediately become marxists? No wonder you refuse to read any marx, you’re so afraid that you’ll find his argument so persausive that you’ll become a filthy communist! Wonderful!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 7:26pm
roger nome

“from each according to ability to each according to need”

not my ideology master baiter – who believes in that these days anyway? Poor baiter, you truly were born in the wrong century. If only you could time travel back to your spiritual home, during the time of McCarthyism in the USA – how happy you would be.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 7:31pm
Redbaiter

“not my ideology”

I’ll enjoy reminding you of that the next time your frothing away on here in defense of socialism with its reliance on progressive taxation and other such forms of “wealth transfer” you worthless half educated commie loon.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 8:00pm
roger nome

Redbaiter:

“I’ll enjoy reminding you of that the next time your frothing away on here in defense of socialism with its reliance on progressive taxation and other such forms of “wealth transfer”

There’s plenty of room in the middle of the political spectrum you know. We all know that you’re a slightly unhinged right-wing extremist, so maybe this effects the way you view others – i.e. someone who is near the centre, like me, to you looks like Stalin – at least this is the impression you give.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 8:40pm
Redbaiter

“We all know”

Who is that “we all” then Phillip? You have been delegated to speak for how many other people, and who are they? Do you have a gang of commie troglodytes just like you with no brains, no wit, and no education there drooling away over your shoulder as you write, or are you just like most brainwashed collectivists, pathologically convinced you’re speaking for the hive, or the school, or the herd, or that imaginary crowd of cheering commies that you delusionally think are thankful for every dimwitted irrational utterance you make on here?

So if you disagree with the foundations of Marxist ideology as you claim, when are you going to write something opposing progressive taxation and other forms of wealth transfer you boring non-comprehending hopelessly confused politically ignorant dumbfuck?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 9:01pm
roger nome

“Who is that “we all” then Phillip? You have been delegated to speak for how many other people, and who are they?”

Many people here have pointed out that you’re a mentally unstable extremest baiter, and juudging by how often you’re here it seems unlikely you have a job. In fact you don’t have one do you? Bloody hypocrite. You would think that you would be greatful for Helen’s hand-outs.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 9:23pm
Redbaiter

You didn’t answer the questions Phillip. Who are the people who have delegated you the right to speak for them? What are their names? How many of them are there? When are you going to write something expressing your disagrement with the maxim that underpins Marxism, that ideology you said was “not yours”?

..as for your pathetic and cowardly false allegations, so typically Stalinist. Falsely accused of joblessness, (and insanity, a typical totalitarian ploy) tried in a kangaroo court and sent off to the gulags right?. Jezuz Phillip, you are one repulsive little commie slimeball.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 29, 2007 9:37pm
roger nome

So no job then Baiter? On the mental health sickness benefit perhaps? Not that I have anything against that normally, it’s just that you are always slagging off the welfare state when you are so clearly a beneficiary of its generosity. Just doesn’t make much sense.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
July 30, 2007 9:36am

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Comings and Goings

Daily Show on NZ Satire ban »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 13K other subscribers

Highlights

Target achieved II
Good progress on attendance
Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments

Top Stories

General Debate 03 June 2026
Another British policing scandal
General Debate 04 June 2026
A win for democracy
Abolishing HR
Meet the Greens - ACC
Democrat says lock up the Jews
$600k on a website for a building!
Words that are now meaningless
General Debate 02 June 2026

Recent Posts

Words that are now meaningless 4 June 2026
Abolishing HR 4 June 2026
General Debate 04 June 2026 4 June 2026
Meet the Greens – ACC 4 June 2026
Democrat says lock up the Jews 3 June 2026
Another British policing scandal 3 June 2026
General Debate 03 June 2026 3 June 2026
A win for democracy 3 June 2026
$600k on a website for a building! 2 June 2026
Set housing outcomes not outputs 2 June 2026
General Debate 02 June 2026 2 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour 2 June 2026

Recent Comments

General Debate 04 June 2026
Jack5
Words that are now meaningless
Maggy Wassilieff
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ra Henare
Words that are now meaningless
Maggy Wassilieff
Words that are now meaningless
CJames
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
Words that are now meaningless
David Garrett
Words that are now meaningless
David Garrett
Words that are now meaningless
Maggy Wassilieff
Words that are now meaningless
Charlotte Wells
Words that are now meaningless
CJames
General Debate 04 June 2026
David George
General Debate 04 June 2026
virtualmark
Abolishing HR
imalwaysright
Words that are now meaningless
mandk

Links

Parliament fails to defend transparency
No Right Turn
"The principal view of human laws is, or ought always to be, to explain, protect, and enforce such rights as are absolute, which in themselves are few and simple."
Not PC
Word of the day
Hompaddock
The response to Budget 2026 has been unusually muted
Point of Order
You know what “does not pass the sniff test”? Labour’s incremental response to blatant corruption – this is why they plunged 7.5%
The Daily Blog
When is a Free Speech Union not a Free Speech Union?
The Standard
We Are a Country That Decided Housing Was The Economy
No Minister
My Opening Statement for the UATX Caplan-Jones Immigration Rematch
Utopia
Playing with numbers.
Kiwipolitico
Another non-tariff barrier
Offsetting Behaviour
Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 18
Stats Chat
Budget 2026
NZCPR
UK Conversion Therapy Ban, Digital ID, Rallies, Elections
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A central banker’s fiction
Croaking Cassandra
THE WORKING FROM HOME RACKET BY PUBLIC SERVANTS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Get Vaccinated Tomorrow Or Shut Your Pie Hole
Cactus Kate
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker

[email protected]

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2026 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d