The Dom Post editorial does not approve of the secret donations:
Lest anyone has forgotten, it should be remembered that the donation is not a donation in the commonly understood sense of the word. It is NZ First’s response to having been caught misspending $158,000 of public money during the 2005 election campaign. …
But giving $158,000, taken from the public purse, to outside organisations does not constitute repayment of a debt. Nor does refusing to name the recipients, something he had previously undertaken to do, lend credibility to the exercise. Mr Peters says he has decided not to name the charities because he does not want them bothered by the “prying media”.
That is a one-fingered salute to those who hold to the quaint notion that politicians should be accountable for how they spend public money.
It is also unsatisfactory. Who is to say that NZ First does not regard the Re-elect Winston Campaign in Tauranga or, for that matter, NZ First itself, as charities?
By retrospectively changing the law, the Government obviated the legal requirement for politicians to repay the money they unlawfully spent. But the moral obligation to comply with the law of the day remains. NZ First has not met it.
If no other benefit arises, Mr Peters’ reluctance to do the right thing serves as a useful reminder of how a politician positioning himself to once again act as a post-election kingmaker, operates.
Mr Peters has made a reasonable fist of being foreign minister, though as a minister outside Cabinet who opposes New Zealand’s landmark free trade deal with China he is an international oddity. But voters know he remains a law unto himself and one whose principal priority appears to be to ensure he is reinstalled as foreign minister whichever party heads the next government.
Says it all really.