Trevor on teachers’name supression

Trevor Mallard blogs:

– mainly on Sundays – and especially Cam Slater have been frustrated with ' Council rules that make it very hard to hear cases in public. share their concerns. There is almost no way to have suppression orders because the maximum fine for a breach is $1k which deters no one.

The Council is understandably reluctant to identifying victims especially of but their rules don't let them identify accused and not the victim – and won't change with the current fine level.

This breeds rumours and false conclusions.

I've got two SoPs one very simple which increases the fine to $100k and would leave the Teachers' Council to rewrite the rules. The second, below, is more comprehensive and adopts the position that Simon Power is promoting for the Courts. It has a presumption of an open hearing.

I agree with a presumption of open hearings. I also agree that if you have name supression, you need a larger maximum fine than $1,000 to be effective. However $100,000 is too much considering this is just for a professional disciplinary board – not an actual court.

You can read the proposed SOP in full at Red Alert, and comment either there or here on what you think.

It's a good example of MPs using blogging to get feedback on proposed law changes.